コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 mps form tripartite assemblies that span the cell envelope.
2 remodeling the architecture of the bacterial cell envelope.
3 acteria and on the assembly of the bacterial cell envelope.
4 aring as distinct foci or patches around the cell envelope.
5 Most bacteria are surrounded by a complex cell envelope.
6 g to and sequestering histones away from the cell envelope.
7 form multi-protein assemblies that span the cell envelope.
8 Escherichia coli are protected by a complex cell envelope.
9 hat the gene products are distributed in the cell envelope.
10 hat mostly target elements in the parasite's cell envelope.
11 lationships of the various components of the cell envelope.
12 urbing the assembly of the Corynebacterineae cell envelope.
13 teins serve essential roles in the bacterial cell envelope.
14 tiple genes with putative association to the cell envelope.
15 otics because of its durable and impermeable cell envelope.
16 c levels by mediating drug efflux across the cell envelope.
17 f functional properties of the Gram-positive cell envelope.
18 he mechanical integrity of the Gram-negative cell envelope.
19 ria to secrete proteins across their complex cell envelope.
20 glycolipids/lipoglycans of the mycobacterial cell envelope.
21 tiation and incorporation into the cornified cell envelope.
22 elope compared to those with a Gram-negative cell envelope.
23 septal peptidoglycan and constriction of the cell envelope.
24 drugs and other harmful compounds across the cell envelope.
25 lasmic membrane and its transport across the cell envelope.
26 sis of major components of the mycobacterial cell envelope.
27 megadalton nanomachine that spans the entire cell envelope.
28 ntified are known or predicted to affect the cell envelope.
29 as well as the architecture of the bacterial cell envelope.
30 extend a thin cylindrical projection of the cell envelope.
31 cts the speciation of U(VI) on the bacterial cell envelope.
32 I) surface complexes formed on the bacterial cell envelope.
33 panning the inner and outer membranes of the cell envelope.
34 nts, intercellular lipids, and the cornified cell envelope.
35 glycolipids/lipoglycans of the mycobacterial cell envelope.
36 nfection, has a dynamic and immunomodulatory cell envelope.
37 the assembly of the other components of the cell envelope.
38 ome, T-hyperstarvation also destabilizes the cell envelope.
39 in the initial interaction of PAF26 with the cell envelope.
40 urs in the outer layers of the mycobacterial cell envelope.
41 that disrupt the integrity of the bacterial cell envelope.
42 t for both growth and virulence across their cell envelope.
43 exert on molecular targets at the bacterial cell envelope.
44 eir genome and proteins across the bacterial cell envelope.
45 teins across their highly hydrophobic diderm cell envelope.
46 donor, allowing for the full recovery of the cell envelope.
47 in the translocation of these enzymes to the cell envelope.
48 teins form a ~2.4 MDa complex that spans the cell envelope.
49 ly that kills pathogens by perforating their cell envelopes.
50 ays to secrete proteins across their complex cell envelopes.
51 cteria is critical for the assembly of their cell envelopes.
52 ful delivery of large molecules across their cell envelopes.
53 the functionality of gram-negative bacterial cell envelopes.
54 ricrin is a major component of the cornified cell envelope, a highly insoluble structure composed of
58 ements for PIC targeting are a Gram-negative cell envelope and a unique cell surface antigen; therefo
59 in complexes can form rigid links across the cell envelope and are therefore subject to physical forc
64 , transcribes genes required to maintain the cell envelope and is activated by conditions that destab
65 ry mechanisms that control the nature of the cell envelope and its impact on host innate immune funct
66 ese proteins form a complex that bridges the cell envelope and that has been proposed to cause fusion
67 n of its components, its position within the cell envelope and the interactions between its different
68 rgy metabolism genes; and an upregulation of cell envelope and transport and binding genes in the mut
69 and shear mechanical stress in the bacterial cell envelope and use single-molecule tracking to show t
70 ns and different abilities to diffuse across cell envelopes and interact with lipids and intracellula
72 the degraded compound, (2) properties of the cell envelope, and (3) the localization of the reacting
73 pidated polysaccharides of the mycobacterial cell envelope, and are targets of anti-tuberculosis drug
74 re essential components of the mycobacterial cell envelope, and their biosynthetic pathway is a well
75 re essential components of the mycobacterial cell envelope, and their biosynthetic pathway is one of
76 recognized to conduct electrons across their cell envelope, and yet molecular details of the mechanis
78 ways that transport PLs across the bacterial cell envelope are fundamental to OM biogenesis and homeo
79 inery needed for NB translocation across the cell envelope are widespread in Gram-negative bacteria,
80 termediary metabolism, and remodeling of the cell envelope as a means of defending spirochetes agains
81 rence for necromass in the form of microbial cell envelopes as well as plankton and algal detritus.
