ライフサイエンスコーパス: cesarean delivery

1 been reported for offspring born by planned cesarean delivery.

2 The only related obstetric event was a cesarean delivery.

3 pressure wound therapy in obese women after cesarean delivery.

4 ising in parallel with the increased rate of cesarean delivery.

5 ital stays, and significantly higher risk of cesarean delivery.

6 as been associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery.

7 The primary outcome was the rate of cesarean delivery.

8 Thirty-four percent of women had elective cesarean delivery.

9 atient factors that affect the likelihood of cesarean delivery.

10 with an overall decrease in the incidence of cesarean delivery.

11 s (56.8%) were in labor at the time of their cesarean delivery.

12 There are no published data specific to cesarean delivery.

13 ry 8 hours for a total of 48 hours following cesarean delivery.

14 d with hypertensive disease of pregnancy and cesarean delivery.

15 ronidazole vs placebo for 48 hours following cesarean delivery.

16 Cesarean delivery.

17 organ/space infections within 30 days after cesarean delivery.

18 3.07) compared with women having no previous cesarean delivery.

19 k of surgical site infection (SSI) following cesarean delivery.

20 f whom 70 were delivered vaginally and 32 by cesarean delivery.

21 microbiota during vaginal delivery, but not Cesarean delivery.

22 prevention of surgical-site infection after cesarean delivery.

23 Exposure: Birth by cesarean delivery.

24 male), 4921 individuals (22.3%) were born by cesarean delivery.

25 The primary outcome was cesarean delivery.

26 ing diagnosis related groups for vaginal and cesarean deliveries.

27 ccurred in the ICU, including four emergency cesarean deliveries.

28 85 (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.25-1.55; P<.001) for cesarean deliveries.

29 [0] years), of which 2 202 632 (16.7%) were cesarean deliveries.

30 ut-of-pocket price estimates for vaginal and cesarean deliveries.

31 itals with higher profits per procedure from cesarean deliveries.

32 y and 1.30 (95% CI, 1.02-1.65) for 2 or more cesarean deliveries.

33 arean delivery, and 724 (9.4%) had 2 or more cesarean deliveries.

34 5% CI, 0.96-1.91) for women having 2 or more cesarean deliveries.

35 n delivery, most women have scheduled repeat cesarean deliveries.

36 pared with those born to women with repeated cesarean deliveries.

37 .546 +/- 0.146; P = 0.0002), and unscheduled cesarean delivery (0.387 +/- 0.162; P = 0.02) were assoc

38 -0.4%; 95% CI, -0.7% to -0.1%; P = .01), and cesarean delivery (-1.0%; 95% CI, -1.3% to -0.7%; P < .0

39 o was 1.33 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.75) for elective cesarean delivery, 1.07 (95% CI: 0.94, 1.22) for emergen

40 1.54), and 1.37 (1.30 to 1.44); for primary cesarean delivery, 1.11 (95% CI, 1.06 to 1.15), 1.10 (1.

41 1.9%, respectively; odds ratio with planned cesarean delivery, 1.16; 95% confidence interval, 0.77 t

42 There was no difference in the rate of cesarean delivery (10.5% versus 10.7%; RR 0.98, [95% CI

43 (n = 56,015 [17.4%]), those born by planned cesarean delivery (12,355 [3.8%]) were at no significant

44 Women with CHD were more likely to undergo cesarean delivery (1357 [39.3%] vs 1 164 509 women witho

45 ant between-group differences in the rate of cesarean delivery (16.9% and 16.2%, respectively; P=0.30

46 usion criteria, 5267 (68.5%) had no previous cesarean delivery, 1694 (22.0%) had 1 cesarean delivery,

47 r than in women undergoing repeated elective cesarean delivery (2.9 percent vs. 1.8 percent), as was

48 .3%), shoulder dystocia (1.5% vs. 4.0%), and cesarean delivery (26.9% vs. 33.8%).

49 CI: 0.78-1.79; I2: 63%; p-value = 0.40), or cesarean delivery (34,693 FGM/C and 46,013 non-FGM/C par

50 7% (1674 of 1919 infants]; P < .001), as did cesarean delivery (44% [625 of 1431 births] to 64% [1227

51 ith 48%, P = 0.02; with exclusion of planned cesarean deliveries: 5% compared with 53%; P = 0.002).

