ライフサイエンスコーパス: climate

1 pes as a function of geology, topography and climate.

2 ole it can play in stabilizing future global climate.

3 ding of the ocean's influence on weather and climate.

4 ects of soil structure on surface fluxes and climate.

5 ormation rather than a direct consequence of climate.

6 -native populations-under a rapidly changing climate.

7 of tree longevity and growth rates to future climate.

8 (N(2)O) plays a critical role in the global climate.

9 times commensurate with the pace of changing climate.

10 sity conservation in the context of changing climate.

11 egional and global atmospheric chemistry and climate.

12 the effects of ageing forests from variable climate.

13 dynamics are highly sensitive to changes in climate.

14 ility of species range edges with a changing climate.

15 ven in large part by changes to land use and climate.

16 ence of these migrations, or with changes in climate.

17 ivity and resistance to pathogens in adverse climates.

18 onditions simulating shipping in hot or cold climates.

19 ent scenarios for field sites across various climates.

20 ciation rates ~2-fold below rosids in cooler climates.

21 ologies to further insights gained from past climates.

22 t generally remains unclear which changes in climate actually cause extinctions, and how many species

23 e and fluvial connectivity will be important climate adaptation tactics for conserving aquatic biodiv

24 We then applied this method to calculate climate-adjusted water quality guideline values (GVs) fo

25 The Paris Climate Agreement aims to keep temperature rise well bel

26 ons in large areas of the globe, influencing climate, air quality, and human health in open seas and

27 ses control aerosol lifetime and thus impact climate and air quality.

28 Tropical forest responses to climate and atmospheric change are critical to the futur

29 hould always be considered when studying the climate and biogeochemistry of the Precambrian.

30 eography ultimately arises from gradients of climate and biogeochemistry with implications for the ge

31 t source of uncertainty in projecting future climate and carbon (C) cycle feedbacks.

32 anges in climatic and atmospheric processes, climate and ecological dipoles are likely to shift in th

33 with this depth dependency persisting across climate and ecological zones.

34 mplications of a positive feedback to global climate and emphasize the close linkage between soil mic

35 It temporarily interrupted a cold and dry climate and generated a warm and wet period.

36 erstanding of atmospheric aerosol impacts on climate and health.

37 Black carbon (BC) aerosols perturb climate and impoverish air quality/human health-affectin

38 Global climate and land use change are causing woody plant encr

39 ritical for predicting the effects of future climate and land-use change on plants, pollinators, and

40 op between Amazonian BVOCs and the trends of climate and land-use changes in Amazonia is then constru

41 The Indian Ocean Dipole (IOD) affects climate and rainfall across the world, and most severely

42 Climate and soil fertility influence seed yield, nutrien

43 tion of macroinvertebrate assemblages across climates and continents, respectively.

44 gradient thereby introducing them to warmer climates and novel plant and pollinator communities.

45 ors including woody plant traits, site level climate, and abiotic soil conditions.

46 fundamental role in global water resources, climate, and biogeochemical processes; however, no globa

47 tify the top influential factors among soil, climate, and farming practices, which drive the spatial

48 polygenic adaptation of SHB to the southern climate, and may be relevant for future population-scale

49 ms and was mediated by landscape topography, climate, and soil characteristics.

50 Changing climates are altering wildlife habitats and wildlife beh

51 ered across the range of recent interglacial climate backgrounds, which demonstrates that catastrophi

52 rly successional >= restored prairie; direct climate benefits ranged from ~80% (stover) to 290% (rest

53 Forests are critical for stabilizing our climate, but costs of mitigation over space, time, and s

54 nge in plant functional traits under warming climate, but studies on one key factor, snow cover, are

55 derstood, hampering long-term predictions of climate C-feedbacks.

56 ance (S(net)) is important to predict future climate-carbon cycle feedbacks.

57 r occurs, signalling a reorganization of the climate-carbon cycle system.

58 tperformed local populations under simulated climate change (snow removal) across all five experiment

59 revealed that 82% of real-world examples of climate change adaptation in MPA planning derive from tr

60 ties) with high diversity in a key trait for climate change adaptation-phenology.

61 tal hazards as declining sediment supply and climate change alter their sediment budget, affecting de

62 ility is fundamental to predicting near-term climate change and changing extremes, and to attributing

63 s were exacerbated by drought, anthropogenic climate change and existing land-use management.

