ライフサイエンスコーパス: cell-to-cell interaction

1 e that arises from the head-tail symmetry of cell-to-cell interaction).

2 a process that facilitates immune evasion or cell to cell interaction.

3 that ECs can directly activate basophils via cell-to-cell interaction.

4 ors, while the CD8+ T cell response required cell-to-cell interaction.

5 hat influence survival, cell morphology, and cell-to-cell interaction.

6 des present on adjacent cells, thus creating cell to cell interactions.

7 ation during PMN vascular as well as mucosal cell to cell interactions.

8 ass of biological systems exhibiting typical cell to cell interactions.

9 se to the theoretically calculated limit and cell-to-cell interactions.

10 tumor microenvironmental patterns, including cell-to-cell interactions.

11 numerous cellular activities, processes, and cell-to-cell interactions.

12 ems that collectively make decisions through cell-to-cell interactions.

13 population structure and closer interspecies cell-to-cell interactions.

14 ear cells (PBMCs) in order to study in vitro cell-to-cell interactions.

15 feration and differentiation, through direct cell-to-cell interactions.

16 ion via stimulating both cell-to-surface and cell-to-cell interactions.

17 These changes implicate extensive cell-to-cell interactions.

18 release and CD4+ T cell proliferation during cell-to-cell interactions.

19 tracellular matrix components, bacteria tune cell-to-cell interactions.

20 hibit decreased migration speed and impaired cell-to-cell interactions.

21 nformation about cellular subpopulations and cell-to-cell interactions.

22 of cell surface receptors as well as general cell-to-cell interactions.

23 mpassing proliferation, differentiation, and cell-to-cell interactions.

24 supported by various types of spatiotemporal cell-to-cell interactions.

25 is, including cytokines, growth factors, and cell-to-cell interactions.

26 ned influence of hydrodynamic and mechanical cell-to-cell interactions.

27 s a complex network of soluble mediators and cell-to-cell interactions allowing human classically act

28 Interestingly, alterations of cell-to-cell interactions among the immune sub-populatio

29 An in silico cell-to-cell interaction analysis highlights the CXCL9/C

30 cell cultures do not resemble intercellular cell-to-cell interaction and communication; however, thr

31 on as a unique signaling system triggered by cell-to-cell interaction and have been shown to mediate

32 a necessity when considering characterizing cell-to-cell interaction and rolling dynamics during cel

33 ecies that colonize human host via extensive cell-to-cell interactions and biofilm formation.

34 ts: DE due to pathology, anatomical regions, cell-to-cell interactions and cellular microenvironment.

35 trafficking of cells that affect the dynamic cell-to-cell interactions and determine the outcome of i

36 lates endothelial cytoskeletal architecture, cell-to-cell interactions and lumen formation.

37 nd the tumor microenvironment is mediated by cell-to-cell interactions and soluble factors.

38 This might influence directly cell-to-cell interactions and the community effects with

39 t regulate growth, transcription regulation, cell to cell interactions, and morphology.

40 chemokines, CCL5 and CCL6, was dependent on cell-to-cell interaction, and was observed only with fib

41 ned our understanding of tissue composition, cell-to-cell interactions, and cell signaling.

42 ell covariance and conditional distribution, cell-to-cell interactions, and short/long-scale arrangem

43 chanisms of inter-leukemic communication and cell-to-cell interactions are proposed to be important f

44 hich fail to recapitulate spatial aspects of cell-to-cell interactions as well as tissue gradients pr

45 detect and define, and make inferences about cell-to-cell interactions at single-cell resolution.

46 Microenvironment cues and cell-to-cell interactions balance stem cell quiescence w

47 ed a computational method to infer potential cell-to-cell interactions based on transcriptome data of

48 mily of proteins that are thought to mediate cell to cell interactions between neurons.

