ライフサイエンスコーパス: catalytic efficiency

1 es of a component (e.g., binding strength or catalytic efficiency).

2 n of the stimulatory effect of Tat on P-TEFb catalytic efficiency.

3 horylation, providing a 7.4-fold increase in catalytic efficiency.

4 ansformations and can strongly influence the catalytic efficiency.

5 t HDL essential for optimal LCAT binding and catalytic efficiency.

6 trate ARPP, with AtcpFHy/PyrP1 having higher catalytic efficiency.

7 , and resulting in partial permanent loss of catalytic efficiency.

8 eservation in both LCAT binding affinity and catalytic efficiency.

9 ained using pinacolborane with unprecedented catalytic efficiency.

10 d drug affinity is limited by a trade-off in catalytic efficiency.

11 vers compared with APX2 without compromising catalytic efficiency.

12 itical for both LCAT binding to HDL and LCAT catalytic efficiency.

13 unctional enzymes and just one has very high catalytic efficiency.

14 efficiently improve the enzyme activity and catalytic efficiency.

15 used yeast-display evolution to improve its catalytic efficiency.

16 both correct and mispair formation with high catalytic efficiency.

17 eacts with CO2 and produces CO with the same catalytic efficiency.

18 s but rather through directly increasing its catalytic efficiency.

19 gn and construct a 3D hybrid to maximize the catalytic efficiency.

20 llyl complex that greatly diminished overall catalytic efficiency.

21 an free enzymes while maintaining comparable catalytic efficiency.

22 hydrogen abstraction and thus result in low catalytic efficiency.

23 DNA and nucleotides, resulting in diminished catalytic efficiency.

24 s revealed position 596 also plays a role in catalytic efficiency.

25 acid addition enhances their selectivity and catalytic efficiency.

26 levels, enzyme product profiles, and enzyme catalytic efficiency.

27 inal domain of the enzyme that may lower its catalytic efficiency.

28 loying can significantly the improve overall catalytic efficiency.

29 nd, which controls substrate specificity and catalytic efficiency.

30 al cluster/support systems to achieve higher catalytic efficiency.

31 eugenol and also of isoeugenol with a lower catalytic efficiency.

32 he lipid moiety significantly influenced the catalytic efficiency.

33 parent actin affinity, resulting in a higher catalytic efficiency.

34 anges in the enzyme's binding properties and catalytic efficiency.

35 s synthetic organophosphates with remarkable catalytic efficiency.

36 for the microtubule, thus controlling their catalytic efficiency.

37 radients that dictate heat and mass flow and catalytic efficiency.

38 lation impeded substrate binding and reduced catalytic efficiency.

39 achieved without location-dependent loss of catalytic efficiency.

40 rate binding and its relationship to overall catalytic efficiency.

41 nhances enzymatic hydroxylation and improves catalytic efficiency.

42 pplications are limited because of their low catalytic efficiency.

43 reductive elimination reaction with greater catalytic efficiency.

44 f such an intermediate may determine overall catalytic efficiency.

45 pressure to maintain binding affinity and/or catalytic efficiency.

46 g that helical mobility is important for ICH catalytic efficiency.

47 ntial structural changes that can affect PKA catalytic efficiency.

48 plexes that promote substrate channeling and catalytic efficiency.

49 nal contacts with protein substrates enhance catalytic efficiency.

50 rea of these materials and hence improve the catalytic efficiency.

51 and present comparable, extremely high COox catalytic efficiency.

52 ate-limiting step over a 10(4)-fold range of catalytic efficiency.

53 cess the same substrates, but with different catalytic efficiencies.

54 lyglutamylated forms of CH2-THF with similar catalytic efficiencies.

55 statistics between mutations determine their catalytic efficiencies.

56 kininogen (HK) to release bradykinin with a catalytic efficiency ~1500-fold lower than that of kalli

57 Recombinant SIRT6 displays catalytic efficiencies 2 orders of magnitude greater for

58 ctivity in reduction of l-cystine, where the catalytic efficiency (2,217 min(-1)microM(-1)) coupled t

59 aved and inactivated by plasmin in solution (catalytic efficiency = 8.3 x 10(3) M(-1)s(-1)).

