ライフサイエンスコーパス: cathodal

1 Single, nonarcing, nonbarotraumatic, cathodal 100 and 200 J applications were delivered at 2

2 id not affect any of the TVA parameters, but cathodal 2 mA stimulation significantly enhanced top-dow

3 ronary arteries were targeted with a single, cathodal 200 J application.

4 Nonarcing, nonbarotraumatic, cathodal 50, 100, and 200 J electroporation applications

5 n pentobarbital-anesthetized rats, mid-cycle cathodal activation (0.3 ms) or end-cycle anodal black (

6 l bodies, but not axons, thresholds for both cathodal and anodal stimulation were dependent on the se

7 Both cathodal and anodal stimuli evoked a neural response in

8 emonstrate a pro-inflammatory effect of both cathodal and anodal tDCS, and a polarity-specific migrat

9 tive activated microglia occurred after both cathodal and anodal tDCS.

10 During the application of cathodal and anodal transcranial currents we observed po

11 Passive and 2-mA iontophoretic (both cathodal and anodal) transport experiments were conducte

12 Sixty-two adults underwent anodal, cathodal and sham high-definition tDCS of the left motor

13 us stimulation-MRI protocol applying anodal, cathodal and sham stimulation to 24 healthy control subj

14 n significantly decreased TST, compared with cathodal and sham stimulation.

15 10 healthy subjects before and after anodal, cathodal and sham transcranial direct current stimulatio

16 62 healthy adults in three sessions (anodal, cathodal and sham).

17 rietal cortices following anodal relative to cathodal and sham.

18 The influence of current polarity (anodal vs cathodal) and electrode location (left vs right hemisphe

19 approach, we examined the effects of anodal, cathodal, and sham tsDCS delivered to the C3-C5 level on

20 ithmetic problems before and after receiving cathodal, anodal or sham tDCS to the left DLPFC.

21 al anodal stimulation is more effective than cathodal at cell activation; (c) cortical surface stimul

22 Interestingly, cathodal, but not anodal, tsDCS induced a persistent inc

23 Semantic tasks results revealed that cathodal, but not sham, stimulation significantly decrea

24 However, cathodal cerebellar TDCS also significantly enhanced ada

25 As predicted, we found that cathodal cerebellar TDCS resulted in impairment of adapt

26 dium nitroprusside (SNP; administered with a cathodal charge) are unclear.

27 es while the inhibitory LTD-like plasticity (cathodal) converts to excitatory LTP-like plasticity und

28 ibition is neutralized with an extracellular cathodal current pulse, subthreshold auditory stimuli ar

29 h anodal current pulses; in the other cells, cathodal current pulses were used.

30 Cathodal DCS in vitro induces a long-term depression (DC

31 lectrodes before sleep (anodal 'activation', cathodal 'deactivation', and sham stimulation).

32 Cathodal direct current stimulation (cDCS) induces long-

33 The cathodal directional cue therefore requires Cdc42 GTP hy

34 F3)/cathodal vmPFC (Fp2), anodal vmPFC (Fp2)/cathodal dlPFC (F3), and anodal vmPFC (Fp2)/cathodal lef

35 F3)/cathodal vmPFC (Fp2), anodal vmPFC (Fp2)/cathodal dlPFC (F3), anodal dlPFC (F3)/cathodal right sh

36 loon Analog Risk Task: (1) right anodal/left cathodal DLPFC tDCS, (2) left anodal/right cathodal DLPF

37 t cathodal DLPFC tDCS, (2) left anodal/right cathodal DLPFC tDCS, or (3) sham tDCS.

38 e reproduction/estimation task, anodal vmPFC/cathodal dlPFC, isolated anodal dlPFC stimulation and is

39 ion but larger in the leg ipsilateral to the cathodal ear.

40 The cathodal effect on CBI was found to be dependent on stim

41 llary organ electroreceptors excited by weak cathodal electric fields are used for hunting by both ca

42 l tDCS over the right or left DLPFC with the cathodal electrode over the contralateral supraorbital a

43 or inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and a return cathodal electrode over the left supraorbital region.

44 esults were obtained when the skin under the cathodal electrodes was anaesthetized.

45 dal electrode and minimally activated by the cathodal electrodes, while Martinotti cells are moderate

46 an EF and NGs were superimposed in parallel, cathodal electrotaxis along NGs was enhanced compared to

47 establishment in an applied electric field, cathodal emergence of hyphae was lost when either of the

48 Lampreys showed preferences for the cathodal end of the testing aquarium after electric stim

49 Within a range of cathodal fields (-0.1 to -30.0 mu-V/cm), lampreys exhibi

50 left temporal fossa, responses to 1 mA left cathodal galvanic vestibular stimulation were of similar

51 unlike both the sham and anodal groups, the cathodal group exhibited no RIF.