52 50.0) was due to interaction between HDP and cesarean delivery, 9.6% (95% CI: 3.4, 15.2) was due to m

53 up and 5471 to the placebo group); scheduled cesarean delivery accounted for 50.1% and 49.2% of the d

54 ospital stay (>6 days) among both women with cesarean deliveries (adjusted OR, 2.13 [95% CI, 2.03-2.2

55 ective factors against transmission included Cesarean delivery (adjusted OR [aOR]: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.36

56 adjusted OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.92-1.13) or any cesarean delivery (adjusted OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.99-1.13)

57 utilization, including an increased risk of cesarean delivery (adjusted OR, 1.40 [95% CI, 1.38-1.42]

58 er among women without known indications for cesarean delivery (adjusted risk ratio, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.

59 , cesarean delivery with no labor trial, and cesarean delivery after induction) and estimate logistic

60 rom 440 children (49.3% girls, 24.8% born by cesarean delivery; all children except for 6 were breast

61 mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m(2) or those having cesarean delivery also had elevated rates up to 6 weeks

62 liveries involving either induction or first cesarean delivery also increased from 21.9% to 27.3% bet

63 cy reduced GWG and limited complications and cesarean deliveries among women with overweight or obesi

64 The odds ratio for cesarean delivery among women in the fourth quartile, as

65 an additional cost of $8.7 million, vs 2345 cesarean deliveries and $4.9 million with the 4000-g pol

66 However, more favorable ratios for both cesarean deliveries and cost per permanent injury avoide

67 dds ratios of 1.16 (95% CI, 0.98-1.37) for 1 cesarean delivery and 1.30 (95% CI, 1.02-1.65) for 2 or

68 5 fetuses) were randomly assigned to planned cesarean delivery and 1406 women (2812 fetuses) to plann

69 of celiac disease in individuals exposed to cesarean delivery and adverse fetal events (ie, low Apga

70 monitored areas subject to overuse, such as cesarean delivery and angioplasty rates, more than areas

71 Cesarean delivery and CAPN14 genetic variation likely pr

72 ts whose mothers underwent elective repeated cesarean delivery and in 12 infants born at term whose m

73 ound a positive association between elective cesarean delivery and later celiac disease (adjusted odd

74 It can also be reduced by cesarean delivery and limiting the use of invasive monit

75 s; quality criteria; and outcomes, including cesarean delivery and maternal and neonatal morbidity.

76 yond is associated with a decreased risk for cesarean delivery and meconium-stained amniotic fluid.

77 lish- or Spanish-speaking women with 1 prior cesarean delivery and no contraindication to trial of la

78 higher BMI was related to increased rates of cesarean delivery and obesity-related high-risk conditio

79 The risk of emergency cesarean delivery and of delivering LGA infants increase

80 In recent decades rates of cesarean delivery and preterm birth survival have increa

81 Cesarean delivery and preterm delivery rates did not dif

82 Some pregnant women prefer cesarean delivery and request it without maternal or fet

83 clampsia lead to early induction of labor or cesarean delivery and subsequent preterm birth.

84 Obesity increases the risk of both cesarean delivery and surgical-site infection.

85 We examined interactions with cesarean delivery and used mediation analysis with 4-way

86 compared with offspring born by unscheduled cesarean delivery and with offspring delivered vaginally

87 iations between mode of delivery (vaginal vs cesarean delivery) and maternal and neonatal birth outco

88 ion between mode of delivery (vaginal versus cesarean delivery) and risk for transmission.

89 ticosteroid use, induced preterm deliveries, cesarean deliveries, and surfactant use increased signif

90 ery, 1.07 (95% CI: 0.94, 1.22) for emergency cesarean delivery, and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.84, 1.12) for ope

91 evious cesarean delivery, 1694 (22.0%) had 1 cesarean delivery, and 724 (9.4%) had 2 or more cesarean

92 rs, including maternal fever, preterm labor, cesarean delivery, and antibiotic or acid suppressant us

93 EXIT procedure differs significantly from a cesarean delivery, and caution must be taken to avoid ma

94 age, racial or ethnic minority group status, cesarean delivery, and comorbidities were associated wit

95 Studies regarding nutrition, fertility, cesarean delivery, and contraception were limited.

96 Among mothers: preterm birth, cesarean delivery, and hypertensive diseases of pregnanc

97 isks of fetal overgrowth, shoulder dystocia, cesarean delivery, and hypertensive disorders.

