ライフサイエンスコーパス: classification system

1 ed by the University of Texas Diabetic Wound Classification system).

2 iopsy and classified according to the Vienna Classification system.

3 ot correlate with results from the Cambridge classification system.

4 tion is constrained by the lack of a thermal classification system.

5 AMD graded according to the Beckman clinical classification system.

6 verity of DR using the modified Airlie House classification system.

7 the conventional expert-assessed morphology classification system.

8 uropean Surveillance of Congenital Anomalies classification system.

9 ude lid margin evaluation using a recognized classification system.

10 ancer/Union for International Cancer Control classification system.

11 ons and pedogenic processes based on a given classification system.

12 ents of all CDR structures in the PDB to our classification system.

13 the gold-standard regions of difference (RD) classification system.

14 ety (ATS)/European Respiratory Society (ERS) classification system.

15 because of the lack of a standardized stone classification system.

16 ng cell type has so far defied a generalized classification system.

17 and advanced AMD (n = 765) by the AREDS AMD Classification System.

18 traditional Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification System.

19 of glycoside hydrolase family 88 in the CAZy classification system.

20 lysaccharide capsules in the current capsule classification system.

21 defined new data analyses needed to refine a classification system.

22 erts was the foundation of the International Classification System.

23 nome-wide experimental data with the PANTHER classification system.

24 ing on the traditional maternal based strain classification system.

25 graded using the American Heart Association classification system.

26 Geographic and Epidemiological Ophthalmology classification system.

27 mily CE-3 carbohydrate esterases of the CAZy classification system.

28 Scales for Children and Gross Motor Function Classification System.

29 photographs using the modified Airlie House classification system.

30 eta)/T (tau)/N (neurodegeneration) biomarker classification system.

31 verity of DR using the modified Airlie House classification system.

32 m into one or more errors by using a 22-part classification system.

33 s were graded according to the Dindo-Clavien Classification System.

34 across all types as defined by the universal classification system.

35 Network for Co-Operative Research in Health) classification system.

36 nset were defined by using the Read Clinical Classification System.

37 alysed using an automated call detection and classification system.

38 c intraepithelial neoplasia, and 81% for WHO classification system.

39 genome-wide experimental data in the PANTHER classification system.

40 hcare associated infections surveillance and classification system.

41 of the problems in the existing psychiatric classification system.

42 raded according to the modified Airlie House classification system.

43 re accurate outcome prediction, than earlier classification systems.

44 greatest interpretative challenge with all 3 classification systems.

45 cular features within tumour types from both classification systems.

46 pare prognostic performance of the competing classification systems.

47 D-OCT, characterizing ECE, and proposing new classification systems.

48 ncing studies proposed partially overlapping classification systems.

49 or an unlimited number of parallel taxonomic classification systems.

50 gnosis, and thus might help to align current classification systems.

51 human trafficking in international diagnosis classification systems.

52 candidate and forms the basis of a number of classification systems.

53 ven BKPyVAN compared to previously published classification systems.

54 a comparison, 4 previously proposed BKPyVAN classification systems.

55 e molecular groups according to the 2016 WHO classification system: (1) oligodendroglioma, IDH-mutant

56 ependent isoform-level gene-expression based classification-system), a novel computational approach t

57 r, there was only 34% concordance for either classification system across laboratories.

58 New classification systems allow for overlap of mechanisms b

59 This classification system, along with a vascular assessment,

60 psychotic disorder show that our diagnostic classification system already reflects, in part, aetiolo

61 mmon utilization of inadequate or inaccurate classification systems among healthcare providers.

62 ntation of a four level (meta)genome project classification system and a simplified intuitive web int

63 A classification system and criteria for OCT-defined atrop

64 entity in the 2008 World Health Organization classification system and is defined as an EBV-positive

65 tion and/or known genetic cause, the current classification system and nomenclature remain confusing.

