ライフサイエンスコーパス: checklist

1 >/=2 SD above the mean on the Child Behavior Checklist).

2 ress symptoms (Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist).

3 ictor of infant scores on the Child Behavior Checklist.

4 using the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist.

5 ICU or the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist.

6 hod-ICU or Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist.

7 ve on screening with the Noticeable Problems Checklist.

8 ation Surveillance-Revised (SACS-R) 12-month checklist.

9 ly rated study validity using a standardised checklist.

10 itute for Clinical Excellence methodological checklist.

11 tudies' quality was assessed using a 14-item checklist.

12 nt of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) checklist.

13 ars) using the Social Communication Disorder Checklist.

14 clusters of symptoms in a depressive symptom checklist.

15 ality was examined using the Downs and Black Checklist.

16 sed using the Hawker et al. (2002) appraisal checklist.

17 e of a pre-brief, debrief, and delivery room checklist.

18 tional epidemiology were added to the STROBE checklist.

19 CPR/intubation, and an advance care planning checklist.

20 n of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist.

21 ISMA extension statement and modified AMSTAR checklist.

22 t 40 months of age, using the Child Behavior Checklist.

23 haviorally anchored professionalism criteria checklist.

24 ndependently evaluated study quality using a checklist.

25 neral, and urologic surgery had received the Checklist.

26 logical Evaluation of Observational Research checklist.

27 assessment of technical skills method and a checklist.

28 ration information to enhance the use of the checklist.

29 ing of Observational Studies in Epidemiology checklist.

30 Surement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 checklist.

31 available randomized controlled trial of the checklist.

32 essed using the National Institute of Health checklist.

33 med daily multiple PP following a systematic checklist.

34 tematic reviews' (AMSTAR) critical appraisal checklist.

35 idemiology for Newborn Infection (STROBE-NI) checklist.

36 using the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist.

37 tudy quality was assessed using the Drummond checklist.

38 tients during the encounter using predefined checklists.

39 sed according to standardized algorithms and checklists.

40 Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network checklists.

41 duplicate using standardized algorithms and checklists.

42 stress, assessed using the Kessler 6 symptom checklist 1 week before, 1 week after, and 3 months afte

43 n with PTSD symptom severity (using the PTSD Checklist 5, or PCL5 survey) in the awake state, during

44 ttsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Symptom Checklist 90 (SCL-90), Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) and

45 epression Study who had at least one Symptom Checklist-90 (SCL-90) assessment after at least 8 weeks

46 t-Military Version for PTSD, and the Symptom Checklist-90 for anxiety.

47 ton Depression Rating Scale [HAM-D], Symptom Checklist-90 Revised [SCL-90-R]), respectively.

48 ars of psychiatric symptoms from the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised were obtained from 1,305 participan

49 ng Scale) and pain symptom severity (Symptom Checklist-90-Revised).

50 ality of these was assessed using the AMSTAR checklist (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Revie

51 r the ICU, Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist, a focused bedside cognitive examination, char

52 Using the WHO surgical safety checklist, a prominent example of a rapidly and widely i

53 ld Health Organization (WHO) Safe Childbirth Checklist, a quality-improvement tool, promotes systemat

54 These include article badging, checklists, a more extensive withdrawal ontology, identi

55 was associated with lower Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) scores.

56 nt and team for difficulty-including using a checklist, acquiring necessary equipment, maximizing pre

57 ernative strategies (including no screening, checklist-activated screening, and high-risk specialty-b

58 he ICU and Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist against reference-standard expert diagnosis.

59 these STROBE-NI recommendations, and linked checklist, aims to improve scientific reporting of neona

60 s were developed: (1) fever/sepsis screening checklist and (2) blood culture decision algorithm.

61 ven to the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist and Confusion Assessment Method for ICU improv

62 using the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist and Confusion Assessment Method for ICU.

63 The authors present TRIPOD for Abstracts, a checklist and corresponding guidance for reporting predi

64 This document contains the checklist and explanatory and elaboration information to

65 nt Group reached agreement on the PRISMA-IPD checklist and flow diagram by consensus.

66 improvement intervention, including a daily checklist and goal setting during multidisciplinary roun

67 To overcome this problem, we developed a checklist and guide for reporting placebo or sham interv

68 raisal Skills Programme Qualitative Research Checklist and Paterson et al.'s Primary Research Apprais

69 en those allocated to the initial monitoring checklist and people in the control group (Registered wi

70 ials expands on 10 items of the CONSORT 2010 checklist and provides examples of good reporting and a

71 ior was assessed using the Aberrant Behavior Checklist and Social Responsiveness Scale.

