ライフサイエンスコーパス: chewing

1 icate brain regions involved with initiating chewing.

2 evaluate brain activity in humans during gum chewing.

3 groups, with no complications related to gum chewing.

4 gies is better adapted for either gnawing or chewing.

5 ic behaviours such as walking, breathing and chewing.

6 acking (a rhythmic facial expression) versus chewing.

7 z rhythm during lip-smacking, but not during chewing.

8 which entails swallowing food whole without chewing.

9 elivery that led to better perception during chewing.

10 upting before, during, or after habitual gum-chewing.

11 unique palinal (longitudinal and backwards) chewing.

12 rough friction between teeth and food during chewing.

13 ely well suited to efficient (high-leverage) chewing.

14 ation of SF and SFN occurred during in vitro chewing.

15 ivation both during resting state and during chewing.

16 CI, 1.67-6.43) with >10 years paternal betel chewing, 1.62 (95% CI, 0.88-2.96) for 5 to 9 years, and

17 To evaluate whether chewing a loading dose (LD) of ticagrelor, 180 mg, vs tr

18 Chewing a tasteless odorless gum elevates metabolic rate

19 Edentulous individuals have reduced chewing ability and lower fruit and vegetable consumptio

20 Chewing ability and OHRQoL were assessed before and afte

21 Both the RPD and CD groups reported improved chewing ability and OHRQoL, with RPD resulting in superi

22 roup, the RPD group had significantly better chewing ability both before (p < 0.001) and after (p = 0

23 Perceived chewing ability explained approximately 4% variance in i

24 observation period (period effect), and (3) chewing ability improved with each successive generation

25 res for the older adults did not improve the chewing ability in the eligible population.

26 analyzed whether the new policy improved of chewing ability in the eligible population.

27 Perceived chewing ability significantly increased in both groups.

28 f this study were to: determine if perceived chewing ability was predictive of fruit and vegetable in

29 ke of fruits, vegetables, and nutrients, and chewing ability were assessed pre-and 6 weeks post-inter

30 Improved chewing ability with new dentures has resulted in little

31 , psychosocial factors, as well as perceived chewing ability, must be addressed.

32 Perceived chewing ability, sociodemographic, and psychosocial fact

33 ved to be significantly superior in terms of chewing ability, when compared with zero-degree posterio

34 Gutka chewing alone, chewing among individuals with prediabete

35 wing among individuals with prediabetes, and chewing among healthy controls did not significantly inc

36 Gutka chewing alone, chewing among individuals with prediabetes, and chewing

37 Chewing an LD of ticagrelor, 180 mg, in patients with ST

38 atients with STEMI were randomized to either chewing an LD of ticagrelor, 180 mg, or standard oral ad

39 creases bilateral masseter activation during chewing, an effect driven by the expression of TeNT in S

40 parent bone density in mandible under normal chewing and biting forces.

41 An emphasis on careful chewing and cooking and processing of fruits and vegetab

42 occurred specifically while recipients were chewing and hence emitting the most potent chemical cues

43 Leaf-chewing and leaf-mining herbivores, and predatory ants a

44 and taste, an unusual epigastric sensation, chewing and lip smacking, automatisms, postictal symptom

45 sely related to the native oak received more chewing and mining damage than distantly related oaks, a

46 otably including ingestive behaviors such as chewing and nursing.

47 riodontal inflammatory conditions with gutka chewing and prediabetes.

48 Over the past two centuries, mammalian chewing and related anatomical features have been among

49 sity better explain plant resistance against chewing and sap-feeding herbivores than classic diversit

50 Longer duration of paternal betel quid chewing and smoking, prefatherhood, independently predic

51 ression in insects, and the function of both chewing and sucking mouthparts in insects.

52 Chewing and suckling induced tension at the metopic and

53 studies have shown that cyclical strain from chewing and suckling influences the closure of cranial v

54 salivary hypofunction exhibit difficulty in chewing and swallowing foods, tooth decay, periodontal d

55 ntainer, transporting it into the mouth, and chewing and swallowing it.

