ライフサイエンスコーパス: carryover

1 ification of the wash procedure to eliminate carryover.

2 automated, high-throughput analyses without carryover.

3 ciency, with no evidence of sample-to-sample carryover.

4 ession of NRF-1 did not result from maternal carryover.

5 ct (C-->D), there was very little detectable carryover.

6 well as elimination of any potential sample carryover.

7 mitigate the impact of membrane fouling and carryover.

8 l design and surfactant tailoring can reduce carryover.

9 I-MS signal with 94-99% accuracy and without carryover.

10 cation, intraday and interday precision, and carryover.

11 continuously cleaned the system, eliminating carryover.

12 aspirate" operation results in a higher 3.6% carryover.

13 y and matrix effect, dilution linearity, and carryover.

14 derived from a PNT blastocyst with 4% mtDNA carryover.

15 ceptable reproducibility (<30%), and lack of carryover.

16 ing the extraction efficiency and desorption carryover.

17 arcoal-containing agar to reduce clofazimine carryover.

18 n lung against a background of oropharyngeal carryover.

19 rapid extraction of multiple samples without carryover.

20 nse and reduce band broadening and/or solute carryovers.

21 nkers with beneficial effects that appear to carryover after discontinuation of memantine treatment.

22 A significant after-effect (carryover) also occurred when a subject prism-adapted re

23 but also offers a means for decontaminating carryover amplicons.

24 , requiring less than 5 s per sample without carryover and 1 s per sample, accepting minor cross cont

25 Zygote small RNAs exhibit extensive maternal carryover and an apparent lack of paternal contribution,

26 an enzymatic digestion step to eliminate PCR carryover and an exogenous internal positive control tha

27 raction chromatography to mitigate detergent carryover and improve liquid chromatography-mass spectro

28 Adding acetonitrile to sample eliminated carryover and improved LOD by 1.4- to 60-fold.

29 espite growing interest, the amount of CH(4) carryover and influx from the sewer and its impacts on o

30 substantial loss in recovery, no observable carryover and no need for 'reactivation' of the PC surfa

31 It also eliminates sample-to-sample carryover and the requirement of instrument cleaning bet

32 a. 180 h(-1) (on the Mini 12) with no sample carryover and with inline derivatization in the case of

33 njection system did not show any significant carryover, and after thousands of injections, the system

34 f the in-cell detection, sample recovery and carryover, and overall repeatability of light-induced de

35 , together with the probe's reproducibility, carryover, and recovery.

36 subfemtomole detection sensitivity, minimal carryover, and robust and stable electrospray throughout

37 op to drive cyclic mixing of the diluent and carryover, and two bus valves to control fluidic access

38 oughput, low-volume, noncontact, and minimal-carryover approach for characterization of liquids.

39 onsistent performance over many days without carryover, as long as washing buffers specific to each m

40 ace (OPSI) system as a simple noncontact, no-carryover, automated system for flow injection analysis

41 such as symmetrical peak shapes, low sample carryover (below 1%), and total injection cycle times of

42 .81, 95% CI 0.67-0.98; p=0.03), although the carryover benefit was smaller after 8 years.

43 at cells are analyzed rapidly, and no signal carryover between cells is observed.

44 No detectable carryover between runs was noted for the sputtered fiber

45 quired in a square wave profile with minimal carryover between samples that enhances throughput and e

46 ny common fluid path, presents a low risk of carryover between successive analyses.

47 The method showed good sensitivity, without carryover between the samples.

48 owing high consistency (11% CV) and very low carryover between wells.

49 ite blood cell yield, 0.0059% red blood cell carryover) by processing whole blood at 3 mL/min, or app

50 Carryover color in the whey fluid is one of the major ch

51 body transfer possesses minimal donor mtDNA carryover compared to the F1 generation from other proce

52 ster and more rugged extraction with reduced carryover compared with results obtained under laminar-f

53 The closed-tube system reduces the risk of carryover contamination and supports high throughput.

54 False-positive results due to carryover contamination are prevented by the incorporati

55 We did find minimal carryover contamination in autosampler field controls.

56 size, some systematic biases, and low-level carryover contamination in Illumina reads continue to ma

57 encing runs (>30) with negligible amounts of carryover contamination or degradation in the sequencing

58 ing results, virtual elimination of amplicon carryover contamination, and equivalent costs compared t

59 suggested as a possible means to prevent PCR carryover contamination.

60 assay simplified the workflow and minimized carryover contamination.

61 on per ml, we were unable to demonstrate any carryover cross-contamination of negative samples.

62 ClvR (tko) results in germline and maternal carryover-dependent inactivation of melanogaster tko (>9

63 included in a fast event-related, continuous carryover design.

64 We tested carryover during array printing with dye solution, label

65 To minimize carryover during droplet deposition, a strategy was impl

66 troduced into human oocytes by mitochondrial carryover during nuclear transfer often vanish, they can

67 ally higher rRNA:mRNA ratios and higher rRNA carryover during RNA-seq analysis.

