ライフサイエンスコーパス: chloramphenicol

1 d with ribosome-targeting antibiotics (e.g., chloramphenicol).

2 ng antibiotics: tobramycin, clindamycin, and chloramphenicol.

3 % were resistant to ampicillin, TMP-SMX, and chloramphenicol.

4 mia associated with clinical applications of chloramphenicol.

5 wo genes cmlA (24.87%) and catA1 (8.63%) for chloramphenicol.

6 o upregulate ceoR promoter activity, as does chloramphenicol.

7 and the minimum inhibitory concentration of chloramphenicol.

8 bial antibiotics novobiocin, pefloxacin, and chloramphenicol.

9 nthesis had been blocked by spectinomycin or chloramphenicol.

10 capable of resisting up to 400 microg/mL of chloramphenicol.

11 s remain susceptible to either penicillin or chloramphenicol.

12 ce mechanisms that deactivate tobramycin and chloramphenicol.

13 enylephrine 10%, diclophenac 0.1% along with chloramphenicol 0.5% were used preoperatively.Pupil diam

14 5% confidence intervals [CI], 0.35 to 0.87); chloramphenicol, 49% (95% CI, 0.20 to 0.83); trimethopri

15 n, but fewer isolates were nonsusceptible to chloramphenicol (5.7%), meropenem (16.6%), and cefotaxim

16 ethoprim, 20%; piperacillin-tazobactam, 11%; chloramphenicol, 9%; and aminoglycoside, 4%.

17 cin (a cell-wall biosynthesis inhibitor) and chloramphenicol (a protein synthesis inhibitor).

18 Chloramphenicol, a peptidyl transferase inhibitor, affec

19 in I (NECI) and analyzed the expression of a chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (CAT) marker gene dri

20 Gel shift analysis and chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (CAT) reporter assays

21 s) or isoform II (60 amino acids) fused to a chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (CAT) reporter demons

22 ement into heterologous SV40 promoter (SV40) chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (CAT) vector showed o

23 with the GSTA2 antioxidant response element-chloramphenicol acetyl transferase construct.

24 ed a plasmid construct encoding the cDNA for chloramphenicol acetyl transferase modified to contain a

25 no inhibition of GR-mediated induction of a chloramphenicol acetyl transferase reporter in LMCAT cel

26 olecular mechanism of this effect, we used a chloramphenicol acetyl transferase reporter under the co

27 inserted in the promoter region of the cat (chloramphenicol acetyl transferase) gene on a plasmid.

28 Shear stress activated a human eNOS promoter chloramphenicol acetyl-CoA transferase chimeric construc

29 in PAO1 carried the algD promoter fused to a chloramphenicol acetyl-transferase cartridge (PalgD-cat)

30 corporation of [3H]uridine and a decrease in chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) activity in a de

31 nic acid capsule genes (hasABC) by measuring chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) activity in a re

32 Chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) activity varied

33 An ambisense MG coding for chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) and green fluore

34 n, each cell line was transfected with pRARE-chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) and treated with

35 to activate both RRE-mediated reporter gene [chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) and/or gag] expr

36 The analysis of IGRP-chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) fusion gene expr

37 The analysis of IGRP-chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) fusion gene expr

38 c and intestinal expressions of the reporter chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) gene (which subs

39 d transgenic mice in which expression of the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) gene is driven b

40 irs was linked to the coding sequence of the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) gene.

41 3'UTRs of these transcripts were mapped and chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) reporter constru

42 r genes and an NFkappaB motif containing the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) reporter gene ma

43 ES and Lab-Lb intervening segment fused to a chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) reporter has bee

44 With newly constructed chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) reporter vectors

45 Using a chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) target gene, inh

46 ed by a shortened version of intron 1 to the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) vector showed th

47 , including green fluorescent protein (GFP), chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT), and luciferase.

48 For that purpose, we decided to use chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT), as chloroplasts

49 the third vector containing a reporter gene, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT), they were cotra

50 integrated with a mouse mammary tumor virus-chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (MMTV-CAT) reporter, w

51 CHN) resulted in repression of IL-6 promoter chloramphenicol acetyltransferase activity (P < 0.05).

52 kbone fold, which is also similar to that of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase and dihydrolipoyl tran

53 ng partners of an insoluble protein fused to chloramphenicol acetyltransferase by monitoring the surv

54 , and Smads, within the p-560Col7a1 promoter/chloramphenicol acetyltransferase construct, coupled wit

55 was examined using the same Col7a1 promoter/chloramphenicol acetyltransferase constructs.

