ライフサイエンスコーパス: chloroplast DNA

1 ext-dependent mutational properties of plant chloroplast DNA.

2 egenerate sites of coding regions from grass chloroplast DNA.

3 ncoding sites in different contexts in grass chloroplast DNA.

4 rticipants in the uniparental inheritance of chloroplast DNA.

5 Variation of chloroplast DNA and nuclear ribosomal DNA (DNA encoding

6 cucumerifolius with reference to diagnostic chloroplast DNA and nuclear ribosomal DNA markers.

7 the number found in previous comparisons of chloroplast DNA and nuclear ribosomal internal transcrib

8 logenetic studies using noncoding regions of chloroplast DNA and rDNA internal transcribed spacer wer

9 these mutants contain near normal levels of chloroplast DNA and RNAs, suggesting that ZmWHY1 is not

10 CTPS2 function in providing nucleotides for chloroplast DNA and signaling.

11 We used molecular data from chloroplast DNA and simple sequence repeats loci of P. m

12 14 populations of H. annuus ssp. texanus had chloroplast DNA and/or ribosomal DNA markers of H. debil

13 aracterized mitochondrial sequences, 2.4% to chloroplast DNA, and 15% to the seven repetitive DNA mot

14 ely altered deoxyribonucleotide levels, less chloroplast DNA, and chlorotic cotyledons.

15 gly disagreed with those based on allozymes, chloroplast DNA, and morphological traits.

16 tion analysis of a 3.2-kb region of variable chloroplast DNA, and restriction fragment length polymor

17 umber of the single-copy nuclear genes or on chloroplast DNA are found.

18 d the changes in methylation patterns in the chloroplast DNA as the rice plant ages.

19 The chloroplast DNA became more methylated as the plant ages

20 The leaf chloroplast DNA becomes more methylated as the rice plan

21 Other restriction fragments of tobacco chloroplast DNA besides those at the oriA region also ge

22 copy of the inverted repeat (IR) of tobacco chloroplast DNA between positions 130,502 and 131,924 (I

23 Several chloroplast DNA clones from this region were tested for

24 Although both CCMP452 and NIES293 chloroplast DNAs contains 197 genes, multiple nucleotide

25 nvestigated, pointing out that the number of chloroplast DNA copies is too variable for its possible

26 In successive generations, chloroplast DNA copy numbers continued to rise, whereas

27 The distribution of chloroplast DNA (cp-DNA) length variants was analyzed wi

28 al DNA molecules to analyze the structure of chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) from shoots of ten to 14 day old

29 vated, part of which leads to destruction of chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) from the mating type minus (mt-)

30 ce of local base composition on mutations in chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) is studied in detail and the res

31 Chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) is under great photooxidative st

32 In contrast with RNA metabolism, chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) levels declined under P deprivat

33 l transcribed spacer (ITS)) and two types of chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) markers (PCR-RFLP, cpSSR) to stu

34 and organization of a large number of intact chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) molecules from Arabidopsis, toba

35 We sequenced chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) of white spruce (Picea glauca),

36 hain reaction experiments involving specific chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) oligonucleotides.

37 al and crossing groups, which also differ in chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) restriction map and nuclear ribo

38 A chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) restriction site analysis of Arg

39 Analyses of nuclear rDNA and chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) sequences indicate that the dome

40 We used patterns of chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) variation to investigate the pos

41 rophytes by sequencing a c. 350-bp region of chloroplast DNA (cpDNA).

42 n and evolutionary biology are studied using chloroplast DNA (cpDNA).

43 analyze the structure of Medicago truncatula chloroplast DNA (cpDNA).

44 ng 5' end-labeled nascent strands of tobacco chloroplast DNA (ctDNA) as a probe, replication displace

45 Replication of chloroplast DNA (ctDNA) in several plants and in Chlamyd

46 Furthermore, we were unable to detect chloroplast DNA-derived sequences among nuclear genome d

47 Chloroplast DNA differentiation is consistent with gene

48 idopsis chloroplasts and binds to all tested chloroplast DNA fragments without detectable sequence sp

49 bines isomorphic plus and minus gametes, but chloroplast DNA from minus gametes is selectively degrad

50 chloroplast DNA sequences indicated that the chloroplast DNA from rice leaves collected at early ripe

51 Ultimate origin of silversword alliance chloroplast DNA from within the Californian-endemic para

52 me more methylated as the plant ages so that chloroplast DNA from young leaves was less methylated ov

53 existing and new phylogeographic data sets (chloroplast DNA) from 14 woody taxa in Eastern North Ame

54 e-copy genes, rRNA-encoding DNA (rDNA) and a chloroplast DNA gene, was determined and compared to a n

55 Chloroplast DNA haplotype distributions and extensive ba

56 ear allozyme loci and both mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA haplotypes in a natural population of po

57 versus minus mating type gametes followed by chloroplast DNA hypermethylation in zygotes.

