ライフサイエンスコーパス: citation

1 reference, regardless of the context of the citation.

2 practice, including what to do if you miss a citation.

3 id not entail a lower level of clustering of citations.

4 or over 200,000 publications and 7.4 million citations.

5 endered patterns are present in neuroscience citations.

6 identified out of 39,891 initially screened citations.

7 having to date over 18,000 downloads and 540 citations.

8 The combined searches yielded 437 citations.

9 The searches initially yielded 64 unique citations.

10 Our search identified 5408 unique citations.

11 The combined searches yielded 281 citations.

12 Our search identified 4517 citations.

13 Two reviewers independently reviewed citations.

14 d a manual search yielded an additional five citations.

15 of co-author affiliations, and diversity of citations.

16 or, but would rank much lower based on total citations.

17 se cross-references, synonyms and literature citations.

18 iterature search identified a total of 1,129 citations.

19 dreds of papers and hundreds of thousands of citations.

20 act journals and a high likelihood of future citations.

21 ion to the prevalence of gender imbalance in citations.

22 conducted in April 2018, yielded 253 unique citations.

23 erimental discovery timelines extracted from citations.

24 Of 2447 citations, 11 studies met our inclusion criteria.

25 After screening 10,159 citations, 114 articles were reviewed in full; a final 3

26 After screening of 19 684 citations, 163 studies (23 143 patients) were included i

27 Of 2567 citations, 20 primary studies met prespecified inclusion

28 Of 7,300 unique citations, 22 studies met the inclusion criteria and wer

29 The combined searches yielded 98 citations, 23 of which were reviewed in full text.

30 The search identified 2631 citations; 24 studies from 22 articles were included.

31 After reviewing 3878 citations, 25 studies were included, featuring 20 distin

32 reviewed articles (25th, 75th: 14, 105), 401 citations (25th, 75th: 102, 1677), and h-index 9 (25th,

33 The combined searches yielded 191 citations, 28 of which were selected because they were c

34 The search yielded 8678 unique citations; 316 full-text articles were reviewed, and 9 s

35 Of 60,349 citations, 407 articles met inclusion criteria; 87% were

36 After screening 2292 citations, 43 articles met our inclusion criteria (61 un

37 We identified 2631 citations; 48 studies from 45 articles were included in

38 Of the 13 citations, 6 articles on 5 randomized clinical trials pr

39 sis and the ongoing debate on the meaning of citations(7,8), citations are still primarily viewed as

40 After screening 5874 citations, 7 RCTs with 10 arms were added for a total of

41 Analyzer of Bioresource Citation (ABC) is a data mining tool extracting strain r

42 From 5316 citations about antiretroviral drugs identified, 549 wer

43 versal patterns of variation in the usage of citations across paper sections(11).

44 riance in research output, when measured via citations, across the globe.

45 ting scientific and public interest; namely, citations, Altimetric scores, and views.

46 ons for citation, we use two case studies of citation amnesia in the field of hypothetical carbon all

47 Despite the acknowledged shortcomings of citation analysis and the ongoing debate on the meaning

48 f the human brain connectome to conventional citation and social networks, where ground truth is know

49 Among 1056 citations and 37 full-text articles reviewed, 23 studies

50 sequence database and the PubMed database of citations and abstracts published in life science journa

51 n authorship of heart failure (HF) guideline citations and clinical trials have not been examined.

52 Two reviewers screened all citations and extracted data independently.

53 We identified 54 417 citations and included 402 studies with data for 53 463

54 n first and last author positions, with self-citations and journal prestige accounting for most of th

55 Metrics with and without self-citations and ratio of citations to citing papers are gi

56 The citations and reference lists of selected studies were r

57 hors independently and in duplicate screened citations and reviewed text of studies to apply selectio

58 produce more scientific papers, receive more citations and scholarly awards, and are typically traine

59 a positive association between the number of citations and the probability of a web server being reac

60 The searches yielded 193 citations, and 15 of the 34 articles selected for full r

61 The searches identified 307 unique citations, and 27 studies were selected according to the

62 a-analysis, initial searches identified 1617 citations, and 31 RCTs were systematically reviewed for

63 search resulted in 194 potentially relevant citations, and 34 were selected for full-text review.