60 eaction system showed significantly enhanced catalytic efficiency, about 30 fold higher than that of

61 The CocH-Fc not only has a high catalytic efficiency against cocaine but also, like an a

62 There is little correlation in catalytic efficiencies among the five caspases, suggesti

63 Catalytic efficiencies and intrinsic scanning distances

64 The mechanism and origins of catalytic efficiencies and selectivities of these reacti

65 ally distinct categories based on both their catalytic efficiencies and their sequence-structural rel

66 e with a 2 order of magnitude improvement in catalytic efficiency and a mixture of zinc and manganese

67 Our results suggest that the reduced catalytic efficiency and a propensity of GlnRS mutants t

68 yst was recycled two times with some loss of catalytic efficiency and a small erosion of ee.

69 spread C(4) decarboxylase, has increased its catalytic efficiency and acquired regulatory properties

70 The reduced enzyme displayed improved catalytic efficiency and decreased effectiveness of subs

71 was identified as a novel esterase with high catalytic efficiency and distinct evolutionary origin fr

72 which outcompete the plant enzyme RuBisCO in catalytic efficiency and fidelity by more than an order

73 ing the modification order and enhancing the catalytic efficiency and fidelity of the synthetase.

74 xins, decamer formation is important for the catalytic efficiency and has been associated with an enh

75 gment 1 (S1) containing A1 (S1A1) has higher catalytic efficiency and higher affinity for actin than

76 EPSPSs with high catalytic efficiency and insensitivity to glyphosate are

77 The catalytic efficiency and k(cat) displayed that ProS were

78 However, low catalytic efficiency and poor selectivity, especially in

79 me performance, calculated as the product of catalytic efficiency and relative expression level, was

80 Enzymes, though capable of high catalytic efficiency and remarkable reaction selectivity

81 Furthermore, we show that the catalytic efficiency and selectivity toward a rhomboid s

82 atalyzes azido-Ala in place of Gly with high catalytic efficiency and selectivity.

83 tural and/or electronic factors that control catalytic efficiency and selectivity.

84 of phage HL is functionally independent, its catalytic efficiency and specificity is influenced by th

85 paradigms for understanding the evolution of catalytic efficiency and specificity, the use of bioinfo

86 m (GndHCl) = 0.53 M], without altering their catalytic efficiency and stereoselectivity properties.

87 NA(Pyl-opt) had no significant effect on the catalytic efficiency and substrate binding of PylRS enzy

88 , which include 4 M KCl, the enzyme exhibits catalytic efficiency and substrate saturation at metabol

89 ation of HAD hydrolases contributes to their catalytic efficiency and substrate specificity.

90 led >3 order of magnitude reductions in both catalytic efficiency and substrate stringency.

91 ect nt T opposite 3-dMeA with a much reduced catalytic efficiency and that both Pols exhibit a high p

92 revealed an intriguing relationship between catalytic efficiency and the base employed in the cross-

93 plays a crucial role in determining both the catalytic efficiency and the chemo-, regio- and enantios

94 llowed by PAGE-based assays to determine the catalytic efficiency and the misinsertion frequency oppo

95 he dimeric structure contributed to the high catalytic efficiency and the stability.

96 availability of a range of enzymes with high catalytic efficiency and well defined substrate specific

97 respect to their substrate binding affinity, catalytic efficiency, and catalytic mechanism.

98 e of its primary kinetic isotope effect, low catalytic efficiency, and elevated enthalpy of activatio

99 dsr1 also showed low succinate affinity, low catalytic efficiency, and increased resistance to SDH co

100 lay significantly reduced substrate binding, catalytic efficiency, and inhibitor binding.

101 and specificity, oxidative regioselectivity, catalytic efficiency, and stability.

102 also showed excellent binding affinities and catalytic efficiencies approaching that of natural enzym

103 ystems and cooperation between them for high catalytic efficiency are two major events in biology.

104 MFAT exhibited much higher catalytic efficiency as a synthase of 11-cis-REs versus

105 against 6-thio-dGTP, inserting with similar catalytic efficiency as dGTP.

106 iL can result in up to a 20-fold increase in catalytic efficiency as well as enhancement in polymer m

107 rticle shapes display significantly enhanced catalytic efficiency at 40 degrees C.

