ライフサイエンスコーパス: chest pain

1 and assessment of prognosis in patients with chest pain.

2 value (PPV) of 100% for detecting causes of chest pain.

3 enting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain.

4 selection of noninvasive testing for stable chest pain.

5 ame, which resulted in the resolution of her chest pain.

6 e diagnostic pathway of patients with stable chest pain.

7 al care over 90 days in patients with stable chest pain.

8 ncy department with left-sided abdominal and chest pain.

9 nd 12-month mortality in patients with acute chest pain.

10 T) might improve evaluation of patients with chest pain.

11 ial disease and a relatively common cause of chest pain.

12 drome in patients presenting with exertional chest pain.

13 bclinical disease to the assessment of acute chest pain.

14 ive to triage patients presenting with acute chest pain.

15 itted to this hospital because of fevers and chest pain.

16 to PCI complications but often for recurrent chest pain.

17 n important and often overlooked etiology of chest pain.

18 tment (ED) evaluation in patients with acute chest pain.

19 fractory asthma, especially those presenting chest pain.

20 who present to the emergency department with chest pain.

21 sive coronary angiography and FFR for stable chest pain.

22 detection of the cause of death after acute chest pain.

23 eafter in 887 unselected patients with acute chest pain.

24 (20%) had both, and 17 (11%) had noncardiac chest pain.

25 ified PRO concepts were cough, dyspnoea, and chest pain.

26 g acute myocardial ischemia in patients with chest pain.

27 as part of the clinical evaluation of stable chest pain.

28 rthralgia, diarrhea, pruritus, vomiting, and chest pain.

29 nd reduce unnecessary costs in patients with chest pain.

30 .89 to 4.11), dyspnoea (1.6, -0.58 to 3.87), chest pain (0.4, -2.13 to 2.93), fatigue (2.2, -0.38 to

31 for management of low- to intermediate-risk chest pain, 120 individuals were randomly assigned to re

32 placement, 1 death, and 5 hospitalizations-1 chest pain, 2 dyspnea, 1 heart failure, and 1 syncope) o

33 The most common symptoms were central chest pain (25%) and dyspnea (12%).

34 1), and those without a primary complaint of chest pain (3.5 minutes; P<0.01).

35 for visit were pneumonia (4.5%), nonspecific chest pain (3.7%), and urinary tract infection (3.2%).

36 (3.1 [1.75 to 4.36] vs 1.4 [-0.51 to 3.34]), chest pain (-3.1 [-4.57 to -1.60] vs -3.5 [-5.68 to -1.2

37 diagnoses were symptom-based descriptions of chest pain (34%) and shortness of breath (6.5%) and the

38 ; 70% shortness of breath; 47% wheezing; 46% chest pain; 42% abnormal peak flow), 334 (84%) provided

39 weeks (11% versus 9%), dysphagia/odynophagia/chest pain (9% versus 2%), strictures (0% versus 0%), an

40 In diabetic patients presenting with stable chest pain, a CTA strategy resulted in fewer adverse CV

41 osis is based on clinical criteria including chest pain, a pericardial rub, electrocardiographic chan

42 ow- to intermediate-risk patients with acute chest pain, a positive ETT has a limited sensitivity but

43 o-apply instrument to stratify patients with chest pain according to their short-term risk for major

44 phy (CTA) for evaluating patients with acute chest pain (ACP).

45 ed to evaluate the need for reevaluation for chest pain, additional imaging, or cardiac events.

46 ormed in 760 consecutive patients with acute chest pain admitted thorough the emergency department.

47 patient had an adverse event (reported mild chest pain after the procedure) and was discharged from

48 noninvasive testing for patients with stable chest pain, although many subsequently have normal test

49 One patient had nonexertional chest pain and 17 were symptom-free at median follow-up

50 t for 60-year-old patients who have nonacute chest pain and a low to intermediate probability of CAD.

51 ry tuberculosis referred to our hospital for chest pain and a single pleural nodule seen on plain che

52 fferential diagnosis in a young patient with chest pain and an abnormal ECG.

53 ociated with reported functional impairment, chest pain and anxiety, but not illness severity or pati

54 lter monitoring revealed ST elevation during chest pain and coronary angiography showed coronary vaso

55 Subjects were adults with chest pain and dyspnea, nondiagnostic ECGs, and no obvio

56 % of men vs. 53% of women; P = 0.59), mainly chest pain and dyspnea.