52 n GS-DeltaV(m); (2) for intermediate shocks, cathodal GS-DeltaV(m) became multiphasic, whereas SS-Del

53 ained monophasic; and (3) for strong shocks, cathodal GS-DeltaV(m) became uniformly negative, whereas

54 Cathodal (inhibitory) stimulation to the contralesional

55 ated measures design to assess the impact of cathodal (inhibitory) tDCS over the left vlPFC on reward

56 We used anodal (excitatory), cathodal (inhibitory), and sham transcranial direct curr

57 ent 1, participants received sham and active cathodal-inhibitory tDCS over the left occipital cortex,

58 ent 2, participants received sham and active cathodal-inhibitory tDCS over the vertex, to exclude any

59 phere anodal-excitatory and right hemisphere cathodal-inhibitory tDCS, compared to sham stimulation.

60 ed from the sclera in approximately 2h after cathodal iontophoretic delivery of the micellar carrier

61 /cathodal dlPFC (F3), and anodal vmPFC (Fp2)/cathodal left shoulder stimulations we have observed an

62 /cathodal right shoulder, anodal vmPFC (Fp2)/cathodal left shoulder we have observed more stable choi

63 /cathodal right shoulder, anodal vmPFC (Fp2)/cathodal left shoulder, and sham stimulation.

64 ased tDCS for 4 weeks, 2 mA anodal-right and cathodal-left prefrontal stimulation with 35-cm2 carbon

65 The greatest cathodal migration in response to a DC electric field wa

66 dc42 in cells overexpressing NIPP1 recovered cathodal migration.

67 movement, it was essential for directional (cathodal) migration in the absence of epidermal growth f

68 in the orientation of the field to maintain cathodal movement.

69 When this cathodal (negative) electrode is connected to a regulate

70 cols: anodal on the ipsilesional hemisphere, cathodal on the contralesional hemisphere, or bilateral;

71 ing behavior compared with left anodal/right cathodal or sham stimulation.

72 ts received excitatory (anodal), inhibitory (cathodal), or sham stimulation before completing three s

73 le participants completed the tasks, anodal, cathodal, or sham tDCS was applied over the right dlPFC.

74 kward or forward while they received anodal, cathodal, or sham TDCS.

75 , and CBI before and after 25 min of anodal, cathodal, or sham transcranial direct current stimulatio

76 rticipants were randomly assigned to anodal, cathodal, or sham-control groups.

77 the angle of migration in relation to anodal-cathodal orientation.

78 y received either anodal over the right with cathodal over the left DLPFC, anodal over the left with

79 er the left DLPFC, anodal over the left with cathodal over the right DLPFC, or sham stimulation.

80 The cathodal pathway involves GPCR/purinergic signaling and

81 forms with the same tilts for anodal but not cathodal phase 1 at the right ventricular electrode.

82 e membrane lipids asymmetrically, leading to cathodal polarization and enhanced activation of the MAP

83 ting proteins, Rga2 and Bem3, also abolished cathodal polarization, but this was not rescued by Ca(2+

84 ar pH in this scenario led to restoration of cathodal polarization.

85 CS (F(1,9) = 7.15, P < 0.03, mean difference cathodal pre-post: 0.65 muV).

86 dal pulses and positive (depolarized) during cathodal pulses.

87 shift of DBP-actin complexes to an even more cathodal region of the gels.

88 Six-week treatment of 2-mA anodal left/cathodal right prefrontal tDCS (twelve 30-minute session

89 (F3)/cathodal vmPFC (Fp2), anodal dlPFC (F3)/cathodal right shoulder, anodal vmPFC (Fp2)/cathodal lef

90 (Fp2)/cathodal dlPFC (F3), anodal dlPFC (F3)/cathodal right shoulder, anodal vmPFC (Fp2)/cathodal lef

91 The tDCS conditions were anodal left dlPFC/cathodal right vmPFC, the reversed electrode positioning

92 ramp-down) for 4 weeks with anodal-left and cathodal-right prefrontal stimulation (35 cm2 electrodes

93 The duration of the vulnerable period during cathodal S2 stimulation is longer for an S1 wavefront pr

94 With cathodal search and stimulation, cell body median thresh

95 2 mA) in two experiments: 1 mA tDCS (anodal, cathodal, sham) did not affect any of the TVA parameters

96 Group 2 received anodal cerebellar tDCS and cathodal spinal tDCS (real tDCS) for 5 days/week for 2 w

97 cond treatment of anodal cerebellar tDCS and cathodal spinal tDCS (real tDCS) for 5 days/week for 2 w

98 ved 4 consecutive days of active and placebo cathodal stimulation (current density: 0.29 mA/cm(2)) to