108 of protein cleavage sites and found similar catalytic efficiencies between the protein and peptide s

109 In contrast, (Ss)RidA-2 had a generally low catalytic efficiency, but showed a relatively higher act

110 prp8 RH alleles link splicing fidelity with catalytic efficiency by biasing the relative stabilities

111 tion at Val-216 that leads to an increase in catalytic efficiency by increasing kcat, but not signifi

112 We also show that altered catalytic efficiency by millimolar changes in free basal

113 hermophilus UDGa to QD doublet increases the catalytic efficiency by over one hundred-fold and sevent

114 capable of sequestering an enzyme and whose catalytic efficiency can be manipulated by the molecular

115 degrade different antibiotics in vitro with catalytic efficiencies comparable to that of an average

116 These clones possess 100-140 fold enhanced catalytic efficiency compared to hASNase1.

117 exhibits a more than three-fold increase in catalytic efficiency compared to the Pt loaded carbon sp

118 However, the catalytic efficiency decreases for larger multiprotein c

119 sults show that inside the cell the apparent catalytic efficiency decreases, and Km increases with in

120 in the reactions of HPNP, GpU, and UpU, the catalytic efficiency depends very little on whether the

121 s is also operational in vivo, enhancing the catalytic efficiency during the final electron transfer

122 BiFae1B showed low catalytic efficiencies for both substrates.

123 The catalytic efficiencies for correct nucleotide insertion

124 The catalytic efficiencies for cyclization of 3-OPP and 4-OP

125 Common IDH1 mutations have moderate catalytic efficiencies for D2HG production, whereas rare

126 udy, we use quantitative MS to determine the catalytic efficiencies for hundreds of natural protease

127 s found to have 8-fold and 3,500-fold higher catalytic efficiencies for hydrolysis of ISG15-AMC than

128 oxidized and reduced isoforms have different catalytic efficiencies for hydrolysis of MetAP2 peptide

129 that HalM2 and ProcM have markedly different catalytic efficiencies for the various reactions they ca

130 portant strategy to tune and to optimize its catalytic efficiency for a chemical reaction.

131 Both G151D and R150Q exhibit markedly lower catalytic efficiency for adenosine triphosphate hydrolys

132 he alanine with aspartate decreased the GalB catalytic efficiency for CHM by 9.5 x 10(4)-fold, and th

133 cocaine hydrolysis, and obtain a much higher catalytic efficiency for cocaine conversion than for con

134 ate, and hydroxypyruvate, having the highest catalytic efficiency for glyoxylate.

135 mes have different substrate specificity and catalytic efficiency for hydrolysis of both small and ma

136 Importantly, SIRT4 catalytic efficiency for lipoyl- and biotinyl-lysine mod

137 ADHc in vitro displays a 50-fold decrease in catalytic efficiency for NADH production and a significa

138 opposite adducts, with up to 150-fold higher catalytic efficiency for O(6)-MeG over guanine in the te

139 re dependent on the selected position, while catalytic efficiency for p-nitrophenyl acetate hydrolysi

140 3-fold lower than for uninhibited COX-2, the catalytic efficiency for PG formation by the acetylated

141 in-conjugated mono(ADP-ribose), but improved catalytic efficiency for protein-conjugated poly(ADP-rib

142 results show that pol beta has a diminished catalytic efficiency for r8-oxo-GTP compared with canoni

143 It demonstrates high catalytic efficiency for the activation of epoxides, fac

144 Using kinetic assays, we show that the catalytic efficiency for the incorporation of dGTP catal

145 x with almost two orders of magnitude higher catalytic efficiency for xanthosine hydrolysis than obse

146 The specific catalytic efficiency for xylose compared to glucose was

147 activity above which further improvements in catalytic efficiency had little if any effect on growth

148 enase activity of the P450 enzymes, and this catalytic efficiency has inspired protein engineering to

149 e site amino acid trio in determining OleTJE catalytic efficiency in alkene production and in regulat

150 creased ribonucleotide binding and decreased catalytic efficiency in both primer-dependent and de nov

151 er substrate specificity and fine-tune their catalytic efficiency in cells.

152 f this design, HP-MOFs exhibited an enhanced catalytic efficiency in styrene oxidation.

153 line h-BNNS was evidenced by its much higher catalytic efficiency in the dehydrogenation of dodecahyd

154 es, a Ru/F-Phos-POPs catalyst exhibited high catalytic efficiency in the formylation of amines (turno

155 The new biocatalysts demonstrated high catalytic efficiency in the solventless synthesis of iso

156 ide to primase, which correlates with higher catalytic efficiency in vitro.

157 led to a 2 orders of magnitude reduction in catalytic efficiency in vitro.

