ライフサイエンスコーパス: certificate

1 conomic resources were more likely to earn a certificate.

2 ths and almost all stillbirths have no death certificate.

3 tive >/=70% grade on quizzes, were awarded a certificate.

4 f life at the address indicated on the birth certificate.

5 s (81%) passed all requirements and earned a certificate.

6 lling for confounders available on the birth certificate.

7 3.7%) had respiratory TB listed on the death certificate.

8 g use check boxes on the Massachusetts birth certificate.

9 re derived by chart review or from the death certificate.

10 0 codes U07.1 or U07.2 anywhere on the death certificate.

11 hat specific etiology mentioned on the death certificate.

12 een events or conditions listed on the death certificate.

13 a, and vascular dementia listed on the death certificate.

14 sion and the World Health Organization death certificate.

15 were hospital-matched and selected by birth certificate.

16 hnic ancestry were identified from the birth certificate.

17 by linkage to hospitalization data and death certificates.

18 cause of death was ascertained through death certificates.

19 nfection is greatly underdocumented on death certificates.

20 medical records, autopsy reports, and death certificates.

21 liver disease had HCV listed on their death certificates.

22 bout the coding of individual cause of death certificates.

23 he drugs and other substances named on death certificates.

24 , and race-ethnicity was obtained from death certificates.

25 cates, and controls were selected from birth certificates.

26 ough linkage with hospital records and death certificates.

27 guidelines and compared with reported death certificates.

28 ces and linked to 1995-2006 California birth certificates.

29 n medical and pharmacy claims data and birth certificates.

30 Infants were identified from birth certificates.

31 ing ECGs, hospital discharge codes and death certificates.

32 uting causes-of-death data recorded on death certificates.

33 ained from death registry matching and death certificates.

34 h poisoning mortality as identified on death certificates.

35 tives was determined and verified from death certificates.

36 rough interviews, medical records, and death certificates.

37 cause of death as that listed on their death certificates.

38 han with the causes of death listed on death certificates.

39 cal history, physical examination, and death certificates.

40 mining cause of death than reliance on death certificates.

41 and CVD mortality were abstracted from death certificates.

42 nza infection by laboratory results or death certificates.

43 ntal ages and covariates obtained from birth certificates.

44 ho were diagnosed only on the basis of death certificates.

45 Causes of death were obtained from death certificates.

46 ALS cases were ascertained through death certificates.

47 that selected controls from electronic birth certificates.

48 ere obtained from hospital records and death certificates.

49 ialists choose not to renew their respective certificates.

50 and causes of death were collected via death certificates.

51 spiratory infection were obtained from death certificates.

52 Causes of death were determined from death certificates.

53 ed with the use of medical records and death certificates.

54 ease had hepatitis B reported on their death certificates.

55 ation (GP) controls (n=418) from state birth certificates.

56 m 520 patients), supplemented by state death certificates.

57 ords with a birth defects registry and birth certificates.

58 Cases were identified through death certificates.

59 Causes of death were ascertained from death certificates.

60 and ICD-10 code) was ascertained from death certificates.

61 and birth outcomes were obtained from birth certificates.

62 -specific mortality as determined from death certificates.

63 rug poisoning deaths as "accidents" on death certificates.

64 thms for hospitalization databases and death certificates.

65 cer Registry and matched to California birth certificates.

66 cause of death from ALS collected from death certificates.

67 f death were ascertained from official death certificates.

68 less likely than men to have a subspecialty certificate (16% vs 27%, P < .001).

69 oncancer mortality rates from national death certificates, 1975 to 2005.

70 pa (kappa) statistic = 0.69) than with death certificates (61%; kappa = 0.54).

71 he presenting cancer (ascertained from death certificates), adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, y

72 ose not yet due to report, and those given a certificate allowing for delayed reporting.

73 hysician epidemiologists, based on the death certificate and additional records surrounding the death

74 The mother's address from the birth certificate and addresses reported from a residential hi

75 Agreement between the birth certificate and maternal report was good for singletons

76 til 31 March 2008 were abstracted from death certificates and a database of hospital admissions, resp

77 individual patients was obtained from death certificates and cancer registries.

