ライフサイエンスコーパス: checkerboard

1 sectors; each sector was a pattern-reversing checkerboard.

2 boxes with a 3-Hz audio cue and a reversing checkerboard.

3 for the presence of P. gingivalis by DNA-DNA checkerboard.

4 reaction, and the subgingival microbiota by checkerboard.

5 Biofilm samples were analyzed by checkerboard.

6 soidal wrinkles, herringbone, labyrinth, and checkerboard.

7 s of 44 bacterial species were determined by checkerboard.

8 he human visual cortex induced by a flashing checkerboard.

9 tients, by using different sizes of circular checkerboards.

10 stimuli or the visual contrast of flickering checkerboards.

11 periment was conducted by using conventional checkerboard 8-Hz light-flash stimulation of the eye and

12 Visual stimulation under anaesthesia with checkerboards activated lateral geniculate nucleus of mo

13 Checkerboard analyses indicated that LPA causes both che

14 distinct biologic phenotypes based upon DNA checkerboard analyses of eight plaque bacteria, serum im

15 g from 1 to 30 microg/ml, and Zigmond Hirsch checkerboard analysis indicated that both chemotaxis and

16 Checkerboard analysis indicated that SPP stimulates both

17 DNA checkerboard analysis revealed that most observed variab

18 Checkerboard analysis showed that monocytes migrated in

19 Using chemotactic checkerboard analysis, the greatest motogenic response t

20 emokinetic for monocytes, as demonstrated by checkerboard analysis.

21 post-therapy for microbiological analyses by checkerboard and 16S rRNA gene sequencing.

22 lid discs) and to changes in target texture (checkerboard and concentric patterns).

23 in a dyad was nonuniform containing a mix of checkerboard and side-by-side arrangements, as well as i

24 the functional response to a visual flashing checkerboard and their relationship to panic symptoms as

25 een these compounds was assessed by in vitro checkerboard and time kill assays in planktonic cultures

26 istic antifungal effect, as confirmed by the checkerboard and time kill assays.

27 d evidence for a charge modulation with both checkerboard and unidirectional components decoupled fro

28 gnaling produces other patterns that are not checkerboard, and therefore a new model is needed.

29 jor impact, as well as faces, houses, tools, checkerboards, and false fonts.

30 to large squares were smaller than those to checkerboards, and the latency of the cVEP response to s

31 fMRI responses to faces, scenes, color, and checkerboard annuli at different visual field eccentrici

32 le than uniform paramagnetic state and usual checkerboard antiferromagnetic state.

33 hile systematic deletion scans delineate the checkerboard architecture of sequential enhancers and si

34 The sensing elements on the checkerboard are composed of silver-capped nanoslit arra

35 es groups were obtained by a reverse capture checkerboard assay for 30 subjects with caries and 30 he

36 valuated using whole genomic DNA probes in a checkerboard assay to 23 subgingival species.

37 used bioluminescent E. coli in a simplified checkerboard assay to generate unique drug interaction f

38 and nitrocefin), and synergy (determined by checkerboard assay) between azithromycin and outer-membr

39 In a resazurin checkerboard assay, combining rifaximin with NAC had sig

40 frequency, and synergy with isoniazid in the checkerboard assay.

41 Checkerboard assays confirmed synergy with a fractional

42 Checkerboard assays demonstrated synergy of R91 with cop

43 aconazole and tacrolimus were synergistic in checkerboard assays for 4 clinical isolates of R. oryzae

44 Furthermore, checkerboard assays show this alternative EmrE transport

45 ddress this issue, we utilized microdilution checkerboard assays to evaluate nine stilbene compounds

46 emonstrated by fluorescence spectroscopy and checkerboard assays, the latter confirming strong to mod

47 Laborious CFU experiments such as checkerboard assays, treatment time-courses and drug scr

48 inations of clade B and C reagents tested in checkerboard assays.

49 d finger-sequencing task, cued by a flashing checkerboard (at 2 or 4 Hz).