158 splays the lowest molecular mass and highest catalytic efficiency, in addition to reusability, therma

159 The catalytic efficiency increased 8.4-fold upon cooperative

160 ions, the changes introduced likely improved catalytic efficiency indirectly in both cases by bolster

161 that the remaining barriers to matching the catalytic efficiency ( k(cat)/ K(M)) of native Cu nitrit

162 The catalytic efficiencies (k cat/K m) indicated that cellot

163 likely contributes to its >1300-fold greater catalytic efficiency (k (cat)/K(m) ) on histidine than o

164 ely K23> K18> K27 approximately K36) and the catalytic efficiency (k(cat)/K(m)) for K9, K14, K18, and

165 protein family, similarly to BiuH, and has a catalytic efficiency (k(cat/)K(M)) of 6 x 10(5) M(-1)s(-

166 nmol retinal/mg BCO1 x h, Km = 17.2 muM and catalytic efficiency kcat/Km = 6098 M(-1) min(-1).

167 of these proteases, turnover number kcat and catalytic efficiency kcat/KM, are largely unknown.

168 ubstrates; however, few data exist about the catalytic efficiencies (kcat/KM) of these substrates, wh

169 s only approximately 2-fold greater than the catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km = 1.3 x 10(7) M(-1) s(-1))

170 on or mutation of the PHD domain reduces the catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km of AdoMet) of ATXR5 up to

171 h five of the six clearly exhibiting reduced catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km) at colder temperatures an

172 rface modalities that permit plasma protease catalytic efficiency (kcat/km) determination by MALDI-TO

173 The catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km) for the removal of a myri

174 correlated with neither the logarithm of the catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km) nor catalytic proficiency

175 otide binding in the D2 domain increases the catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km) of D1 ATP hydrolysis 280-

176 less so than mEar 1 and mEar 2; the relative catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km) of mEar 11 is diminished

177 The catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km) of the variant toward the

178 CYP2B35 showed the highest catalytic efficiency (kcat/KM) with 7-heptoxycoumarin as

179 ained in vitro We found the apparent in vivo catalytic efficiency, kcat/Km , to be lower than in vitr

180 The enzyme demonstrates low catalytic efficiency, low thermostability at temperature

181 ity of applications emanate from SaSrtA, low catalytic efficiency, LPXTG specificity restriction, and

182 he observed reductions in actin motility and catalytic efficiency may serve as the mechanistic basis

183 inity for PChlide and an about 6-fold higher catalytic efficiency measured as kcat/Km.

184 d by a fractal Michaelis-Menten model with a catalytic efficiency nearly 17% better than the homogene

185 three single-subunit RNAPs measured from the catalytic efficiencies of correct and all possible incor

186 In this manuscript, a study of the catalytic efficiencies of inorganic oxoanions such as ar

187 specific for NADPH (Km = 18 to 33 muM), with catalytic efficiencies of more than 10-fold higher for N

188 ke advantage of the inherent specificity and catalytic efficiencies of proteins.

189 The system proceeds with a catalytic efficiency of 10(5) M(-1) s(-1) and achieves t

190 BiFae1A showed a catalytic efficiency of 12mM s(-1) on para-nitrophenyl-a

191 a hemithioindigo based molecular motor into catalytic efficiency of a chemical reaction.

192 complex substrate switchgrass increased the catalytic efficiency of a commercial cellulose-degrading

193 Catalytic efficiency of a sphere-shaped nanosized polyox

194 terium tuberculosis, has less than 1% of the catalytic efficiency of a typical natural CM and require

195 The 16-100-fold higher catalytic efficiency of AA initiation sequence relative

196 these results also reveal the origin of the catalytic efficiency of acetic acid in these transformat

197 severe alleles significantly decreasing the catalytic efficiency of actin-activated ATP hydrolysis.

198 of MG in GLO1(-/-) is achieved by increased catalytic efficiency of aldose reductase toward hemithio

199 Gln403 of the OB domain) are crucial for the catalytic efficiency of AsfvLIG.

200 properties similar to human peroxidases, the catalytic efficiency of bromide oxidation (kcat/KM(app))

201 The catalytic efficiency of cholesterylation with D46H is si

202 The catalytic efficiency of class D beta-lactamases depends

203 nally conjugated methylcoumarin enhances the catalytic efficiency of deacetylation catalyzed by cobal

204 The catalytic efficiency of deltaFXII activation by kallikre

205 ate to the catalytic domain and improves the catalytic efficiency of demethylation.