99 Results showed that cathodal stimulation accelerated responses for time perc

100 ynesthesia can be selectively augmented with cathodal stimulation and attenuated with anodal stimulat

101 Bi-frontal cathodal stimulation did not significantly increase TST,

102 (n = 16) were randomized to either anodal or cathodal stimulation for either 5 or 10 consecutive days

103 that the often reported inhibitory effect of cathodal stimulation in e.g., motor tasks might not exte

104 issue responses during and immediately after cathodal stimulation in the refractory wake of a propaga

105 taneous anodal stimulation of left DLPFC and cathodal stimulation of right DLPFC (bipolar-balanced mo

106 Both anodal and cathodal stimulation of the left pLPFC disrupted trainin

107 Cathodal stimulation of the left, but not right, ventrol

108 ents with the affected hand during and after cathodal stimulation over the affected cortex and simult

109 As predicted, during right anodal/left cathodal stimulation over the DLPFC, participants chose

110 On the other hand, 20 min of cathodal stimulation produced significant after-effects

111 g of pictures, anodal tDCS increased whereas cathodal stimulation reduced the number of false alarms

112 ions, with weaker interference effects after cathodal stimulation relative to anodal and sham in the

113 account when choosing to exploit or explore: Cathodal stimulation resulted in an increased focus on t

114 ither anodal or cathodal tDCS, we found that cathodal stimulation robustly disrupted the repertoire o

115 The results suggest that cathodal stimulation should produce lower thresholds, mo

116 Notably, cathodal stimulation significantly reduced these unit sp

117 Surprisingly, cathodal stimulation tended to increase the extent of bo

118 potassium application or on the incremental cathodal stimulation threshold to evoke CSD.

119 CSD frequency by 40 to 80% and increased the cathodal stimulation threshold, whereas acute treatment

120 stimulation to the ipsilesional hemisphere; cathodal stimulation to the contralesional hemisphere; a

121 d blocks of 2 (1:1) to receive daily sham or cathodal stimulation to the contralesional motor cortex

122 Unipolar cathodal stimulation was performed from the distal elect

123 rgic (anodal stimulation) and glutamatergic (cathodal stimulation) activity [5, 6].

124 anied by a greater increase in velocity with cathodal stimulation, and reduced duration of change for

125 Compared with sham or cathodal stimulation, anodal tDCS led to significantly b

126 mere add-on effects of anodal and concurrent cathodal stimulation, but rather by complex network modu

127 After 10 days of cathodal stimulation, proliferating NSC increased by app

128 that depended on the Vm magnitude during S2 cathodal stimulation.

129 as always larger from the leg on the side of cathodal stimulation.

130 ymmetric after effects induced by anodal and cathodal stimulation.

131 ectrodes but exhibit a slight preference for cathodal stimulation.

132 ulation and decreased cortical arousal after cathodal stimulation.

133 rently downregulating contralateral M1 using cathodal stimulation.

134 auses locally reduced GABA while inhibitory (cathodal) stimulation causes reduced glutamatergic neuro

135 ent was prevented by anodal, but not sham or cathodal, stimulation of the dlPFC.

136 search and stimulation of matching polarity, cathodal stimuli evoked a ganglion cell response at lowe

137 deep myocardial layers 2-6 mm away from the cathodal surface, contrary to theory.

138 threshold pulse-train was used, subthreshold cathodal tACS decreased cortical excitability and anodal

139 n the contralateral DLPFC was modulated with cathodal tCDS, an important decrease in risk taking was

140 AE) investigated whether anodal (a-tDCS) or cathodal tDCS (c-tDCS) applied during AE over the left d

141 were analyzed for the effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS (compared with sham tDCS).

142 over design, we applied anodal tDCS (atDCS), cathodal tDCS (ctDCS), and sham tDCS (stDCS) over the le

143 low-frequency rTMS, anodal tDCS (atDCS) and cathodal tDCS (ctDCS), CT, sham CT and sham brain stimul

144 low-frequency rTMS, anodal tDCS (atDCS) and cathodal tDCS (ctDCS), CT, sham CT and sham brain stimul

145 in peak amplitude of somatosensory MMN after cathodal tDCS (F(1,9) = 7.15, P < 0.03, mean difference

146 In contrast, activity-reducing cathodal tDCS apparently acted as a noise filter inhibit

147 The findings support exploration of cathodal tDCS as a treatment of neurologic conditions ch

148 tigated the modulatory effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS at the right DLPFC on placebo analgesia an

149 ion being demonstrated after both anodal and cathodal tDCS compared to the period during stimulation.

150 ates using arm or finger movements following cathodal TDCS directly over M1.