72 ween 2014 and 2018 to develop and revise the checklist and the accompanying text, with additional dis

73 using a modified version of Downs and Black checklist and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.

74 rity Scale, and scores on the Child Behavior Checklist and the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory.

75 ement Process Towards Accreditation (SLIPTA) checklist and the Strengthening Laboratory Management To

76 oring system, the Crisis Resource Management checklist, and a self-efficacy survey instrument.

77 Health Questionnaire and the Hopkins Symptom Checklist, and according to self-reported alcohol intake

78 Scale and Patient Health Questionnaire, PTSD checklist, and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-B

79 y some items on Firestone & Scholl's (F&S's) checklist, and to explain perceptual effects from an att

80 es including plot data, herbarium databases, checklists, and the Global Biodiversity Information Faci

81 Rather than a checklist approach when evaluating individual studies us

82 in unanswered questions surrounding surgical checklists as a quality and safety tool, such as the imp

83 (CONSORT-PRO) than in those not citing this checklist, as evidenced by the International Society for

84 ts and 892 Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist-assessed patients were included.

85 easured with the parent-rated Child Behavior Checklist at ages 6 and 10.

86 Mothers also completed the Child Behavior Checklist at the 18-month visit.

87 eview of electronic health records, clinical checklists at care transitions, and daily review of medi

88 A draft checklist based on previous work was iteratively revised

89 ely on model estimates, neglecting published checklists based on verified voucher data.

90 Implementation of a checklist-based quality improvement intervention did not

91 als in South Carolina completing a voluntary checklist-based surgical quality improvement program had

92 determine whether completion of a voluntary, checklist-based surgical quality improvement program is

93 s use a global assessment tool and 33% use a checklist-based tool when evaluating fellow central veno

94 findings reviewed as part of the systematic checklist before PRRT.

95 Four study team members pilot tested the checklist between January and August 2015.

96 ies not included in the taxonomically-vetted checklist but verified by taxonomists to occur in Amazon

97 e developed an initial list of items for the checklist by surveying experts in placebo research (n =

98 FACE-Q appearance scales and adverse effects checklists can be used in clinical practice, research, a

99 e data by carrying out the LekCheck, a short checklist carried out in the operating theater as a time

100 We used the Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL) to assess behavioural and emotional pro

101 functioning (parent-reported Child Behaviour Checklist, [CBCL]).

102 s method, the 7-point checklist, the 3-point checklist, chaos and clues, and CASH (color, architectur

103 We used the PTSD Checklist-Civilian Version and a structured clinical int

104 Follow-up measures were the PTSD Checklist-Civilian Version, Patient Health Questionnaire

105 arge using the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist-Civilian Version, the Patient Health Questionn

106 od-ICU and Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist cohort, and compared with both prediction mode

107 nt, counseling, and decision aids; screening checklists; community engagement; and provider training.

108 Checklist usage was recorded as checklist completed in full/partly.

109 Checklist completion did not affect mortality reduction,

110 Full, as opposed to partial, checklist completion provides a health policy opportunit

111 ociation between complications/mortality and checklist completion.

112 formance and World Health Organization (WHO) checklist compliance, measured for 3 months before and a

113 The final checklist contains 12 items and applies to journal and c

114 t individual items on the direct observation checklist could be used to target areas for training and

115 A brief checklist covering symptoms and signs can distinguish an

116 The provided consensual checklist customizes the methodology of outcome reportin

117 The effectiveness of checklists, daily goal assessments, and clinician prompt

118 gesting different biodiversity patterns from checklist data.

119 activation tools-a 3-minute video and 1-page checklist-delivered electronically 1 week before, 3 days

120 who had at least a 50% reduction in Symptom Checklist Depression Scale (SCL-20) scores (range, 0-4;

121 ot tested, and analyzed a direct observation checklist designed to assess the extent to which patient

122 A systematic checklist designed to ensure appropriate selection of tr

123 5.8 to 23.1; P<0.001), on the Child Behavior Checklist (difference, 13.1; 95% CI, 10.7 to 15.6; P<0.0

124 Checklist-directed triage without diagnostic testing cor

125 Bedside confirmation of bundle checklists during physician extender rounds reduces the

126 Staff attained median scores of >90% in checklist evaluations of practical skills.

127 estion (MCQ) examinations, a video quiz, and checklist evaluations of practical skills.