49 bel-free, and noninvasive probing of dynamic cell-to-cell interactions between adherent and nonadhere

50 These findings show that cell-to-cell interactions between intraepithelial gammad

51 Cell-to-cell interactions between intraepithelial lympho

52 local non-MHC stimulatory factors or direct cell-to-cell interactions between the T cells themselves

53 plethora of signalling processes influencing cell-to-cell interactions between the vascular endotheli

54 istance, are required for citrate-stimulated cell-to-cell interactions, but the GraRS regulatory syst

55 s and can alter the microenvironment through cell-to-cell interactions by fusion with the plasma memb

56 s establishing the theoretical basis for how cell-to-cell interactions can influence population level

57 scriptomic analyses revealed that sequential cell-to-cell interactions direct functional maturation o

58 ng a unique insight into the dynamics of how cell-to-cell interaction drives intratumor heterogeneity

59 stem-cell behavior during its migration and cell-to-cell interaction during the process of homing.

60 propose that alpha-hemolysin is required for cell-to-cell interactions during biofilm formation.

61 f secreted signaling molecules that regulate cell-to-cell interactions during development.

62 ss, the implications of matrix plasticity on cell-to-cell interactions during EC outgrowth, along wit

63 ller incorporates both short- and long-range cell-to-cell interactions (e.g. via paracrine and endocr

64 odel predicts three possible benefits of the cell-to-cell interactions: First, the asymmetric interac

65 s and coupled analytical methods can recover cell-to-cell interactions, groups of spatially covarying

66 Furthermore, analyses of cell-to-cell interactions highlight different networks o

67 is important in establishing and maintaining cell to cell interactions in epithelial cells, thereby p

68 active eicosanoids that can be formed during cell to cell interactions in human tissues to self limit

69 e characterization of immune populations and cell-to-cell interactions in granular detail.

70 has become a widely used technique to study cell-to-cell interactions in living organisms.

71 spatiotemporal gene expression landscape and cell-to-cell interactions in their native microenvironme

72 identified that NOTCH signaling drives these cell-to-cell interactions in tumors, with pericytes and

73 , however, bypasses the normal mechanisms of cell-to-cell interactions in which Notch-1 participates.

74 Mechanical forces are also essential in cell-to-cell interactions, including the widespread inte

75 raded when derived from a model that ignored cell-to-cell interactions, indicating the importance of

76 expression analyses, pathway enrichment and cell-to-cell interaction inferences are more accurate.

77 function and that this may be largely due to cell-to-cell interactions mediated by P-selectin.

78 We propose that besides cell-to-cell interaction-mediated Fas triggering, stimul

79 Cell-to-cell interaction modeling and assays in vitro de

80 tic Elucidation and Assessment of Regulatory Cell-to-cell Interaction Networks (SEARCHIN) to identify

81 Treatment with ZD1839 reduced the cell-to-cell interaction of HUVECs, resulting in disrupt

82 e three-dimensional spatial organization and cell-to-cell interactions of brain tissue that are presu

83 ine how alterations in cellular function and cell-to-cell interactions of pulmonary resident cells an

84 to better understand the composition and the cell-to-cell interactions of the alloreactive inflammato

85 For the first time, the direct cell-to-cell interactions of tumor cells with bead-activ

86 ollowed by a relatively slower step in which cell-to-cell interactions predominate (the aggregation p

87 By analyzing cell-to-cell interaction profiles of the mouse developin

88 ), through deregulation of the expression of cell-to-cell interaction proteins and protein secretion.

89 gth and whether pilus length is critical for cell-to-cell interactions remain unknown.

90 d of the macroscopic patterns resulting from cell-to-cell interactions remains largely qualitative.

91 n that the bystander phenomenon must involve cell-to-cell interactions, the relevance of such single-

92 omposition, transcriptional cell states, and cell-to-cell interactions, thereby providing insight int

93 rs cell proliferation, death, migration, and cell-to-cell interaction through contact inhibition.

94 This antiapoptotic effect required direct cell-to-cell interactions, was associated with phosphory

95 bind avidly to C. albicans hyphae via direct cell-to-cell interaction, while the cariogenic pathogen

96 hat their morphology is sculpted by specific cell to cell interactions with neurons and each other.

97 OC formation requires cell-to-cell interactions with osteoblasts and can be ac

98 evidence that migratory DCs execute targeted cell-to-cell interactions with stationary MCs before lea