64 The searches identified 216 unique citations, and 49 articles of possible clinical relevanc

65 We identified 4542 citations, and 88 studies were included, comprising 55 6

66 An electronic database search identified 885 citations, and a manual search yielded an additional fiv

67 onic databases, hand-searched references and citations, and consulted experts to identify studies ass

68 We identified 7965 citations, and included 126 studies describing 491 608 H

69 plemented by hand-searching reference lists, citations, and journals.

70 ution as measured by number of publications, citations, and National Institutes of Health (NIH) fundi

71 The search yielded 286 citations, and the full text of 50 articles was reviewed

72 1 are incorrect; the correct citations are as follows: MHC class I free heavy chain(2

73 By assuming that some citations are distributed according to the rich get rich

74 MEDLINE citations are indexed with Medical Subject Headings (MeS

75 ing debate on the meaning of citations(7,8), citations are still primarily viewed as endorsements and

76 Taking relocation into account, we find that citations are the strongest predictors of current online

77 factor, journal quartile, and the number of citations as suitable metrics for quality consideration.

78 From 11 295 literature citations associated with 10 PICO questions, 20 relevant

79 From 17 607 literature citations associated with the 17 PICO questions, 145 stu

80 f Birmingham, Birmingham, UK." The reference citation at the end of the first sentence of the second

81 In addition, the citation at the end of the sentence, "On a monthly basis

82 Citations at 60 months were additionally examined as a s

83 oth sexes were not associated with increased citations at 60 months.

84 mention of traditional research outputs and citation-based metrics: however, such outputs and metric

85 rmally returns a long list of hits with many citations being unwanted by the user.

86 ion in modern physics and on the patterns of citations between articles published in the various fiel

87 nd effective way to increase awareness about citation bias and help mitigate it.

88 Here, we describe why reducing citation bias is important and how to include a Citation

89 ccurate predictions about a paper's eventual citation by a clinical article (accuracy = 84%, F1 score

90 utomates bibliographic tasks by implementing citation by identifier, where users cite persistent iden

91 Three reviewers independently screened citations by title and abstract, whereas the full-text e

92 cally searched alongside manual searches and citation chaining which yielded the 11 papers included i

93 he relevant literature and retraced numerous citation chains to reveal the primary data that were use

94 ature repositories, and forward and backward citation chasing.

95 port systems with more than 11 000 reference citations, classified into over 1000 transporter familie

96 Here, we describe the NIH Open Citation Collection (NIH-OCC), a public access database

97 was no significant association between total citation count and time since publication (correlation c

98 ressing the long-standing issue that not all citations count the same.

99 The citation counts of the 100 most cited articles varied fr

100 Citation counts were compared using generalized estimati

101 es were ranked in descending order per their citation counts.

102 ning the diversity of baby names, scientific citations, cryptocurrencies, pot decorations, literary l

103 Citation data have remained hidden behind proprietary, r

104 sis (OPA) has been aggregating and enhancing citation data that can be shared publicly.

105 This Formal Comment presents an update to citation databases of top-cited scientists across all sc

106 re was a significant negative association of citation density (correlation coefficient = -0.610, P <

107 The average citation distance between papers published in the same y

108 n research articles to determine the minimum citation distance between patented inventions and prior

109 nd that there are no differences between the citation distributions of the top 4 journals European He

110 Given the fact that their citation distributions were similar, it is obvious that

111 ation bias is important and how to include a Citation Diversity Statement in your next publication.

112 Appending a Citation Diversity Statement to a paper is a simple and

113 Despite the noisiness of citation dynamics, as little as 2 years of postpublicati

114 zed glaucoma education (38 participants, 149 citations), electronic reminders, and hearing their adhe

115 ne, Medline in Process, and other nonindexed citations, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database from incept

116 r 30, 2016, identified 56 of a possible 3284 citations for (1) data-driven analyses of the dimensions

117 2003 to August 2017, and a manual search of citations from key primary and review articles.