58 ted to the chloroplast and co-localized with chloroplast DNA in nucleoids.

59 methylation of grain amyloplast DNA and leaf chloroplast DNA in rice.

60 By contrast, only about 20 kb (16%) of chloroplast DNA, including a single intact plastid-deriv

61 polymorphisms than for paternally inherited chloroplast DNA, indicating that wind-dispersed pollen i

62 plus-specific Otu2p establishes uniparental chloroplast DNA inheritance.

63 SceI, and showed experimentally that tobacco chloroplast DNAs insert into nuclear genomes through dou

64 y, this protein was able to compact purified chloroplast DNA into a nucleoid-like structure in a prot

65 erted repeat, whereas NIES293 (West Pacific) chloroplast DNA is 159,370 bp in size and has an inverte

66 H. akashiwo strain CCMP452 (West Atlantic) chloroplast DNA is 160,149 bp in size with a 21,822-bp i

67 As chloroplast DNA is not transmitted by pollen in plants s

68 hylogenies of the tribe based on nuclear and chloroplast DNA markers, representing the most in-depth

69 observed mating type-specific differences in chloroplast DNA methylation levels in plus versus minus

70 The genus Pistacia was shown to have a low chloroplast DNA mutation rate: 0.05-0.16 times that expe

71 on of Arabidopsis nuclear, mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA (ncDNA, mtDNA, cpDNA) was assayed by mea

72 gy-mediated linking of disparate segments of chloroplast DNA occurs frequently during healing of indu

73 sequence variation from multiple nuclear and chloroplast DNA of 239 individuals of Juniperus microspe

74 nt analysis revealed that the amyloplast and chloroplast DNA of MR219 were identical to each other.

75 The technique has been used to sequence chloroplast DNA of two Heterosigma akashiwo strains.

76 In contrast, no chloroplast DNA or ribosomal DNA markers of H. debilis s

77 A chloroplast DNA phylogeny indicates that thorn-like pric

78 eveals that both strains contain an isomeric chloroplast DNA population resulting from an inversion o

79 s, the mitochondrial genome, a multifragment chloroplast DNA probe, and bacteriophage lambda.

80 analysis of the Pistacia cpDNA with tobacco chloroplast DNA probes) provided a new set of variables

81 ates chloroplast isolation, does not require chloroplast DNA purification, and reduces sequencing pro

82 Two noncoding chloroplast DNA regions were sequenced for samples colle

83 Two mechanisms for chloroplast DNA replication have been revealed through t

84 the w2 gene is responsible for virtually all chloroplast DNA replication in maize.

85 in all the necessary elements for support of chloroplast DNA replication in vitro.

86 In vivo chloroplast DNA replication intermediates were examined

87 ns of limited dNTP supply, the inhibition of chloroplast DNA replication may be the primary factor in

88 or with the same plasmid carrying a putative chloroplast DNA replication origin (oriA).

89 ddition of the 68 kDa protein to an in vitro chloroplast DNA replication system resulted in complete

90 lso support the reliability of this in vitro chloroplast DNA replication system.

91 Chloroplast DNA restriction-site comparisons were made a

92 Restriction site markers in the chloroplast DNA reveal several clear cases of localized

93 material from La Reunion and Mauritius using chloroplast DNA RFLP markers and random amplified polymo

94 The chloroplast DNA sequence polymorphism analysis of M. rub

95 d thus a detailed functional analysis of any chloroplast DNA sequence should be possible.

96 Chloroplast DNA sequences and microsatellites are useful

97 Grain amyloplast and leaf chloroplast DNA sequences are identical in rice plants b

98 A molecular analysis was conducted using six chloroplast DNA sequences from leaf material from across

99 ylation between the identical amyloplast and chloroplast DNA sequences indicated that the chloroplast

100 Double Y patterns were observed when a chloroplast DNA template containing both ori s (pKN9) wa

101 is and the many separate losses of infA from chloroplast DNA, the gene has probably been transferred

102 Transcriptionally active chloroplast DNA together with tightly bound protein fact

103 to detect any stable nuclear integration of chloroplast DNA under normal growth conditions or under

104 ct the genome-wide pattern of PEP binding to chloroplast DNA using plastid chromatin immunoprecipitat

105 ethod for detecting protein-binding sites on chloroplast DNA, using modifications to the nuclear ChIP

106 hese data agree with our previous studies of chloroplast DNA variation in suggesting that this polypl

107 A phylogenetic analysis of chloroplast DNA variation in the purple saxifrage (Saxif

108 The geographical distribution of chloroplast DNA variation in the species supports the hy

109 An intrapopulation polymorphism in chloroplast DNA was used to examine relative spatial and

110 subset of these proteins and the majority of chloroplast DNA were recovered in the supernatant after

111 Chloroplast DNA, which is typically unmethylated, was en

112 lling about 84 kb and covering two thirds of chloroplast DNA, with the intact nuclear copies of 26 di