56 to replace the an open reading frame with a chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene (cat) and a bacmi

57 ssay for (CAG)(n)*(CTG)(n) deletion from the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene integrated into t

58 The rates of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene transcription dri

59 ch a firefly luciferase gene was linked to a chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene using a segment o

60 ansformed an exthemophilic red alga with the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene, rendering this o

61 ansformed an exthemophilic red alga with the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene, rendering this o

62 muscle cells by binding to myocyte-specific chloramphenicol acetyltransferase heptamer elements in t

63 This motif increased the expression of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase in Caco-2 cells treate

64 Fusions of the F-ATPase promoter to chloramphenicol acetyltransferase indicated that pH-depe

65 We found the amount of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase induced by the wild-ty

66 tant to chloramphenicol due to production of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase mediated by catP.

67 ts on VSV in vitro transcription and in vivo chloramphenicol acetyltransferase minigenome replication

68 ted with an mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter (Cat0) synchr

69 of a mutated or deleted residue 1 of a cRNA chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter construct, su

70 The minimal promoter sufficient to drive chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter gene activity

71 B expression, the seb promoter fused to the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter gene was intr

72 es were subcloned in front of a promoterless chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter gene.

73 gene was cloned, sequenced, and fused to the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter gene.

74 However, in a chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter system, only

75 In contrast, when studied in a chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter, two promoter

76 polar expression of fluorescent proteins and chloramphenicol acetyltransferase substitutions for the

77 Transfection experiments with OvCAT (chloramphenicol acetyltransferase) reporter constructs d

78 During growth in THB, the reporter activity (chloramphenicol acetyltransferase) was first detected in

79 dition, successful co-expression of GFP with chloramphenicol acetyltransferase, and thioredoxin with

80 in, netilmicin, and tobramycin resistance; a chloramphenicol acetyltransferase, catB8; and gene aadA1

81 hares unexpected similarity to structures of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase, dihydrolipoyl transac

82 mblance of catalysis by the EntF C domain to chloramphenicol acetyltransferase, including an active s

83 smid containing a Himar1 transposon encoding chloramphenicol acetyltransferase, mCherry fluorescent p

84 for His-tagged green fluorescent protein and chloramphenicol acetyltransferase, respectively) and wer

85 pment of a method, based on the transport of chloramphenicol acetyltransferase, that allows positive

86 er gene such as green fluorescent protein or chloramphenicol acetyltransferase.

87 e transcriptional activation of the gene for chloramphenicol acetyltransferase.

88 We now report the finding that chloramphenicol administered at reperfusion reduced infa

89 nterestingly, well-known antibiotics such as chloramphenicol also cause a substantial reduction in th

90 who received monotherapy with tetracyclines, chloramphenicol, aminoglycosides, or sulfonamides was 1.

91 ays measuring the efflux from cells of [(3)H]chloramphenicol and [(3)H]tritylimidazole were used.

92 ibited the replication of C. burnetii, while chloramphenicol and ciprofloxacin did not.

93 o traditional first-line antibiotics such as chloramphenicol and co-trimoxazole have significantly de

94 Based on limited data, chloramphenicol and doxycycline may be associated with a

95 Chloramphenicol and doxycycline resistance evolved smoot

96 as organisms replicating in the presence of chloramphenicol and expressing mCherry.

97 Seven (4%) children with chloramphenicol and five (3%) with placebo had further c

98 A), and brain heart infusion (BHI) agar with chloramphenicol and gentamicin.

99 treptomyces venezuelae ISP5230, affects both chloramphenicol and jadomycin production levels in block

100 induced by the ribosome-binding antibiotics chloramphenicol and kasugamycin show how the specific lo

101 owever, our in vitro experiments showed that chloramphenicol and linezolid stall ribosomes at specifi

102 The first broad-spectrum antibiotic chloramphenicol and one of the newest clinically importa

103 Experiments using radiolabeled chloramphenicol and salicylate demonstrated active efflu

104 l agents used to treat Y. pestis, except for chloramphenicol and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.

