ライフサイエンスコーパス: certified reference material

1 inst NCS DC 73349 - bush branches and leaves certified reference material.

2 d the accuracy was assessed using DOLT-3 NRC certified reference material.

3 pared with other standard methods and with a certified reference material.

4 igesting block and by analyzing bovine liver certified reference material.

5 The method was validated by analysing a certified reference material.

6 thod was confirmed by analysis of rice flour certified reference material.

7 Method accuracy was further confirmed using certified reference material.

8 ddition calibration or calibration against a certified reference material.

9 y with (235,238)U(16)O2 species in a uranium certified reference material.

10 he developed method was checked by analyzing certified reference material.

11 luated by analysing of SRM Apple Leaves 1515 certified reference material.

12 validity was checked by the analysis of four certified reference materials.

13 of the analytes in natural water samples and certified reference materials.

14 Accuracy of the method verified using certified reference materials.

15 Method accuracy was verified by analyzing certified reference materials.

16 fortified water and NIST 1573a tomato leaves certified reference materials.

17 hod using various sample types, particularly certified reference materials.

18 sation for the food sample matrix using leaf certified reference materials.

19 rice flour and black tea samples as well as certified reference materials.

20 ation method was verified by the analysis of certified reference materials.

21 nation of analytes in some dairy samples and certified reference materials.

22 lidity was controlled by the analysis of two certified reference materials.

23 ten nutritional supplement samples and three certified reference materials.

24 uman serum reference materials for cortisol [Certified Reference Materials 192 and 193] with the cert

25 of 93.5-98.0% in food samples as well as in Certified Reference Material (99.1%).

26 Due to the lack of certified reference materials, a methodological comparis

27 Evaluation of dot-blot using certified reference material and 146 food and feed sampl

28 of a primary reference measurement method, a certified reference material and a reference laboratory.

29 Accuracy was assessed by analyzing a certified reference material and addition and recovery t

30 e verified against GBW 07604 (Poplar leaves) certified reference material and by the recovery test.

31 d precision was checked by analyzing an AFM1 certified reference material and different milk samples

32 ise (<6.9%) and accurate (recoveries using a certified reference material and spiked blanks: 90-102%;

33 netic and spectrometric techniques using the certified reference material and the determined values w

34 ccuracy was estimated by the analysis of two certified reference materials and also by spike recoveri

35 method was validated using soil and sediment certified reference materials and also using real sample

36 ur essential elements (V, Mn, Cu, and Zn) in certified reference materials and in actual seafood samp

37 The analysis of certified reference materials and real samples proved th

38 e determination of nickel and cobalt ions in certified reference materials and some food samples.

39 SPME method was confirmed based on different certified reference materials and standard addition meth

40 proposed method was validated by applying to certified reference materials and successfully applied f

41 thod was studied by performing the method on certified reference materials and the presence of differ

42 ccuracy was evaluated by the analysis of two certified reference materials and the results were to be

43 A set of fifteen certified reference materials and three real vegetal sam

44 Firstly, this SPE method was applied to certified reference material, and than coffee, tea, legu

45 its application for the measurement of IAEA certified reference materials, and through participation

46 as assessed using spike test and analysis of certified reference materials (Apple leaves and Oyster t

47 Method accuracy was confirmed using certified reference material as well as comparison with

48 < 5%) during the mycotoxin determination in certified reference material as well as excellent quanti

49 ditionally proved by analysis of bovine milk certified reference material (BCR(R)-492).