98 in early labor did not increase the rate of cesarean delivery, and it provided better analgesia and

99 th weight, small-for-gestational-age births, cesarean delivery, and low Apgar score.

100 al death >=24 weeks' gestation), preterm and cesarean delivery, and neonatal unit admission in the mo

101 at increased risk of placental abruption and cesarean delivery, and their infants were at increased r

102 her than that associated with planned repeat cesarean delivery, and there was a marked excess of deat

103 aOR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.06-4.48), intrapartum (cesarean delivery: aOR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.01, 3.09), and i

104 al studies have shown that offspring born by cesarean delivery are at increased risk of ill health in

105 ciations were strengthened only for elective cesarean delivery (aRR = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.13, 1.97).

106 a trial of labor in women with a history of cesarean delivery, as compared with elective repeated ce

107 Cesarean delivery, as opposed to vaginal delivery, was a

108 The rates of cesarean delivery associated with the separate indicatio

109 Of 24,077 repeat cesarean deliveries at term, 13,258 were performed elect

110 women with a singleton gestation and a prior cesarean delivery at 19 academic medical centers.

111 We assessed associations between elective cesarean delivery at term (37 weeks of gestation or long

112 y is an independent predictor of the risk of cesarean delivery at term in primiparous women.

113 The rate of cesarean delivery at term was lowest (16.0%) among women

114 n pregnancy who were scheduled for a planned cesarean delivery at term were randomized to receive sin

115 Elective repeat cesarean delivery before 39 weeks of gestation is common

116 s) and medically indicated preterm delivery (cesarean delivery before onset of labor or induced onset

117 he difference in the probability of having a cesarean delivery between hospitals was 25 percentage po

118 gnificant difference in the overall rates of cesarean delivery between the open and masked groups (26

119 e with diagnosis codes for obstetric trauma, cesarean delivery, birth injury, preterm birth, hypoglyc

120 ecific absolute adjusted risks for emergency cesarean delivery, birth of a small-for-gestational-age

121 rly-life factors (antibiotic use in infancy, cesarean delivery, breast-feeding, neonatal intensive ca

122 orphine is commonly used for analgesia after cesarean delivery, but is frequently associated with pos

123 We examined whether cesarean delivery (CD) increased the risk of wheeze or f

124 The rate of cesarean delivery (CD) is high in many parts of the worl

125 Furthermore, cesarean delivery (CD) is increasing and may affect brea

126 Cesarean delivery (CD) perturbs the assembly of the neon

127 ttle known about healing of the uterus after Cesarean delivery (CD).

128 90th percentile for gestational age, primary cesarean delivery, clinically diagnosed neonatal hypogly

129 m births, hypertension during pregnancy, and cesarean delivery compared with naturally conceived preg

130 s in Scotland between 1993 and 2007, planned cesarean delivery compared with vaginal delivery (but no

131 , the risk of neuroblastoma was elevated for cesarean delivery compared with vaginal delivery (OR = 1

132 onates (65 with vaginal delivery and 23 with cesarean delivery) completed the MR imaging evaluation.

133 Planned cesarean delivery comprises a significant proportion of

134 t not from nonelective mothers who underwent cesarean delivery contained a different bacterial commun

135 t twin in the cephalic presentation, planned cesarean delivery did not significantly decrease or incr

136 irth, indicated preterm birth, and unplanned cesarean delivery) differed according to maternal race/e

137 ould be associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery during labor at term.

138 of 24 weeks or more and who were undergoing cesarean delivery during labor or after membrane rupture

139 s were restricted to vaginal and nonelective cesarean deliveries, each one-log increase in mean titer

140 ased risk of asthma associated with elective cesarean delivery, especially among children born at ter

141 Women with at least 1 previous cesarean delivery face an increased risk of complication

142 Audits of indications for cesarean delivery, feedback for health professionals, an

143 hout ultrasound; (2) ultrasound and elective cesarean delivery for estimated fetal weight of 4000 g o

144 0-g policy); and (3) ultrasound and elective cesarean delivery for estimated fetal weight of 4500 g o

145 ronidazole vs placebo for 48 hours following cesarean delivery for the prevention of SSI in obese wom

146 n who are not diabetic, a policy of elective cesarean delivery for ultrasonographically diagnosed fet

147 companied by a decrease in the proportion of cesarean deliveries from 22% on weekdays to 16% on weeke

148 cords of more than 25,000 women with a prior cesarean delivery from 17 community and tertiary-care ho