78 ons leading to death was obtained from death certificates and comprehensive assessments that were com

79 We tabulated the drugs named on death certificates and computed age-adjusted and age-specific

80 linked with maternal health data using birth certificates and EHRs to determine prenatal medication e

81 ined through blind physician review of death certificates and hospital or pathology reports.

82 ty diagnoses were obtained from linked birth certificates and hospitalization files.

83 ach case, we recruited 3 controls from birth certificates and interviewed identified adult close cont

84 individuals were randomly sampled from birth certificates and matched 2:1 to cases by sex, birth year

85 Data were collected from birth certificates and maternally linked hospital discharge da

86 l record review and fatalities through death certificates and medical record review.

87 Causes of death were extracted from death certificates and medical records.

88 ver a median of 4.6 y were verified by death certificates and medical records.

89 l registration, including specific perinatal certificates and revised International Classification of

90 ying causes of death was obtained from death certificates and the National Death Index.

91 individuals, ascertained by validated death certificates and the national death registry.

92 Methadone was named on 2,149 death certificates and was the most frequently named substance

93 from inpatient and outpatient care and death certificates and were confirmed by medical record review

94 Center Enterprise Data Warehouse, and death certificates and were linked to the UPDB for analysis.

95 01, were retrospectively obtained from birth certificates and were linked to their clinical, laborato

96 lergy passport, a drug allergy alert card, a certificate, and a discharge letter after medical evalua

97 the decedent frequently completed the death certificate, and HCV and HBV often were not detected and

98 he world's newborn babies do not get a birth certificate, and most neonatal deaths and almost all sti

99 Used linked ART surveillance, birth certificates, and birth defects registry data for 3 stat

100 had their records linked to California birth certificates, and controls were selected from birth cert

101 death was similar to that for clinical death certificates, and could therefore be acceptable for medi

102 ,103) were ascertained from linkage to death certificates, and hazard ratios (HRs) for all- and cause

103 s, hospital discharge diagnosis codes, death certificates, and Medicare claims data.

104 erts used study data, medical records, death certificates, and proxy reports to adjudicate causes of

105 ontact with next of kin, collection of death certificates, and searches of the National Death Index.

106 es identified through medical records, death certificates, and state cancer registries.

107 viewed EMS and hospital records, state death certificates, and the national death index to determine

108 untries are based on clinical records, death certificates, and verbal autopsy studies.

109 According to death certificates, approximately 1800 persons die from hepati

110 er who had an Ebola treatment unit discharge certificate are eligible for inclusion.

111 The authors concluded that birth certificates are an efficient means of locating children

112 Death certificates are inaccurate and do not report PCI-relate

113 on and diabetes mellitus (mentioned on death certificate as either primary or contributing cause of d

114 us (breast vs bottle) was coded on the birth certificate as the type of feeding the infant was receiv

115 mong 1244 child reports with available death certificates/autopsy reports included sudden infant deat

116 Death certificate-based 12-year mortality was analyzed among 1

117 Standard death certificate-based methods for ascertaining deaths due to

118 Birth certificate (BC) controls are an alternative, because th

119 agnosed ALS and a severely disabling disease certificate between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 20

120 h and demographic data, collected from death certificates by the Centers for Disease Control and Prev

121 estimate) revisions of the US standard birth certificate: clinical or obstetric estimate and LMP-base

122 ne assessments, hospital discharge and death certificate codes, and the visit 6 neurocognitive evalua

123 telephone interviews, and hospital and death certificate codes.

124 ing cause of death was identified from death certificates collected through 2006 (mean follow-up, 14.

125 s targeted at improving the quality of death certificate completion are urgently needed.

126 a (ALL) cases 0-7 years of age and 214 birth certificate controls matched on date of birth, sex, and

127 n diagnosed with incident leukemia and birth certificate controls who were matched to them on age, se

128 Crude and birth certificate covariate-adjusted results for carbon monoxi

129 ath in HIV (CoDe) protocol, which uses death certificate data and clinical markers.