50 The stone and plastic checkerboard barriers increase plant diversity, while st

51 RNA transcriptional profiling and the checkerboard board 2D-MIC assay in the presence of varyi

52 e correlated than in response to white noise checkerboards, but they were much less correlated than p

53 t includes two essential ingredients, namely checkerboard charge disproportionation and nano phase se

54 Test stimuli consisted of a static checkerboard (checks) and dichoptic static random dot (R

55 However, very few units were modulated by checkerboard color composition or the color of the chose

56 Second, they viewed a full-field flickering checkerboard compared with a small stimulus in the origi

57 g2+ moved the tetramers into a predominantly checkerboard configuration, whereas the 4 mmol/L Mg2+ in

58 In a cancer context, these checkerboards correspond to genes that are markedly up-

59 s, by discriminating the dominant color of a checkerboard cue composed of different numbers of square

60 color of the chosen target, even during the checkerboard deliberation epoch of the Checkerboard Firs

61 control tasks (i.e., number judgment versus checkerboard detection) and experimental designs (i.e.,

62 the scaled dartboard display and an unscaled checkerboard display (check size of 50 minarc).

63 the neutral expectations, and OTUs exhibited checkerboard distributions among flies.

64 Oral samples were assayed by means of a checkerboard DNA probe assay.

65 des (IPS), and for microbiologic analysis by checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization (for levels and propo

66 Subgingival P. endodontalis was defined by checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization analysis, and corresp

67 menopausal and 81 postmenopausal women using checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization and measured serum es

68 The checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization assay was used to det

69 ified and amplified samples were analyzed by checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization for levels and propor

70 with subgingival microbial composition using checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization in premenopausal and

71 riodontal pathogens were performed using the checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization method.

72 35 microbial species were determined by the checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization method.

73 ites in all participants and analyzed by the checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization technique.

74 of this investigation was to combine MDA and checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization to examine the microb

75 d count of 40 subgingival microbial species (checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization).

76 idually analyzed for 40 bacterial species by checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization.

77 etermined by colony counting and taxonomy by checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization.

78 Subgingival plaque was primarily analyzed by checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization.

79 evels/proportions of 40 bacterial species by checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization.

80 aque samples per patient were analyzed using checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization.

81 Samples were analyzed using checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization.

82 zed for levels of 40 bacterial species using checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization.

83 0 subgingival bacteria were determined using checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization.

84 s of 40 bacterial taxa were quantified using checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization.

85 for the levels of 40 bacterial species using checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization.

86 their content of 40 bacterial species using checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization.

87 d with respect to 11 bacterial species using checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridizations, and serum immunoglo

88 severe chronic periodontitis, and for whom "checkerboard" DNA-DNA hybridization quantification of 8

89 e treated by oral gavage for 28 days using a checkerboard dosing format (0, 3.0, 6.0 and 10.0 CsA and

90 between periods of flickering or stationary checkerboards (each period lasted 14 s).

91 ed first, followed by the checkerboard; in a Checkerboard First task, this order was reversed.

92 g the checkerboard deliberation epoch of the Checkerboard First task.

93 dies were used to detect bound antigens in a checkerboard format.

94 matching-task with faces (Experiment 1a) or checkerboards from a familiar prototype-defined category

95 terized by using oligonucleotide probes in a checkerboard hybridization assay that identifies the seq

96 The reverse-capture checkerboard hybridization assay was used to assess leve

97 Checkerboard hybridization DNA analysis of subgingival p

98 gival plaque samples was evaluated using DNA checkerboard hybridization, and serum antibody to a batt

99 as 16S RNA gene sequence and reverse-capture checkerboard hybridization, for identification of the ba

100 for 11 known periodontal bacteria by DNA-DNA checkerboard hybridization.

101 The por type was determined by checkerboard hybridizations performed using oligonucleot

102 e probes to 5 VRs of each class were used in checkerboard hybridizations to type 282 clinical gonococ

103 scribe the development and validation of the checkerboard immunoblotting (CBIB) technique for the hig

104 ta (serum IgG antibody levels, obtained with checkerboard immunoblotting technique) for 1,450 adult p

105 We used checkerboard immunoblotting to assess serum IgG levels t

106 trix metalloproteinase 8 were measured using checkerboard immunoblotting, and the levels of 40 bacter

107 ere measured against the same bacteria using checkerboard immunoblotting.

