戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ding an aminoglycoside, and early indwelling catheter removal).
2  the 46 abscesses recurred (12-95 days after catheter removal).
3  colonization and skin colonization rates at catheter removal.
4 nts with indwelling catheters at the time of catheter removal.
5 reventing insulin errors and accidental tube/catheter removal.
6 g radiolabeled tracer, was given 1 hr before catheter removal.
7 ers (CVC) are slow and in many cases require catheter removal.
8 were cultured and venography was repeated at catheter removal.
9  were collected until treatment cessation or catheter removal.
10 essfully treated with antifungal therapy and catheter removal.
11 lso evaluated insertion site colonization at catheter removal.
12 rapid and generally uncomplicated with early catheter removals.
13  test results, any time between 8 days after catheter removal and 3 months after surgery.
14 tions were aborted in all patients following catheter removal and carotid artery closure.
15 pulmonary artery catheter insertion mandates catheter removal and repair of the carotid artery punctu
16 ond PD catheter implanted, 6.6% underwent PD catheter removal, and 5.9% had a PD catheter revision wi
17 of tissue removed, bladder infusion prior to catheter removal, and ethanol-glycine in assessment of t
18  whose ASB persists for more than 48 h after catheter removal, and pregnant women.
19  risk ratio [RR], .52; 95% CI, .33-.85), and catheter removal based on defined schedules potentially
20 ife-threatening infections require immediate catheter removal, but most can be treated with antimicro
21     Prompt adequate antifungal treatment and catheter removal could be critical to decrease early mor
22 D (12% ACH, 40% IMD; P < .001), but rates of catheter removal did not differ (13% ACH, 11% IMD).
23 acy end points included the time to drainage catheter removal, drainage catheter output volume, and c
24 ite concerns) and device failure, defined as catheter removal following device complication.
25 arly antifungal treatment and central venous catheter removal form the cornerstones to decrease morta
26 tibiotics in 81% of cases and central venous catheter removal in 51% (P = 0.001).
27                 Aminoglycoside use and early catheter removal in patients with undocumented sepsis ma
28 s (CRBI) can be successfully treated without catheter removal (in situ therapy), but there is insuffi
29                   Antibiotic therapy without catheter removal is unlikely to eradicate catheter-relat
30 o identify a biofilm device infection before catheter removal may obviate removal of a substantial nu
31      The rate of occurrence of bleeding with catheter removal (mediastinal output in the hour after r
32                          The accidental tube/catheter removal multifaceted safety program decreased e
33                          Infection requiring catheter removal occurred at a rate of 0.06 per 100 cath
34                  Complications necessitating catheter removal occurred in 534 PICCs (20.8%) during 46
35 re were no complications, although premature catheter removal occurred in two patients.
36 t early appropriate antifungal treatment and catheter removal (odds ratio, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.08-0.91),
37  regression analysis, only early intravenous catheter removal (on day 2) [odds ratio: 0.390; 95% conf
38              Patients were followed up until catheter removal or death.
39 ssociated with a need for intervention after catheter removal (p < .05).
40 h an aggressive postoperative irrigation and catheter removal policy can result in transurethral rese
41 pus implemented a protocol requiring urinary catheter removal prior to urine sampling from a new cath
42  consumption, time to mobilization and Foley catheter removal, quality of patient blinding to randomi
43 te hair removal, R = -0.012 [P = .95]; Foley catheter removal, R = -0.089 [P = .63]; deep vein thromb
44 g a follow-up procedure, which we defined as catheter removal, replacement, or revision within 90 day
45 on, in comparison with two methods requiring catheter removal (tip roll and tip flush), and a third t
46                                           At catheter removal, ultrasonography (US) of the veins cont
47  have a greater need for interventions after catheter removal, warranting added precautions.
48                             The mean time to catheter removal was 15.8 +/- 13.2 days.
49                             Early indwelling catheter removal was performed routinely in the 107 (25%
50 ty data collection at catheter insertion and catheter removal was performed.
51 inical failure, whereas early central venous catheter removal was protective (AOR, 0.43; P = .040).
52                 However, interventions after catheter removal were required for only 8.3% (42/504) of
53 ithout bloodstream infection resolving after catheter removal with a positive quantitative tip cultur
54 28 cases); and (3) severe clinical symptoms (catheter removal with delayed replacement after deferves
55  randomisation and 48 h after central venous catheter removal with impregnated (antibiotic or heparin
56 ocytosis, or hypotension which resolved with catheter removal, without another source of infection.