128 llow-up time point, whether assessed by PTSD Checklist Event-Specific Version (score >/= 50) or item

129 The direct observation checklist exhibits strong content and face validity as w

130 of disruptive behavior, e.g., Child Behavior Checklist externalizing problems scale.

131 ngthening and a modified WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist; facilities in the intervention group addition

132 his launched a call to establish a reporting checklist focusing on validation, implementation, and tr

133 rapeutics by a European Consortium (PROTECT) checklist for adverse drug events.

134 titute of Health Economics Quality Appraisal Checklist for Case Series Studies.

135 We assessed the reporting quality using the Checklist for Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for

136 ICU or the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist for delirium assessment.

137 ress symptoms (Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5), functional impairment (WHODAS 2.0)

138 It also includes a conceptual overview and checklist for experimental design and calibration decisi

139 We also present a key-data checklist for investigators to consider in the design, c

140 ing of Observational Studies in Epidemiology checklist for mixed-methods and quantitative studies.

141 The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist for qualitative research was used to assess th

142 ified version of the Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist for Qualitative Research.

143 servational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist for reporting observational cohort, case contr

144 We also provide a 21-point checklist for researchers and for readers who assess the

145 llmarks of pluripotent stem cells, propose a checklist for their evaluation, and illustrate how foren

146 00 (highest), and the FACE-Q adverse effects checklists for problems after skin and lip treatment.

147 in Randomised Evaluations (known as ASPIRE) checklist, for those considering the use of a placebo co

148 The proposed checklist framework is generalizable to other areas of e

149 rt colorectal surgeons using a task-specific checklist, global rating scale, and overall performance

150 quality improvement intervention with daily checklists, goal setting, and clinician prompting did no

151 occurred (Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist >/= 4 with psychiatric confirmation), 10 days

152 ystematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist guided the reporting of the data.

153 largely noticed when all 3 components of the checklist had been completed (odds ratio = 0.57, 95% con

154 ible measures, such as WHO's Surgical Safety Checklist, have led to improvements in safety and qualit

155 vides a health policy opportunity to improve checklist impact on surgical safety and quality of care.

156 Costs considered included checklist implementation costs and length and cost of ho

157 Checklist implementation varied greatly between and with

158 Checklist implementation was associated with reduced cas

159 The overall cost of checklist implementation was calculated to be $900 per 1

160 es of differing complexity and the extent of checklist implementation.

161 (largely nursing staff) using an oral health checklist improves oral health behaviour or oral health

162 The Checklist improves surgical outcomes but the economic ca

163 tal-wide implementation of a surgical safety checklist in Moldova, a lower-middle-income country, as

164 Future research should validate this checklist in other settings and compare its results with

165 To determine the effects of an oral health checklist in routine clinical practice.

166 ed implementation of the WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist in Uttar Pradesh, India, improved adherence to

167 ed implementation of the WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist in Uttar Pradesh.

168 ce of efficacy of team-based surgical safety checklists in improving perioperative outcomes in resear

169 Expert knowledge is essential for building checklists in the digital era: reliance on online taxono

170 problems (as measured by the Child Behavior Checklist) in their offspring.

171 Our publicly searchable checklist includes 124,993 species, 6227 genera, and 355

172 Our publicly available checklist includes 13,634 species (68% endemic), 1,742 g

173 ent taxonomic changes added up to an updated checklist including 10,071 species recorded for the Amaz

174 ds can be used in combination with other GSC checklists, including the Minimum Information about a Ge

175 In addition, the provision of a checklist increases the clinical utility and accessibili

176 utcome was fatigue severity, measured by the Checklist Individual Strength subscale (CIS-fatigue) at

177 treatment (EOT; week 26), assessed with the Checklist Individual Strength subscale Fatigue Severity.

178 f frailty (Clinical Frailty Scale), fatigue (Checklist Individual Strength-8), anxiety and depression

179 n co-primary outcomes: the Aberrant Behavior Checklist-Irritability subscale (range, 0-45) and the Ho

180 oncurrent validity of the direct observation checklist is demonstrated by statistically significant d

181 plementation of a team-based surgical safety checklist is feasible.

182 A checklist is provided for the clinical evaluation of pat

183 The clinical effectiveness of surgical checklists is largely understood.

184 Examples of good reporting for each RECORD checklist item are also included herein.

185 Each checklist item of the TRIPOD Statement is explained in d

186 The checklist items focus on the introduction, methods, resu

187 ful life events (measured by the Life Events Checklist [LEC]), and health service utilisation.