56 ding that cheek teeth function as guides for chewing and tools for fracturing allows us to characteri

57 on activates and modulates the gastric mill (chewing) and pyloric (filtering of chewed food) motor ci

58 ctromyographic activity occurring during gum chewing, and (2) to explore these data for evidence of s

59 increased age, less education, difficulty in chewing, and absence of dentures.

60 Before gum chewing, and at 7 min and 15 min afterward, whole plaque

61 generated by other people eating, drinking, chewing, and breathing [1-8].

62 mammals, e.g., walking, swimming, suckling, chewing, and breathing, inhibition is often hypothesized

63 ments, the effects of mechanical disruption, chewing, and digestion on almond seed microstructure and

64 in stepping, jaw opening and closing during chewing, and inspiration-expiration in breathing, which

65 to experience dry eyes and mouth, difficulty chewing, and mild dysphagia that worsened throughout the

66 activities of daily living (e.g., speaking, chewing, and swallowing).

67 use our mouth and throat, including speech, chewing, and swallowing.

68 r the effects of paternal smoking, areca nut chewing, and their duration prefatherhood on age of dete

69 mmal that displays decoupling of hearing and chewing apparatuses and functions.

70 Evidence shows that hearing and chewing apparatuses have evolved in a modular fashion.

71 ent, lower educational level, and pan masala chewing appear to be risk factors of GERD symptoms for t

72 o predict volatile induction: feeding guild (chewing arthropods > sap feeders), diet breadth (special

73 d to enable both gnawing at the incisors and chewing at the molars.

74 cluding locomotion, grooming, head movement, chewing, auditory stimuli, and whisker movement (both pa

75 ants, honeydew-producing membracids and leaf-chewing beetles on perennial host plants in field experi

76 Items related to chewing, being understood, tasting, and dry mouth were p

77 etric Morphometrics were employed to analyse chewing biomechanics and mandible morphology to, firstly

78 e many rhythms necessary for survival (e.g., chewing, breathing, locomotion), and doing so often requ

79 hat physiologically relevant exercise (i.e., chewing bubble gum for 6 min) increases masticatory musc

80 th clenching and bruxism, while mastication (chewing) can promote coping with stress.

81 feeding guilds (piercing aphids, generalist chewing caterpillars and specialist chewing caterpillars

82 neralist chewing caterpillars and specialist chewing caterpillars).

83 s issue in the network-driven, gastric mill (chewing) circuit in the crab stomatogastric nervous syst

84 almonds, which were consumed under the same chewing conditions.

85 is latter situation, using the gastric mill (chewing) CPG in the crab (Cancer borealis) stomatogastri

86 mples were quantified into 165 variables per chewing cycle, averaged to create a single multivariate

87 Approximately 11 right- and 11 left-sided chewing cycles and associated masticatory electromyograp

88 s in early cladotherians that indicate their chewing cycles included significant transverse movement,

89 mprised one-third of the diet, the number of chewing cycles per year would have declined by nearly 2

90 ith increased yaw rotation of the jaw during chewing cycles.

91 We found high phylogenetic signal in chewing damage but not mining damage and all traits exce

92 milarity in leaf traits also received higher chewing damage but not mining damage.

93 This, in turn, mediated the reduction in chewing damage in mixed stands.

94 own defoliating herbivores and suggests that chewing damage on mountain birch foliage could significa

95 ntly about the associated metabolic costs of chewing different items.

96 effect), (2) there was a steady decrease in chewing difficulty during the observation period (period

97 The RD analysis showed that in 2015, the chewing difficulty in aged above 65 was 2.2% lower than

98 ing difficulty: (1) there was an increase in chewing difficulty starting at around 60 years of age (a

99 The main outcome evaluated was self-reported chewing difficulty.

100 APC analysis revealed three trends in chewing difficulty: (1) there was an increase in chewing

101 vivo to simulate stresses during biting and chewing - dorsoventral (DV) shear and lateral transverse

102 , sex, duration and daily frequency of gutka chewing, duration of gutka placement in the mouth, and d

103 ividuals generally experience a reduced food-chewing efficiency.

104 Wax chewing elicited a similar response, indicating a mastic

105 s after the two-year program of habitual gum-chewing ended, 288 children were re-examined.

