戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (left1)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 al transcripts and 5524 chimp ESTs to the 4x chimp draft genome assembly and identified polymorphisms
2 7628 chimpanzee virtual transcripts and 5524 chimp ESTs to the 4x chimp draft genome assembly and ide
3 imp and one bonobo sequences, and assuming a chimp-human coalescent time of 5 million years before pr
4                    Recently, we identified a chimp cDNA, termed CR1b, which represented transcription
5         The vaccine regimen, consisting of a chimp adenovirus (ChAd68) and self-amplifying mRNA (samR
6                In general, models that allow chimps to have a larger per-repeat unit slippage rate an
7                       We find that human and chimp FOXP2 have similar binding sites that are distinct
8 tch events during the evolution of human and chimp from their common ancestor and hundreds of events
9 he methylation differences between human and chimp have occurred in the germline.
10 rgoing natural selection along the human and chimp lineage by fitting models that include parameters
11 bridisation" between the diverging human and chimp lineages, such observations can be explained more
12                                    Human and chimp orthologous regions show a striking similarity in
13                           Although human and chimp positively selected genes have different molecular
14      We profiled the methylomes of human and chimp sperm as a basis for comparison to methylation pat
15            Comparing methylomes of human and chimp sperm revealed a subset of differentially methylat
16 n compared with the orientation in human and chimp.
17 gions differ significantly between human and chimp.
18 rtebrate species (including human, mouse and chimp), the m6A epitranscriptomes of 10 virus species (i
19 er similarity with the homologous murine and chimp genomic and protein sequences and contained both N
20 nding syntenic regions in the mouse, rat and chimp genomes indicates, as previously suggested, that p
21 at the CTL repertoire overlaps in humans and chimps and that the HLA-A2 and HLA-B7 supertypes extend
22 n synonymous rate in ESX1 between humans and chimps as well as among a total of 15 primate species.
23  analyzing nearly 14,000 genes of humans and chimps.
24 mans (worldwide sample) and four great apes (chimp, bonobo, and gorilla).
25 r that is otherwise highly conserved between chimps and other mammals.
26 g adaptive physiological differences between chimps and humans, human-accelerated genes are significa
27 the proposed cognitive discontinuity between chimps and humans.
28 wn HIV-1 and the infection of chimpanzees by chimp-adapted HIV-1.
29 s of 5 different categories of animals (cat, chimp, gorilla, tiger, fish).
30                                       Common chimps and bonobos are our closest living relatives but
31 to compare reaction rates among human CPEB3, chimp CPEB3, and HDV ribozymes.
32 etween WDR36 orthologues in mouse, rat, dog, chimp and human.
33              The peptides recognized by each chimp corresponded with the ability of its class I molec
34 teny relationships among 10 amniotes (human, chimp, macaque, rat, mouse, pig, cattle, dog, opossum, a
35 e difference in gene expression among human, chimp, and orangutan, which suggested an accelerated rat
36  complete genomes of mammals (such as human, chimp, horse, and mouse) into their constituent nongenic
37  included the analyses of 11 genomes: human, chimp, rhesus, mouse, rat, dog, cat, chicken, guinea pig
38 ddle temporal gyrus of five primates (human, chimp, gorilla, macaque and marmoset) to identify 57 hom
39 uilt using the latest releases of the human, chimp, dog, macaque and mouse genomes, so that the resul
40 sing a simulated data set resembling a human-chimp-gorilla scenario, we show that our method has comp
41 e is consistent with that based on the human-chimp comparison.
42 red to humans give a better fit to the human-chimp data as well as the human genomic data.
43 he chimpanzee nuclear genome since the human-chimp divergence, which is significantly greater than th
44 fold lower than estimates based on the human-chimp divergence.
45  in our 15 candidate genes predate the human/chimp divergence.
46 onal networks activated in humans but not in chimps by the FoxP2 gene suggest molecular mechanisms un
47 s is substantially smaller in humans than in chimps, despite a generally higher nonsynonymous substit
48 , fruit fly, fugu, chicken, dog, rat, mouse, chimp and human.
49 o substitutions is 3.0 for this 2 million-nt chimp DNA sample compared with human.
50 a key difference in the immune reactivity of chimp and human lymphocytes appears to be related to the
51 ing region of human CR1 and the 3' region of chimp CR1b.
52  that show accelerated evolution in human or chimp, as compared to noncoding regions showing accelera
53 me sequence data from four nonhuman species (chimp, dog, mouse, and rat) with recently available comp
54  were not infectious in a second susceptible chimp, even when from donors with low-level, intermitten
55      Further sequence analysis suggests that chimp, dog and frog nyctalopins are likely to be GPI anc
56 d popularity, a more likely scenario is that chimps and humans were infected by an HIV-1 precursor vi
57 terns, comparisons between the human and the chimp mt protein sequences also revealed a surprisingly
58 nt are present in about equal amounts in the chimp and human sequences.
59  sequence is ancestral or derived, using the chimp genome as the outgroup.
60 nhanced antigen-specific T cell responses to chimp adenoviral vector (ChAdOx) vaccination in a mouse
61  From a comparison of our haplogroups to two chimp and one bonobo sequences, and assuming a chimp-hum
62 e also detected in occasional HBV-uninfected chimps.
63 These models were hyperparameter tuned using chimp optimization algorithm (ChOA) for a performance ap