64 es due to latitudinal range shifts driven by climate change and increased artificial light at night (

65 Climate change and increasing world population will dire

66 We found that the projected climate change and intensive land use decreased their to

67 rts to predict how consumers will respond to climate change and other environmental perturbations.

68 f sudden and severe biodiversity losses from climate change and provide a framework for predicting bo

69 able potential to help mitigate human-caused climate change and provide society with many cobenefits.

70 e promise of mitigating the worst effects of climate change and providing a means to engineer crops f

71 maladaptive in the context of anthropogenic climate change and that selection now promotes thermal c

72 Predator loss and climate change are hallmarks of the Anthropocene yet the

73 Rising atmospheric CO(2) is intensifying climate change but it is also driving global and particu

74 gle field of research that could help combat climate change by generating better heat pumps for both

75 Climate change causes changes in the timing of life cycl

76 As anthropogenic climate change continues the risks to biodiversity will

77 For example, climate change could exacerbate the impacts of biologica

78 hypothesized to help or hinder adaptation to climate change depending on the circumstances.

79 rbate the impacts of biological invasions if climate change differentially affects invasive and nativ

80 nly 5 out of 236 genes that responded to the climate change experiment.

81 udies have not addressed the consequences of climate change for the metabolism of these organisms in

82 Given the prospect of ongoing climate change for the next several decades to centuries

83 With climate change forecasted to increase SSTs and the frequ

84 Recent studies show that although climate change has an impact on the carbon fluxes of the

85 Climate change has intensified the hydrologic cycle glob

86 Rapid climate change has wide-ranging implications for the Arc

87 While humans and climate change have been proposed as potential causes of

88 plastics will affect species in concert with climate change in freshwater ecosystems.

89 Climate change in the Arctic is occurring rapidly, and p

90 on data also suggest an accelerating role of climate change in the range expansion of M. soledadinus,

91 dicting how organisms will respond to future climate change is a challenging task for biologists.

92 Climate change is altering the intensity and variability

93 Climate change is an impressive factor with effects on c

94 Climate change is expected to affect crop production wor

95 sk [10-12], so understanding its response to climate change is important.

96 Climate change is leading to widespread elevational shif

97 Climate change is predicted to result in warmer and drie

98 One of the most robust signals of climate change is the relentless rise in global mean sur

99 uced species are one mechanism through which climate change may exacerbate negative impacts of biolog

100 rstanding how species have responded to past climate change may help refine projections of how specie

101 These findings demonstrate how climate change may increase habitat connectivity and alt

102 Modeling suggests that climate change mitigation actions can have substantial h

103 of the potential contributions of forests in climate change mitigation associated with tree planting.

104 In all cases, there are climate change mitigation benefits compared to fossil fu

105 ered to determine whether planting trees for climate change mitigation results in increased C storage

106 of perennial crops as a useful component of climate change mitigation strategies.

107 n (the Master Plan) on population health and climate change mitigation, assuming primary, sustained u

108 been proposed as a means to sequester C for climate change mitigation, yet little is known about how

109 Brazil and the rest of the world in terms of climate change mitigation.

110 tudies have estimated the adverse effects of climate change on crop yields, however, this literature

111 e, a crucial step in assessing the impact of climate change on imperiled turtle species.

112 Despite concerns about the effects of climate change on migratory species and the critical rol

113 ive, whereas the likely outcome of continued climate change on summer survival was generally positive

114 s expanding into new habitats as a result of climate change or human introductions will frequently en

115 Climate change poses significant emerging risks to biodi

116 ) ) in global agriculture is important given climate change projections.

117 Our results suggest that climate change scenarios considered here could result in

118 ted CO(2) and warmer temperatures reflecting climate change scenarios somewhat attenuated nanoplastic

119 tivity and soil carbon dynamics under future climate change scenarios.

120 eading to similar SOC stocks under different climate change scenarios.

121 become aware that responses of holobionts to climate change stressors may be driven by shifts in the

122 indirect effects, we used the simulations of climate change to assess the distribution of P. smintheu

123 As climate change transforms seasonal patterns of temperatu

124 capacity to predict terrestrial feedback to climate change under projected warming scenarios.

