ライフサイエンスコーパス: catheter placement

1 d complications, and tunneled central venous catheter placement.

2 ransfusion before CVC placement was $410 per catheter placement.

3 Those in the control arm had no urinary catheter placement.

4 ified blunt dilating instrument, followed by catheter placement.

5 atypical findings of NMI in association with catheter placement.

6 intraperitoneal hemorrhage on the day after catheter placement.

7 across programs for assessing central venous catheter placement.

8 s in 143 patients with a history of dialysis catheter placement.

9 tem, and the risk increases with duration of catheter placement.

10 ore than 10 mL/d for more than 4 weeks after catheter placement.

11 st patients were discharged within 2 days of catheter placement.

12 with internal jugular and subclavian venous catheter placement.

13 f patients in the IV group required tunneled catheter placement.

14 oximately 50% of patients within 6 months of catheter placement.

15 department with PUR leading to a suprapubic catheter placement.

16 ons- hemorrhage, brain injury and suboptimal catheter placement.

17 ter placement, and 250 were randomized to no catheter placement.

18 43 mGy) were observed for tunneled dialysis catheter placements.

19 is often prolonged and may require multiple catheter placements.

20 patients who underwent midline percutaneous catheter placement (0/230) compared with lateral percuta

21 In procedures that required catheter placement, 10 of 11 placements (91%) were achie

22 mechanical ventilation (3% to 47%), arterial catheter placement (4% to 46%), central venous catheter

23 t (0/230) compared with lateral percutaneous catheter placement (60/4283; p = 0.03).

24 and competence assessment of central venous catheter placement across pediatric critical care medici

25 e patient required fluoroscopic transvaginal catheter placement after opacification of the collection

26 idance increased the use of internal jugular catheter placement and decreased artery punctures.

27 be taken even with ultrasound-guided central catheter placement and that alternative ultrasound guida

28 temic absorption, technical challenges of IP catheter placement and the incidence of IP catheter-rela

29 clinical sized haematoma was used to ensure catheter placement and to allow administration of the th

30 icile colitis, 1 (0.1%) urethral trauma from catheter placement, and 1 (0.1%) enterotomy.

31 91 patients enrolled, 241 were randomized to catheter placement, and 250 were randomized to no cathet

32 on, infusion of 2 L of fluid, central venous catheter placement, and antibiotic administration, were

33 traindications, technical aspects of feeding catheter placement, and complications.

34 , regardless of analgesic agent, location of catheter placement, and type and time of pain assessment

35 r function, renal function, pulmonary artery catheter placement, and type and timing of temporary mec

36 Postoperative catheter placement appears to be important for optimal d

37 rities in care that occur prior to neuraxial catheter placement are associated with higher rates of g

38 As early as 1 month after catheter placement, atherosclerotic plaque formed around

39 ) increased patient risk of pulmonary artery catheter placement; b) ability to measure similar variab

40 is the preferred site for tunneled infusion catheter placement because of the lower incidence of sym

41 ated to the device occurred after subclavian catheter placement before surgery.

42 ive was to compare initial outcomes after PD catheter placement by different types of operators.

43 other AEs were in line with expectations for catheter placement, cell infusion, concomitant medicatio

44 cific issues, such as difficulty turning and catheter placement challenges.

45 d tool when evaluating fellow central venous catheter placement competence under direct supervision.

46 practice" checklists were developed: central catheter placement, consultation, family discussions, re

47 During ultrasound-guided central venous catheter placement, correct positioning of central venou

48 rotid sheath insertion during central venous catheter placement could lead to serious complications.

49 ); incidence of infection was 0.93 per 1,000 catheter-placement days.

50 In patients who voided urine preoperatively, catheter placement did not appear to confer any advantag

51 tions and infections associated with central-catheter placement did not differ significantly between

52 ation against landmark-guided central venous catheter placement during inpatient medical emergencies.

53 rests and secondary access if central venous catheter placement failed during noncardiac arrest emerg

54 Right or left internal jugular vein catheter placement followed by a postprocedural chest ra

55 The mean duration of catheter placement for all patients was 57.5 months (ran

56 al to improve the accuracy and safety of EVD catheter placement for patients without significantly in

57 d <6 months) undergoing cardiac surgery with catheter placement for PD were approached for inclusion.