83 cidification capacity, proteolytic activity, cell envelope associated peptidase (CEP) profile and LC-
85 baumannii are far-reaching - from impacts on cell envelope biogenesis and maintenance, bacterial phys
91 contrast, BsrG strongly interferes with the cell envelope biosynthesis, causes membrane invagination
93 serve that LpqN also interacts with secreted cell envelope biosynthetic enzymes such as Ag85A via pul
94 (PAT) not only play a structural role in the cell envelope but also contribute to the ability of M. t
96 of these toxins target the integrity of the cell envelope, but the full range of growth inhibitory m
98 ains enhance the structural integrity of the cell envelope by anchoring the beta-barrels within the p
99 he binding capacity of AMPs to the bacterial cell envelope by calorimetry is difficult because of an
100 at ultimately undermine the integrity of the cell envelope by depleting the inner membrane of phospho
101 F-encoded structures in the native bacterial cell envelope by in situ cryoelectron tomography (CryoET
102 aptic cleft, and would depolarize other hair cells enveloped by the same neuritic process increasing
104 or upregulation of genes associated with the cell envelope can modulate vesicle production or remodel
105 tty-acid availability limits growth rate and cell envelope capacity, revealing that fatty-acid synthe
106 model in which fatty acid availability sets cell envelope capacity, which in turn dictates cell size
107 nger for microorganisms with a Gram-positive cell envelope compared to those with a Gram-negative cel
113 ction, host immune cells recognize bacterial cell envelope components through cognate receptors.
116 tensive and tightly integrated modulation of cell envelope constituents, chemotaxis/motility machiner
118 entration of U(VI) adsorbed on the bacterial cell envelope control the kinetics of U(VI) bioreduction
121 el gut microbiota, and to sensitively detect cell-envelope damage caused by antibiotics or previously
126 f Mycobacterium smegmatis is exported to the cell envelope following cleavage of its signal peptide a
127 lipidic elements are transported across the cell envelope for cell-wall biosynthesis is unclear.
129 K-rich clay occurs within and exterior to cell envelopes, forming where the supply of Fe had been
131 Revealing the molecular architecture of the cell envelope frames our understanding of its mechanical
136 okaryotes, mycobacteria decorate their major cell envelope glycans with minor covalent substituents w
137 Much of what we know about the mycobacterial cell envelope has been gleaned from model actinobacteria
138 complex network connecting in vivo fitness, cell envelope homeostasis and resistance to antibiotics.
140 (a member of the LiaFSR system that controls cell envelope homeostasis), from daptomycin-resistant En
143 role of the physical state of the bacterial cell envelope (i.e., particulate versus soluble) in host
145 e and mechanical properties of the S. aureus cell envelope in both types of clinically relevant strai
146 between the inner and outer membranes of the cell envelope in Gram-negative bacteria, maintains cell
149 also incorporated into the loricrin knockout cell envelope, in addition to the small proline rich pro
150 le, the outermost layer of the mycobacterial cell envelope, in modulation of the host immune response
151 amnose polysaccharides that are critical for cell envelope integrity and cell shape and also represen
152 rucella virulence that functions to maintain cell envelope integrity and influences cell division.
155 antagonistically to IreK and interfere with cell envelope integrity, antimicrobial resistance, and G
156 ies have indicated the importance of ECA for cell envelope integrity, flagellum expression, and resis
162 ow the molecular components of the bacterial cell envelope interact with each other to mediate cell w
167 bacteria, phospholipid transport across the cell envelope is critical to maintain the outer membrane
172 stinctive component of the Corynebacterineae cell envelope is the mycolyl-arabinogalactan (mAG) compl
173 The defining feature of the Gram-negative cell envelope is the presence of two cellular membranes,
177 rane protein large (MmpL) proteins transport cell envelope lipids and siderophores that are important