125 mate trends, and whether advance rates match climate change velocities (CCVs).

126 capacity all contribute to heterogeneity in climate change vulnerability, predicting these features

127 preceding summer and the effect of continued climate change was likely to be mainly negative, whereas

128 nder pressure from resource exploitation and climate change(1,2).

129 unlikely.(1-3) Eutrophication, overfishing, climate change, and disease have fueled the supremacy of

130 distributed globally, improve predictions of climate change, and mitigate effects.

131 ions (NO) lead to increased smog, acid rain, climate change, and respiratory inflammation within the

132 esponse of caribou reproductive phenology to climate change, and species-specific changes in terrestr

133 communities exhibit a range of responses to climate change, and that improving passage and fluvial c

134 as a result of declining natural resources, climate change, and the growing world population.

135 he most dramatic damage due to anthropogenic climate change, and the situation is predicted to worsen

136 Interlocked challenges of climate change, biodiversity loss, and land degradation

137 resented in studies demonstrating effects of climate change, but depending on their thermal tolerance

138 nge are governed by ecosystem sensitivity to climate change, but ecosystem model projections are unde

139 and biomes to shift poleward and upward with climate change, but non-climatic factors complicate thes

140 l conditions could increase vulnerability to climate change, even for geographically widespread speci

141 If these processes continue during modern climate change, future loss of summer Arctic sea ice wil

142 However, under projections of climate change, predator plasticity was insufficient to

143 tical role of coastal wetlands in mitigating climate change, sea-level rise, and salinity increase, s

144 Fast ecological responses closely track climate change, slow responses substantively lag climate

145 With climate change, the median annualized impact exceeds pou

146 Owing to the climate change, those indigenous varieties' substantial

147 While MREDs undoubtedly can help mitigate climate change, variability in the sensitivity of differ

148 ten discussed as "co-benefits" of mitigating climate change, yet they are rarely considered when desi

149 , we assess the likely effects of four major climate change-related abiotic factors on the spatiotemp

150 dy permits spatially explicit predictions of climate change-related population extinction-colonizatio

151 rategy for geoengineering to mitigate global climate change.

152 ate and manage future range shifts driven by climate change.

153 r coastal wetlands under future scenarios of climate change.

154 s sites in community dynamics in response to climate change.

155 rucial interactions between nanoplastics and climate change.

156 rld are shifting their ranges in response to climate change.

157 rately predict tree mortality under on-going climate change.

158 stems are highly vulnerable to pollution and climate change.

159 the vulnerability of groundwater aquifers to climate change.

160 nd associated impacts on ozone depletion and climate change.

161 enhouse gas emission that exacerbates global climate change.

162 burst - false springs - which may shift with climate change.

163 e the responsiveness of arctic ecosystems to climate change.

164 construct operators able to flexibly predict climate change.

165 vulnerability of species in these regions to climate change.

166 ecies can occur and how they will respond to climate change.

167 tral tools for understanding past and future climate change.

168 enon predicted to increase in magnitude with climate change.

169 s in floral pigmentation linked to ozone and climate change.

170 e advantage of the existing attention toward climate change.

171 ses generate a valuable negative feedback on climate change.

172 source of CO(2) emissions and contribute to climate change.

173 emissions and uptake will respond to ongoing climate change.

174 on gymnosperm-dominated forests under future climate change.

175 ances than animals but are more sensitive to climate change.

176 importance, especially in the face of global climate change.

177 tinction due to human land use, hunting, and climate change; (ii) loss of megabiota has a negative im

178 anticipate, manage, and potentially mitigate climate-change effects on ecosystems.

179 netic diversity and adaptive potential under climate-change-related range change.

180 We find impacts of climate changes on global GDP-per-capita by the end of t

181 actice, to promote their adaptation to a new climate-changing environment.

182 gically relevant traits, as well as soil and climate characteristics.

183 Irrigation affects climate conditions - and especially hot extremes - in va

184 When countries engineer the climate, conflict can arise because different countries

185 Ragweed was grown in climate-controlled chambers under normal (380 ppm, contr

186 s, and declined through the Eocene as global climate cooled.

187 t methane (CH(4)) emissions can offset their climate cooling effect.