118 (n = 155), and Canada (n = 144).The overall citation h-index was 106, and the countries with the hig

119 ranked by the composite score than by total citations, H index, or Hm index; 40/47 of these laureate

120 ts that provides standardized information on citations, h-index, coauthorship-adjusted hm-index, cita

121 sely, many of the top 1,000 authors on total citations have had no single/first/last-authored cited p

122 icators that address total impact (number of citations, Hirsch H index [H]), co-authorship adjustment

123 Of 559 citations identified and manually screened, 161 were sel

124 Of 10 126 citations identified by our search, 75 cognitive variabl

125 Of 6,176 citations identified from our search strategy, 26 studie

126 Of 1,826 citations identified, 22 met our overall inclusion crite

127 Of 1903 citations identified, 24 studies (16 565 participants) m

128 From 31 767 citations identified, 783 studies met the inclusion crit

129 l prestige, we find near-identical per-paper citation impact for women and men in first and last auth

130 d to assemble among individuals with similar citation impact in all fields of science and patenting.

131 a method for describing individual and team citation impact that both is computationally feasible an

132 rting results of gender-based comparisons of citation impact.

133 article originally published, the reference citations in the Methods section were misnumbered.

134 used tool for this purpose with over 118 000 citations in the past two decades.

135 Two reviewers screened citations independently.

136 The survey based on 36 RCTs (median 5-yr citation index 85 (24-474), from 21 different countries,

137 llaboration networks to define an individual citation index and examine outcomes when each individual

138 (1974-2017 week 1) databases and the Science Citation Index and Social Science Citation Index were se

139 74-2015 from journals indexed in the Science Citation Index Expanded database.

140 Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Science Citation Index Expanded were searched to July 2014.

141 A MEDLINE Ovid, Science Citation Index Expanded, and PubMed systematic search fo

142 We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index Expanded, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRA

143 e on Traumatic Stress, PsycINFO, and Science Citation Index for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) a

144 he Science Citation Index and Social Science Citation Index were searched combining terms for audit a

145 BIOSIS, SCOPUS, clinicaltrials.gov, Science Citation Index, and Cochrane Library databases through N

146 y searching PubMed, Medline, Embase, Science Citation Index, Current Contents, and the Cochrane Centr

147 chInfo, Embase, Medline, and Social Sciences Citation Index.

148 SIA, IBSS (Proquest), Conference Proceedings Citation Indexes (Web of Science), using a combination o

149 comprehensive picture of impact, although no citation indicator, single or composite, can be expected

150 Here, we explore multiple citation indicators that address total impact (number of

151 erences between the team members' individual citation indices grow.

152 near the harmonic average of the individual citation indices.

153 ng stationarity however score two times more citations influencing other fields of science and the sc

154 d identification' was incorrect; the correct citation is "...ligands(20-40)." There is an error (en d

155 ese primary Intestine Chips...'; the correct citation is Supplementary Table 2.

156 ion network to field-normalize the number of citations it has received.

157 The number of citations, journal type (e.g., Open Access or subscripti

158 Only 37 articles from 373 citations met our inclusion criteria.

159 Citation metrics are increasingly used to appraise publi

160 Citation metrics are widely used and misused.

161 Citation metrics from 224 articles indicated that half o

162 ith the glaucoma coach (38 participants, 184 citations), motivation to aid personal change (38 partic

163 ed to English language articles, yielded 149 citations; multifocal (diffractive optic) and phakic int

164 Two practical cases, the citation network and the co-purchase network, were exami

165 search article by making novel use of its co-citation network to field-normalize the number of citati

166 ur results revealed that social networks and citation networks contain more leader communities wherea

167 ces within and clustering of cross-sectional citation networks, this study presents evidence that fie

168 Adjusting for self-citations, number of authors, international collaboratio

169 Here, we use data on the citation of academic articles and patents, and on the on

170 omain: inclusion of refuted science, lack of citation of post-publication correspondence and failure

171 rence between the mean and the median of the citation of the papers published by the journals.

172 the other 2 journals in between, the median citation of their articles plus reviews (IF Median) was

173 The searches yielded 734 citations of articles published in English.

174 Using Scopus citations of Cell Stem Cell research papers, it illustra

175 r 2000, but including the milestones and key citations of earlier work.

176 correlated with productivity as measured by citations of grant-supported publications.

177 formed, including a Google Scholar search of citations of included articles.