188 Since the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist may be positive without the presence of sympto

189 was common to Social Communication Disorder Checklist measures across development; the other account

190 -item Patient Health Questionnaire, the PTSD Checklist-Military Version for PTSD, and the Symptom Che

191 nian tree diversity, we recently published a checklist of 11,675 tree species recorded to date in the

192 The COS-STAR Statement consists of a checklist of 18 items considered essential for transpare

193 GATHER comprises a checklist of 18 items that are essential for best report

194 twins born between 1967 and 1979 comprised a checklist of 31 illnesses and symptoms, including IBS an

195 of the Amazonian tree flora with an updated checklist of all known tree taxa.

196 Here we provide a checklist of all tree species collected to date, and des

197 amic nature of establishing an authoritative checklist of Amazonian tree species.

198 Here, we combine a uniquely comprehensive checklist of bee species distributions and >5,800,000 pu

199 We assessed child stress using the Checklist of Children's Distress Symptoms, and maternal

200 an itemised and evidence-based comprehensive checklist of core elements for NCCP formulation.

201 They consist of a checklist of information to include in publications desc

202 The panel generated a checklist of recommendations regarding stakeholder engag

203 f the discussions in addition to a suggested checklist of reporting guidelines needed to improve the

204 We established a preliminary checklist of reporting items to be considered for inclus

205 the first, to our knowledge, expert-verified checklist of the vascular plants of mainland New Guinea

206 ntial predictors of clinical TMD were simple checklists of comorbid health conditions and nonpainful

207 of a video decision support tool and patient checklist on advance care planning for patients with hea

208 rical distribution of the mean effect of the checklist on total admission costs and the probability o

209 -based implementation of the Safe Childbirth Checklist, on a composite outcome of perinatal death, ma

210 , than the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist or Confusion Assessment Method for ICU alone.

211 n with the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist or Confusion Assessment Method for ICU resulte

212 n and outcome metrics and we propose a basic checklist our community might follow going forward.

213 3rd Edition), and behavioral (Child Behavior Checklist) outcomes.

214 High-quality SSC implementation (all 3 checklist parts) improved processes and outcomes of care

215 essor-specific Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL-S); secondary measures were scores on the

216 easured by the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist [PCL]), personally identified problems (measur

217 asured by the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist [PCL]-6 scale).

218 e behavior problems using the Child Behavior Checklist: physical aggression, irritability, disobedien

219 ting (31 stakeholders) and refined through a checklist pilot (34 participants).

220 ting (31 stakeholders) and refined through a checklist pilot (34 participants).

221 Twelve regional and national checklists, prepared over the past 25 years and includin

222 used the coaching-based WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist program than in those that did not, but matern

223 hospitals on the basis of completion of the checklist program.

224 voluntary, collaborative implementation of a checklist program.

225 This checklist provides guidance for conducting and reporting

226 ies belong to the first taxonomically-vetted checklist published for the region (Cardoso D, et al. (2

227 as a score 44 points or greater in the PTSD Checklist questionnaire, and BDR was defined as both a c

228 Implementation of the WHO checklist resulted in an additional 5.9 complication-fre

229 of psychopathy according to the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (p = .02).

230 s assessed using the validated Life Stressor Checklist-Revised.

231 roaches, process redesign, lean methodology, checklists, root cause analysis, and parallel processing

232 The Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist's inclusion of nonverbal features may make it

233 pport the economic argument for investing in Checklist scale-up as part of a national strategy for im

234 According to WHO criteria, Checklist scale-up is considered "very cost-effective" a

235 rtality reduction and increased usage due to Checklist scale-up would need to deviate approximately 1

236 ures were BMI and 20-item Depression Symptom Checklist (SCL-20) scores (range, 0 [best] to 4 [worst])

237 chotomous AG phenotype based on the Symptoms Checklist (SCL-90; N=3845) and a case-control sample wit

238 oscopy score of only 4.2 (1.3) and a 7-point checklist score of 2.0 (1.9), both in the range of benig

239 ined as an Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist score of 4 or more at any time.

240 dermoscopy score of 4.7 (1.6) and a 7-point checklist score of 4.4 (2.3), while dermoscopically SK-l

241 The total dermoscopy score and the 7-point checklist score were assessed.

242 Inter-rater reliability was high for the checklist scores (0.82-0.97) but moderate for GEARS rati

243 r Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale and PTSD Checklist scores in E2+ individuals, as well as alterati

244 scores, GEARS ratings, and robot familiarity checklist scores.