57 dly obese patients presenting to the ED with chest pain and dyspnea.

58 posure in patients presenting to the ED with chest pain and dyspnea.

59 nd length of hospital stay for patients with chest pain and dyspnea.

60 singly used technique for initial work-up of chest pain and early post-reperfusion and follow-up eval

61 There is a high incidence of pericarditic chest pain and ECG changes after epicardial ventricular

62 year-old man who presented with weight loss, chest pain and epigastric pain was found to have pericar

63 omen presented more frequently with atypical chest pain and had a lower pretest probability of corona

64 ll patients who sought medical attention for chest pain and had at least 1 hs-cTnT analyzed during 2

65 patients (N = 22,589) >25 years of age with chest pain and hs-cTnT analyzed concurrently in the emer

66 symptoms of heartburn, regurgitation, and/or chest pain and inadequate PPI response.

67 A total of 475 patients with stable chest pain and intermediate likelihood of CAD underwent

68 luation of Chest Pain), patients with stable chest pain and intermediate pretest probability for obst

69 European population of patients with stable chest pain and low prevalence of CAD, coronary computed

70 eviation]; 58% were male) with ischemic-type chest pain and low to intermediate risk for ACS were eva

71 A 60-year-old woman with recent chest pain and no history of previous disease was admitt

72 nstrate its role in evaluating patients with chest pain and nonobstructive coronary artery disease.

73 0-day MACE in a majority of ED patients with chest pain and performed better than the troponin-alone

74 In patients with stable chest pain and planned invasive coronary angiography, ca

75 Six hundred patients with chest pain and previous revascularization included in a

76 ntly suffer from cough, shortness of breath, chest pain and pronounced fatigue and are at risk of dev

77 aging outcome trials in patients with stable chest pain and provide significant insights into patient

78 ered Nurses during two simulation exercises (chest pain and respiratory distress); (b) video footage

79 d a pain in her tail bone, and one woman had chest pain and shortness of breath).

80 Among patients with chest pain and stable troponin levels, any detectable le

81 ts with abdominal pain (15%), 53 of 387 with chest pain and/or dyspnea (14%), and 49 of 433 with head

82 ts with abdominal pain (25%), 72 of 387 with chest pain and/or dyspnea (19%), and 81 of 426 with head

83 s with abdominal pain (51%), 163 of 387 with chest pain and/or dyspnea (42%), and 103 of 433 with hea

84 pectively, for patients with abdominal pain, chest pain and/or dyspnea, and headache; P < .0001); med

85 ho were referred for CT with abdominal pain, chest pain and/or dyspnea, or headache were identified.

86 reported a combination of effort and resting chest pain, and 41 (4%) presented with troponin-positive

87 Three of the examined symptoms (neck lump, chest pain, and back pain) were consistently associated

88 ymptoms (cough, sputum production, pleuritic chest pain, and dyspnea) and no worsening of symptoms at

89 to deterioration of the composite of cough, chest pain, and dyspnoea in the QLQ-LC13.

90 Duke score, including ST-segment depression, chest pain, and exercise capacity, was used as the outco

91 ntermittent episodes of shortness of breath, chest pain, and palpitations with exertion, but more rec

92 idered when patients present with dysphagia, chest pain, and refractory reflux symptoms after an endo

93 ads to symptoms of dysphagia, regurgitation, chest pain, and weight loss, but also results in an incr

94 and vomiting; one had malaise, headache, and chest pain; and one had severe chest pain, difficulty br

95 reasons for readmission included nonspecific chest pain/angina (24%) and heart failure (11%).

96 Most patients with chest pain are discharged from the emergency department

97 About 10% of patients with acute chest pain are ultimately diagnosed with acute coronary

98 TEMI subgroup presented less frequently with chest pain as their primary symptom.

99 otyped immune response, and characterized by chest pain associated often with peculiar electrocardiog

100 rapy prior to randomization, and have severe chest pain at baseline.