178 external stakeholders (proximal outcome) and citations of NTP's research in scientific publications,

179 We sought to obtain citations of original research published between Jan 1,

180 The original two citations of reference 80 in the Box 4 text have been up

181 We also reviewed bibliographic citations of retrieved articles.

182 l Science Collections), reference lists, and citations of the included articles for studies published

183 The searches yielded 321 citations, of which 109 were reviewed in full text and 2

184 These searches yielded 162 citations, of which 13 were deemed clinically relevant f

185 We identified a total of 1531 citations, of which 255 reports contributed to 552 C tra

186 The database search retrieved 4,172 unique citations, of which 289 were reviewed, and 13 studies re

187 This search yielded 311 citations, of which 37 were deemed clinically relevant f

188 The combined searches yielded 118 citations, of which 53 were reviewed in full text.

189 We identified 6,396 citations, of which 725 articles were reviewed and 85 (N

190 Because of the downstream effects of citations on visibility and career advancement, understa

191 books, it is virtually always stated without citation or argument.

192 sessed according to multiple publication and citation outcomes.

193 was included for analysis of publication and citation outcomes.

194 Ovid MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Ovid Cochrane Cent

195 als (p<0.05), it did not translate to higher citations (p>0.05).

196 oad reach of the journal and the dynamics in citation patterns and research agenda over its 100-y his

197 Notably, we find differences in microlevel citation patterns that were dependent on the ultimate im

198 Interestingly, the average citation per paper, however, is in all career stages neg

199 -18), and the median citation rate was 0.007 citations per day (IQR: 0.0032-0.017).

200 n, journal impact factor, and citation rate (citations per day) were extracted for the diagnostic acc

201 differ from available SDARs in their average citations per year over their lifespan or journal impact

202 to aid personal change (38 participants, 157 citations), personalized glaucoma education (38 particip

203 s by identifying possible "false negatives." CITATION: Phillips MB, Leonard JA, Grulke CM, Chang DT,

204 ncement, understanding the role of gender in citation practices is vital for addressing scientific in

205 that this imbalance is driven largely by the citation practices of men and is increasing over time as

206 Sixteen of the 28 citations provided level I evidence supporting the use o

207 between 1955 and 2010 with an average of 609 citations (range: 333-2304) and are included among the 3

208 e of publication, journal impact factor, and citation rate (citations per day) were extracted for the

209 s of reporting, as evaluated with STARD, and citation rate as well as impact factor.

210 l studies are rarely frontline news, but the citation rate of this paper underscores the critical nat

211 le citation rates are divided by an expected citation rate that is derived from performance of articl

212 15 of 25 items (IQR: 12-18), and the median citation rate was 0.007 citations per day (IQR: 0.0032-0

213 ARD] endorsement) and study-level variables (citation rate, timing of publication, and order of publi

214 Article citation rates are divided by an expected citation rate

215 Impact was evaluated as annual citation rates measured using the ISI Web of Knowledge d

216 sus peer review versus mixed--did not impact citation rates.

217 e effect of impact factor on postpublication citation rates.

218 y (STARD) is associated with postpublication citation rates.

219 Team impact is predicted more by the lower-citation rather than the higher-citation team members, t

220 The Relative Citation Ratio (RCR), a metric that was designed to serv

221 The citation reads Schneider et al. (2018) and the correct r

222 act of each dataset by tracing the number of citations, reanalysis and biological entities reported b

223 Second, inequality in the number of citations received by papers increased, and, as a conseq

224 ioRxiv was associated with the attention and citations received by the corresponding peer-reviewed ar

225 e crafted a model that accurately summarizes citation records with merely three easily interpretable

226 ell as summary data such as all diseases and citations reported for the variant.

227 y Instrument, influence using Web of Science citations, results, and conclusions was created, and qua

228 alsy syndrome were identified out of the 943 citations retrieved and were included in the qualitative

229 Of 3660 citations retrieved, 16 case-control studies comprising

230 Of 3,188 citations reviewed, 10 studies met the inclusion criteri

231 Of 3188 citations reviewed, 10 studies met the inclusion criteri

232 Of 488 citations screened, 10 studies were identified for inclu

233 Of 6,892 citations screened, 76 studies reported in 87 citations

234 reviewed for additional works and a forward citation search conducted.

235 We added four studies after reference and citation searches, meaning 71 studies in total were incl

236 Citation searches, reference checking and searches of th

237 y-August 2016: database searching, backwards citation searching and forward citation searching.

238 d hand-searching reference lists, performing citation searching, and contacting authors.

239 30, 2019 (Scopus, MEDLINE, Web of Science), citation searching, and expert consultations.

240 ng, backwards citation searching and forward citation searching.

241 from the literature search and three through citation searching.