66 esis of further POMzites is anticipated, the classification system and terminology introduced here wi

67 ration Task Force for the Redefinition of MI Classification System and the risk of cardiovascular dea

68 y between behavior-based psychiatric disease classification system and the underlying brain dysfuncti

69 de useful information for developing a novel classification system and therapeutic strategies for HNS

70 nomic differences in the current prokaryotic classification system and to delineate the boundary of a

71 s called the Functional Therapeutic Chemical Classification System and was further evaluated against

72 The findings will be critical for refining classification systems and improving clinical management

73 ssified, using the LanguaL, FoodEX2 and ODIN classification systems and ranked according to quality c

74 gies enable the development of more accurate classification systems and the more detailed breakdown o

75 hose from three different clinical molecular classification systems and two prognostic signatures for

76 hthalmologists to recognize the updated MPGN classification system, and all patients with complement-

77 ed into one out of three-grades in the HOUSE classification system, and concomitantly graded accordin

78 ussed the important components of a clinical classification system, and defined new data analyses nee

79 the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) classification system, and quality of life was assessed

80 invasion, the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification system, and the 5-gene score in a nomogra

81 as determined according to the IASLC/ATS/ERS classification system, and the percentage of each histol

82 ogeneity, compared interconnectivity between classification systems, and experimentally addressed the

83 Available protocols, injury classification systems, and issues awaiting future resea

84 n the nosology of ADs, challenges to current classification systems, and prior attempts to subtype in

85 We examined agreement between classification systems, and tested the unidimensionality

86 ant anal sphincter anatomy, imaging methods, classification systems, and treatment objectives.

87 Current breast cancer classification systems are based on molecular evaluation

88 These classification systems are not only of prognostic value

89 the Age-Related Eye Disease Study 9-step AMD classification system based on color fundus photographs

90 We aimed to develop a risk classification system based on colorectal cancer inciden

91 was achieved in generating a basic clinical classification system based on fundus lesions assessed w

92 A semiquantitative classification system based on histopathologically detec

93 d proteome data provides a new brain disease classification system based on molecular etiology and pa

94 discussions at 3 meetings over 12 months, a classification system based on OCT was proposed for atro

95 A kidney stone classification system based on practical and clinically

96 We developed a risk classification system based on standardized incidence ra

97 We propose a refined classification system based on subset-specific B-cell-as

98 ) are overlapping categories, a hierarchical classification system based on the presence or absence o

99 torially or descriptively, and propose a new classification system based on these findings.

100 merican College of Radiology (ACR) created a classification system based on US characteristics.

101 gy and KEGG, but also offers additional, new classification systems based on high-throughput text-min

102 The WHO 2007 glioma classification system (based primarily on tumour histolo

103 ability of ciprofloxacin, a biopharmaceutics classification system (BCS) class 4 drug (low solubility

104 In the Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS), drugs are classified on the

105 ht the changes in the pulmonary hypertension classification system, briefly explore pulmonary hyperte

106 stillbirth causation are impeded by various classification systems, but for 18 countries with reliab

107 Typically one trains a classification system by gathering large amounts of prob

108 f known histology; and (4) validation of the classification system by NBI-trained gastroenterology fe

109 Field trials of diagnostic classification systems can be divided into two types: de

110 The Bosniak classification system cannot fully differentiate aggress

111 licity or Biopharmaceutical Drug Disposition Classification System class and changes in volume of dis

112 ed interconnectivity between six independent classification systems coalescing into four consensus mo

113 matic drugs (Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system code R03) during 1995-2009 was obt

114 prognostic prediction performance using this classification system compared with clinical criteria an

115 The WHO 2016 classification system comprises five glioma subtypes, ca

116 The developed two-stage classification system comprising two support vector mach

117 evance to prostate cancer, developed a novel classification system consisting of three distinct subty

118 This revised classification system consists of 5 groups of diseases:

119 Subtypes defined by the different classification systems correlate to some extent, but the

120 This classification system could be implemented as a clinical

121 We consider the CMS groups the most robust classification system currently available for CRC-with c

122 er, which substantially refines the existing classification systems currently used.

