ライフサイエンスコーパス: chromoendoscopy

1 white-light endoscopy and preferably optical chromoendoscopy.

2 'smarter' mucosal biopsy when combined with chromoendoscopy.

3 methods include magnification endoscopy and chromoendoscopy.

4 of preneoplastic lesions with methylene blue chromoendoscopy.

5 ite light endoscopy, narrow band imaging and chromoendoscopy.

6 ocedure and withdrawal times with pancolonic chromoendoscopy (30.7 +/- 12.8 minutes and 18.3 +/- 7.6

7 nce in adenoma detection rates by pancolonic chromoendoscopy (34.4%; 95% CI 26.4%-43.3%) vs white-lig

8 croscopy (90.2 and 98.5%), and magnification chromoendoscopy (88.6 and 93.2%), respectively.

9 nition endoscopy in combination with digital chromoendoscopy allowed real-time in vivo prediction of

10 Virtual chromoendoscopy, although not beneficial for polyp detec

11 ia are constantly being evaluated, including chromoendoscopy and biomarkers of carcinoma, in an attem

12 using high-definition endoscopy with digital chromoendoscopy and the accuracy of predicting histology

13 arrow-band imaging without magnification and chromoendoscopy, as required.

14 BE) using dye-based chromoendoscopy, optical chromoendoscopy, autofluorescence imaging, or confocal l

15 ithin this study we assessed whether digital chromoendoscopy can accurately predict the histology of

16 The addition of chromoendoscopy can aid in identification and removal of

17 Optical chromoendoscopy can also be used to evaluate lesions bef

18 of high-definition white light endoscopy and chromoendoscopy compared with white light endoscopy alon

19 However, pancolonic chromoendoscopy detected serrated lesions in a significa

20 Chromoendoscopy facilitated the identification of colon

21 endoscopy [i-scan], and Fujinon intelligent chromoendoscopy [FICE]), confocal laser endomicroscopy (

22 nsitivity and specificity of pCLE to virtual chromoendoscopy for classification of colorectal polyps

23 light endoscopy is noninferior to pancolonic chromoendoscopy for detection of adenomas in patients wi

24 The overall accuracy of digital chromoendoscopy for prediction of adenomatous polyp hist

25 Electronic chromoendoscopy has been largely ineffective at improvin

26 e for ACF detection using high-magnification chromoendoscopy has demonstrated considerable variabilit

27 y, cap-fitted colonoscopy, and dye-based pan-chromoendoscopy have each shown to increase polyp detect

28 Image enhancement methods such as chromoendoscopy have greatly improved neoplasia detectio

29 Chromoendoscopy holds promise for facilitating the endos

30 ds (narrow band imaging, Fujinon Intelligent ChromoEndoscopy, i-scan, and autofluorescence) have been

31 ight endoscopy is not inferior to pancolonic chromoendoscopy if performed by experienced and dedicate

32 Chromoendoscopy increases detection of diminutive adenom

33 Topically applied methylene blue dye chromoendoscopy is effective in improving detection of c

34 Dye-based pancolonic chromoendoscopy is recommended for colorectal cancer sur

35 Surveillance colonoscopy with chromoendoscopy is recommended, but conventional forward

36 de enhancements in diagnostic optics such as chromoendoscopy, magnification endoscopy, and confocal l

37 Newer technology and techniques, including chromoendoscopy, magnification endoscopy, optical cohere

38 Electronic chromoendoscopy methods (narrow band imaging, Fujinon In

39 hite-light endoscopy (n = 128) or pancolonic chromoendoscopy (n = 128) evaluations by 24 colonoscopis

40 Chromoendoscopy, narrow band imaging, and autofluorescen

41 ith Barrett's esophagus (BE) using dye-based chromoendoscopy, optical chromoendoscopy, autofluorescen

42 High-resolution chromoendoscopy provides morphological detail of diminut

43 everity and Paddington International virtual ChromoendoScopy ScOre, respectively.

44 More convenient methods, such as "digital" chromoendoscopy, show promise but have had mixed results

45 Virtual chromoendoscopy systems, such as Fujinon intelligent col

46 rrounding mucosa, and preliminary support of chromoendoscopy to target dysplasia better during colono

47 nsitivity and specificity of pCLE to virtual chromoendoscopy using a modified gold standard that assu

48 ccuracy of predicting histology with digital chromoendoscopy was assessed.

49 Using magnification chromoendoscopy, we collected large ACF with endoscopic

50 Surveillance intervals with digital chromoendoscopy were correctly predicted with >90 % accu

51 E had higher sensitivity compared to virtual chromoendoscopy when considering histopathology as gold

52 ence in specificity between pCLE and virtual chromoendoscopy when considering histopathology or modif

53 ng (NBI) with magnifying endoscopy (ME), and chromoendoscopy with 1.5% Lugol's solution, before defin

54 er, these methods and several other methods (chromoendoscopy with magnification, confocal laser micro

55 Chromoendoscopy with methylene blue has been proposed to

56 o DNA is increased in Barrett's mucosa after chromoendoscopy with methylene blue, an effect apparentl