ライフサイエンスコーパス: cholangiography

1 sonance cholangiopancreatography, and direct cholangiography.

2 ing cholangitis (PSC) but normal findings on cholangiography.

3 tive and false-negative findings occur at MR cholangiography.

4 patients underwent LC without intraoperative cholangiography.

5 aphy, and intraoperative ultrasonography and cholangiography.

6 of liver function, perfusion assessment, and cholangiography.

7 Presence of CBDSs on intraoperative cholangiography.

8 all patients underwent successful endoscopic cholangiography.

9 ications, and need for endoscopic retrograde cholangiography.

10 e computed tomography and magnetic resonance cholangiography.

11 surgery; one variant branch was missed at CT cholangiography.

12 unlikely to need conventional intraoperative cholangiography.

13 patient underwent percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography.

14 lysis was used to measure the accuracy of MR cholangiography.

15 mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced excretory MR cholangiography.

16 anatomy was found to have been missed at CT cholangiography.

17 pancreaticoduodenectomy (n = 1) underwent MR cholangiography.

18 s underwent iodipamide meglumine-enhanced CT cholangiography.

19 o compare each technique with intraoperative cholangiography.

20 rately than does conventional T2-weighted MR cholangiography.

21 underwent helical computed tomographic (CT) cholangiography 10-12 hours after ingesting iopanoic aci

22 fore adequate skill was achieved was 160 for cholangiography, 140 for pancreatography, 160 for deep c

23 27.4%; P < .001), percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (17.4% vs 5.9%; P < .001), and endobilia

24 , and combined conventional and excretory MR cholangiography (2.31 and 2.25, P <.01).

25 espectively, were significantly higher at CT cholangiography (2.81 and 2.75) than at conventional MR

26 s established at surgery (n = 29) and direct cholangiography (23 of 29) or at direct cholangiography,

27 ty-six patients referred for elective direct cholangiography (45 endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancr

28 owed preservation of peribiliary glands, and cholangiography 6 months posttransplantation showed no e

29 MR cholangiography accuracy was 82% (19 of 23); sensitivity

30 CT cholangiography accurately depicts biliary tract anatomy

31 ubjects required conventional intraoperative cholangiography after the introduction of CT cholangiogr

32 Modern-day magnetic resonance cholangiography allows accurate diagnosis of bile duct d

33 was 0.21% among patients with intraoperative cholangiography and 0.36% among patients without it.

34 nts showed characteristic features of PSC on cholangiography and 11 out of 24 had compatible hepatic

35 (40.4%) underwent concurrent intraoperative cholangiography and 280 (0.30%) had a common duct injury

36 es underwent early percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography and biliary drainage.

37 Intraoperative cholangiography and biliary exploration revealed that 24

38 gnificant association between intraoperative cholangiography and common duct injury.

39 Multi-detector row CT cholangiography and CT angiography were performed in 44

40 ecystectomy performed without intraoperative cholangiography and duct injury was no longer significan

41 , in individual cases, during intraoperative cholangiography and laparatomy.

42 Cholangiography and liver biopsy were performed at entry

43 liver donors then underwent conventional MR cholangiography and mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced excr

44 ulation (SBC) and post endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and pancreatography (ERCP) complications

45 rwent preoperative percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography and placement of transhepatic biliary ca

46 nts (5.1%) and new percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography and stent placement in 4 patients (2.3%)

47 t both 3D mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced MR cholangiography and T2-weighted MR cholangiography were

48 gnetic resonance imaging, and intraoperative cholangiography and ultrasonography.

49 all intestine as demonstrated by Trypan blue cholangiography, and a liver histological picture indica

50 fluid was obtained by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography, and bacterial and fungal species grew i

51 uted tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, cholangiography, and biliary cytologic techniques for de

52 3 patients underwent LC with intraoperative cholangiography; and group 4 patients underwent LC witho

53 tion, and donors who undergo preoperative CT cholangiography are unlikely to need conventional intrao

54 ve and postoperative ERCP and intraoperative cholangiography as adjuncts to laparoscopic cholecystect

55 Biliary stricture was identified on cholangiography as narrowing of the extrahepatic biliary

56 Calculi were depicted at cholangiography as rounded filling defects.

57 MRC were determined using findings on direct cholangiography as the gold standard.

58 lobe liver donor candidates who underwent CT cholangiography at their institution between October 200

59 mbers of donors who underwent intraoperative cholangiography before and after the introduction of CT

60 ion]) who were consecutively referred for MR cholangiography between November 2004 and November 2005.