106 During the 5 years after habitual gum-chewing ended, xylitol gums reduced the caries risk 59%

107 g, jumping, shakes, abdominal constrictions, chewing, facial tremor and scratching.

108 all fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) and Chewings fescue (Festuca rubra L. subsp. fallax [Thuill]

109 Palaeolithic processing technologies affect chewing force production and efficacy in humans consumin

110 Tooth roots provide support to counter chewing forces and so it is advantageous to grow roots q

111 t of teeth(1), and has evolved to bear large chewing forces, resist mechanical fatigue and withstand

112 Previous studies on chewing frequency across animal species have focused on

113 e maximum force of muscle, so that the upper chewing frequency scales as the -1/3 power of body mass

114 xcess of saliva describes the lower limit of chewing frequency, scaling approximately as the -1/6 pow

115 roused without elucidating the variations in chewing frequency.

116 Platelet reactivity in the chewing group was significantly reduced by 24% at 30 min

117 Chewing gum (2 g) containing plant cells expressed CTB-A

118 Patients in the intervention arm received chewing gum 4 times a day postoperatively.

119 s suggest that regular use of CHX-containing chewing gum appears useful to control dental plaque form

120 Lastly, the role of vagal signaling or chewing gum as potential treatment strategies of allevia

121 ies on elective procedures demonstrates that chewing gum can lessen the duration of ileus.

122 amplitude was significantly decreased after chewing gum containing 4 mg of nicotine.

123 tude responses decreased significantly after chewing gum containing both 2 and 4 mg of nicotine.

124 Chewing gum could induce increased swallowing frequency,

125 instructed to use 5 pieces of the unlabeled chewing gum daily (containing 5.0 mg CHX acetate/piece;

126 The null hypothesis of this study was that chewing gum does not have any effect on the clearance of

127 Sham feeding with chewing gum has been shown to accelerate the return of g

128 owels (OR = 3.1, 95% CI 2.1-4.5), sharing of chewing gum or partially eaten candies (OR = 3.4, 95% CI

129 dents were assigned a random ordering of the chewing gum products and received professional tooth cle

130 phosphate-fortified (alpha-TCP) experimental chewing gum released sufficient calcium and phosphate to

131 The CHX-containing chewing gum showed significantly reduced plaque values (

132 Chewing gum that is readily available and reasonably pri

133 H < 4 during the postprandial period without chewing gum were 5.7 (1.7-13.5) and, with chewing gum, 3

134 Two pieces of chewing gum were used following each morning and evening

135 Chewing gum with virus-trapping proteins offers a genera

136 ut chewing gum were 5.7 (1.7-13.5) and, with chewing gum, 3.6 (0.3-7.3), respectively (p = 0.001).

137 ng diluted samples, computer keyboard swabs, chewing gum, and cigarette butts.

138 These techniques include nicotine chewing gum, skin patches, nasal sprays, and inhalers, a

139 acetate-, xylitol-, and sorbitol-containing chewing gum.

140 and could be used as an active component in chewing gums or mouthwashes for both caries and gingivit

141 ations and industrial products like candies, chewing gums, mouthwash and toothpaste.

142 tent of TiO(2) included candies, sweets, and chewing gums.

143 duals with prediabetes irrespective of gutka-chewing habit (P <0.05).

144 age, sex, duration of prediabetes, and gutka-chewing habits was collected using a questionnaire.

145 es risk for several years after the habitual chewing has ended.

146 ts only when phloem-feeders were present and chewing herbivore abundance was high.

147 alysis revealed that trophic position of the chewing herbivore and omnivore increased significantly w

148 e show that a specialist caterpillar (biting-chewing herbivore) and a specialist aphid (phloem feeder

149 lants were independently challenged with (1) chewing herbivores (Manduca sexta), (2) piercing-sucking

150 Chewing herbivores activate plant defense responses thro

151 e season resulted in halving of herbivory by chewing herbivores and a reduction in the abundance of p

152 plant immune receptors in the perception of chewing herbivores and defense.