123 A binary classification system demonstrating a high general perfo

124 ded according to the OCT-based International Classification System developed by the International Vit

125 Traditional classification systems do not correlate optimally with u

126 For further validation of the color-based classification system, ex vivo videos of a methylene blu

127 h various phenotypic and research diagnostic classification systems exist and several prognostic mode

128 Several classification systems exist for the description and cla

129 No universally accepted classification system exists for mandibular defects afte

130 s were graded according to the International Classification System for age-related maculopathy and st

131 s images were graded using the International Classification System for Age-Related Maculopathy.

132 A histopathological classification system for ANCA-associated vasculitis was

133 A consensus classification system for atrophy and OCT-based criteria

134 We propose a new classification system for biological CAs that parallels

135 , and work relative value units) to devise a classification system for common surgical procedures.

136 sample preparation method and bioinformatics classification system for comparative analysis of plant

137 This paper provides a new classification system for describing PSTDs at single imp

138 al coherence tomography (OCT)-based anatomic classification system for diseases of the vitreomacular

139 Possibly, the introduction of a classification system for duodenal diverticulum perforat

140 biology and led to the development of a new classification system for glioma.

141 We aimed to update the classification system for HCA and associate the subtypes

142 of Radiology recently released Lung-RADS, a classification system for LDCT lung cancer screening.

143 classes of blood cancers, based on the EGIL classification system for leukemias, and relying upon ad

144 is somewhere in between, which leads to the classification system for MV systems introduced by Melvi

145 Consensus was reached on a classification system for OCT-based structural alteratio

146 ncreasingly important to have an alternative classification system for orbiviruses.

147 bsolid nodules and a brief review of the new classification system for peripheral lung adenocarcinoma

148 lobal regions were compared using a modified classification system for PK indications and analyzed vi

149 unveils the limits of our current functional classification system for plant metabolites.

150 eover, we review a recently updated two-tier classification system for precursor lesions, new finding

151 results provide a framework for developing a classification system for psychiatric illness that is ba

152 The RSNA chest CT classification system for reporting COVID-19 pneumonia h

153 r radiology resident using the RSNA chest CT classification system for reporting COVID-19 pneumonia.

154 uch needed new drugs reach the market, a new classification system for resistance might need to be de

155 in which they demonstrate that a hierarchial classification system for specific cytogenetic abnormali

156 review is to suggest a new nomenclature and classification system for the diseases currently categor

157 We developed a classification system for the endoscopic diagnosis of co

158 were adapted to stratify TBI using the Mayo Classification System for Traumatic Brain Injury Severit

159 In addition, an unambiguous classification system for various types of acidic ionic

160 The Paralympic classification system for visual impairment only assesse

161 Most classification systems for age-related macular degenerat

162 cently been integrated into major diagnostic classification systems for conduct disorders.

163 rver agreement of the two most commonly used classification systems for conjunctival melanocytic intr

164 omparable strengths and limitations of the 3 classification systems for conjunctival melanocytic intr

165 conducted meta-analyses with four different classification systems for footedness on 145,135 individ

166 In the current major diagnostic classification systems for psychiatric disorders, some c

167 ensitive biomarkers of myonecrosis and a new classification system from the universal definition of m

168 ive score less than 70, Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level of 3 to 5, or blindn

169 th cerebral palsy and a Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level of II or III (walks

170 festyle factors for all Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels (I-V).

171 Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels I-III were commoner

172 tor function, using the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS).

173 pecific functioning occurred at Lens Opacity Classification System grades 4 (nuclear opalescence), 5

174 The traditional disease classification system groups diseases with similar clini

175 The 3 classification systems had comparable accuracy of 81%-83

176 This classification system has also been applied to describe

177 A classification system has been described as predictive o

178 The ISGPF classification system has its limitations in clinical de

179 In lung adenocarcinoma, the IASLC/ATS/ERS classification system has significant prognostic and pre

180 urrent revision of the two major psychiatric classification systems has elicited particular comment o

181 A variety of different terms and classification systems have been used historically to de

182 ature regarding FCDs, addressing the current classification system, histopathology, molecular genetic

183 en children with cerebral palsy (Gross Motor Classification System I:6, II:6, III:4) aged 5-14 years

184 As a reporting standard and diagnostic classification system, ICD-11 will be highly influential

185 The NICE classification system identified lesions with deep invas

186 eart failure staging nor the NYHA functional classification system identifies the variable symptomato

187 However, this simple classification system ignores much of the variation that

188 t of lens opacities using the Lens Opacities Classification System II (LOCS II) at baseline and again

189 t of lens opacities using the Lens Opacities Classification System II.

