戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  (scenario range, -2.53 to 33.50 kgCO2e) for clean-contaminated and 22.60 kgCO2e (scenario range, -1.
2                                         Both clean-contaminated and contaminated cases had an increas
3 ive occurrences following VHRs using mesh in clean-contaminated and contaminated cases relative to cl
4 ve occurrences were significantly greater in clean-contaminated and contaminated cases using mesh whe
5 hout increased mesh-related complications in clean-contaminated and contaminated repairs when compare
6 the safety and efficacy of synthetic mesh in clean-contaminated and contaminated ventral hernia repai
7 ects were clean at the time of AWR, 44% were clean-contaminated, and 14% were contaminated/infected.
8 majority of cases (66%) were clean, 26% were clean-contaminated, and 8% were contaminated.
9 41), pneumonia (4.43), and sepsis (4.90) for clean-contaminated cases.
10 nt VHR with mesh (3.56) to nonmesh (2.52) in clean-contaminated cases.
11             In patients undergoing elective, clean contaminated colorectal surgery, the use of IPA fa
12 alcohol-based preparations are equivalent in clean-contaminated colorectal procedures.
13 IPA) and chlorhexidine-alcohol for elective, clean-contaminated colorectal surgery.
14 as stratified by wound contamination status (clean-contaminated, contaminated-dirty) and country-inco
15 ore pronounced in colorectal surgery, and in clean-contaminated/contaminated surgeries.
16  surgery, which requires the management of a clean-contaminated field and the need to reconstruct the
17 e incidence of SSIs in elective and clean or clean-contaminated open abdominal surgery.
18              Patients with a contaminated or clean-contaminated operative field and a hernia defect a
19           A total of 253 adult patients with clean-contaminated or contaminated ventral hernias were
20 wever, guidelines and outcomes of repairs in clean-contaminated or grossly contaminated ventral herni
21 ed in patients with clean wounds, however in clean-contaminated, PME more frequently resulted in SSOP
22                                For clean and clean-contaminated procedures, additional prophylactic a
23                  Most surgeries (89.3%) were clean-contaminated procedures.
24            This organism might be useful for cleaning contaminated subsurface environments and restor
25 ing perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis for clean-contaminated surgeries, which suggest that clindam
26 ; 95% CI: 0.33-0.87; P = 0.01; NNT = 30) and clean-contaminated surgery (OR = 0.43; 95% CI: 0.20-0.93
27       We randomly assigned adults undergoing clean-contaminated surgery in six hospitals to preoperat
28 ncur with the literature on contaminated and clean-contaminated surgery, and endorse guidelines world
29 for preventing surgical-site infection after clean-contaminated surgery.
30 s than 0.5% in clean wounds, less than 1% in clean contaminated wounds and less than 2% in highly con
31 s; aOR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.76-1.12; P = .44) or clean-contaminated wounds (10 014 patients; aOR, 0.90; 9
32 hemotherapy (OR = 1.94 [95% CI, 1.16-3.25]), clean-contaminated wounds (OR = 2.1 [95% CI, 1.24-3.55])
33 operative complications in PME patients with clean-contaminated wounds and mesh infections/fistulas,
34                                    Clean and clean-contaminated wounds can be safely showered 48 hour
35 d face and extremity surgeries with clean or clean-contaminated wounds were included.