245 re of ASD traits (ie, children communication checklist, second edition).

246 Checklist sensitivity and specificity were minimally aff

247 eening instruments, the PC-PTSD and the PTSD Checklist, show reasonable performance characteristics f

248 ent Study (CIGTS) Symptom and Health Problem Checklist (SHPC) and evaluate its psychometric propertie

249 ing from preplanned/phased approaches to the checklist simply "appearing" in operating rooms, or staf

250 measure, the parent-rated Aberrant Behavior Checklist Social Withdrawal/Lethargy subscale.

251 charge via the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist-Specific scale; a suggested diagnostic cutoff

252 atus-A), posttraumatic stress (Posttraumatic Checklist-Specific Stressor), anxiety (Hospital Anxiety

253 World Health Organization's Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) will lead to improved care processes and

254 ly coached implementation of surgical safety checklists (SSCs) reduces the incidence of perioperative

255 r than the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (standard of care) and Confusion Assessment Me

256 This checklist, Strengthening the Reporting of Observational

257 no farther than recent attempts to implement checklists, team training, and surgical briefings.

258 back researchers present a consensus-derived checklist that aims to improve the reporting and experim

259 A number of species in the 2016 checklist that are not trees, non-native, synonyms, or m

260 he lessons provided by these pitfalls into a checklist that future work could use to convincingly dem

261 ient care that encourages critical thinking, checklists that encourage communication among team membe

262 e ABCD rule, the Menzies method, the 7-point checklist, the 3-point checklist, chaos and clues, and C

263 defined as sum scores on the Child Behavior Checklist, the Ages and Stages Questionnaire, and the Ch

264 aptive Behavior Scale, the Aberrant Behavior Checklist, the Autism Symptom Questionnaire and the Beha

265 vention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist; this allows the key features of both active i

266 rson trial (WPT) extension, and a new 3-item checklist to assess its trial reporting quality (TRQ), W

267 asurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews) checklist to assess methodological quality of each revie

268 ly, we sought to create a direct observation checklist to assess the "respect and dignity status" of

269 a validated risk score and used a discharge checklist to ensure access to appropriate medications an

270 agreement and results were used to develop a checklist to establish benchmarks in surgery.

271 d Organisation of Care Group data collection checklist to extract relevant data at the household and

272 address this problem, we propose adopting a checklist to guide studies in reporting at least the min

273 We present a consensus-based checklist to improve and document the transparency of re

274 Here we collate taxonomically verified checklists to present a list of seed plant species from

275 of minimal experimental criteria, the 'RIDE' checklist, to improve the validity of future low microbi

276 Guidelines, protocols, and checklists (together called "protocols") can be immensel

277 The checklist tool and pooling approach described can be use

278 nd web-based technology including ICU safety checklist, tools to develop shared care plan, and messag

279 Significant variability in checklist usage was found: although at least 1 of the 3

280 Checklist usage was recorded as checklist completed in f

281 ate have evaluated the cost-effectiveness of checklist use.

282 Two common checklists used to measure depressive severity can produ

283 ining, 220 CHWs were assessed using standard checklists using facility staff responses as the referen

284 Child Behavior Checklist version for preschool children (CBCL/1.5-5) ex

285 isted intervention and advance care planning checklist versus a verbal description in 246 patients >/

286 Implementation of the WHO checklist was a cost-effective strategy for improving su

287 is, for every 100 admissions, use of the WHO checklist was estimated to save $55,899.

288 could be prevented if full completion of the checklist was implemented.

289 was completed in 96.7% of cases, the entire checklist was only completed in 62.1% of cases.

290 tical Appraisal Skills Programme Qualitative Checklist was used to assess the quality of eligible pap

291 omic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist was used to evaluate quality of the included a

292 ems for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist was used to guide the structure of the review.

293 servational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist was used, combined with the Quality Rating Sch

294 hed central venous catheter insertion skills checklist, we compared Veterans Affairs Medical Centers

295 ost significant when all 3 components of the checklist were completed.

296 s who initially screened positive on symptom checklists were excluded from late-onset ADHD diagnosis.

297 cy makers, and stakeholders can utilise this checklist, while considering their own unique contexts a

298 the attention scale from the Child Behavior Checklist with cortical measures were determined in a pe

299 havior was assessed using the Child Behavior Checklist within 6 months of their MRI scan.

300 derstanding of why interventions such as the checklist "work" in some settings and appear "not to wor