181 CR signaling is inhibited by M. tuberculosis cell envelope lipoglycans, such as lipoarabinomannan and
182 The LytR-CpsA-Psr proteins are important for cell envelope maintenance in many Gram-positive species.
185 rotein complex, mechanical forces within the cell envelope make the bacteria more susceptible to meta
187 PG), a major component of the B. burgdorferi cell envelope, may contribute to the development and per
188 dulating the function of proteins within the cell envelope, mechanical stress has the potential to re
189 st that CA-MRSA success might be driven by a cell-envelope mediated selective advantage across divers
191 ns observed in the DeltaMceG mutant, such as cell envelope modifications, suggest a pleiotropic funct
193 The fragmentation of these representative cell envelope molecules provides insight into the biocid
198 e present the first detailed analysis of the cell envelope of an important but neglected member of th
204 complex, a widely conserved component of the cell envelope of Gram-negative bacteria, is required to
208 ully coordinate constriction of a tripartite cell envelope of inner membrane, peptidoglycan (PG), and
209 predominant stress-bearing structure in the cell envelope of most bacteria, and also a potent stimul
212 ng two different forms of the staphylococcal cell envelope of Staphylococcus aureus RN4220 and USA300
214 tered the hydrophobicity and rigidity of the cell envelope of the bacilli without significantly alter
215 cell wall is integrated into the protective cell envelope of the bacterium may identify new antibact
217 ein (MOSP) is a prominent constituent of the cell envelope of Treponema denticola (TDE) and one of it
218 gy of mycobacteria is dominated by a complex cell envelope of unique composition and structure and of
219 lts suggest a novel function for OmpA in the cell envelope: OmpA competes with the inner membrane pro
220 r stability on many proteins exported to the cell envelope or beyond, including bacterial virulence f
221 by removing barriers to the external world (cell envelopes) or by destroying their genetic identity
222 nt properties on the bacterium in respect of cell envelope organisation and interaction with the envi
224 , the particulate form of the staphylococcal cell envelope (PCE) induced the production of chemokine
226 mecA protects the bacteria against increased cell-envelope permeability under subinhibitory cefoxitin
228 Molecular components of the Brucella abortus cell envelope play a major role in its ability to infect
230 hear (but not hydrostatic) stress within the cell envelope promotes disassembly of the tripartite eff
234 e Psp system in persister cell formation and cell envelope protection in bacterial pathogens and prov
236 echanical forces can inhibit the function of cell envelope protein assemblies in bacteria and suggest
237 mic analysis, to date, of the changes in the cell envelope protein profile of F. succinogenes S85 in
238 the streptococcal CXC protease, S. pyogenes cell envelope proteinase, we developed a combination vac
239 mitigation of stress generated by misfolded cell envelope proteins but promotes expression of genes
240 lfide exchange-mediated folding of bacterial cell envelope proteins during periods of oxidative stres
242 enzymatic subunits, bind cohesin modules of cell envelope proteins, thereby anchoring the cellulosom
244 n interesting research material for defining cell-envelope proteins without experimental cell disrupt
245 tic, for the capture of the Escherichia coli cell envelope proteome and its high-resolution fractiona
247 e assembled F-pilin subunits relative to the cell envelope, providing insights into the F-like type I
250 etry, and SYTOX green assays showed that the cell envelope remained intact to a high degree at the mi
251 rast, compared with PCE, the soluble form of cell envelope (SCE), which was derived from PCE by treat
252 ing reveals a novel role for FtsK in linking cell envelope septation events and yields further eviden
254 sion, adhesion and retraction powered by the cell-envelope spanning type IVa pilus machine (T4aPM).
255 functionality.IMPORTANCECaudovirales encode cell envelope-spanning proteins called spanins, which ar
256 consists of the F pilus attached to a thin, cell envelope-spanning stalk, whereas the F4 structure c
257 her between the OM and PG and is crucial for cell envelope stability(4); however, most other Gram-neg
259 findings to propose a model of Gram-negative cell envelope stabilization that includes cell cycle con
260 is important for survival under a number of cell envelope stress conditions and in gastrointestinal
261 t in addition to anaerobiosis, adaptation to cell envelope stress is a critical requirement for E. co
263 factor, sigma(E) , is a key regulator of the cell envelope stress response in Streptomyces coelicolor
264 ological insight into the sigma(E) -mediated cell envelope stress response in the genus Streptomyces.
265 l, these data demonstrate that RpoE is a key cell envelope stress response regulator and, similar to
266 k protein (Psp) system is a highly conserved cell envelope stress response required for virulence in
270 ECF factors typically respond to cell wall/cell envelope stress, iron levels, and the oxidation sta
272 at Amj is expressed under the control of the cell envelope stress-response transcription factor sigma
276 s enhance our understanding of mycobacterial cell envelope structure and dynamics and have implicatio
277 Together, sigma(M) and sigma(X) regulate cell envelope structure to decrease access of nisin to i
279 the system indicate adaptation to different cell envelope structures, bacterial lifestyles, and/or b
282 nd L-glutamate, thereby coupling protein and cell envelope synthesis with the metabolic status of the
284 otected by an unusual and highly impermeable cell envelope that is critically important for the succe
285 lagella are complex machines embedded in the cell envelope that rotate a long extracellular helical f
286 aerobiales are remnants of an ancient diderm cell envelope that was present in the ancestor of the Fi
287 r adaptive success is linked to their unique cell envelopes that are extremely resistant to chemical
288 urface-associated carbohydrates of the Ldb17 cell envelope: the Gro3P decoration of the major surface
289 encoding proteins that are localized to the cell envelope; these include metallopeptidases, multidru
291 obust barrier of hydrophobic double membrane cell envelope, thus, leading to drug-resistance in Gram-
293 nslocated across the different layers of the cell envelope to their final extra-cytoplasmic location.
295 recognized the peptide-target complex in the cell envelope, we next analyzed substrate binding by the
297 lecules representing components found in the cell envelope were treated with FNA at 6.09 mg N/L (NO(2
298 247 may exert some of its effects within the cell envelope whereas other activities occur in the cyto
299 Gram-negative bacteria and their complex cell envelope, which comprises an outer membrane and an