130 Death certificate data are often used to study the epidemiolog

131 According to death certificate data between 1969 and 2013, an overall decre

132 g persons aged 25 years or older using death certificate data collated by the National Center for Hea

133 e Medical Birth Registry of Norway has birth certificate data dating back to 1967 and allowed nuclear

134 were linked to hospital admission and death certificate data for 71,681 pairs of maternal grandparen

135 Using birth certificate data for nearly all registered US births fro

136 Using 1999-2001 birth certificate data from 2 counties in North Carolina, the

137 We used nationwide birth certificate data from singleton mother-infant pairs in t

138 on-based cohort study using nationwide birth certificate data from the US National Vital Statistics S

139 gestation during 2000-2005 using live birth certificate data from three states (Pennsylvania, Ohio,

140 National death certificate data greatly overestimate deaths in which HZ

141 cted for this observational study from death certificate data in the US Centers for Disease Control a

142 hospital discharge diagnoses linked to birth certificate data in the year following delivery for 849,

143 States, researchers compared 1997-2003 birth certificate data linked to selected controls (n = 6,681)

144 ing linked New York City discharge and birth certificate data sets from 2010.

145 We reviewed death certificate data to assess the accuracy of deaths report

146 US death certificate data were used to identify deaths due to met

147 n, identified using publicly available birth certificate data, born in 1992, 1994, 1996, and 1998 fro

148 federal government and based on state death certificate data, identifies such deaths by assigning th

149 ers for Disease Control and Prevention death certificate data, using International Statistical Classi

150 cy characteristics were extracted from birth certificate data.

151 ington State Trauma Registry linked to death certificate data.

152 identified by using state and national death certificate data.

153 partment of Health's maternally-linked birth certificate database, we performed a retrospective popul

154 We examined whether birth certificate-derived maternal anthropometric characterist

155 ubtype at the population level because death certificates do not record subtype information.

156 chieved a champion efficiency of 16.1% and a certificated efficiency of 15.6% with improved photostab

157 ations of relying on death counts from death certificates, estimations of indirect deaths, and estima

158 We used data from death certificates filed in the United States from 1999 to 200

159 r diagnosis was randomly selected from birth certificate files (n = 12990) with frequency matching on

160 ; CCR records were linked to statewide birth certificate files from January 2000 to December 2014 to

161 frequent cause of death listed on the death certificate for patients, and cardiovascular disease was

162 Florida resident birth certificates for 2004-2006 were linked to the Centers fo

163 collected by random digit dialing and birth certificates for a Children's Oncology Group case-contro

164 icators was better than agreement with death certificates for all disease-specific causes of death.

165 We linked individual-level data with death certificates for all registered singletons births in Eng

166 ese Ministry of Agriculture issued biosafety certificates for commercial production of two cry1Ab/Ac

167 xies and obtaining medical records and death certificates for ESRD cases.

168 e Congenital Malformations Registry to birth certificates for the years 1992-2006.

169 nt studies looking at information from death certificates found people with intellectual disabilities

170 US death certificates from 1990 to 2004 for which hepatitis A was

171 We analyzed Florida birth certificates from 1994 to 2002 linked to Florida public

172 We conducted an analysis of death certificates from 1999 to 2017 to calculate annual CHD m

173 We validated HZ coding on death certificates from California, using hospital records as

174 Individual death certificates from Kentucky during 1911-1919 were abstrac

175 for-service billing records matched to birth certificates from Medicaid beneficiaries aged 0 to 12 mo

176 enhanced by obtaining paper copies of death certificates from the states, because death certificates

177 use-of-death and demographic data from death certificates from the US National Center for Health Stat

178 of Diseases system diagnostic codes on death certificates from the US National Mortality Database.

179 From live birth certificates from three states, we constructed a cohort

180 tional American Board of Medical Specialties certificates (GS+).

181 nterviews with 399 women whose child's birth certificate had at least one of the boxes checked along

182 ol degree or general educational development certificate had greater eye health knowledge (incidence

183 ortion of children aged 0-4 years with birth certificates had increased by 1.5% (95% CI -7.1 to 10.1)

184 Death certificates had only 58% accuracy (95% confidence inter

185 tational age measurements derived from birth certificates has been in question.

186 (HCV)-infected persons recorded on US death certificates has been increasing, but actual rates and c

187 cesses meet established standards and when a certificate holder is required to periodically demonstra

188 We linked birth certificates, hospital discharge abstracts (including in

189 ulture occupation was described on the death certificate in 115 (35%) of these men.