101 ee hundred forty-six patients (35%) reported chest pain at rest, 222 (22%) reported chest pain on exe

102 One of 10 serious adverse events (chest pain, brinzolamide group) was judged as treatment

103 hs-cTn) levels and outcomes in patients with chest pain but no myocardial infarction (MI), or any oth

104 In emergency department patients with acute chest pain, CAC score does not provide incremental value

105 ement detailed clinical assessment including chest pain characteristics and the electrocardiogram.

106 Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain) cohort randomized to coronary computed tomog

107 troke; early or first aid use of aspirin for chest pain; control of life-threatening bleeding through

108 n patients with diabetes mellitus and stable chest pain, coronary computed tomography angiography inc

109 d both can present with shortness of breath, chest pain, cough, and wheezing.

110 agnostic protocol (ADP) for possible cardiac chest pain could identify low-risk patients suitable for

111 ography (CA) for diagnosis and management of chest pain (CP) has several flaws.

112 cal outcomes were similar at 5 years, except chest pain, diarrhea, and bloat symptoms which were more

113 headache, and chest pain; and one had severe chest pain, difficulty breathing, and left arm pain) and

114 months of treatment, the pleural lesion and chest pain disappeared.

115 ovascular (CV) risk profile in patients with chest pain discharged from the ED.

116 y included 65,696 patients with "unspecified chest pain" discharged from 16 Swedish hospital EDs betw

117 rdiovascular disease, who were evaluated for chest pain, discharged, and without adverse clinical out

118 fect, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chest pain, diverticulitis, enterovesical fistula, gastr

119 y A 54-year-old woman presented with typical chest pain during physical training at the gym.

120 ryA 54-year-old woman presented with typical chest pain during physical training at the gym.

121 There were 21,742 patients evaluated for chest pain during the study period.

122 more prevalent in women than men, functional chest pain, dyspepsia, vomiting, and anorectal pain do n

123 The patient denied chest pain, dyspnea, focal weakness, or prior similar ep

124 symptomatic diagnoses including non-specific chest pain, dyspnoea and syncope (1368 [6%] deaths), and

125 on admission; headache/visual disturbances; chest pain/dyspnoea; vaginal bleeding with abdominal pai

126 (age 64 years; 62% male patients) with acute chest pain, elevated high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T

127 rolled well and their symptoms including the chest pain eroded their quality of life.

128 ients undergoing coronary CT angiography for chest pain evaluation is associated with a small reducti

129 ajor adverse cardiac events, repeat hospital chest pain evaluation, and repeat imaging or stress test

130 ctly discharged from the ED with unspecified chest pain experienced fewer MACEs and had a better risk

131 ted tomographic angiography caused by stable chest pain, expert readers identified 30 patients with N

132 ify emergency department patients with acute chest pain for early discharge.

133 enting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain, for whom hs-cTnT testing was ordered at pres

134 Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain) found that initial use of at least 64-slice

135 y group were dyspnoea (four [15%] patients), chest pain (four [15%] patients), and lung infections (t

136 nting to the emergency department with acute chest pain from July 19, 2013, to December 31, 2014.

137 systems, a fast management of patients with chest pain has become crucial and urgent.

138 comes (emergency department presentation for chest pain, hospital admission for unstable angina or ac

139 nths, their asthma, including the symptom of chest pain, improved.

140 ted with pneumonia; however, the presence of chest pain in 2 studies that included adolescents was as

141 val, 14%-17%) and was accompanied by typical chest pain in 24 of 397 patients (6%) and any ischemic s

142 ich are only produced 6 h after the onset of chest pain in human serum, was possible.

143 he emergency department after evaluation for chest pain in Ontario, follow-up with a cardiologist was

144 is useful to rule out other causes of acute chest pain in patients admitted to the emergency departm

145 graphy (2D-TTE) to determine causes of acute chest pain in patients presenting to the ED in order to

146 mography angiography in the workup of stable chest pain in patients with diabetes mellitus in the con

147 CCTA) versus usual care (UC) triage of acute chest pain in the emergency department (ED).

148 CTA in the evaluation of patients with acute chest pain in the Rule Out Myocardial Infarction Using C

149 old female who presented with non-exertional chest pain in the setting of an emotional stressor.