108 a visual-search task and ignoring distractor checkerboards in the periphery.

109 ds in the auditory attention task and to dim checkerboards in the visual attention task.

110 ored targets appeared first, followed by the checkerboard; in a Checkerboard First task, this order w

111 blocks of flickering (8 Hz) black and white checkerboards interleaved with 15 s of blank (black) scr

112 Anodal tDCS eliminated the checkerboard inversion effect reliably obtained in the s

113 with a tDCS procedure that can eliminate the checkerboard inversion effect.

114 e to squares was significantly less than the checkerboard latency.

115 nearest neighbor interactions and a six-site checkerboard lattice, which might be in reach of current

116 pologically non-trivial flat-band model on a checkerboard lattice.

117 al superconductors of spinless fermions in a checkerboard-lattice Chern-insulator model.

118 A finite-size checkerboard-lattice cylinder with a harmonic trap poten

119 Here we show the assembly of checkerboard lattices from colloidal nanocrystals that h

120 Checkerboard lattices-where the resulting structure is o

121 crocycle, generating honeycomb (bnn net) and checkerboard-like (pcu net) networks for alpha-CD (C(6))

122 (CO/OO) near T(CO) = 300 K and then develops checkerboard-like antiferromagnetic (AF) order below T(N

123 with C(7) ideal symmetry, led to a distorted-checkerboard-like network.

124 order and guide the multicell lattice toward checkerboard-like patterns.

125 assembly experiments, we achieve a periodic checkerboard mesostructure that represents a tiny fracti

126 llin against MRSA were performed through the checkerboard method and time-kill assay.

127 as selected, and a PCR-based reverse-capture checkerboard method was used for detection.

128 azole, or voriconazole) was performed by the checkerboard method.

129 Checkerboard microdilution assays revealed a significant

130 A checkerboard microdilution method, performed according t

131 Further, using cells migrating along checkerboard micropatterns, we show that the appearance

132 a softening at the propagation vector for a checkerboard modulation can be observed.

133 surface plasmon resonance (SPR) sensor in a checkerboard nanostructure on plastic substrates is pres

134 structure of CeMg(2)Si(2) (P4/mmm), exhibits checkerboard nets of corner-shared bicapped Au squares (

135 gher and more stable for natural movies than checkerboard noise as degeneration progressed.

136 To evoke MO VEP, the checkerboard of 60' checks moved for 200 ms with a speed

137 see text]), revealing three distinct phases-checkerboard-ordered, glassy, and quasi-ordered-with a p

138 ts, whose interactions form a characteristic checkerboard pattern in chromatin interaction maps.

139 mate the binocular image displacement of the checkerboard pattern on the near and far surfaces.

140 A-positive and -negative samples tested in a checkerboard pattern over 12 runs of 96 samples.

141 e polarization-dependent transmission in the checkerboard pattern produces optical isolation between

142 patterns and relax towards the lower energy checkerboard pattern while at large noise levels the sys

143 periodic patterns of alternating cell types (checkerboard pattern), yet only if the proportion of sym

144 s were recorded with a 15' and 60' reversing checkerboard pattern, and the mfVEPs were elicited by a

145 For a 140micromx140microm checkerboard pattern, the dynamic range was approximatel

146 used to obtain 60 VEP responses to a scaled checkerboard pattern.

147 stimulation with a black and white reversing checkerboard pattern.

148 man visual cortex with an alternating radial checkerboard pattern.

149 exhibits Mott localization in the form of a checkerboard pattern.

150 low (Lc) and a high (Hc) Michelson contrast checkerboard pattern.

151 were incubated with resistant isolates in a checkerboard pattern.

152 resenting each eye with a contrast-reversing checkerboard pattern.

153 They exhibit a copper-oxygen bond-oriented "checkerboard" pattern, with four unit cell (4a0) periodi

154 y, we experimentally demonstrate spontaneous checkerboard patterning in an optogenetic setup, where c

155 am representation of sound such as localized checkerboard patterns and frequency-modulated excitatory

156 uccessfully produces spontaneous, persistent checkerboard patterns for systems of sixteen patches, in

157 ud and soft speech sounds and bright and dim checkerboard patterns occurred every 800 to 1200 msec.