190 y and periodontology at Harvard, receiving a certificate in 1961.

191 use of death (MCOD) data in 12 million death certificates in 2006-2010.

192 g holders of time-limited and time-unlimited certificates in non-VA and nonacademic settings and the

193 alogy of the Utah population linked to death certificates in Utah over a period of 100 years.

194 diagnosis of AN, or who had a cause-of-death certificate including an AN diagnosis.

195 (n = 5) in hospitalization records or death certificates, including 36 who were diagnosed only on th

196 Death certificates indicated PD was a substantial contributor

197 The authors obtained death certificate information in a cohort of 260 patients who

198 2019;188(7):1213-1223) use death certificate information on all deaths occurring among ad

199 awal of anticonvulsant medication, and death certificate information provided no evidence to suggest

200 Using birth certificate information, we examined the relation betwee

201 and cardiometabolic diseases based on death-certificate information.

202 degree or a general educational development certificate (IRR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.07-1.54), those who we

203 Accuracy of coding on death certificates is difficult to ascertain.

204 ember 31, 2009, using Washington State birth certificates linked to hospital discharge data.

205 th using 2008-2010 New York City (NYC) birth certificates linked to hospital records.

206 Limitations: Underreporting of SLE on death certificates may have resulted in underestimates of SLE

207 Death certificates may lack accuracy and misclassify the cause

208 2014) for whom the data were linked to death certificates/medical records through December 2016.

209 d international sites, including linkages to certificate, MS, and PhD programs.

210 Data were from parental interviews, birth certificates, multiple-pass 24-h dietary recalls, 3-d ac

211 7) who could be linked to a California birth certificate (n = 3,590).

212 Physicians who had signed selected death certificates (n = 6,927) were sent a questionnaire.

213 approval of the petition for establishing a Certificate of Added Qualification in Transplant Hepatol

214 raw materials, PHPI product specifications, certificate of analysis, and test methods.

215 ss was defined as the receipt of an official certificate of blindness (a visual acuity of 3/60 or wor

216 r passive consenting processes and a Federal Certificate of Confidentiality and other protections for

217 dical visit necessary in Italy to obtain the certificate of eligibility to practice sports.

218 d using the 2003 revision of the US Standard Certificate of Live Birth (N = 17,896,048).

219 ere accepted based on the application of the Certificate of Medical Benefit between 2003 and 2007, we

220 Certificate of need (CON) regulation was introduced to c

221 Certificate of need laws provide state-level regulation

222 me or quality between states without vs with certificate of need laws.

223 reevaluating whether the current approach to certificate of need regulation is achieving the intended

224 State certificate of need regulation status as determined by d

225 nderwent procedures in the 15 states without certificate of need regulations and 1 077 716 (69.7%) in

226 analyses have examined relationships between certificate of need regulations and outcomes of care.

227 t differences between states without vs with certificate of need regulations for median hospital mark

228 While many states have repealed certificate of need regulations in recent years, few ana

229 states with highly and moderately stringent certificate of need regulations, respectively, were less

230 When comparing states without vs with certificate of need regulations, there were no significa

231 dergo early revascularization in states with certificate of need regulations.

232 and 1 077 716 (69.7%) in the 35 states with certificate of need regulations.

233 Educational achievement measured by General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE) grades had a p

234 United Kingdom-wide examination, the General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE), which is admi

235 he age-16 UK-wide standardized GCSE (General Certificate of Secondary Education) examination results

236 Two neuroradiologists with certificates of added qualification, one with 5 years an

237 HCV data were matched with 2011-2013 birth certificates of children aged >/=20 months to identify m

238 ality was similar in states with and without certificates of need (109,304 [17.5%] vs 90,104 [17.5%];

239 .001) relative to patients in states without certificates of need, although no differences in the lik

240 e ACEs, and 54.5% received 5 or more General Certificates of Secondary Education (GCSEs) at grade C o

241 using a 30% stratified sample of Interstate Certificates of Veterinary Inspection (ICVI), which are

242 esearch using administrative data associated certificate-of-need (CON) regulation for open heart surg

243 certificates from the states, because death certificates often provide additional information and ai

244 lly diagnosed at autopsy or known from death certificates only.

