ライフサイエンスコーパス: choke

1 es to predict the flow rate through wellhead chokes.

2 xposure, recurrent infection, aspiration, or choking.

3 hat explicit monitoring of behavior leads to choking.

4 he blood agent hydrogen cyanide (AC) and the choking agent chlorine (CL).

5 ompanied by a broad yet modest translational choke and changes in alternative mRNA splicing that inac

6 ress responses that have been linked to both choking and thriving are well-conserved in primates, but

7 phagus symptoms included narrowing, burning, choking, and pressure in the esophagus appearing within

8 ay interact with long-term stress to produce choking behavior in early sessions of a task.

9 Choking cancer via inhibition of metabolic enzymes essen

10 cluded vomiting (78%), growth failure (62%), choking-coughing-gagging (38%), and pneumonia (25%).

11 Although problems with choking declined to levels comparable with patients with

12 ion pathways and is linked to swallowing and choking difficulties, which can lead to aspiration pneum

13 with approximately 35% reporting swallowing/choking difficulties.

14 o chest infections, episodes of coughing and choking during meals, and prognosis.

15 igated the influence of incentive framing on choking effects in humans: in one condition, participant

16 effect on an individual's susceptibility to choking effects, which is contingent on their loss avers

17 was correlated with their susceptibility to choking effects.

18 d not predict chest infections, coughing and choking episodes during meals or survival.

19 logistical difficulties of instrumenting ice-choked fjords with actively calving glaciers.

20 g in the lung at the point of development of choked flow (Vch) was stable for the first 40 mins after

21 From these data, we conclude that choked flow occurs at intratracheal pressure of less tha

22 nd the development of the flow limitation or choked flow phenomenon as a function of expiratory flow

23 intratracheal pressure at the occurrence of choked flow was established at -20 mm Hg.

24 , whereas individuals with low loss aversion choked for large prospective losses but not for large pr

25 ith higher loss aversion were susceptible to choking for large prospective gains and not susceptible

26 rge prospective gains and not susceptible to choking for large prospective losses, whereas individual

27 larify the evolution and proximate causes of choking in humans.

28 However, it could be that choking is a uniquely human occurrence.

29 Nocturnal gasping or choking is the most reliable indicator of obstructive sl

30 ial has been interpreted as a signature of a choked jet, which did not emerge from the progenitor sta

31 anied by a successful jet and sometimes by a choked jet.

32 nt is unlikely to be a consequence of direct choking of proteasomes by protein aggregates.

33 s that govern the central deflection and the choking of the cell, respectively.

34 , unintentional social transgressions (e.g., choking on food at a party and coughing it up), or inten

35 ated N-htt-whether aggregated or not-did not choke or clog the proteasome.

36 s with obstructive sleep apnea was nocturnal choking or gasping (summary likelihood ratio [LR], 3.3;

37 Among adults 65 years of age or older, choking or pill-induced dysphagia or globus caused 37.6%

38 entry (OR, 4.8; 95% CI, 3.5-6.5), witnessed choking (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.0-9.6), wheezing (OR, 2.5; 9

39 growth of submerged aquatic vegetation that chokes out water access points and serves as habitat for

40 Type 1 patients (n=9) had a long RVOT with a choke point and a wide main pulmonary artery.

41 short, bulbous main pulmonary artery with a choke point and an open pulmonary artery bifurcation.

42 and the Atlantic, 'Agulhas leakage', forms a choke point for the overturning circulation in the globa

43 Synthesis of nucleic acids is a choke point in AI-assisted protein engineering pipelines

44 pathogens, lipid droplets (LDs) emerge as a choke point in the battle for nutrients.

45 ble, as moving one SD (1,100 km) closer to a choke point increases the conflict likelihood by 25% of

46 leus and suggest how this important activity choke point may be easily overcome in disorders such as

47 The Sicily Channel is a choke point separating the sea in two main basins, the E

48 rt RVOT that was pyramidal in shape, with no choke point, and extensive main pulmonary artery lengthe

49 communities is continuous across the Agulhas choke point, South Atlantic plankton diversity is altere

50 rship of exotic valuables within an exchange choke point.

51 ent in strategic locations close to maritime choke points (e.g., straits or capes), but that booming

52 ng the importance of these ocean circulation choke points in constraining diatom distribution and div

53 ses is modulated by flow through key oceanic choke points in the Drake Passage, the Indonesian Seas,

54 cycle reveals multiple viral- and host-based choke points that can be exploited to combat the virus.

55 is strategy has the potential to ease supply choke points to substantially expand COVID-19 testing an

56 ich seizures propagate, focusing on circuit 'choke points' remote from the initiation site might be a

57 Swallowing/choking problems are common in FXTAS, particularly in la

58 ad a significantly higher risk of swallowing/choking problems compared to those without FXTAS (adjust

59 PM carriers with swallowing/choking problems showed a significantly increased associ

60 pe-Phenotype cohort data examined swallowing/choking problems, FXTAS stage, neuroimaging, and psychol

61 sure (P(wh)), gas-to-liquid ratio (GLR), and choke size (D(c)).

62 stigated in this study and revealed that the choke size variable had the most significant effect, whi

63 were noted for fighters winning by joint or choke submission (lower impact mechanism as well as less

64 ate, sediments from the Thar Desert probably choked the signature of an independent Saraswati-like ri

65 f the cell blocks the outflow, interrupting (choking) the flow.

66 But when incentives get too high, we can "choke under pressure" and underperform right when it mat

67 tex (MC) in a manner that can explain why we choke under pressure.

68 aradoxically decreases-we "choke." Why do we choke under pressure?

69 Our results demonstrate that choking under pressure is not unique to humans, and thus

70 wn performance, colloquially referred to as "choking under pressure." Physiological stress responses

71 s exhibit a frustrating phenomenon known as "choking under pressure." Usually, we perform better when

72 What neural processes might lead to choking under pressure?

73 re parkinsonism, near mutism, dysphagia with choking, vertical supranuclear gaze palsy or slowing, ba

74 tensively documented (e.g., entanglement and choking), very little is known about effects on assembla

75 To determine whether animals also choke, we trained three rhesus monkeys to perform a diff

76 eases in performance, a phenomenon known as "choking." We investigated the influence of incentive fra

77 , -12.2 [95% CI, -19.6 to -4.7]; problems of choking when swallowing, -10.3 [95% CI, -16.4 to 4.2]; t

78 igh, performance paradoxically decreases-we "choke." Why do we choke under pressure?

79 rapods lived in productive woodland streams, choked with woody debris as a refuge from large predator

80 An animal model of choking would facilitate the investigation of its neural

81 causing pulmonary aspiration, dysphagia, and choking, yet relevant sensory pathways remain poorly und