188 o biodiversity loss is being eclipsed by the climate crisis.

189 limate varies due to human activity, natural climate cycles, and natural events external to the clima

190 f area index data from satellites along with climate data estimated localized phenological parameters

191 using NMR did not find any correlations with climate/daytime temperatures, or region.

192 In contrast to the climate dependency of greening, we find spatially unifor

193 Here, we use a climate-dependent epidemic model to simulate the SARS-Co

194 during litter decomposition will change with climate, driven primarily by indirect climate effects (e

195 Finally, we compare the climate-driven and anthropogenic pumping impacts.

196 On the other hand, climate-driven deterioration of conditions may reduce en

197 ggest that evolution at Eda is a response to climate-driven habitat transformation rather than a dire

198 sent exposure to natural hazards, and future climate-driven shifts in their distribution, frequency,

199 Climate-driven vegetation models typically predict that

200 Improved knowledge of species' responses to climate dynamics will allow us to anticipate and manage

201 lume plays in the predictability of Cenozoic climate dynamics.

202 e with climate, driven primarily by indirect climate effects (e.g., greater nitrogen availability and

203 e simulations producing temporal dynamics of climate en route to stable global mean temperature at 1.

204 s from the North Atlantic to correlate major climate events in a common timescale.

205 ors of green seaweeds survived these extreme climate events in isolated refugia, and diversified in b

206 ay change relationships between rain-related climate exposures and diarrheal disease.

207 ate projections of ecosystem functioning and climate feedbacks.

208 sions respond to interannual and longer-term climate fluctuations and close to half the world's lake

209 ture, sustainable food systems, reduction in climate forcing agents, and reduction in wildfires.

210 ate patterns yet its sensitivity to external climate forcing remains uncertain.

211 ate change, slow responses substantively lag climate forcing, causing disequilibria and reduced fitne

212 tween erosion rates, sliding velocities, and climate from a global compilation of 38 glaciers.

213 The transition of the martian climate from the wet Noachian era to the dry Hesperian (

214 ly used to characterize a range of plausible climate futures.

215 e the spatial structure of range edges along climate gradients, and we discuss several ways that thes

216 in trait coordination and trait responses to climate gradients.

217 Our data suggest that overall climate had the prevailing effect on changes in iWUE acr

218 Third, changes in climate have functioned as fertilization to enhance GPP

219 gy to simultaneously alleviate CO(2) -caused climate hazards and ever-increasing energy demands, as i

220 ul tool with reasonable skill to provide the climate-health outlook about possible disease incidence

221 pirical support, we argue that three factors-climate heterogeneity, collinearity among climate variab

222 lowing forest establishment, but the role of climate in driving these trends has not been explored.

223 under the U.S. Endangered Species Act due to climate-induced habitat loss.

224 to the vulnerability of forest landscapes to climate-induced productivity losses and mortality events

225 ally due to geographic genetic variation and climate interactions with other aspects of environment.

226 mperature and water stress in a region where climate is changing rapidly.

227 The changing global climate is having profound effects on coastal marine eco

228 redicting how tropical deforestation affects climate is the lack of baseline conditions (i.e., prior

229 how dispersal influences responses to novel climates is limited.

230 ining drought vulnerability as a function of climate, lithology and hydrology using regional aerial d

231 r understanding of how soil C may respond to climate-mediated changes in O(2) dynamics.

232 level of understanding, we conclude that the climate mitigation induced by increased SOC storage is g

233 Conversely, we conclude that maximum climate mitigation potential from natural forest regrowt

234 under eCO(2), and challenge the efficacy of climate mitigation strategies that rely on ubiquitous CO

235 ghlight the importance of fire management in climate mitigation.

236 mes and apply the resulting relationships to climate model data in a risk-based attribution methodolo

237 sea level pressure data from a large set of climate model simulations and, as a proxy for observatio

238 Forecasts from climate models and oceanographic observations indicate i

239 Global climate models are central tools for understanding past

240 Under greenhouse warming, climate models project an increase in the frequency of s

241 While climate models reproduce observed ENSO amplitude relativ

242 itation projections vary substantially among climate models, enhancing variation in overall trajector

243 uncertainty in global chemical transport and climate models.