151 build on this evidence by demonstrating that cathodal TDCS impairs motor adaptation with a differenti

152 nsity range (0.5-2.0 mA) for both anodal and cathodal tDCS in a sham-controlled repeated measures des

153 Most interestingly, only cathodal tDCS increased the number of endogenous NSC in

154 allows upregulation of brain activity, with cathodal tDCS of the left DLPCF, which downregulates act

155 nodal tDCS over the contralateral cortex and cathodal tDCS over the ipsilateral cortex compared with

156 We conclude that cathodal tDCS over the left DLPFC might facilitate the r

157 Relative to cathodal tDCS over the left somatosensory cortex, cathod

158 future studies can determine whether chronic cathodal tDCS over the left vlPFC has sustained effects

159 dal tDCS over the left somatosensory cortex, cathodal tDCS over the left vlPFC lowered reward expecta

160 Acute cathodal tDCS over the left vlPFC relative to the left s

161 t dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and cathodal tDCS over the right DLPFC for 30 minutes, one o

162 We found that cathodal tDCS resulted in a clear decrease of CBI, where

163 ncreased skill learning relative to sham and cathodal tDCS specifically by increasing on-line rather

164 (mediating sensory input) during anodal and cathodal tDCS suggest that tDCS modifies thalamocortical

165 adaptation session while receiving anodal or cathodal TDCS to control for the direct effects of TDCS

166 -1mA cathodal tDCS was administered over the left vlPFC versu

167 Cathodal tDCS was delivered over the left prefrontal cor

168 Participants who received cathodal tDCS were more likely to solve the problems tha

169 althy young adults received M1 or cerebellar cathodal TDCS while making fast 'shooting' movements tow

170 Cathodal tDCS, instead, promotes irregular spiking by en

171 ilitatory effects relative to sham while for cathodal tDCS, only 1.0 mA resulted in sustained excitab

172 by the simultaneous application of anodal or cathodal tDCS, respectively, when stimulation of the whi

173 In awake macaques receiving either anodal or cathodal tDCS, we found that cathodal stimulation robust

174 main effect of intensity for both anodal and cathodal tDCS.

175 ent neuroplastic after-effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS.

176 d versus non-stimulated S1 region only after cathodal tDCS.

177 jects were divided into groups of anodal and cathodal tDCS.

178 TD) evoked in the somatosensory cortex after cathodal tDCS.

179 erved in the somatosensory cortex only after cathodal tDCS.

180 er limb function, especially for inhibitory (cathodal) tDCS applied over contralesional M1.

181 After anodal, but not cathodal, tDCS, we found a reduced item recognition capa

182 contralateral homolog areas with inhibitory/cathodal-tDCS, based on prominent theories of stroke rec

183 excitations, or hot spots (HS), occurring at cathodal tissue surfaces or large coronary vessels.

184 eversed the polarity of hypha emergence from cathodal to anodal, an effect augmented by Ca(2+).

185 the directional response of HeLa cells from cathodal to slightly anodal in a PP1-dependent manner.

186 Cathodal trans-spinal direct current (c-tsDC) stimulatio

187 Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (C-tDCS

188 Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (ctDCS)

189 weak current stimulation, delivered through cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (ctDCS)

190 e impact on plasticity induced by anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

191 20 mg or placebo medication) with anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS),

192 Interestingly, both the inhibitory effect of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation applied

193 parietal cortex (PPC) using high-definition cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation impedes

194 ulating neuronal excitability with anodal or cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation over ri

195 if the magnetic S2 was replaced by anodal or cathodal transcranial electrical stimulation.

196 protocols were repeated in combination with cathodal tsDC application.

197 Both anodal and cathodal tsDCS induced a progressive increase in DiMEP a

198 Increased tidal volume after cathodal tsDCS opens up the perspective of harnessing re

199 ymmetries in irregular afferent responses to cathodal versus anodal currents.

200 Also, for anodal dlPFC (F3)/cathodal vmPFC (Fp2), anodal dlPFC (F3)/cathodal right s

201 Moreover, for anodal dlPFC (F3)/cathodal vmPFC (Fp2), anodal vmPFC (Fp2)/cathodal dlPFC

202 imulation conditions were: anodal dlPFC (F3)/cathodal vmPFC (Fp2), anodal vmPFC (Fp2)/cathodal dlPFC

203 XP-4: anodal vs. sham tDCS during AE; EXP-5: cathodal vs. sham tDCS during AE) investigated whether a

204 mulated (EXP-1: anodal vs. sham tDCS, EXP-2: cathodal vs. sham tDCS) or did AE (EXP-3: AE vs. active

205 , epileptic excitability was alleviated with cathodal weak direct current stimulation by diminishing

206 CS would result in an enhancement of CBI and cathodal would decrease it, relative to sham stimulation

207 We hypothesized that right anodal/left cathodal would decrease risk-taking behavior compared wi