149 gnificant but small reduction in the rate of cesarean delivery from the preintervention period to the

150 the 149 hospitals that had baseline rates of cesarean delivery greater than 23.9% for NTSV births, of

151 f cesarean delivery was 90.7% in the planned-cesarean-delivery group and 43.8% in the planned-vaginal

152 omposite primary outcome between the planned-cesarean-delivery group and the planned-vaginal-delivery

153 Women in the planned-cesarean-delivery group delivered earlier than did those

154 Women having 2 or more cesarean deliveries had an adjusted odds ratio for recei

155 within-family analysis, individuals born by cesarean delivery had 64% (8%-148%) higher odds of obesi

156 rth among women who had undergone a previous cesarean delivery had a 31% (95% CI, 17%-47%) lower risk

157 Fecal samples from infants born by cesarean delivery had lower levels of S100A8-A9 than fro

158 men who attempt vaginal delivery after prior cesarean delivery has decreased largely because of conce

159 Repeated cesarean deliveries have higher rates of operative compl

160 In recent decades, the global rates of cesarean delivery have rapidly increased.

161 appropriateness of charges, and the rates of cesarean delivery, high-risk infant transfer, ultrasound

162 holecystectomy, colorectal cancer resection, cesarean delivery, hysterectomy, knee replacement, hip r

163 The estimated number of cesarean deliveries in 2012 was 22.9 million (95% CI, 22

164 obstetric hospitalizations, deliveries, and cesarean deliveries in women with SLE, RA, pregestationa

165 Offspring born by planned cesarean delivery in a first pregnancy were compared wit

166 th combined rates of planned and unscheduled cesarean delivery in a number of regions approaching 50%

167 herapy reduces surgical-site infection after cesarean delivery in obese women.

168 ents should weigh this risk when considering cesarean delivery in the absence of a clear indication.

169 ew found that avoidance of breastfeeding and cesarean delivery in women with viremia also reduced ris

170 the statewide actions to reduce the rates of cesarean delivery, including the 149 hospitals that had

171 To investigate whether previous cesarean delivery increases the risk of reoperation, per

172 ation with bupivacaine and adrenaline during cesarean delivery (intervention group) or no single woun

173 A trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery is associated with a greater perinatal

174 Trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery is associated with increased risk of u

175 ssociation with elective, but not emergency, cesarean delivery is consistent with the hypothesis that

176 rates of respiratory complications, elective cesarean delivery is discouraged before 39 weeks of gest

177 e maternal morbidity (SMM), yet mediation by cesarean delivery is largely unexplored.

178 iated with trial of labor following previous cesarean delivery is low.

179 armacological approach to pain control after cesarean delivery is often insufficient on its own.

180 Cesarean delivery is the most common inpatient surgery i

181 imen in this high-risk population undergoing cesarean delivery is unknown.

182 stetrical outcomes including maternal death, cesarean delivery, length of stay, preeclampsia, preterm

183 No difference was found for cesarean delivery (low evidence), induction of labor (in

184 gnancy-induced hypertension (PIH), emergency cesarean delivery, low birthweight (LBW), preterm birth,

185 In contrast, among elective Cesarean deliveries, maternal body mass index was not as

186 Finally, the risk for persistent pain after cesarean deliveries may be associated with a certain gen

187 iously recommended national target rates for cesarean deliveries may be too low.

188 r clinical factors that increase the risk of cesarean delivery may be methodologically biased and mis

189 d regimens for antibiotic prophylaxis before cesarean delivery may further reduce the rate of postope

190 vidence of the safety of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery, most women have scheduled repeat cesa

191 Cesarean deliveries, multiple births, and births at less

192 ivery episode (as a proxy for parity), prior cesarean delivery, multiple gestation, patient age, mari

193 gression analyses excluding subjects who had cesarean deliveries (n = 5), markers of both fetal and m

194 here was an equal distribution of vaginal vs cesarean deliveries (n=192 and n=190, respectively).

195 who had a trial of labor following previous cesarean delivery (n = 15 515), the overall rate of deli

196 Compared with offspring born by unscheduled cesarean delivery (n = 56,015 [17.4%]), those born by pl

197 than the risk associated with planned repeat cesarean delivery (n = 9014), more than twice (OR, 2.2;

198 age, EGA) compared to those who had elective Cesarean deliveries near term (35 to 36 weeks of EGA).