105 yclines, fluoroquinolones, sulfonamides, and chloramphenicol) and limited-efficacy classes (all other

106 the large ribosomal subunit (macrolides and chloramphenicol) and, intriguingly, the small subunit (d

107 were resistant to amoxicillin, 85 (81.0%) to chloramphenicol, and 93 (92.1%) to trimethoprim-sulfamet

108 Tetracyclines, chloramphenicol, and aminoglycosides were associated wit

109 -line antibiotics amoxicillin or penicillin, chloramphenicol, and co-trimoxazole; 68.3% of Gram-negat

110 The prevalence of resistance to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and cotrimoxazole was 38.11%, with regi

111 We found that doxycycline, chloramphenicol, and Geneticin (G418) interfered with in

112 streptomycin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, chloramphenicol, and gentamicin.

113 y, high swarming motility, low resistance to chloramphenicol, and increased killing of Caenorhabditis

114 sensitivity of DAF binding to inhibition by chloramphenicol, and loss of binding capability to colla

115 parison of the Ki values for oxazolidinones, chloramphenicol, and sparsomycin revealed partial cross-

116 ity, with limits of detection for ofloxacin, chloramphenicol, and streptomycin of 0.3, 0.12, and 0.2

117 e to other antibiotics (i.e., ciprofloxacin, chloramphenicol, and tetracycline).

118 272 (22%) were also resistant to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (mult

119 solates tested were resistant to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (mult

120 Resistance to at least ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (mult

121 solates tested were resistant to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; 4 we

122 a series of jadomycins and between JadX and chloramphenicol, another natural product produced by S.

123 h as aplastic anemia and leukemia induced by chloramphenicol are a major concern.

124 ffinity to efflux transporters (atropine and chloramphenicol) are the likely reasons for these low in

125 Sulfonamide and chloramphenicol ARG levels were largely unaffected by tr

126 nd a short peptide, Crb(CmlA), that requires chloramphenicol as a coinducer of pausing.

127 Using optical sensing of chloramphenicol as a proof of concept, we show here that

128 the lincosamide clindamycin, and a phenicol, chloramphenicol, at resolutions of approximately 3.3 A-3

129 of decreased Salmonella typhi resistance to chloramphenicol, attributed to restricted antibiotic usa

130 Both isolates are susceptible to chloramphenicol, azithromycin and carbapenems.

131 Both isolates are susceptible to chloramphenicol, azithromycin, and carbapenems.

132 ted for sensitive and selective detection of chloramphenicol, based on an indirect competitive enzyme

133 preservative-free lubricating gel and drops, chloramphenicol, betamethasone, homatropine, oral vitami

134 ing of puromycin, while the aromatic ring of chloramphenicol binds to the exit tunnel hydrophobic cre

135 show that CmlA, the beta-hydroxylase of the chloramphenicol biosynthetic pathway, contains a (mu-oxo

136 om Thermus thermophilus suggests a model for chloramphenicol bound to the large subunit of the bacter

137 acteria and treatment of infected cells with chloramphenicol, but not ampicillin, abrogated the induc

138 The ultimate step in chloramphenicol (CAM) biosynthesis is a six-electron oxi

139 Chloramphenicol (Cam) is a broad-spectrum antibiotic use

140 the hydroxyl groups on a "quasi-diffusible" chloramphenicol (Cam) moiety tethered to the evolving li

141 r highly sensitive and specific detection of chloramphenicol (CAP) based on engineered "hot" Au core-

142 sensor is developed for the determination of chloramphenicol (CAP) exploring its direct electron tran

143 ectrochemical biosensor for the detection of chloramphenicol (CAP) in the presence of its analogues h

144 , thiamphenicol (TAP), florfenicol (FFC) and chloramphenicol (CAP) were separated on an Inertsil, C(8

145 of-of-concept, the MIP film was tailored for chloramphenicol (CAP), a common contaminant in aquacultu

146 In the presence of chloramphenicol (CAP), which freezes translating chlorop

147 cillin [bla(TEM)], streptomycin [strA-strB], chloramphenicol [cat-1], and erythromycin resistance [me

148 Blocking translation with chloramphenicol caused characteristic nucleoid compactio

149 wever, was significantly up-regulated during chloramphenicol challenge and in T. maritima bound in ex

150 sition from exponential to stationary phase, chloramphenicol challenge, and syntrophic coculture with

151 esterases (e.g., BioH and YjfP), to generate chloramphenicol (CL) in E. coli.