153 It is well known that plant damage by leaf-chewing herbivores can induce resistance in neighbouring

154 ng, which likely reduces plant resistance to chewing herbivores due to its negative cross-talk with J

155 Leaf-chewing herbivores fluxed 6.2 g m(-2) yr(-1) of frass an

156 a the salicylic acid pathway, whereas biting-chewing herbivores induce plant resistance mainly via th

157 Simultaneously, however, these chewing herbivores stimulated JA production, demonstrati

158 ivores increased with plant biomass; that of chewing herbivores tracked plant quality; and predator b

159 The growth of various chewing herbivores was not significantly affected by the

160 henorrhyncha, sucking herbivores, Acrididae, chewing herbivores, Tettigoniidae, omnivores, and Aranea

161 suite of proteins that defend maize against chewing herbivores.

162 Stereotyped chewing, horizontal home cage activity, and changes in b

163 On multivariate analysis, heavy-areca nut chewing (HR = 2.18, 95% CI: 1.37-3.47), current smoking

164 postoperative oscillopsia that occurred upon chewing in 29 of 34 patients (85%) and upon walking in 8

165 nce for specific brain areas associated with chewing in humans and demonstrated that brain activation

166 d immunosorbent assay (ELISA) indicated that chewing increased IgA secretion.

167 Chewing increased pain in both female and male patients

168 Because chewing-induced masticatory muscle pain was significantl

169 Thus, sex differences in chewing-induced pain were found in control subjects but

170 (Solanum lycopersicum) defenses against the chewing insect beet armyworm (Spodoptera exigua; BAW).

171 g is required for host plant resistance to a chewing insect herbivore.

172 Damage inflicted to leaves by chewing insect larvae led to an increase in the local an

173 nase that is a key defensive protein against chewing insect pests in maize (Zea mays).

174 syringae pv tomato DC3000, and larvae of the chewing insect tobacco hornworm (Manduca sexta).

175 n contrast to their detrimental effects on a chewing insect, calcium oxalate crystals do not negative

176 litatively and quantitatively different from chewing insects and aphids.

177 JA synthesis is essential for resistance to chewing insects and male reproductive function and furth

178 may influence JA-dependent defenses against chewing insects and SA-dependent defenses against aphids

179 ortant role in plant defense against various chewing insects and some pathogenic fungi.

180 Here we provide evidence that chewing insects differentially alter the oxylipin profil

181 Although defense responses to leaf-chewing insects have been well studied, little is known

182 ws the elaborate behaviors exhibited by leaf-chewing insects that appear to function specifically to

183 ors of Nicotiana attenuata responses against chewing insects, a 26-nucleotide tag matching the HSPRO

184 tion and response to both phloem-feeding and chewing insects, often antagonistically; NPR appears to

185 complex responses against pathogens and leaf-chewing insects.

186 y impaired by both generalist and specialist chewing insects.

187 which they serve as toxic compounds against chewing insects.

188 In the present study we show that vigorous chewing is limited by the maximum force of muscle, so th

189 Areca nut chewing is one of the major risk factors for oral cancer

190 either forcing itself beneath the thatch or chewing its way into it.

191 It is known that gutka chewing jeopardizes periodontal health; however, severit

192 gerprint analysis (OFA) to reconstruct their chewing kinematics; we also used various morphometric ap

193 , detritus shredding, detritus grazing, leaf chewing, leaf piercing, ambush predators, active hunting

194 bbage looper (Trichoplusia ni), a generalist-chewing lepidopteran.

195 n parasite systems and to the pocket gophers-chewing lice system, and demonstrate that both host shif

196 s and have played a minor role in the gopher-chewing lice system.

197 ociation with oral-buccal movements, such as chewing, licking, and grooming.

198 acial behaviors such as breathing, sniffing, chewing, licking, swallowing, vocalizing, and in rodents

199 opment of orofacial dyskinesias, involuntary chewing-like movements that often accompany long-term ne

200 Although thorough chewing lowers postprandial glucose concentrations, rese

201 tion to quitting smoking, quitting areca nut chewing may also reduce the risk of first recurrence in

202 Habitual xylitol gum-chewing may have a long-term preventive effect by reduci

203 The findings suggest that areca nut chewing may jeopardize the defensive functions of neutro

204 tle or no exercise; a low-salt diet; trouble chewing meat; self-reported protein albumin, blood, or s

205 The STNS includes the gastric mill (chewing) motor circuit in the stomatogastric ganglion (S

206 (STG), where they activate the gastric mill (chewing) motor circuit.