190 ification was assessed by the Lens opacities classification system III.

191 sease characteristics in the most recent WHO classification system, improved understanding of the pat

192 Our classification system in patients with INS allows a syst

193 However, clinical research supporting the classification system in psychiatry has not kept up with

194 projects are organized based on a four level classification system in the form of a Study, Organism (

195 so discussed the disease types and different classification systems including VCUAM and AFS/ASRM amon

196 narcolepsy are discussed, and a possible new classification system incorporating the borderland condi

197 nnotation through evolutionary relationship) classification system is a comprehensive system that com

198 We show how this classification system is applicable at different levels

199 This classification system is completely automatic and can be

200 Each category of this new classification system is linked with treatment recommend

201 nt of patients, it is crucial that the ISGPF classification system is merged with newer clinical data

202 Although the current classification system is not yet embraced by all researc

203 This classification system is positioned to inform patient mo

204 A modified classification system is proposed based on our data and

205 The ACR TI-RADS classification system is reproducible.

206 A new classification system is suggested for defect-related PL

207 rs are recorded in excel files while a novel classification system is used which provides, tailor-mad

208 ntity in the World Health Organization (WHO) classification system, is readily recognized as a partic

209 g International Colorectal Endoscopic (NICE) classification system, is used to identify neoplasias wi

210 etic cerebral palsy (Gross Motor Functioning Classification System level IV-V) aged 4 to 24 years who

211 diagnosed clinically using the Lens Opacity Classification System (LOCS) III system.

212 ) a multidimensional rather than categorical classification system may be a better conceptualization

213 This classification system might be used to select treatment

214 replicated, then the disorder's place in the classification system must be reconsidered, and research

215 This classification system needs to be prospectively tested i

216 reatic neuroendocrine tumors, new prognostic classification systems, new diagnostic algorithms, more

217 ity of a global, cross-culturally applicable classification system of allergic disorders.

218 e, this study proposes a surgically relevant classification system of chromophores in current use, wh

219 In addition, we have developed a novel classification system of congenital vascular abnormaliti

220 ema; n = 95) using the modified Airlie House classification system of DR.

221 We applied the Montreal classification system of inflammatory bowel disease subp

222 A hierarchical classification system of Mg(2+) sites in RNA structures

223 A classification system of NIS, based on the magnitude of

224 The proposed classification system of peri-implant status after surgi

225 Because of its retrospective character, the classification system of the International Study Group o

226 the five botanical races in the most common classification system of the species, defined by genetic

227 le on the prognostic implications of the new classification system on a Western population.

228 AMD according to the modified International Classification System on digitized fundus images at 1 gr

229 an Procurement and Transplant Network (OPTN) classification system on patients undergoing transplanta

230 ategy increases the PPV for a multi-category classification system over two common alternative strate

231 tiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease classification system (P = .0015), more frequent exacerb

232 n-stained virtual microscopic slides using 3 classification systems: PAM, conjunctival melanocytic in

233 geneous diseases, which influences taxonomic classification systems, prognosis, and therapeutic decis

234 The classification system proposed and illustrated in this a

235 Current classification systems recognize lymphomatoid papulosis

236 ndard error +/-0.37, P < .001) between the 2 classification systems, representing good agreement.