50 applied to the determination of thiamine in certified reference material (BCR-485), pharmaceutical f

51 The method was validated by applying to certified reference materials (BCR estuarine water 505 a

52 d was successfully verified by analyzing two certified reference materials (BCR-482 Lichen and SPS-WW

53 To verify the method' accuracy, two certified reference materials, BCR(R) 414 Plankton & IRM

54 CbPx is applied to the analysis of five certified reference materials by inductively coupled pla

55 There are few and expensive certified reference materials commercially available for

56 y relying on the analysis of the SELM-1 cell-certified reference material, consisting of Se-enriched

57 We report that the certified reference material CRM 7405-a (Hijiki) is a ri

58 um (Pu) dioxide particles were produced from certified reference material (CRM) 136 solution (CRM 136

59 n serum reference material for progesterone [Certified Reference Material (CRM) 347] with the certifi

60 tainty measurement, precision, accuracy, and certified reference material (CRM) analysis using optimi

61 o overcome the difficulties of obtaining the Certified Reference Material (CRM) and according to the

62 ) has been developed and evaluated through a certified reference material (CRM) and beer samples.

63 d was evaluated by analysis of SRM 2700 as a certified reference material (CRM) and result was in goo

64 int Research Center, European Commission) as Certified Reference Material (CRM) for analytical qualit

65 e content of Ag, Cd, Hg, Pb, Tl, and Zn in a certified reference material (CRM) of Lobster hepatopanc

66 Certified reference material (CRM) Rice Flour SRM 1568b

67 ass fractions in single-wall carbon nanotube certified reference material (CRM) SWCNT-1.

68 eservatives in meat and to obtain a suitable Certified Reference Material (CRM) to achieve this task.

69 After the validation by analysis of a certified reference material (CRM), the method was succe

70 brated by standard solutions, rather than by certified reference material (CRM).

71 n 0.7 mol kg x soln(-1) NaCl, and a seawater Certified Reference Material (CRM).

72 ent of reference values to a mushroom powder Certified Reference Material (CRM).

73 Certified reference materials (CRM) DOLT-4 (Dogfish Live

74 ranium isotopic ratios in particles of three certified reference materials (CRM) of uranium, CRM U030

75 titrimetric method (SM-ORT) using different certified reference materials (CRM).

76 om the lack of efficient digestion steps and certified reference materials (CRM).

77 e United States and pentachlorophenol from a certified reference material (CRM524) using various solv

78 man serum reference materials for estradiol [Certified Reference Materials (CRMs) 576, 577, and 578]

79 racy of the method was verified by analyzing certified reference materials (CRMs) and performing reco

80 ney (ERM-BB186), and groundwater (ERM-CA615) certified reference materials (CRMs) and recoveries of C

81 Certified reference materials (CRMs) are required to gua

82 is fit to assign target values to secondary certified reference materials (CRMs) for further use in

83 s in HClO4 has been optimized and applied to certified reference materials (CRMs) of natural waters C

84 lying various analytical techniques, and the certified reference materials (CRMs) tool plays a crucia

85 evaluated the performance of Ho3-(aq)-based Certified Reference Materials (CRMs) under "routine" ope

86 Certified reference materials (CRMs) were used to valida

87 on test of the established dSPmuE procedure, Certified reference materials (CRMs) were used, yielding

88 ng several marine sediment and tissue matrix certified reference materials (CRMs) with certified valu

89 of target concentration in primary calibrant certified reference materials (CRMs), both lambda and th

90 The accuracy was validated using certified reference materials (CRMs), demonstrating the

91 evelopment and certification of nucleic acid certified reference materials (CRMs), particularly for t

92 Accuracy was evaluated using certified reference materials (CRMs), spiked samples, an

93 ffectiveness was also validated by analyzing certified reference materials (CRMs).

94 cated series of analysis was performed using certified reference materials (CRMs).

95 Validation tests also performed using certified reference materials (CRMs).

96 The validation was verified by analysis of certified reference materials (CRMs).

97 The method is validated by the analysis of certified reference materials (CRMs).

98 ogy was successfully verified by analysis of Certified Reference Material CTA-FFA-1 (Fine Fly Ash) an

99 Results favorably compare against Certified Reference Materials data (NASS-4 and SLRS-3) a

100 Accuracy of the method was verified using certified reference material DOLT-3 and ERM-BB186.

101 Accuracy was evaluated using dogfish liver certified reference material (DOLT-3 NRC) for trace meta

102 racy of the technique was evaluated by using certified reference material (DORM-2) and spiking the bo

103 Accuracy was evaluated by the analysis of certified reference materials (DORM-2 and TORT-2) after

104 osed method was validated by analysis of two certified reference materials (DORM-3 and DORM-4) with g

105 y of the method was verified by means of the Certified Reference Material EDF-2525 and good results i

106 acy of the method was confirmed by analyzing certified reference material ERM BC-211 (rice powder).