61 sis of PSC is based on endoscopic retrograde cholangiography, but magnetic resonance cholangiography

62 e early group required endoscopic retrograde cholangiography, compared with 4 in the control group (P

63 MR cholangiography completely demonstrated first-order intr

64 Intraoperative cholangiography demonstrated a strong correlation with M

65 ere repeated at 2- to 14-day intervals until cholangiography demonstrated free drainage of contrast m

66 Mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced 3D MR cholangiography depicts intrahepatic biliary anatomy, es

67 patients with CBDSs found on intraoperative cholangiography during cholecystectomy from May 1, 2005,

68 mage obtained with percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography during the most recent admission.

69 ualization than conventional or excretory MR cholangiography either alone or in combination.

70 MR cholangiography enabled correct diagnosis and depicted t

71 MR cholangiography enables accurate depiction of the biliar

72 MR cholangiography enables accurate detection and localizat

73 In living potential liver donors, CT cholangiography enables significantly better biliary tra

74 The use of ERCP, intraoperative cholangiography, endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic reso

75 Subsequent endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) performed in 5 patients with small

76 Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) with the placement of a stent is t

77 ic complications after endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC).

78 and 21.9% (7/32) after endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC).

79 surgical specimens and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP) findings in relevant cases.

80 ients who had MRCP and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP) were included.

81 tions are preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP), laparoscopic exploration of the

82 ings of PSC disease on endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP).

83 patient underwent percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography ( Fig 2 ).

84 CT cholangiography findings were compared with those at sur

85 e value, and negative predictive value of MR cholangiography for detection of biliary dilatation and

86 e value, and negative predictive value of MR cholangiography for detection of stones were 100% for on

87 MR cholangiography is as sensitive as direct cholangiography for the assessment of bile duct strictur

88 e use of selective or routine intraoperative cholangiography has intensified with the advent of lapar

89 giopancreatography (ERCP) and intraoperative cholangiography in a series of patients who underwent la

90 Initial cholangiography in both patients was unremarkable.

91 as performed to determine the accuracy of MR cholangiography in depicting extrahepatic biliary atresi

92 arance of LCH in the liver graft a follow-up cholangiography in one of the girls demonstrated a low g

93 e UDCA on liver biochemistry, histology, and cholangiography in patients with PSC is translated into

94 cation with intravenous morphine prior to CT cholangiography in potential liver donors does not incre

95 ersy exists regarding routine intraoperative cholangiography in preventing common duct injury during

96 When CT cholangiography in the donor demonstrated the right bili

97 n one patient, and that seen at excretory MR cholangiography in three patients.

98 erations, the use of imaging (intraoperative cholangiography, intraoperative ultrasound, near-infrare

99 luate NIR-C, VR-AR, and x-ray intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) during robotic cholecystectomy.

100 Intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) may decrease the risk of common bi

101 Intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) was performed in 1292 (98.0%).

102 nly if a CBD stone is seen on intraoperative cholangiography (IOC), avoids unnecessary ERCP but risks

103 Results of this study found that MR cholangiography is 82% accurate, 90% sensitive, and 77%

104 rade cholangiography, but magnetic resonance cholangiography is a promising noninvasive alternative.

105 Single-shot fast spin-echo MR cholangiography is an accurate, noninvasive modality for

106 MR cholangiography is as sensitive as direct cholangiograph

107 Among these modalities, intraoperative cholangiography is associated with reduced length of sta

108 The use of routine intraoperative cholangiography is discouraged in view of its low yield

109 Intraoperative cholangiography is helpful for intraoperative discovery

110 Intraoperative cholangiography is not effective as a preventive strateg

111 ICG fluorescence cholangiography is routine in a number of centers and ac

112 hy, intraoperative ultrasound, near-infrared cholangiography) is recommended.