150 Use of a decision aid in patients with chest pain increased knowledge and engagement in decisio

151 Readmissions with recurrent chest pain infrequently met criteria for myocardial infa

152 age >60 years, rapid deceleration mechanism, chest pain, intoxication, abnormal alertness/mental stat

153 Chest pain is a common symptom often associated with ben

154 Chest pain is a leading reason patients seek medical eva

155 gnosis of the clinical conditions underlying chest pain is a relevant clinical issue.

156 Hospital evaluation of patients with chest pain is common and costly.

157 The routine use of CCTA for ED evaluation of chest pain is feasible and safe.

158 Assessment of chest pain is one of the most common reasons for emergen

159 diate risk of ACS who present to the ED with chest pain is safe at long-term follow-up, including pat

160 e during initial assessment of patients with chest pain is safe, but the effect on health care resour

161 Pericarditic chest pain is significantly decreased by intrapericardia

162 al imaging strategy for patients with stable chest pain is uncertain.

163 artment (ED) with the diagnosis "unspecified chest pain." It is unknown if evaluation with a high-sen

164 In patients presenting with stable chest pain, low-attenuation plaque burden is the stronge

165 Chest pain, lower New York Heart Association class, high

166 In early presenters (chest pain <3 h), the improvement in rule-in/rule-out cl

167 spitals participating in the CathPCI and the Chest Pain-MI registries, both part of the American Coll

168 ry-Get With The Guidelines (now known as the Chest Pain - Myocardial Infarction Registry) between Jan

169 clinicians discussing treatment options for chest pain, myocardial infarction, diabetes mellitus, an

170 We identified 169 505 STEMI patients in the Chest Pain-Myocardial Infarction Registry from October 2

171 ts were neutropenia (n = 5), nausea (n = 2), chest pain (n = 2), deep vein thrombosis (n = 1), transa

172 46%), followed by dysphagia (n = 4, 37%) and chest pain (n = 2, 18%).

173 pe or presyncope, focal neurologic deficits, chest pain, nausea, vomiting, unintentional weight loss,

174 DHE was added to a model that included age, chest pain, New York Heart Association class, and Wester

175 t pain unit for patients admitted with acute chest pain, nondiagnostic ECG, and negative 12-hour trop

176 Patients were adults with dyspnea and chest pain, nondiagnostic electrocardiograms, and no obv

177 gnificant portion of women veterans may have chest pain not attributable to obstructive coronary arte

178 e (odds ratio, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.55 to 0.96]), chest pain (odds ratio, 0.63 [CI, 0.44 to 0.89]), septic

179 on scene-to-hospital time for patients with chest pain of cardiac origin and those with ST-segment e

180 coronary angiography for evaluation of acute chest pain of coronary origin in non-diabetic patients.

181 orted chest pain at rest, 222 (22%) reported chest pain on exertion, 238 (24%) reported a combination

182 The 3-way interaction (sex, age, and chest pain) on mortality was significant (P < .001).

183 cted from 92 AMI patients within 48 hours of chest pain onset and 105 asymptomatic healthy control in

184 Shortening the duration between chest pain onset and reperfusion to less than 4.0 hours

185 Patients presenting within 3 hours of chest pain onset had elevated levels of hypoxia inducibl

186 The results showed that time from chest pain onset to door did not differ between two grou

187 /-8.3 years, 52.7% were women, and 87.7% had chest pain or dyspnea on exertion.

188 ent aspirin administration for patients with chest pain or heart attacks (rho = 0.24; p < 0.001) and

189 ood of emergency department presentation for chest pain or hospital admission for AMI between practic

190 For cases in which chest pain or other symptoms concerning for angina promp

191 were readmitted for evaluation of recurrent chest pain or other symptoms concerning for angina, wher

192 luation of Chest Pain), patients with stable chest pain (or dyspnea) and intermediate pretest probabi

193 er/chills/night sweats, dyspnea or pleuritic chest pain) or with Pneumonia-in-Plan (adds pneumonia st

194 Median time to deterioration in cough, chest pain, or dyspnoea was not reached (95% CI 10.2 mon

195 ) score, and time to deterioration in cough, chest pain, or dyspnoea.

196 ce of pericarditic ECG changes, pericarditic chest pain, or pericarditis (all P>0.05).