58 The effectiveness of the trocar technique of catheter placement for transvaginal sonographically guid

59 Subclavian catheter placement had the longest dwell time with a med

60 th an increased rate of early central venous catheter placement identified after 2007.

61 in 77 patients and percutaneous transhepatic catheter placement in 24 patients).

62 limit of guidewire introduced during central catheter placement in adults.

63 In adults undergoing central venous catheter placement in compressible anatomic sites, plate

64 was predictive of unsuccessful hemodialysis catheter placement in one patient.

65 As shown previously, catheter placement induced an inflammatory response resu

66 Central venous catheter placement is a common procedure performed on cr

67 aneous revascularization procedures, guiding catheter placement is associated with scraping debris fr

68 Intrapancreatic lavage catheter placement is essential to the success of this p

69 The location of catheter placement, lateral vs. midline, was recorded in

70 nneled catheter placement versus nontunneled catheter placement (<.001 to .027).

71 y catheter, or peripherally inserted central catheter placement; lumbar puncture; thoracentesis; para

72 venography (n = 3), attempted central venous catheter placement (n = 3), or surgery (n = 6).

73 -square test) between catheter type, side of catheter placement, number of catheter lumens, site of c

74 ess maintenance procedure or as hemodialysis catheter placement occurring 1-30 days after the index p

75 ressure monitor, placement of a jugular bulb catheter, placement of a pulmonary artery catheter, crit

76 out continuous infusions for the duration of catheter placement or discharge from intensive care unit

77 abetic retinopathy (P < 0.001), and vascular catheter placement or infection (P < 0.001).

78 lacement, number of catheter lumens, site of catheter placement, or NC placement duration and positiv

79 st, underwent intubation or pulmonary artery catheter placement, or received temporary mechanical cir

80 ransfusion of blood products, central venous catheter placement, presence of pelvic or lower extremit

81 ccurred frequently after peritoneal dialysis catheter placement (prevalence 10% to 34%) and after gas

82 After anesthesia and catheter placement, rabbits were tracheotomized, paralyz

83 When used for vessel location and catheter placement real-time, ultrasound guidance or Dop

84 ion compared with radial artery for arterial catheter placement (relative risk, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.32-2.

85 oor anatomical landmarks, number of previous catheter placements, resistance to wire or catheter adva

86 theter models and on axillary versus femoral catheter placement routes.

87 concentration as well as assisted and ideal catheter placement techniques including ultrasound.

88 Median time from catheter placement to initial failure was 3.5 months (ra

89 f programs provide formalized central venous catheter placement training for first-year fellows, only

90 ay reduce the need for invasive testing (ie, catheter placement, urodynamics), and prompt early treat

91 eding a follow-up procedure after initial PD catheter placement varied by operator specialty and was

92 burn to a patient's forearm, we instituted a catheter placement verification protocol.

93 fferences in dose were observed for tunneled catheter placement versus nontunneled catheter placement

94 CED is a complex delivery method requiring catheter placement via a second procedure to achieve acc

95 Catheter placement via the supraorbital keyhole (SOK) fo

96 the top quartile for in-ICU pulmonary artery catheter placement (vs the bottom quartile) using chi-sq

97 The success rate for catheter placement was 100%.

98 The mean duration of catheter placement was 4 days (range, 2-14 days).

99 Median (IQR) procedure time for catheter placement was 53.5 (33-75) minutes for intraven

100 Mean duration of catheter placement was 92 days.

101 d right internal jugular vein central venous catheter placement was 96.9% with an average of 1.3 atte

102 Catheter placement was curative in six of seven patients

103 Catheter placement was successful in 25 (96%) of 26 kidn

104 The two most common guidance methods of catheter placement were ultrasound localization and fluo

105 Fifteen studies with 1,553 central venous catheter placements were identified with a pooled sensit

106 placement and peripherally inserted central catheter placement) were compared with a one-way analysi

107 from presumed sepsis following intravascular catheter placement, whereas Clcn3(+/+) littermates survi

108 One of the first steps to PD is successful catheter placement, which can be performed by surgeons,

109 its in terms of speed and ease of continuous catheter placement while reducing the necessary number o

110 for patients having elective central venous catheter placement with a platelet count less than 20 x

111 ters required revision, removal, or a second catheter placement within 90 days.