68 independent of the degree of the beneficial carryover effect after aromatase inhibitor therapy or th

69 improvement at 5 years is consistent with a carryover effect and further supports the use of abemaci

70 s), nor was there a significant differential carryover effect from one period to the next.

71 strongly by their past, and describing this carryover effect is important to accurately forecast the

72 nt effect on carnivore efficiency suggests a carryover effect of algal quality across 3 trophic level

73 find weak evidence for a short-term negative carryover effect of migration on body condition, but thi

74 ction P = .005), perhaps reflecting a longer carryover effect of tamoxifen.

75 owever, the strength and persistence of this carryover effect on ecosystem dynamics in comparison to

76 Neither a period nor differential carryover effect was observed.

77 No significant carryover effect was observed.

78 restarting SD after DD treatment, a possible carryover effect was seen for several biological markers

79 were analyzed for a direct and a first-order carryover effect, there was a significant difference in

80 L) could be directly analyzed without sample carryover effect, thereby enabling high-throughput analy

81 tation during the previous summer had a weak carryover effect, with migrants switching slightly more

82 nsiveness while reducing the likelihood of a carryover effect.

83 Without carryover effects (i.e., initial transfer from the 32- a

84 rossover design showed significant (p<0.005) carryover effects (ie, lasting longer than 1 week).

85 ents, and food-chain length and suggest that carryover effects across multiple trophic levels are imp

86 aradigm, we tested for pre- to post-fledging carryover effects among 20 coexisting species (nine foca

87 key factor generating pre- to post-fledging carryover effects among songbirds, and demonstrate how m

88 low as approximately 0.1% are identified and carryover effects are minimized in high-throughput on-li

89 Carryover effects are particularly relevant in young ani

90 Carryover effects broadly influence adult performance an

91 thereby provide novel evidence that thermal carryover effects can generate assortative mating and se

92 exposure directly to foraging adults and via carryover effects from past exposure reduced reproductio

93 Carryover effects had profound implications for populati

94 olled trial that was balanced for period and carryover effects in 28 healthy, young-adult men.

95 This problem, especially involving carryover effects in crossover trials, is well recognize

96 es of corals, despite a growing knowledge of carryover effects in other systems.

97 netic and/or egg-provisioning legacies, with carryover effects modifying growth among years.

98 Our results indicate that carryover effects of even highly divergent migratory str

99 312 kcal/d; P < 0.0001), perhaps because of carryover effects of gut adaptations during the first 2

100 represents a powerful opportunity to explore carryover effects of migration.

101 ated the effects of current exposure and the carryover effects of past insecticide exposure on the in

102 Our finding suggests that beneficial carryover effects of spring growth on summer growth are

103 d in the autoregressive model, adjusting for carryover effects of the depressive disorders across the

104 Direct and carryover effects of treatment were compared in the two

105 We found evidence for pre- to post-fledging carryover effects of wing development in all species, by

106 Furthermore, our findings suggest that carryover effects operating at the species level ultimat

107 In songbirds, pre- to post-fledging carryover effects operating within species may be critic

108 Autoregressive models accounting for carryover effects over time were conducted to further ev

109 trained with small sets (e.g., 8 items) have carryover effects that hamper transfer when the training

110 subject treatment comparisons were made, and carryover effects were evaluated.

111 No carryover effects were observed.

112 when the drug was actually present (i.e., no carryover effects), increased cell firing also parallele

113 ts such as precision and accuracy, recovery, carryover effects, and analyte stability were all quanti

114 mechanistic understanding and prediction of carryover effects, and emphasize that local conservation

115 apid near-Nernstian response with negligible carryover effects, and good resiliency against various m

116 somatosensory activity over and above visual carryover effects, we recorded EEG activity from two gro

117 morphological traits may generate important carryover effects, whereby conditions experienced during

118 ure, confounding via non-shared factors, and carryover effects.

119 ubjects analysis) are primarily shown due to carryover effects.

120 e reused after regeneration of beads with no carryover effects.

121 he current stage or time, potential delayed "carryover" effects from past exposure at a different lif

122 the 12 animals given CX516 did not exhibit "carryover" effects of the drug to the intervening (vehic

123 on age and gender, as well as demonstrating "carryover" effects.

124 ion, can be monitored simultaneously without carryover for several hours.

125 varying the valve placement in the circuit, carryover fractions from 0.04 to 0.2 were obtained.

126 oval of liquids from the reaction vessel for carryover-free operations.

127 containing fluorescent Ags, suggestive of Ag carryover from HBEC to EMP.

128 MS/MS) analysis indicated significant sample carryover from previous injections of authentic standard

129 te that, by increasing the pressure, protein carryover from run to run is reduced and in some cases e

130 nsitivity due to exposure to extra surfaces, carryover from run to run, and increased dead volume.