158 For stimulation, we used checkerboard patterns with 15' and 60' checks.

159 this "lateral inhibition" principle leads to checkerboard patterns with alternation of Sender and Rec

160 size using spatial frequency selectivity to checkerboard patterns.

161 cone-contrast observed in responses to color checkerboard patterns.

162 result in convergence without discontinuous checkerboard patterns.

163 s genes and conditions, finding distinctive "checkerboard" patterns in matrices of gene expression da

164 ponse to simple but strong stimulation using checkerboard presentations.

165 According to checkerboard results, only three combinations showed a f

166 The VEPs were evoked by checkerboard reversal stimulation before and after a mod

167 Whole cell synergy checkerboard screens were performed using the laboratory

168 s/no decision on the presence of a 'White X' checkerboard signal (1.5 degrees ) at one of two locatio

169 ometer-sized square-to-triangles, squares-to-checkerboards, smiles-to-neutral face, and zeros-to-ones

170 These models result in a checkerboard spatial pattern whereby adjacent cells expr

171 trial-to-trial stimulus noise added to the 9 checkerboard squares.

172 and visual cortical potentials to reversing checkerboard stimulation were recorded from 15 older con

173 block design paradigm of contrast reversing checkerboard stimuli delivered using an MRI-compatible v

174 d with pattern electroretinography (PERG) to checkerboard stimuli of different field sizes.

175 field were mapped using periodic flickering checkerboard stimuli that evoked a traveling wave of act

176 pponent cells preferentially, and fine color-checkerboard stimuli were used to activate Double-Oppone

177 pacing) while participants viewed flickering checkerboard stimuli.

178 occipito-parietal cortices to high-contrast checkerboard stimuli.

179 were measured for a 24 degrees x 32 degrees checkerboard stimulus (0.56 cyc/deg, 90% contrast, 75 cd

180 rticipants observing an expanding flickering checkerboard stimulus of 30 degrees diameter.

181 The cVEP checkerboard stimulus subtended 21 degrees, had a mean l

182 visual cortex while the participant viewed a checkerboard stimulus.

183 n PbTiO(3)/SrTiO(3) superlattices exhibiting checkerboard strain modulation substantiates published p

184 Thus, we demonstrated that MO VEPs evoked by checkerboard, structure containing high spatial content,

185 clustering, is based on the observation that checkerboard structures in matrices of expression data c

186 ee to which the approach is able to identify checkerboard structures.

187 mic differences between cVEPs to squares and checkerboards support the hypothesis that a distinct neu

188 Checkerboard susceptibility analysis revealed synergy be

189 watched as a virtual actor looked towards a checkerboard that appeared in her visual field, confirmi

190 t combined a moving spiral with a stationary checkerboard, the response to looming motion declined.

191 uctures of increasing complexity: a periodic checkerboard tiling, an aperiodic Penrose tiling, and a

192 monotherapy against MRSA was assessed using checkerboard, time-kill, and human whole blood killing a

193 The checkerboard titration method was applied for the optimi

194 cus persists even when using a high-contrast checkerboard using digital defocus in the emmetropic eye

195 by nearest-neighbor vacancy repulsions show checkerboard vacancy order to emerge for x > 0.6, in acc

196 a multifrequency (4, 8, and 16 Hz) reversing-checkerboard visual stimulation paradigm.

197 anipulated neural activity with a flickering checkerboard visual stimulus and found that we could dri

198 A task-irrelevant, peripheral checkerboard was presented on a random half of trials.

199 To defocus the checkerboard, we rendered it with a second-order Zernike

200 -density VEPs evoked by a contrast reversing checkerboard were collected from 15 normal observers usi

201 VEPs in response to pattern-reversing checkerboards were collected in 6 month-old-infants (n =

202 For PR VEP, the checkerboards were reversed in terms of their contrast.

203 The cVEP stimulus was a reversing checkerboard with checks of either 15 minutes or 60 minu

204 Repeated pairing of checkerboards with tones, and gratings with colours enco