237 Maculopathy Grading System and Airlie House classification system, respectively.

238 Any future kidney stone classification system should be aimed at distinguishing

239 This classification system should help the clinician understa

240 Ultimately, these classification systems should be unified into an all-enc

241 uggest that widely used harmonised commodity classification systems should evolve to address these ga

242 The kappa statistic between the 2 classification systems showed "good" agreement.

243 Ontologies are classification systems specifying entities, definitions

244 udies using fundus imaging and international classification systems, studies using fundus imaging wit

245 hment analysis, STRING implements well-known classification systems such as Gene Ontology and KEGG, b

246 Formal classification systems such as the El Escorial criteria

247 Introducing an appropriate classification system, such as "complicated" and uncompl

248 PDB or Uniprot identifier, or browsed using classification systems, such as Pfam, Gene Ontology anno

249 An optimized binary classification system (symphony), which integrates predi

250 Concluding, by developing a classification system tailored to experimental models, w

251 loped and established the validity of an NBI classification system that can be used to diagnose color

252 ations and to examine the traditional strain classification system that depends on maternal family li

253 n eyes with iAMD suggests the need for a new classification system that distinguishes between neovasc

254 this time, O-RADS US is the only lexicon and classification system that encompasses all risk categori

255 ll types, making it challenging to develop a classification system that groups these tumors according

256 Together, our findings provide a classification system that identifies tumors with clinic

257 We discuss how a classification system that incorporates genomic and hist

258 living organisms and is the only transporter classification system that is both universal and recogni

259 h the severity of AH and developed a patient classification system that might be used in clinical dec

260 Finally, a unified classification system that reconciles imaging interpreta

261 We also describe an expanded classification system that uses additional diagnostic cr

262 ancer Screening Program, we developed a risk classification system that would reduce the number of in

263 As new microarrays are invented, classification systems that worked well for other array

264 Based on this classification system the following 10 diseases (the fir

265 d according to the World Health Organization classification system, the efficacy and tolerability of

266 nt evidence for HIV prevention against a new classification system, the HIV prevention cascade.

267 ganization's Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system, the rule-of-two performed best in

268 e the rigor of the current histopathological classification system there remains considerable uncerta

269 were graded using the modified Airlie House classification system to assess the presence and severit

270 information to develop a pattern recognition classification system to authenticate honeys with PGI.

271 There is no histologic classification system to determine prognoses of patients

272 We propose a novel, unifying peptide classification system to emphasize the enormous diversit

273 ompetence in the International Labour Office classification system to ensure accurate radiographic cl

274 f the basic arguments of using the NOVA food classification system to examine the link between food a

275 s between 2012 and 2014 and used a validated classification system to map services to seven subspecia

276 thcare Cost and Utilization Project Clinical Classification System to match HIV-infected and uninfect

277 We devised a machine learning behavior classification system to quantify hunting kinematics in

278 of individual ACAs in CML is unknown, and a classification system to reflect such prognostic impact

279 dardized the terminology around chronic GVHD classification systems to ensure that a common language

280 study were to compare different ototoxicity classification systems, to evaluate the feasibility of i

281 s were subtyped under 2 commonly used stroke classification systems, TOAST (Trial of Org 10172 Acute

282 ector machine (SVM) to create an intelligent classification system towards supporting clinicians to r

283 Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) anatomical classification system: type 1 SBS (n = 9), type 2 (n = 1

284 The 4 different classification systems used challenged the comparison of

285 ortant risk marker and should be included in classification systems used for patient prognosis.

286 The classification system uses five semi-quantitative scenar

287 Main Outcomes and Measures: A standardized classification system was applied to determine AMD stage

288 The classification system was based on that used by the prev

289 In 2011, a new classification system was proposed to standardize the te

290 The American College of Radiology classification system was used to characterize allergic-

291 The American Heart Association classification system was used to rate quality of eviden

292 A alone or FA+OCT and agreement between both classification systems was performed.

293 specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of each classification system were assessed.

294 Three classification systems were applied to 502 patients with

295 rding to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification System) were available on a quarterly bas

296 of the TERT/telomere pathway and establish a classification system whereby the associations between T

297 ociety for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism classification system, who received teduglutide or place

298 This classification system will support systematic diagnosis

299 basis of diagnostic criteria and phenotypic classification systems, with considerable overlap in the

300 Our classification system would reduce the number of individ