131 0.5 and 0.75 ng/mL, respectively; persistent carryover from the autosampler limited the LOQ achievabl

132 This suggests Hg carryover from winter to summer periods and that variati

133 The potential of Hg carryover from wintering sites indicates that Hg concent

134 Specifically, protein carryover ("ghosting") and recovery were examined.

135 ng between samples with no detectible sample carryover has been performed.

136 , the consequences of small amounts of mtDNA carryover have not been studied sufficiently.

137 imed to (i) correct for background noise and carryover, (ii) detect signal drifts and "out-of-control

138 n, multiplication, and division, including a carryover into multiple cells.

139 y eliminates the mRNA complement, preventing carryover into the next cycle.

140 approaches, such as speed, reproducibility, carryover, ion suppression, as well as sample preparatio

141 The response base width for 1% carryover is <95 s, permitting a throughput of 38 sample

142 context-dependent and that the magnitude of carryover is dependent on the VR in which adaptation occ

143 Carryover is inconsequential in the ESI emitter and betw

144 At top speed, less than 1% analyte carryover is observed from well-to-well, and signal inte

145 Carryover issues were mitigated by using a washing step

146 on in internal volumes and associated sample carryover issues will be among the first simple improvem

147 to explain growth rate dynamics, but that a carryover model where 'epigenetic' memory is imperfectly

148 low chromatographic reproducibility and high carryover), nonspecific binding of analyte to containers

149 ntration-based response and sample-to-sample carryover of <3% were also shown.

150 Carryover of aberrant heritable small RNA responses was

151 UV) laser-induced fluorescence for detecting carryover of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) an

152 ximately 10(9) cells per round) with minimal carryover of cheaters after each round.

153 orm rapid sample preparation with low (0.6%) carryover of contaminants from the original sample.

154 itive results as a result of either amplicon carryover of cross-contamination between patient samples

155 The TPW reduces carryover of extraction buffers, phase-separates from th

156 The resulting eluent contains NAs and carryover of extraction buffers.

157 Carryover of Hg among seasons and slow changes in [Hg] o

158 lly reduces chromatographic peak tailing and carryover of hydrophobic peptides by implementing less r

159 e reaction product transfer and minimize the carryover of incompatible buffer for three consecutive e

160 Here, we demonstrate pervasive carryover of inhibitory buffers into eluent when several

161 of winter habitat or diet suggesting minimal carryover of isotopic signatures.

162 nstrated greater than 98% recovery and a low carryover of less than 0.3% for the analytical scale mas

163 vides multiple layers of protection from the carryover of mitotic chromosome segregation patterns int

164 Genetic analysis confirmed minimal carryover of mtDNA following MST.

165 We speculate that carryover of passenger donor lymphocytes within the tran

166 ixed selectivity and were not explainable by carryover of previous firing into the current trial or b

167 hat no anomalous amplification occurs due to carryover of primers or incomplete digestion from the en

168 importance of interrogating and eliminating carryover of ssDNA donor templates in assessing various

169 priate discrimination in both tasks, with no carryover of the approach-relevant discrimination to the

170 tions of TEs, primarily due to the potential carryover of weakly adsorbed TEs (e.g., Ni and Cu) on th

171 No carryover or sequence effects were observed, and melaton

172 SCUSSION: DMF appeared generally safe and no carryover PML among investigated cases was observed.

173 Carryover potential was subsequently assessed by perform

174 Analyte carryover problem encountered was solved by adding 20% a

175 sing recovery and matrix effect, autosampler carryover, run size, stability, and data reproducibility

176 t (V-->D), there was a significantly smaller carryover than from both D-->V and D-->C.

177 For alpha-ionone, being most prone for carryover, the three times higher OT of consumers did no

178 We found evidence of progenitor diversity carryover through multiple hybridization events and show

179 then prisms were removed, there was a large carryover to initial reaches in Video or Cursor (D-->V a

180 The importance of reducing carryover to the lowest possible levels is highlighted b

181 Reduction of sample carryover to the next run (up to 2 to 3%) and decreased

182 Here, we show that vegetation growth carryover (VGC), defined as the effect of present states

183 iation of 0.1-0.5% for standard samples, and carryover was below 0.2% without intermediate washing.

184 No system carryover was detected even when the same device was use

185 of S1P and DHS1P without significant sample carryover was developed.

186 Analyte-dependent carryover was minimized by including wash droplets compo

187 After optimization, mtDNA carryover was reduced to <2% in the majority (79%) of PN

188 le in one extraction with only 0.5% residual carryover, whereas a traditional "spin-down and aspirate

189 lines bears the risk of unintentional aroma carryover, which has led to accusations of illegal aroma

190 elines of good manufacturing practice, aroma carryover with no sensory relevance shall be considered