245 or AF on hospital discharge records or death certificates or 12-lead ECGs performed during 3 triennia

246 om medical records, cancer registries, death certificates, pathology reports, and review of histologi

247 rning unit on Programming for a postgraduate certificate (PG Cert) in Clinical Bioinformatics with a

248 f children younger than 5 years with a birth certificate, proportion younger than 5 years with up-to-

249 d agreement on cause of death from the death certificate, proxy, and adjudication, as well as sensiti

250 was adjudicated using medical records, death certificates, proxy interview, and autopsy reports.

251 ikely lag time in receipt of completed death certificates received by the Centers for Disease Control

252 pital admission, disease registry, and death certificate records from the CALIBER programme, which li

253 records, national cancer registry, and death certificate records, and from primary care data among a

254 Deaths were confirmed by death certificates, referring physicians, and medical records.

255 ratios (PRs) of maternal smoking from birth certificate report and ASDs using logistic regression, a

256 idual cancer mortality rates from 2008 death certificate reporting from the Centers for Disease Contr

257 death among men and women from 2009 US death certificate reporting; (2) individual cancer mortality r

258 tinct strata and reduced the number of death certificate requests by 76%.

259 onable matches to reduce the number of death certificate requests to state offices.

260 hospital and ED discharge records and death certificates, respectively.

261 Regardless of birth certificate revision, the median, 10th, and 90th percent

262 and lower for postterm births for both birth certificate revisions.

263 rice were investigated and optimized using a certificated rice flour.

264 Cases were identified though a state death certificate search, Centers for Disease Control and Prev

265 nsitivity (sensitivity = 50%-89%) than death certificates (sensitivity = 31%-81%).

266 ing the reporting of cause of death on death certificates should improve national vital records data

267 ion spectroscopy (ICPES) and the analysis of certificate standard samples.

268 The new evidence includes the death certificate stating the man's occupation to have been 'm

269 iograms, hospital discharge codes, and death certificates), stroke, heart failure, CHD, and mortality

270 interview studies with physicians, and death certificate studies (the Netherlands and Belgium) were r

271 A nationwide death certificate study in Flanders, Belgium, was conducted in

272 3 using data from newly revised Oregon birth certificates that allowed for the disaggregation of hosp

273 To certificate this encroaching process, we employed the tr

274 sits, hospital discharge diagnosis, or death certificates through 2011.

275 pital transfers), and fetal and infant death certificates to assess neonatal mortality rates among 48

276 ned using the National Death Index and death certificates to characterize the mortality experience of

277 elopmental Services records with state birth certificates to identify all siblings and half siblings

278 cords, which were then linked to state birth certificates to identify full sibs and half-sibs and to

279 ves encourage internists with time-unlimited certificates to recertify.

280 f registers of hospital discharges and death certificates) to identify definite CCM diagnoses first m

281 followed for mortality, identified by death certificate underlying or contributing causes, by linkag

282 followed for mortality, identified by death certificate underlying or contributing causes, by linkag

283 Death certificates underrepresent the true mortality from CHB.

284 Death certificates, utilized by previous reports, have poor co

285 primary or a contributory cause on the death certificate varied according to disease subtype and was

286 ion that death by stroke reported on a death certificate was due to the index stroke if death occurre

287 women with available information, the birth certificate was fully concordant with respect to inferti

288 Information available on birth certificates was not sufficient to understand this dispa

289 Using death certificates, we analyzed trends in NYC-specific and US

290 Based on examination of US death certificates, we identified deaths in 26 states for whic

291 ked with the state death registry, and death certificates were manually reviewed.

292 nked with the state death registry and death certificates were manually reviewed.

293 Death certificates were obtained for all but three of those wh

294 Death certificates were obtained for all participants who died

295 Death certificates were obtained.

296 Death certificates were reviewed by 2 physicians.

297 medical records, autopsy reports, and death certificates were reviewed to identify cause of death.

298 registries of households, cancers, and death certificates were used to derive incidence and mortality

299 Birth certificates were used to select women who had vaginal s

300 ation of direct and indirect deaths on death certificates will require concerted efforts and consensu