107 n the liquid phase with the (202)Hg enriched certified reference material ERM-AE640 and measurements

108 mercial gasoline sample and validated with a certified-reference-material (ERM-EF213) gasoline.

109 A certified reference material, five freeze-dried samples

110 ts potential for use in the development of a certified reference material for cTnI in serum are discu

111 This work describes preparing a certified reference material for pumpkin seed flour for

112 To guarantee accuracy, we need certified reference materials for foods.

113 ccessfully validated through measurements of certified reference material from 10(-7) to 10(-9) and t

114 We used certified reference materials from different plant speci

115 MS analysis of a glyphosate-tolerant soybean certified reference material, GTS 40-3-2, were used to d

116 For this purpose, five certified reference materials have been analysed for the

117 d was successfully verified by analyzing two certified reference materials (IAEA-330 and IAEA-375) co

118 Certified reference materials, IAEA-405 and DORM-2, were

119 nalyzed for vitamin and mineral content with certified reference materials in qualified laboratories.

120 ronmental Protection Agency (EPA) 552.2 CRM (certified reference material) in pure water and in three

121 OSA-MSPE method was tested with certified reference materials including LGC-6010 (Hard D

122 The results of analysis of the certified reference material (INCT-TL-1 tea sample) was

123 The results of analysis of the certified reference material (INCT-TL-1) are in good agr

124 The method was validated using rainwater certified reference material (IRMM CA408) and subsequent

125 the method was confirmed by the analysis of certified reference materials, it was successfully appli

126 calibration ML model was validated with two certified reference materials (LSVEC and IRMM-016).

127 with the certified values of three different Certified Reference Materials (marine sediment SRM 1944,

128 obtained in National Research Council Canada certified reference material MOOS-3 seawater, in good ag

129 our method was further verified against two certified reference materials namely NCS ZC73029 and NIE

130 oaded with 10 pg of New Brunswick Laboratory certified reference material (NBL CRM) 128 from an 8 M H

131 Accuracy was confirmed through analysis of certified reference material (NCS DC 73351 tea) and spik

132 cy of the proposed method was verified using certified reference material (NCS ZC85006 Tomato).

133 method was confirmed by the analysis of the certified reference materials (NCS ZC73032 Celery, CRM02

134 The results for fortified infant formula, a certified reference material (NIST 1869), confirmed the

135 Accuracy was evaluated using milk powder certified reference material (NIST 8435) with good agree

136 The results were validated using a certified reference material (NIST SRM 1643e) and ground

137 he accuracy of the method was confirmed with certified reference materials (NIST 1567a Wheat flour an

138 the method was evaluated by the analysis of certified reference materials (NIST 1567a Wheat Flour an

139 of the method was confirmed with analyses of certified reference materials (NIST SRM 1515 Apple leave

140 The method was validated by using three certified reference materials (NIST SRM 1577b bovine liv

141 Accuracy of the method verified using certified reference materials (NIST-SRM-1946).

142 cy was confirmed by analyzing the rice flour certified reference material, NIST 1568a.

143 of the procedure was performed by analysing certified reference materials; NIST SRM 1515 Apple leave

144 The cRMP demonstrated high agreement with certified reference materials (no significant bias to BC

145 s validated by analysis of a selenized yeast Certified Reference Material NRC SELM-1.