199 ernal benzodiazepine use was associated with cesarean delivery (odds ratio [OR], 2.45; 95% CI, 1.36-4

200 A total of 113 women undergoing scheduled cesarean delivery of term singleton gestations were incl

201 Among women undergoing scheduled cesarean delivery of term singleton pregnancies, delayed

202 Cesarean delivery, older neonatal age, and smaller house

203 Nonetheless, the influence of cesarean deliveries on surgical complications later in l

204 surgical-site infection within 30 days after cesarean delivery, on the basis of definitions from the

205 ted with a significant change in the rate of cesarean deliveries or the infant's condition at birth.

206 t associated with a reduction in the rate of cesarean delivery or with improvement in the condition o

207 ta previa (OR = 1.71; 95% CI, 1.05 to 2.79), cesarean delivery (OR = 1.62; 95% CI, 1.46 to 1.80), and

208 re managed expectantly had a higher risk for cesarean delivery (OR, 1.21 [CI, 1.01 to 1.46]), but thi

209 ], 1.06-2.32), higher adjusted likelihood of cesarean delivery (OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.02-2.51), and hig

210 After emergency cesarean delivery, oral dabrafenib treatment was initiat

211 fants birthed vaginally and those birthed by cesarean delivery (P < 0.005).

212 There were 11.7 to 39.3 cesarean deliveries per 100 deliveries performed in low-

213 ve delivery before 39 weeks of gestation and cesarean delivery performed in low-risk mothers varied w

214 ve delivery before 39 weeks of gestation and cesarean delivery performed in low-risk mothers were not

215 gestation and before 39 weeks of gestation; cesarean delivery performed in low-risk mothers).

216 th weight (PR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.38-1.83), and cesarean delivery (PR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.01-1.14) relative

217 ed, including induction of labor, >/=2 prior cesarean deliveries, preeclampsia, diabetes mellitus, an

218 Psoriasis was not associated with cesarean delivery, preeclampsia/eclampsia, and spontaneo

219 Cesarean delivery, preeclampsia/eclampsia, and spontaneo

220 tational hypertension, gestational diabetes, cesarean delivery, preterm birth, and small or large siz

221 ght-gain z scores in which risk of unplanned cesarean delivery, preterm birth, small-for-gestational-

222 and neonatal outcomes, such as preeclampsia, cesarean delivery, preterm delivery, macrosomia, and con

223 MS and pregnancy outcomes (infections, cesarean delivery, preterm delivery, poor fetal growth,

224 erm IAI was less likely to be managed with a cesarean delivery, prolonged internal monitoring, or ind

225 Among obese women undergoing cesarean delivery, prophylactic negative pressure wound

226 or prevention of SSI among obese women after cesarean delivery, prophylactic oral cephalexin and metr

227 ervention involved audits of indications for cesarean delivery, provision of feedback to health profe

228 , the ultrasound policies increased both the cesarean delivery rate and costs, while decreasing the r

229 The relationship between population-level cesarean delivery rate and maternal mortality ratios (ma

230 At a country-level, cesarean delivery rate estimates up to 19.1 per 100 live

231 The primary outcome was the cesarean delivery rate in the 1-year postintervention pe

232 A high cesarean delivery rate in US hospitals indicates the pot

233 g only 76 countries with the highest-quality cesarean delivery rate information had a similar result:

234 The overall cesarean delivery rate was 15.9% and varied (P<.001) fro

235 which 2012 data were not available, the 2012 cesarean delivery rate was imputed from other years.

236 The cesarean delivery rate was significantly reduced among w

237 gement until 42 weeks without increasing the cesarean delivery rate.

238 arean delivery rate (CDRs) of roughly 19.0%, cesarean delivery rates and maternal mortality ratio (MM

239 ectional, ecological study estimating annual cesarean delivery rates from data collected during 2005

240 ivery rate information had a similar result: cesarean delivery rates greater than 6.9 to 20.1 per 100

241 In Canada, cesarean delivery rates have increased substantially ove

242 Reducing cesarean delivery rates in the US is an important public

243 Cesarean delivery rates of 12.6 to 24.0 per 100 live bir

244 National cesarean delivery rates of up to approximately 19 per 10

245 ld Health Organization (WHO) recommends that cesarean delivery rates should not exceed 10 to 15 per 1

246 Cesarean delivery rates varied across hospitals in a sin

247 Cesarean delivery rates were available for 54 countries

248 Higher cesarean delivery rates were not correlated with materna

249 r times, and a reduction in instrumental and cesarean delivery rates, thought to have been associated

250 ncy, 16 healthy pregnant women scheduled for cesarean delivery received a single application of TFV g

251 a (RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.14, P = .74), cesarean delivery (RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.17; P = .