152 ns of MRSA isolates that were susceptible to chloramphenicol, clindamycin, and erythromycin were lowe

153 pneumoniae grows in medium supplemented with chloramphenicol (Cm) when resistant bacteria expressing

154 ons added resistance to ampicillin (Amp) and chloramphenicol (Cm), and the 1,600-bp integron added re

155 filamentous wild-type cells increase as the chloramphenicol concentration increases to 50 and 250 mi

156 g nanoparticles are observed in the cells as chloramphenicol concentration increases, suggesting that

157 oci was induced by amino acid starvation and chloramphenicol, consistent with the proposal that VapB

158 ell density and secretion in the presence of chloramphenicol, constant viability count, the absence o

159 lycan contributions while those treated with chloramphenicol contained a higher percentage of peptido

160 against ceftazidime, ceftazidime-avibactam, chloramphenicol, delafloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxaci

161 richia coli nitro/quinone reductase NfsA for chloramphenicol detoxification by simultaneously randomi

162 In both cases, improved chloramphenicol detoxification was only observed after a

163 ent, collagen; pretreatment of bacteria with chloramphenicol did not decrease this enhanced adherence

164 glycosides, tetracyclines, lincosamides, and chloramphenicol), DNA synthesis inhibitors (fluoroquinol

165 under selection with single drugs, including chloramphenicol, doxycycline and trimethoprim.

166 micin, plazomicin, streptomycin, tobramycin, chloramphenicol, doxycycline, sulfadiazine, and trimetho

167 rpoB gene, and two strains were resistant to chloramphenicol due to production of chloramphenicol ace

168 east four different antibiotics - isoniazid, chloramphenicol, erythromycin and tetracycline.

169 First trimester chloramphenicol exposure was associated with an elevated

170 resistance to ampicillin, cotrimoxazole, and chloramphenicol), extensive drug resistance (XDR) (MDR p

171 We assigned 163 children to receive chloramphenicol eye drops and 163 to receive placebo eye

172 -blind trial to compare the effectiveness of chloramphenicol eye drops with placebo in children with

173 II was potentially influenced by the use of chloramphenicol for the treatment of iNTS disease.

174 Efficient production of chloramphenicol from the free arylamine precursor sugges

175 Chloramphenicol, furazolidone and nitrofurantoin (banned

176 In addition to the chloramphenicol gene, a second gene neo was introduced f

177 Nine children were lost to follow-up (one in chloramphenicol group; eight in placebo group).

178 Swarming on agar to which chloramphenicol had been added suggested that protein sy

179 The context-specific action of chloramphenicol illuminates the operation of the mechani

180 on oxygenation of the arylamine precursor of chloramphenicol in a nonribosomal peptide synthetase (NR

181 al methods for detection and quantitation of chloramphenicol in blood serum and foodstuffs arse highl

182 istic insights into high-level resistance to chloramphenicol in C. jejuni, using integrated genomic a

183 Our structure of chloramphenicol in complex with the 70S ribosome from Th

184 r the cat gene that determines resistance to chloramphenicol in Escherichia coli.

185 c aptasensor was successfully used to detect chloramphenicol in milk and serum with LODs of 697 and 6

186 e, trimethoprim, macroline, beta-lactams and chloramphenicol in the aquatic ecosystems.

187 Bacterial clones resistant to chloramphenicol in vivo were recovered from the livers o

188 he thermal degradation of a veterinary drug, chloramphenicol, in model solutions (water), as well as

189 col concentration increases, suggesting that chloramphenicol increases membrane permeability and poro

190 bition of mitochondrial protein synthesis by chloramphenicol increases the susceptibility of endothel

191 reviously observed effects of rifampicin and chloramphenicol indicate that transcription and translat

192 olerance of PSII was completely abolished by chloramphenicol, indicating that the acclimation mechani

193 were heat or formalin killed or treated with chloramphenicol, indicating that the TLR2 agonist activi

194 However, the mechanism underlying chloramphenicol-induced leukemogenesis is not known.

195 owed that transcription is necessary for the chloramphenicol-induced nucleoid compaction.

196 staphylococcal enterotoxin B, we found that chloramphenicol induces the differentiation of activated

197 ses to 50 and 250 microg/mL, suggesting that chloramphenicol induces the filamentation.

198 Chloramphenicol inhibited the activation-induced cell de

199 s as infected cells treated with rifampin or chloramphenicol, inhibitors of bacterial RNA and protein

200 Chloramphenicol is a broad-spectrum antibiotic used for

201 Chloramphenicol is an inhibitor of mitochondrial protein

202 ment with antibiotics such as doxycycline or chloramphenicol is effective for the majority of patient

203 Resistance to both gentamicin and chloramphenicol is encoded on pGNS-BAC, permitting selec

204 l step in the biosynthesis of the antibiotic chloramphenicol is the oxidation of an aryl-amine substr

205 chloroplasts are particularly vulnerable to chloramphenicol lethal effects.