146 in two samples of bottled drinking water and certified reference materials, NRC CASS-5 (nearshore sea

147 approach was performed by the analysis of a certified reference material obtaining accurate (2% erro

148 The accuracy was confirmed with a certified reference material of apple leaves (NIST 1515)

149 Method accuracy was assessed using a certified reference material of green coffee, yielding r

150 he method accuracy was confirmed analysing a certified reference material of rice flour furnished by

151 as additionally proved by its application to certified reference material of salmon tissue (BCR(R) 72

152 Addition/recovery tests and analysis of a certified reference material of skimmed powdered milk (E

153 Certified reference materials of analytical standards fo

154 the method was confirmed by the analysis of certified reference materials of different types and by

155 tion and determination of mercury species in certified reference materials of dogfish liver (DOLT-3)

156 The accuracy was confirmed using the certified reference materials of oyster tissue (NIST 156

157 peciation analyses in commercially available certified reference materials of river water and seawate

158 pectrometry (LC/MS/MS) were obtained using a certified reference material (R(2) = 0.99), laboratory r

159 acy of the method was checked by analysing a certified reference material; results were in agreement

160 ans of the parallel analysis of bovine liver certified reference material samples (BCR-185R) doped wi

161 samples (water, apple juice, beer, wine) and certified reference materials (seawater, groundwater, wa

162 developed an 82-Se-enriched selenized yeast Certified Reference Material, SEEY-1 intended to be used

163 tio were measured in selenium-enriched yeast-certified reference material SELM-1, natural selenomethi

164 the device, it was validated by analyzing a certified reference material, showing excellent accuracy

165 ition time, selection of a suitable internal certified reference material, signal selection used for

166 orne particulate (PM10) filters as well as a certified reference material SLRS-4 (river water) were s

167 he desired method was checked by analysis of certified reference materials (SLRS-4 Riverine water and

168 e outlined method was performed by analysing certified reference material soil (NCS DC 73323).

169 method was confirmed by analyzing NIST 1570a certified reference material (spinach leaves) at a 95% c

170 osed procedure was verified by analysing the certified reference materials, SPS-WW2 Batch 108 wastewa

171 s food and water samples and validated using certified reference materials SRM 1570A (spinach leaves)

172 Several certified reference materials (SRM 1568a, SRM 1570a, CRM

173 acterizing primary calibration standards and certified reference materials that can then be used to u

174 Following validation with certified reference material, the method was successfull

175 e factor k = 1) traceable to an Sb-implanted certified reference material through the silicon electro

176 he proposed methodology was validated with a certified reference material TMDA-64.2.

177 Recovery studies were performed, certified reference material (TMDA-61) was used to test

178 or Fe and Zn was assessed by the analysis of certified reference materials Tort-3 (Lobster hepatopanc

179 The method was applied to certified reference materials (TORT-2 and DORM-2) and co

180 nty calculations were also performed using a certified reference material (UME CRM 1202 Elements in H

181 The results obtained for four certified reference materials using external calibration

182 chronometric ages of four distinct plutonium-certified reference materials varying in chemical form,

183 d by determining the concentration of U in a certified reference material, viz., NIST SRM 1640a natur

184 ify the accuracy of the method, GBW07605 Tea Certified Reference Material was analysed.

185 A wide variety of certified reference materials were analyzed to investiga

186 icken, mussels, fish, rice, and seaweed) and certified reference materials were digested with HNO(3)

187 ly, quantification of both sediment and fish certified reference materials were directly compared bet

188 The measurements of the certified reference materials were in good agreement wit

189 NIST SRM 1515 Apple leaves and GBW-07605 Tea certified reference materials were used to confirm the a

190 Certified reference materials were utilized to find out

191 Se-enriched yeast cells (SELM-1 certified reference material) were successfully analyzed

192 The development of certified reference materials whose values are traceable

193 o a mixture of uranium particles coming from certified reference material with a (235)U abundance ran

194 et digestion methods were compared using oil certified reference material with different reagent mixt

195 ted with an accuracy profile approach, using certified reference materials with iodine contents rangi

196 suggested method's accuracy was verified by certified reference materials with recoveries of higher