207 OC) neurons trigger a specific gastric mill (chewing) motor pattern in the stomatogastric ganglion so

208 or (GPR) neuron, regulates the gastric mill (chewing) motor rhythm.

209 arthria, dysphagia, sialorrhea and excessive chewing/mouthing behaviors) have not been fully explored

210 e other is a roachoid with long antennae and chewing mouthparts very similar in form to the most gene

211 such as tiny wingless body, head with strong chewing mouthparts, robust and short antennae having lon

212 quamosal jaw joint, which allows a posterior chewing movement, and must have evolved independently fr

213 The syndrome of vacuous chewing movements (VCMs) in rats is similar in many resp

214 Using vacuous chewing movements (VCMs) induced by chronic haloperidol

215 pregulated in treated rats that show vacuous chewing movements (VCMs).

216 showed that speech movements are faster than chewing movements, and the functional coordination betwe

217 ted in mammals, architecture dynamics of the chewing muscles and their impact on muscle performance a

218 in having relatively smaller teeth, reduced chewing muscles, weaker maximum bite force capabilities,

219 tes even after controlling for sex and gutka chewing (odds ratio = 13.2; 95% CI = 4.3 to 40.7).

220 Previous studies demonstrated that the chewing of a 2.5% (mass fraction) alpha-tricalcium-phosp

221 In contrast, the chewing of a conventional sugar-free gum did not elimina

222 Chewing of areca quid increases the prevalence of period

223 under masticatory stimulation induced by the chewing of parafilm (1 g) at 10 or 60 strokes/min for 15

224 These results suggest that the chewing of the experimental gum deposits a labile minera

225 ir activation accelerates further cleavage ("chewing") of the fragments, while the chymotrypsin-like

226 The effects of chewing on in vivo biofilm, microbial composition, and s

227 tional effects of paternal Areca catechu nut chewing on offspring metabolic syndrome (MetS) risk in h

228 t the patient had a long-standing history of chewing on toilet bowl deodorizing cakes.

229 variables, with a special focus on areca nut chewing, on disease recurrence and progression in patien

230 e the effects of paternal smoking, and betel chewing, on the risks of early MetS in human offspring.

231 on of almond tissue by mechanical methods or chewing, only the first layer of cells at the fractured

232 Teeth that erupted after 1 year of gum-chewing or after the two-year habitual gum use ended had

233 Rhythmic movements, such as walking, chewing or scratching, are phylogenetically old motor be

234 ceived gingival bleeding (P <0.001), pain on chewing (P <0.001), dry mouth (P <0.001), and oral burni

235 mia, smoking, alcohol consumption, betel nut chewing, physical activity, income, and education level,

236 ions of population and is related to certain chewing practices that involve direct exposure of the gi

237 lly stimulate this region of the face (e.g., chewing) produced no detectable increases in GCL activit

238 An increase in larval chewing rate, cotemporaneous with the sudden release of

239 findings have clinical significance in betel-chewing regions and broader implications for theory of m

240 The results suggest that the chewing-related factors evaluated in this sample are not

241 array (HOMIM) analyses revealed a consistent chewing-related increase in the binding of Streptococcus

242 r behaviors, such as breathing, walking, and chewing, remains elusive.

243 hasic (protraction/retraction) gastric mill (chewing) rhythm driven by the projection neuron MCN1 in

244 oceptor neuron on the biphasic gastric mill (chewing) rhythm driven by the projection neuron modulato

245 nin (PK) peptides activate the gastric mill (chewing) rhythm without the participation of the project

246 asic (protraction, retraction) gastric mill (chewing) rhythm, triggered in the isolated stomatogastri

247 iodontal surgery in the past 2 years?," and "Chewing satisfaction?," were added to the model.