252 was found to be more likely among women with cesarean delivery (RR, 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI]

253 Decisions regarding cesarean delivery should be based on obstetric considera

254 Cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cesarean delivery should be performed when indicated.

255 iabetic women, with all 3 policies, rates of cesarean delivery, shoulder dystocia and brachial plexus

256 Cesarean delivery significantly reduced the HSV transmis

257 ntation had inconsistent effects on rates of cesarean delivery, small size for gestational age, and l

258 lower risk of surgical-site infection after cesarean delivery than did the use of iodine-alcohol.

259 associated with a higher odds ratio (OR) of cesarean delivery than was elective induction of labor (

260 ort policies and clinical efforts to prevent cesarean deliveries that are not medically indicated.

261 For women with one prior cesarean delivery, the risk of uterine rupture is higher

262 Furthermore, no data exist on whether cesarean delivery, the standard of care for women with g

263 , avoiding episiotomies or offering elective cesarean delivery to high-risk patients), providing pelv

264 We randomly assigned patients undergoing cesarean delivery to skin preparation with either chlorh

265 nd health plans are often ranked on rates of cesarean delivery, under the assumption that lower rates

266 Among women with 1 previous cesarean delivery, use of a decision support tool compar

267 Cohort-specific rates of cesarean delivery varied from 9.4% to 37.5%.

268 o of reoperation for women having 1 previous cesarean delivery was 1.31 (95% CI, 1.03-1.68), and the

269 The risk of cesarean delivery was 3% lower in the glyburide group (a

270 The rate of cesarean delivery was 90.7% in the planned-cesarean-deli

271 administration in women undergoing scheduled cesarean delivery was associated with increased UA Pao2

272 Cesarean delivery was associated with significantly incr

273 The increased risk of cesarean delivery was attributable to procedures perform

274 Cesarean delivery was more common in patients with V-EoE

275 The rate of cesarean delivery was not significantly different betwee

276 delivery (but not compared with unscheduled cesarean delivery) was associated with a small absolute

277 Vaginal, compared with cesarean delivery, was most strongly associated with an

278 injury prevented by the 4500-g policy, 3695 cesarean deliveries were performed at an additional cost

279 procedure and, to a lesser extent, birth by cesarean delivery were associated; the combination of bo

280 252,917 [78.7%]), offspring born by planned cesarean delivery were at increased risk of asthma requi

281 Obese women undergoing planned or unplanned cesarean delivery were eligible.

282 ian hospitals capable of providing emergency cesarean delivery were identified across the contiguous

283 tion, and the importance of rapid perimortem cesarean delivery when indicated.

284 lbirth, but it also may increase the risk of cesarean delivery, which already is common in this older

285 d to guide the choice of antiseptic agent at cesarean delivery, which is the most common major surgic

286 proximately 60 percent of women with a prior cesarean delivery who become pregnant again attempt labo

287 Among obese women undergoing cesarean delivery who received the standard preoperative

288 Among women undergoing nonelective cesarean delivery who were all receiving standard antibi

289 has seldom been studied in women undergoing cesarean delivery with neuraxial morphine.

290 ective deliveries (induced vaginal delivery, cesarean delivery with no labor trial, and cesarean deli

291 nd were more frequent in women with previous cesarean deliveries, with adjusted odds ratios of 1.16 (

292 te of 1.6 per 1000 among women with repeated cesarean delivery without labor (11 women), 5.2 per 1000

293 t anal sphincter tear (n = 79); and group 3, cesarean delivery without labor (n = 26).

294 ter perinatal risk than is elective repeated cesarean delivery without labor, although absolute risks

295 delivery, as compared with elective repeated cesarean delivery without labor, are uncertain.

296 ompared with the risk in women with repeated cesarean delivery without labor, uterine rupture was mor

297 and 15,801 women underwent elective repeated cesarean delivery without labor.

298 labor and women who had an elective repeated cesarean delivery without labor.

299 or is induced than among those with repeated cesarean delivery without labor.

300 ps of deliveries were compared with repeated cesarean delivery without labor.

301 gnificant but small reduction in the rate of cesarean delivery, without adverse effects on maternal o