206 In contrast, the catalytic efficiency of dGTP insertion decreases ~20-fol

207 eration of diarylamines and implies that the catalytic efficiency of diarylamine antioxidants is subs

208 led primers because of the intrinsically low catalytic efficiency of DnaG.

209 The catalytic efficiency of E30-6 for cocaine hydrolysis is

210 reliable scaffold to precisely regulate the catalytic efficiency of enzyme cascade reaction with ult

211 The enhanced catalytic efficiency of Gd-IHEP-8 versus Gd-IHEP-7 is at

212 The catalytic efficiency of immobilized PALs correlated with

213 wledge of the factors that contribute to the catalytic efficiency of LGK can be used to improve appli

214 The catalytic efficiency of Li3CARS to produce 3-carene was

215 ional design as a strategy for improving the catalytic efficiency of metalloenzymes in the context of

216 In nature, the catalytic efficiency of multienzyme complexes highly dep

217 The catalytic efficiency of P450s in these non-native transf

218 recognition can be employed to increase the catalytic efficiency of peptide-capped Pd nanoparticles.

219 e effects of substituents and cavity size on catalytic efficiency of proline-rich cyclopeptoids under

220 nts were improved in various degrees and the catalytic efficiency of PULDeltaN5, PULDeltaN45, PULDelt

221 ate kinetic parameters demonstrates that the catalytic efficiency of QNS was severalfold higher for l

222 Whereas the catalytic efficiency of rhinovirus 3C protease is approx

223 ransfer is a viable strategy to increase the catalytic efficiency of ring-opening polymerizations, su

224 case activity plays an essential role in the catalytic efficiency of RNase R.

225 ntrations induce up to a 35-fold increase in catalytic efficiency of SIRT6 but not SIRT1.

226 The catalytic efficiency of TET enzymes is known to be enhan

227 this interaction substantially impaired the catalytic efficiency of Tet proteins in oxidizing 5-mC t

228 rmations is a prerequisite for enhancing the catalytic efficiency of the beta-subunit in the absence

229 The median catalytic efficiency of the computationally selected enz

230 e pump expression level, suggesting improved catalytic efficiency of the dimeric species.

231 They increase the catalytic efficiency of the encapsulated enzymes while s

232 e to degradation and maintained or increased catalytic efficiency of the enzyme in which the desired

233 In contrast, the mutation decreases the catalytic efficiency of the enzyme to 1% at the permissi

234 osteric site of COX-2 results in a decreased catalytic efficiency of the enzyme toward 2-AG, whereas

235 ctivity, deletion of this domain reduced the catalytic efficiency of the enzyme.

236 eraction increases both the processivity and catalytic efficiency of the error-free bypass of a 8-oxo

237 ies revealed that the enantioselectivity and catalytic efficiency of the germanyl-substituted ligands

238 d R1-p53R2 complexes, we found here that the catalytic efficiency of the GSH-Grx system is 4-6 times

239 mutations proved effective in enhancing the catalytic efficiency of the hemoprotein in these reactio

240 This enhanced catalytic efficiency of the immobilized enzyme in presen

241 partment and the cytosol correlated with the catalytic efficiency of the N-myristoyltransferase actin

242 in an approximately 17-fold increase in the catalytic efficiency of the PCM activity and a concomita

243 luorescence of the cells correlated with the catalytic efficiency of the PTE variant expressed in eac

244 The catalytic efficiency of the resulting stereoselective, a

245 t of the complex leads to enhancement of the catalytic efficiency of the SET domain and thus the prop

246 E3-UbcH5B-Ub complex, thereby improving the catalytic efficiency of Ub transfer.

247 the significance of atomic positions on the catalytic efficiency of water oxidation.

248 with H2O2 were tested and compared with the catalytic efficiency of White's parent complex 1.Fe(OTf)

249 f these iron-sulfur clusters and compare the catalytic efficiency of wild-type (WT) Methylorubrum ext

250 f iron and zinc in the active site and had a catalytic efficiency of ~10(3) M(-1) s(-1).

251 al signal of human CYP2A6 and to improve its catalytic efficiency on electrode surfaces.

252 228M-W263M) demonstrates a large increase in catalytic efficiencies over the wild-type enzyme, with i

253 a Cys93-Tyr157 crosslink that increases its catalytic efficiency over 10-fold.

254 s, and which displays a 100-fold increase in catalytic efficiency over wild-type GCK.