197 lated adverse events involving palpitations, chest pain, or tachycardia, and 58.0% (95% CI, 52.2 to 6

198 ction, hospital admission for heart failure, chest pain, other angina, and subdural or extradural hae

199 In conclusion, when a patient presents with chest pain, our carrying out LDH and D-Dimer tests will

200 y of heart disease (P < 0.001) or continuous chest pain (P < 0.001).

201 y department with complaints of intermittent chest pain, palpitations and exertional dyspnoea.

202 Exertional dyspnea, chest pain, palpitations, and ankle swelling were report

203 Typical symptoms include dyspnoea, chest pain, palpitations, and syncope.

204 chills, night sweats, hemoptysis, wheezing, chest pain, palpitations, orthopnea, paroxysmal nocturna

205 The majority of chest pain patients (288; 84.4%) underwent >/=1 diagnost

206 independently associated with MACE in acute chest pain patients and beyond that provided by clinical

207 In 94 chest pain patients consecutively admitted to Parma Univ

208 d tomographic angiography (CCTA) in triaging chest pain patients in the emergency department (ED).

209 f hs-TnT reporting on care and outcome among chest pain patients presenting to 5 emergency department

210 l was an observational cohort study of acute chest pain patients presenting to the emergency departme

211 can be performed in more than two thirds of chest pain patients without a high pretest probability o

212 rule-in or -out of myocardial infarction in chest pain patients.

213 ry CTA strategy to standard of care in acute chest pain patients.

214 Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain) patients were randomized to stress testing (

215 Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain), patients with stable chest pain (or dyspnea

216 Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain), patients with stable chest pain and interme

217 on the presence of 2 of 4 clinical criteria (chest pain, pericardial rubs, widespread ST-segment elev

218 Chest pain persisted despite administration of a coronar

219 ARI cases (cough or difficulty breathing or chest pain, plus temperature >=38.0 degrees C or oxygen

220 cCTA may be a cost-saving tool in acute chest pain populations that have a prevalence of potenti

221 ary computed tomography angiography in acute chest pain presentations.

222 Unselected patients with chest pain presenting at emergency departments in 2013 a

223 s was a 16-site study in 1,967 patients with chest pain presenting to an ED within 6 hours of pain on

224 estive heart failure and a 1-week history of chest pain, progressive dyspnea, abdominal swelling, bip

225 Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain (PROMISE) trial found that initial use of >/=

226 Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain (PROMISE) trial, readers at 193 North America

227 Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain [PROMISE]) includes stable, symptomatic outpa

228 Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain [PROMISE]; NCT01174550).

229 Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain [PROMISE]; NCT01174550).

230 Chest pain, pulmonary embolus, and mental status change

231 ference in the rate of admission for cardiac chest pain (rate ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 0

232 The routine use of CCTA in ED evaluation of chest pain reduces healthcare resource utilization.

233 ctice, more than 25% of patients with stable chest pain referred for noninvasive testing will have no

234 Optimal management of patients with stable chest pain relies on the prognostic information provided

235 in emergency department patients with acute chest pain remains unsettled.

236 Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of chest pain) represent the 2 largest and most comprehensi

237 ent's troponins began to trend down, and her chest pain resolved.

238 oman was admitted to the hospital because of chest pain, respiratory distress, and a purpuric rash.

239 time to electrocardiogram for patients with chest pain (rho = -0.12; p < 0.001).

240 R 2.46, 95% CI 1.21, 4.98) and self-reported chest pain (RRR 2.24, 95% CI 1.34, 3.77) were associated

241 ens 1.5-T Avanto scanner in 41 subjects with chest pain scheduled for coronary angiography.

242 Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain), SCOT-HEART trial (Scottish Computed Tomogra

243 l group: hospital admissions for non-cardiac chest pain, sepsis, and an elective procedure.

244 ent in at least two of four symptoms (cough, chest pain, sputum production, dyspnoea) with no worseni

245 Four factors (chest pain, ST-elevation, absence of coronary artery dis

246 yocardial infarction (AMI) upon the onset of chest pain symptoms is crucial for patient survival.

247 asingly being used to evaluate patients with chest pain symptoms.

248 n concentrations in patients presenting with chest-pain symptoms and being investigated for possible

249 enters across 11 states who presented with a chest pain syndrome and were referred for stress CMR wer

250 In a multicenter U.S. cohort with stable chest pain syndromes, stress CMR performed at experience

251 een the many conditions that can cause acute chest pain syndromes.