206 of amoxicillin with clavulanate, ampicillin, chloramphenicol, metronidazole, and penicillin were dete

207 streptomycin (n = 285), tobramycin (n = 43), chloramphenicol (n = 246), doxycycline (n = 2351), sulfa

208 ur application to aptamers for streptomycin, chloramphenicol, neomycin B and ATP identifies 37 candid

209 cross-resistance between oxazolidinones and chloramphenicol; no cross-resistance was observed with s

210 nly a minimum required performance limit for chloramphenicol of 0.3 mug kg(-1) is recommended.

211 8 restored the sensitivity to ampicillin and chloramphenicol of a Mycobacterium smegmatis mutant lack

212 of the following comparator drugs: cefixime, chloramphenicol, ofloxacin, or ceftriaxone.

213 By investigating the effects of chloramphenicol on the activation of mouse T cells stimu

214 ed resistance or decreased susceptibility to chloramphenicol or ciprofloxacin.

215 i and Staphylococcus aureus is suppressed by chloramphenicol or erythromycin, the susceptibility of t

216 rotein synthesis using low concentrations of chloramphenicol or gentamicin, lowered MIC towards OTC.

217 uced by the addition of ribosome inhibitors (chloramphenicol or streptomycin) that indirectly constra

218 In the presence of doxycycline, chloramphenicol, or G418, the Sec-containing form of TR1

219 Isolates were generally susceptible to chloramphenicol, penicillin and rifampin, but almost 60%

220 J774.16 cells were treated with 8 microg of chloramphenicol per ml, 4 microg of tetracycline per ml,

221 ded proteins or mitochondrial respiration in chloramphenicol-perfused hearts, and hypothesized that t

222 Arresting translation elongation with chloramphenicol quickly inhibits RNase E cleavage downst

223 racellular pYV(+) Y. pseudotuberculosis with chloramphenicol reduced apoptosis, indicating that the d

224 We also showed that chloramphenicol reduced infarct size in an open chest ra

225 every possible intermediate of the two best chloramphenicol reductases revealed complex epistatic in

226 chemically suppressing ppGpp synthesis with chloramphenicol relieves inhibition of DNA replication i

227 The biosynthesis of chloramphenicol requires a beta-hydroxylation tailoring

228 various H. pylori strains by insertion of a chloramphenicol resistance cassette into lpxEHP and exam

229 constructed by replacing the P6 gene with a chloramphenicol resistance cassette.

230 previously employed, using tetracycline and chloramphenicol resistance cassettes, and non-polar stra

231 In contrast, the chloramphenicol resistance gene catII was more frequentl

232 A chloramphenicol resistance gene, a modified lux operon f

233 WGS data revealed the integration of a chloramphenicol resistance gene, the deletion of the end

234 the fla operon promoter and a staphylococcal chloramphenicol resistance gene, was constructed to help

235 ria and the inducible cmlA gene that confers chloramphenicol resistance in Pseudomonas spp.

236 resulted in the introduction of a selectable chloramphenicol resistance marker into the chromosome.

237 containing transposon-based tetracycline and chloramphenicol resistance markers were combined to allo

238 omycin resistance occurred in 132 (37%), and chloramphenicol resistance occurred in 33 (9%).

239 In filter matings, chloramphenicol resistance was observed to transfer from

240 Bacteria with target genes expressing chloramphenicol resistance, penicillin resistance, or gy

241 n the plasmid were selected according to the chloramphenicol resistance.

242 and > 50 compounds were tested for promoting chloramphenicol resistance.

243 ml), 4/242 isolates tested were resistant to chloramphenicol (resistance breakpoint >/= 32 mug/ml), 1

244 individually engineered into a plasmid-borne chloramphenicol-resistance (cat) gene driven by the lac

245 erences in protein yields when cloned from a chloramphenicol resistant vector into an identical vecto

246 l cat gene; induced lysogens survive and are chloramphenicol resistant.

247 + variants in the inoculum by constructing a chloramphenicol-resistant (Cm(r)) strain and following C

248 Penicillin-resistant and chloramphenicol-resistant bacteria are a considerable th

249 meningitis caused by penicillin-resistant or chloramphenicol-resistant bacteria.

250 s, cells can survive the disruption and form chloramphenicol-resistant colonies.