113 rect cholangiography (23 of 29) or at direct cholangiography, liver biopsy, and/or serial liver funct

114 e 51 candidates who underwent intraoperative cholangiography, mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced imaging

115 sess role of preoperative magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) for defining biliary anatomy and t

116 ions examining the use of magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) for the diagnosis of primary scler

117 onance imaging (MRI) with magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) has become the radiologic standard

118 Magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) is a noninvasive diagnostic modali

119 be screened for PSC using magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC).

120 gs were correlated with findings from direct cholangiography (n = 24) and surgery (n = 1).

121 Near-infrared cholangiography (NIR-C) provides real-time, radiation-fr

122 f second-order bile duct visualization at CT cholangiography on a four-point scale (0, not seen; 3, e

123 , 19 patients; and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography, one patient.

124 indings were correlated with those at direct cholangiography, pathologic examination, cross-sectional

125 Fifty-two children with cholangiography-proven PSC (34 boys and 18 girls; mean a

126 (a) use of ERCP or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC) as part of the reference standard

127 erwent therapeutic percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC), two underwent diagnostic (PTC), a

128 biliary drainage (percutaneous transluminal cholangiography [PTC]) tube.

129 that the intention to perform intraoperative cholangiography reduced the risk of death after cholecys

130 wever, the benefit of routine intraoperative cholangiography remains in question.

131 Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography remains the gold standard for diagnosis,

132 At CT, conventional MR, and excretory MR cholangiography, respectively, second-order biliary bran

133 Early postoperative cholangiography revealed an anastomotic leak in 4.6% of

134 ared with a standard magnetic resonance (MR) cholangiography sequence, MR cholangiography with a samp

135 cholangiography after the introduction of CT cholangiography (three of 24 subjects [12%]) than before

136 ld otherwise be excluded intraoperatively by cholangiography, thus limiting the risk of an unnecessar

137 Management with preoperative cholangiography to delineate the anatomy and placement o

138 OR 88.38, 95% CI 7.98-978.53, P < 0.001) and Cholangiography type I (OR 22.47, 95% CI 2.63-192.26, p

139 Intraoperative cholangiography use during cholecystectomy was determine

140 es/no), hospitals (percentage intraoperative cholangiography use for all cholecystectomies at the hos

141 The mean second-order bile duct score at CT cholangiography was 2.9 (range, 2-3).

142 eval, biliary tract anatomy determined at CT cholangiography was concordant with findings at surgery

143 MR cholangiography was found to be accurate in detecting PS

144 ir institution between October 2001 (when CT cholangiography was introduced at the institution) and M

145 In 427 (91%), satisfactory peroperative cholangiography was obtained.

146 ery if a cholangiogram was completed than if cholangiography was omitted (80.9% vs. 45.1%).

147 Multidetector CT cholangiography was performed after slow infusion of 20

148 Intraoperative cholangiography was performed for 101 patients (29%).

149 Intraoperative cholangiography was performed in 1292 (98.0%).

150 MR cholangiography was performed in 17 consecutive patients

151 d acquisition with relaxation enhancement MR cholangiography was performed in 25 patients who had und

152 Intraoperative cholangiography was the reference-standard examination f

153 tients who underwent ERCP and intraoperative cholangiography were analyzed.

154 aphy before and after the introduction of CT cholangiography were compared by using the Fisher exact

155 Findings of stricture at MR cholangiography were false-positive in five patients wit

156 ystectomies performed without intraoperative cholangiography were increased compared with those perfo

157 Liver biopsy and cholangiography were performed before randomization and

158 hanced MR cholangiography and T2-weighted MR cholangiography were recorded and compared by using the

159 creatography and 1 percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography) were studied prospectively with 3D FSE

160 The operating time included operative cholangiography which was attempted in all patients.

161 In all patients, magnetic resonance cholangiography will be obtained at six months after tra

162 1 female; median age, 2 months) underwent MR cholangiography with a 1.5-T MR imaging unit.

163 resonance (MR) cholangiography sequence, MR cholangiography with a sampling perfection with applicat

164 ng may be useful as a screening strategy and cholangiography with cytologic examination is helpful fo

165 Helical CT cholangiography with oral cholecystographic contrast mat

166 Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography with stone extraction performed before o

167 od for CT, conventional MR, and excretory MR cholangiography (with weighted kappa values of 0.76, 0.6