248 f withdrawal measured as increased grooming, chewing, scratching, and shaking, plus the appearance of

249 rived from annotated video observation and a chewing sensor to predict mass and energy intake during

250 ent meals in a laboratory setting and wore a chewing sensor while being videotaped.

251 bservation or information extracted from the chewing sensor.

252 ns may dynamically change over the course of chewing sequences.

253 ypothesis is that monkey lip-smacking versus chewing should also exhibit these differences.

254 ffects to be maximized, habitual xylitol gum-chewing should be started at least one year before perma

255 vivo, during VCN-triggered and POC-triggered chewing, show that the lateral teeth protraction movemen

256 Teeth that erupted before the gum-chewing started had no significant long-term prevention

257 L., Bangla cultivar) oil, a widely consumed chewing stimulant and valuable flavouring agent.

258 Chewing-stimulated flow rates were not significantly dif

259 ic reflux esophagitis, in basal and parafilm chewing-stimulated saliva, its volume, pH, bicarbonate,

260 te vials under resting conditions and during chewing-stimulated secretion over 45 min.

261 Samples of unstimulated whole and chewing-stimulated whole saliva were collected under sta

262 It is concluded that chewing stimulates epithelial cell transcytosis of IgA a

263 We infer that the ancestral therian chewing stroke relied heavily on long-axis rotation, inc

264 describe the ancestral tribosphenic therian chewing stroke, as conserved in the short-tailed opossum

265 Notably, chewing, sucking and gall-making herbivores were more af

266 Chewing sugar-free gum for half an hour after a meal can

267 Behaviours such as chewing, swallowing and speech critically depend on prec

268 ontract in response to self-generated noise (chewing, swallowing) and non-auditory stimuli.

269 Chewing, swallowing, breathing, and vocalization in mamm

270 ons among activated brain areas during a gum-chewing task.

271 ea under the curve values were higher in the chewing than in the non-chewing trial.

272 that guinea pigs are more efficient at molar chewing than squirrels.

273 One hour after chewing, the pain remained above pre-test levels for fem

274 eeth benefit most from two-year habitual gum-chewing - those erupting before, during, or after habitu

275 sil mammals and relatives also functioned in chewing through their bony attachments to the lower jaw(

276 On the other hand, gentle chewing to mix food uniformly without excess of saliva d

277 tionary link documenting the transition from chewing to piercing mouthparts in relation to suction fe

278 hat snuff may be a stronger risk factor than chewing tobacco for smokeless tobacco lesions, but the u

279 f and only 61 cases and 96 controls had used chewing tobacco in the absence of cigarettes, precluding

280 dences of oral cancers in users of snuff and chewing tobacco in which NNK is present in high concentr

281 ncy of use, and duration of use of snuff and chewing tobacco separately for never and ever cigarette

282 terval (CI) = 8.5-39.8], followed by current chewing tobacco use [OR = 2.5; 95% CI = 1.3-5.0].

283 Chewing tobacco use poses serious health risks; yet it h

284 state of residence, applicator license type, chewing tobacco use, and total lifetime days of all pest

285 om India on cigarette smoking, bidi smoking, chewing tobacco, and secondhand smoke.

286 ho provided information on the use of snuff, chewing tobacco, cigarettes, and alcohol and who receive

287 olescents by preventing the use of snuff and chewing tobacco.

288 uency, and daily minutes of use of snuff and chewing tobacco.

289 cavity, whereas associations were weaker for chewing tobacco.

290 th snuff being more strongly associated than chewing tobacco.

291 s were higher in the chewing than in the non-chewing trial.

292 ovative saliva reactor, which imitated human chewing under temperature control.

293 lows chromatids to move towards the pole by 'chewing up' microtubule tracks.

294 entrations, research on the effectiveness of chewing vegetables in different forms on postprandial gl

295 ve inhibition of platelet aggregation in the chewing vs the standard group were 51% vs 10% (95% CI, 1

296 Chewing was associated with activations in the cerebellu

297 Betel chewing was associated with tobacco use but not with can

298 Betel chewing was not associated with global health, social fu

299 Although ever (versus never) tobacco chewing was weakly associated with HNC among never cigar

300 Further, those with a habit of pan masala chewing were more likely to develop GERD compared with t