242 Both within- and cross-field citations show a similar rate of slowly growing clusteri

243 ng new software, we found that the number of citations significantly increased when authors provided

244 ntral (PMC), and CrossRef, now underlies the citation statistics delivered in the NIH iCite analytic

245 access Teaching Tools ComponentsRECOMMENDED CITATION STYLE:Feng, J., Chen, J., Selvam, B., and Shukl

246 o access Teaching Tool ComponentsRECOMMENDED CITATION STYLE:Pozo, M.J., Albrectsen, B.R., Bejarano, E

247 o access Teaching Tool ComponentsRECOMMENDED CITATION STYLE:Roeder, A.

248 es to acceptance in high impact journals and citation success.

249 by the lower-citation rather than the higher-citation team members, typically centering near the harm

250 igher Altmetric Attention Score and 36% more citations than articles without a preprint.

251 ificantly higher numbers of publications and citations than MDs, regardless of academic or institutio

252 n only law author teams, and (c) elicit more citations than only law or only psychology author teams.

253 en in leading-author positions attract fewer citations than those with men in leading-author position

254 hat half of the publications have cumulative citations that rank in the top 34% normalized for subjec

255 Of 8048 citations that were screened, 24 studies were included i

256 address this issue by studying the usage of citations throughout the full text of 156,558 articles p

257 Finally, reference citations throughout the legend to Fig.

258 Change history: In this Letter, the citation to 'Fig.

259 In this Letter, a citation to 'Fig.

260 Change history: In this Letter, the citation to 'Fig.4e, f' in the main text should be 'Fig.

261 ted "Fishery changes were underpinned...", a citation to ref.

262 to the Supplementary Acknowledgements; and a citation to the French National Institute has been added

263 with and without self-citations and ratio of citations to citing papers are given.

264 Citations to his scientific contributions are well sprea

265 ed according to journal impact and number of citations to identify predictors of success across these

266 independent reviewers screened the returned citations to identify relevant reviews and rated the qua

267 iber Hm index [Hm]), and author order (total citations to papers as single; single or first; or singl

268 ns, h-index, coauthorship-adjusted hm-index, citations to papers in different authorship positions, a

269 his article, I show that the distribution of citations to papers published by the top 30 journals in

270 Initial analysis of the retrieved citations to reveal clusters of evidence of nursing impa

271 The analysis of citations to scientific publications has become a tool t

272 sting access to data, reviewers recommending citations to their work, editors publishing in their own

273 incorrect articles showed that the number of citations to these articles increased over time.

274 Citations to these reference, plus reference 21, have be

275 The relevance of citations was assessed based on inclusion criteria, with

276 Screening of 6,633 citations was conducted.

277 Regrettably, an in-text citation wasn't listed in the reference section of the a

278 After outlining the reasons for citation, we use two case studies of citation amnesia in

279 Since Scopus does not capture older citations, we conducted an additional analysis by Google

280 Of 6532 citations, we included 100 randomised controlled trials,

281 Of 69 410 citations, we included 17 studies in our analysis: 14 th

282 From 2,290 citations, we included 23 studies (n = 5982).

283 From 3034 citations, we included 38 studies and quantitatively syn

284 From 2373 citations, we selected 27 studies with data on 15,803 in

285 fty articles with the highest average yearly citation were identified.

286 9309 citations were considered and 233 studies were included

287 A total of 11 703 citations were identified, from which 123 publications w

288 A total of 1,124 citations were identified.

289 itations screened, 76 studies reported in 87 citations were included.

290 Seven-thousand seven-hundred sixty-five citations were retrieved of which 15 studies were includ

291 Screened citations were reviewed and extracted independently by t

292 ACTION: One hundred forty-seven nonduplicate citations were screened, 32 underwent full screening and

293 literature databases, trial registries, and citations were searched through December 1, 2018.

294 publishing at high rates and receiving many citations were, overall, not at greater risk of bias.

295 g their adherence score (37 participants, 90 citations) were most commonly cited by participants as h

296 oncatenating titles and abstracts of MEDLINE citations which refer to the miRNAs.

297 The searches identified 281 citations, which were reviewed in abstract form.

298 The search retrieved 10,247 citations with 120 studies reporting on the incidence of

299 We identified 1191 citations with 8 randomized controlled trials meeting in

300 e to approximate 'death dates' and calculate citations/year over each SDAR's lifespan.