244 ver an annual grassland in the Mediterranean climate of California, USA, from 2001 through 2019 with

245 ned if genotypic variation is related to the climate of genotype provenance and whether phenotypic pl

246 lexity and sub-tropical to temperate growing climate of Louisiana warrant a region-specific core coll

247 framework to assess the impacts of changing climate on water resources for the Alabama-Coosa-Tallapo

248 onstrating the potential effects of changing climates on wildlife species.

249 flow across species, mediated by Quaternary climate oscillations that have facilitated a dynamic of

250 no-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) shapes global climate patterns yet its sensitivity to external climate

251 ey been used to investigate the influence of climate perturbation on potentially dangerous natural ph

252 ly considered when designing or implementing climate policies.

253 e agenda to put biodiversity at the heart of climate policy.

254 he relevancy of paleoclimate information for climate prediction and discuss the prospects for emergin

255 n Modeling System (ROMS) to downscale global climate predictions across all Representative Concentrat

256 ssible to provide more reliable and accurate climate projections.

257 hropocene and other eras of rapidly changing climates, rates of change of ecological systems can be d

258 We report evidence from stalagmite climate records indicating a major decrease of monsoon r

259 ersity and multifunctionality, how different climate regimes alter the stability and functions of the

260 no mold homes were significant for all three climate regions considered.

261 ese Mediterranean-like regions, future hydro-climate-related impacts will be substantially modulated

262 c response, its implications on global-scale climate remains elusive in current ESMs.

263 and can inform genomics-enabled breeding for climate-resilient cereals.

264 r estimate that, under a 'business-as-usual' climate scenario, earlier spring arrival will enhance NP

265 projected for any other region under either climate scenario.

266 We find that Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity (ECS) was indeed higher during the w

267 t variable for adequately characterizing the climate sensitivity of cooling load, and that near-surfa

268 O(2) Oligocene world (~300 to 700 ppm), warm climates similar to those of the late Eocene continued w

269 Climate simulation-based scenarios are routinely used to

270 Until recently, ensembles of coupled climate simulations producing temporal dynamics of clima

271 orld endanger the functioning of ecosystems, climate stability, and conservation of biodiversity.

272 The dramatic reorganization of the Asian climate system coincident with Oi-1 was, thus, a respons

273 tions appears to reflect the response of the climate system to both anthropogenic and natural forcing

274 ly to internal or natural variability of the climate system.

275 e cycles, and natural events external to the climate system.

276 ential to drive more ambitious action toward climate targets than governments, thus driving the neces

277 on of oceans and the atmosphere and thus the climate, the microbial world is bound to change and adap

278 counting approach, GHG metric, time horizon, climate threshold, global emissions budget calculation m

279 romotion and delay of flowering in different climates to balance survival and, through a post-vernali

280 ies, we show that when dispersal ability and climate tolerance are restricted, microclimatic variatio

281 y diverse western US, using data on observed climate trends from 1948 to 2014 to highlight emerging p

282 , statistical associations with 20th century climate trends, and whether advance rates match climate

283 case count data, to investigate the role of climate, urbanization and variation in interventions.

284 ge recovery in Beijing within the context of climate variability and other policies.

285 mospheric mode that controls winter European climate variability because its strength and phase deter

286 n agreement with multidecadal North Atlantic climate variability derived from independent proxies.

287 rs-climate heterogeneity, collinearity among climate variables, and spatial scale-interact to shape t

288 The climate varies due to human activity, natural climate cy

289 her g(sn) may arise in genotypes from hotter climates via increased SD.

290 will likely take far longer (centuries) than climate warming (decades), so in the short-term, tree re

291 Climate warming and landscape conversion may reduce the

292 Climate warming is causing a shift in biological communi

293 Resilience to environmental stressors due to climate warming is influenced by local adaptations, incl

294 aining the capacity for future P loading and climate warming to drive cyanobacterial growth.

295 Species responses often lag behind climate warming, but the reasons for such lags remain la

296 esistance from residents than 3 degrees C of climate warming.

297 tablish in newly available habitat following climate warming.

298 osition of this vast C bank could accelerate climate warming; however, the likelihood of this outcome

299 bitats proved more susceptible to changes in climate, with hotter and drier periods associated with g

300 s were consistent across ecosystem types and climate zones, with local characteristics explaining muc