251 hat relies on the folate-dependent growth of chloramphenicol-resistant Lactobacillus casei subspecies

252 a second selective pressure by transferring chloramphenicol-resistant mitochondria into chlorampheni

253 etracycline-, ampicillin-, erythromycin-, or chloramphenicol-resistant oral and urinary bacteria as c

254 ion that blocking bacterial translation with chloramphenicol resulted in the movement of TFEB and TFE

255 Short-term exposure of cells to chloramphenicol results in increased activities in both

256 of transertion by the translation inhibitor chloramphenicol results in nucleoid condensation due to

257 tivities, but long-term exposure of cells to chloramphenicol results in selective loss of the soluble

258 MPCs were estimated for tobramycin, chloramphenicol, rifampicin, penicillin, vancomycin, and

259 placebo compared with 140 (86%) of 162 with chloramphenicol (risk difference 3.8%, 95% CI -4.1% to 1

260 chloramphenicol-resistant mitochondria into chloramphenicol-sensitive, metabolically impaired rho+ m

261 presence of two antibiotics (ampicillin and chloramphenicol) so that the coculture can survive in an

262 Structures of anisomycin, chloramphenicol, sparsomycin, blasticidin S, and virgini

263 Conjugation of a chloramphenicol-specific DNA aptamer to the protein shel

264 s showed multidrug resistance to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, streptomycin, sulfamethoxazole-sulfisox

265 ental isolates were resistant to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, streptomycin, sulfisoxazole, and tetrac

266 first component of the study, pigs received chloramphenicol succinate (CAPS) (an agent that purporte

267 Specifically, the attachment of GG to chloramphenicol succinate (CLsu) generates CLsuGG, which

268 Intravenous administration of a prodrug, chloramphenicol succinate (CLsu), is ineffective.

269 ty to the translational elongation inhibitor chloramphenicol suggesting a link between translational

270 rains were cross-resistant to anisomycin and chloramphenicol, suggesting that Tcin targets the peptid

271 that encodes genes that confer resistance to chloramphenicol, sulphamethoxazole, trimethoprim and str

272 of four antibiotics (ampicillin, cefalexin, chloramphenicol, tetracycline) and their combinations on

273 ]) were associated with nonsusceptibility to chloramphenicol, tetracycline, and co-trimoxazole.

274 reatment with translation inhibitors such as chloramphenicol, tetracycline, and streptomycin gather p

275 h is preceded by elongation, is inhibited by chloramphenicol, tetracycline, or rifampin, and is depen

276 eta-lactams, aminoglycosides, glycopeptides, chloramphenicols, tetracycline, macrolides, trimethoprim

277 In the absence of chloramphenicol, the sandwich structure of aptasensor fo

278 ly and clinically relevant concentrations of chloramphenicol through analyte-mediated inner filtering

279 h peptidyl moieties as well as conjugates of chloramphenicol to either nucleotide groups or pyrene ha

280 Chloramphenicol transacetylase transcriptional fusions i

281 mitochondrial blockers of protein synthesis (chloramphenicol), transcription and replication (ethidiu

282 inant adenoviruses carrying ectopic E2E-CAT (chloramphenicol transferase) reporter genes with mutatio

283 A concentration-dependent inhibition of chloramphenicol transport was observed with imidazole de

284 not p53, c-myc, and CDC25A, was detected in chloramphenicol-treated activated T cells, which may rel

285 the results showed that gentamicin-killed or chloramphenicol-treated bacteria did not induce DNA frag

286 In contrast, chloramphenicol treatment of macrophages infected at mul

287 flux gene cluster that confers resistance to chloramphenicol, trimethoprim, and ciprofloxacin has bee

288 Two extraction strategies for albendazole, chloramphenicol, trimethoprim, enrofloxacin, oxitetracyc

289 ate-bounded method for the following agents: chloramphenicol, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ciproflo

290 illin, cefotaxime, cefuroxime, erythromycin, chloramphenicol, vancomycin, quinupristin-dalfopristin (

291 (+)-Chloramphenicol was generated in 4 steps from commercial

292 acycline, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and chloramphenicol was observed.

293 iologic studies, whereas Sabouraud agar with chloramphenicol was the medium for fungal studies.

294 erogroup and MIC to penicillin, rifampin and chloramphenicol were determined.

295 in), peptides (bacitracin, cycloserine), and chloramphenicol were found to differ significantly.

296 metry, the resulting degradation products of chloramphenicol were identified in water, spiked and inc

297 terial infection, 0.3% norfloxacin or 0.25 % chloramphenicol were prescribed.

298 Most of the ivi clones were sensitive to chloramphenicol when grown in vitro.

299 aptasensor exhibited high selectivity toward chloramphenicol with a limit of detection as low as 451

300 The patient was treated with intravenous chloramphenicol without success.