252 of patients presenting to the ED with acute chest pain syndromes; however, the impact of such testin

253 ity of readmissions were because of low-risk chest pain that did not require any intervention.

254 sited our hospital complaining of persistent chest pain that manifested in the evenings and early mor

255 elop constitutional symptoms or sudden onset chest pain that start days or weeks after atrial fibrill

256 e HEART Trial) trial of patients with stable chest pain, the use of coronary computed tomography angi

257 des valuable information about patients with chest pain, there is growing concern regarding its radia

258 95% CI: 0.4%, 2.3%) had been readmitted for chest pain; there were no instances of coronary revascul

259 d cohorts of 894 ED patients presenting with chest pain to assess the impact of CCTA versus standard

260 Further analysis showed that shortening the chest pain-to-reperfusion time to less than 240 minutes

261 but the value of resting CTP (rCTP) in acute chest pain triage remains unclear.

262 four [4%]), IPF progression (four [4%]), and chest pain (two [2%]).

263 were infusion reactions (four [11%] of 37), chest pain (two [5%] of 37), haemolysis (two [5%] of 37)

264 Among patients with stable chest pain undergoing a noninvasive test, inconclusive r

265 the value of CAC scan in patients with acute chest pain undergoing CCTA.

266 In patients with acute chest pain undergoing coronary CTA, cost-efficient testi

267 ion of hard events of SE incorporated into a chest pain unit for patients admitted with acute chest p

268 SE incorporated into a chest pain unit has excellent feasibility and provides r

269 This is the first reported case of chest pain unrelated to physical activity reported in a

270 rning to the ED within 30 days for recurrent chest pain was 5 times greater with standard evaluation

271 and trismus occurred twice; and non-cardiac chest pain was reported three times.

272 ion (sex and age) on MI presentation without chest pain was significant (P < .001).

273 h no steroids, the incidence of pericarditic chest pain was significantly reduced by intrapericardial

274 Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain) was a randomized trial evaluating an initial

275 rolled trial of CCTA in patients with stable chest pain, we investigated the association between the

276 Both heartburn and chest pain were included in the oesophageal discomfort f

277 s who were undergoing cardiac MR imaging for chest pain were included.

278 Consecutive patients with stable, new onset chest pain were managed by either usual testing (n = 287

279 Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain) were studied, and hsTnI results were analyze

280 al of 250 consecutive patients admitted with chest pain, were enrolled in this prospective study.

281 m were reported to have had antemortem acute chest pain, were imaged with postmortem whole-body CT an

282 icity and sensitivity of detecting causes of chest pain, when compared to patient history, clinical f

283 competent adult received corticosteroids for chest pain, which later was clinically found to be herpe

284 acterised by shortness of breath and obscure chest pain, which may be a diagnostic challenge, especia

285 hough it has been associated with exertional chest pain, which may mimic acute coronary syndrome.

286 re two cases of refractory asthma presenting chest pain, which were successfully treated by using int

287 All patients with chest pain who have an initial hs-cTnT level of <5 ng/l

288 rapid identification of those patients with chest pain who require admission and urgent management a

289 In patients with chest pain who underwent treadmill MPS (n=4764), only 27

290 presenting to the emergency department with chest pain who were candidates for stress-first MPI unde

291 nting to the emergency department with acute chest pain will lead to increased downstream testing and

292 ing in contemporary patients who have stable chest pain with a low burden of obstructive CAD, myocard

293 (Better Evaluation of Acute Chest Pain with Computed Tomography Angiography [BEACON]

294 re was a nonsignificant reduced incidence of chest pain with ECG changes with steroids (13.2%, 10.0%,

295 with usual care for the evaluation of stable chest pain with follow-up for cardiovascular outcomes.

296 test clinical data to identify patients with chest pain with normal coronary arteries and no clinical

297 ed sudden onset of epigastric and midsternal chest pain with shortness of breath.

298 Episodes of acute myocardial injury (chest pain with troponin elevation and normal coronary a

299 d documented preinfarction angina defined as chest pain within 24 hours of infarction.

300 iac injury, to add diagnostic information in chest pain workup.