255 een successfully designed, these exhibit low catalytic efficiencies, requiring directed evolution to

256 even designs expressed solubly and exhibited catalytic efficiencies similar to previously designed re

257 0(6) m(-1) s(-1), indicating that LPMOs have catalytic efficiencies similar to those of peroxygenases

258 ge of lycopene to yield acycloretinal with a catalytic efficiency similar to that of beta-carotene.

259 functional theory calculations show that the catalytic efficiency stems from the optimal distribution

260 Their catalytic efficiency strongly depends on the type of sub

261 properties of Dbl family proteins, including catalytic efficiency, substrate selectivity, and signali

262 rported inhibitor revealed no differences in catalytic efficiency, substrate specificity, and inhibit

263 parameters of diverse enzymes with disparate catalytic efficiencies, such as chymotrypsin, fumarase,

264 he oxygen evolution reaction in KOH with its catalytic efficiency surpassing the commercial Ir cataly

265 eins purified in vitro show 10-20-fold lower catalytic efficiency than ChaC1, although they showed co

266 g more than three orders of magnitude higher catalytic efficiency than commonly used substrates of el

267 Although glyco-KLK2 has a considerably lower catalytic efficiency than glycan-free KLK2 toward peptid

268 LacCh exhibited a higher catalytic efficiency than LacTv.

269 aloduracin), catalyzes reactions with higher catalytic efficiency than ProcM, which modifies 29 diffe

270 -coumaraldehyde > sinapaldehyde, with higher catalytic efficiency than that of both wild-type SbCAD4

271 49G can be evolved, showing a 40-fold higher catalytic efficiency than wild-type CALB in the hydrolys

272 f tetrameric histone (H3/H4) substrates with catalytic efficiencies that are 40-300-fold higher than

273 generated two enzymes having NADH-dependent catalytic efficiencies that are greater than the wild-ty

274 oids the off-cycle intermediate and provides catalytic efficiencies that are superior to those of cat

275 helix, hydrolyses p-nitrophenyl acetate with catalytic efficiencies that match the most-efficient red

276 oxamniquine, yet we observed differences in catalytic efficiency that implicate kinetics as the dete

277 Our findings suggest that despite their low catalytic efficiency, the active-sites of viral mRNA met

278 dity of the Bronsted acid is crucial for the catalytic efficiency: the less acidic phosphoric acids a

279 rotein of those mutants showed a decrease in catalytic efficiency, thereby suggesting a reason for th

280 lly design increases in pol processivity and catalytic efficiency through computational DNA binding p

281 ed novel HDAC8-specific substrates with high catalytic efficiency, thus presenting a general strategy

282 improve both active site properties and the catalytic efficiency to be competitive with the native e

283 Its catalytic efficiency toward l-tyrosine was found to be 4

284 Surprisingly, D46H exhibits increased catalytic efficiency toward non-native substrates, espec

285 Catalytic efficiency toward synthetic substrate is lower

286 ases possess the higher binding affinity and catalytic efficiency toward their cognate CPs in compari

287 s of magnitude, achieving absolute values of catalytic efficiencies up to 10(6) M(-1) s(-1).

288 the presence of alpha-diazoesters with high catalytic efficiency (up to 4,900 turnovers) and excelle

289 esis, evaluation of the pH dependence of the catalytic efficiency (V(max)/K(M)), and kinetic characte

290 purified recombinant human BCO1 in terms of catalytic efficiency values (kcat/Km).

291 label-free quantitation is used to ascertain catalytic efficiency values for individual peptide subst

292 The catalytic efficiency values of these substrates are lowe

293 erfacial PA binding (Km(B) = 4.2 mol %), and catalytic efficiency (Vmax = 557 mumol/min/mg).

294 , thus, an optimal TDN scaffold with highest catalytic efficiency was acquired and subsequently appli

295 dy-state kinetic analysis revealed that Dpo4 catalytic efficiency was strongly influenced by the prim

296 silica surfaces, the observed differences in catalytic efficiency were correlated with an unprecedent

297 In contrast, CYP2B37 showed the highest catalytic efficiency with 7-ethoxy-4-(trifluoromethyl)co

298 cluding model lignin compounds, in which the catalytic efficiency with ABTS (kcat(app)/Km(app) = (1.7

299 a greater than 400-fold improvement in OmpT catalytic efficiency, with a kcat /Km value of 6.1x10(6)

300 oth Zn(II) and Cu(II) complexes exhibit good catalytic efficiency, with a superiority of the 1,2-vici