ライフサイエンスコーパス: coaching

1 (2) scorecard alone, and (3) scorecard plus coaching.

2 ining program that included weekly telephone coaching.

3 essions at home with weekly, telephone-based coaching.

4 thin the actual practice environment such as coaching.

5 ting application of all 4 core principles of coaching.

6 pport was augmented by individualized family coaching.

7 egularity in breathing was assisted by audio coaching.

8 cise app, fitness tracker, and online health coaching.

9 ing feedback control performance in athletic coaching.

10 ge and SDM only when accompanied by decision coaching.

11 data with personalized, telephonic lifestyle coaching.

12 predisposition on the response to lifestyle coaching.

13 cluding proactive team management and skills coaching.

14 per unit time (63.0 vs 102.7 per hour) while coaching.

15 calls during weeks 5-8), extended telephone coaching (12 calls during weeks 5-16), or no coaching (c

16 Of 262 topics of interest identified during coaching, 158 (60.3%) were QPL related; 20 (12.7%) addre

17 mal response received either brief telephone coaching (3 calls during weeks 5-8), extended telephone

18 aching vs control (mean [SD] WL for extended coaching, -5.5% [6.7%]; mean [SD] WL for control, -3.9%

19 ded coaching, 63 participants [48.1%]; brief coaching, 58 participants [45.9%]; control, 38 participa

20 or achievement of 5% WL or greater (extended coaching, 63 participants [48.1%]; brief coaching, 58 pa

21 Implementation of VL-assisted coaching achieved a high level of adherence across the P

22 eb-based self-care support and communication coaching added to SxQOL screening reduced symptom distre

23 The safe space of intentional coaching allowed participants to practice vulnerability

24 n data restricted to the period of intensive coaching and among patients not referred out of the faci

25 (1) TLC comprising intensive telephone coaching and combination nicotine replacement therapy fo

26 o Transplant (YPT), an individually tailored coaching and education program delivered at 4 time point

27 and continues, requiring lasting mentorship, coaching and leadership development, including individua

28 Coaching and message framing varied by group.

29 ersonalized risk-reduction goals with health coaching and nurse visits) or to a health education cont

30 is, and staff-patient relationships, through coaching and partnership.

31 Conclusion A combined coaching and QPL intervention was effective to help pati

32 Interventions such as coaching and skills workshops incorporating video review

33 s 2.1 +/- 0.62 kg and 4.9 +/- 0.63 kg in the coaching and tracking groups, respectively.

34 rved between the use of the SDM tool without coaching and usual care.

35 ntervention group, 52 participants underwent coaching and were included in the analysis.

36 ponents, including automated self-management coaching and/or nurse practitioner (NP) follow-up.

37 he SDM tool, 113 receiving the SDM tool with coaching, and 136 receiving the tool without coaching we

38 used patient-centered care, self-management, coaching, and a behavior change wheel as lenses through

39 dividual therapy, skills training, telephone coaching, and a therapist consultation team, and little

40 ded coaching would be greater than for brief coaching, and both extended and brief coaching would be

41 examining the role of extensive counseling, coaching, and instruction on FM use by adults.

42 ion for the younger generations, mentorship, coaching, and more active engagement by male and female

43 mes: modality, personalization, pretraining, coaching, and self-explanation.

44 ck, mentorship, process improvement training/coaching, and targeted-implementation toolkits.

45 ce of computer cognitive exercises, strategy coaching, and teaching of coping and compensatory strate

46 screening, targeted education, communication coaching, and the opportunity to track/graph SxQOL over

47 but not control parents attended individual coaching appointments to receive linguistic feedback, li

48 it may be worthwhile to assess a redesigned coaching approach prompting long-term behavioral change

49 s ratio, 2.28 [95% CI, 1.15-4.53]) and CDS + coaching arm (adjusted odds ratio, 2.60 [95% CI, 1.25-5.

50 eight change was -2.51 (0.73) kg in the peer coaching arm and -0.79 (0.48) kg in the EUC arm, but the

51 ement program was 28.68% (5.37%) in the peer coaching arm and 13.32% (3.38%) in the EUC arm (differen

52 Patients in the peer coaching arm completed a tablet-based, goal-setting tool

53 The CDS + coaching arm had a smaller magnitude of effect (-0.34 [9

54 f body weight was 16.68% (0.47%) in the peer coaching arm vs 5.50% (0.32%) in the EUC arm (difference

55 cal activity counseling (CDS arm, 45%; CDS + coaching arm, 25%; P < .001 compared with usual care arm

56 Participants in this study viewed coaching as the way to improve the culture of surgery.

57 Patients receiving the SDM tool + coaching, as compared with usual care, demonstrated high

58 the child's bedroom, using (1) motivational coaching at home and by phone, (2) mailed educational ma

59 rdiac rehabilitation with telemonitoring and coaching based on motivational interviewing was used to

60 ffect of the BetterBirth program, an 8-month coaching-based implementation of the Safe Childbirth Che

61 We did a post-hoc analysis of the coaching-based implementation of the WHO Safe Childbirth

62 A coaching-based implementation of the WHO Safe Childbirth

63 tices was higher in facilities that used the coaching-based WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist program tha

64 udy was to identify examples of naturalistic coaching behavior among practicing surgeons operating to

65 rating room, numerous examples of unprompted coaching behavior were identified that target intraopera

66 Surgeons received expert coaching between 2 trials.

67 rvention group subjects received video-based coaching by a surgeon, utilizing an adaptation of the GR

68 al stewardship was delivered using in-person coaching by pharmacists and physicians three to five tim

69 Monthly health-coaching calls (5-10 minutes' duration) focused on goal-

70 er ConTxt only (n = 101), ConTxt plus health-coaching calls (n = 96), or standard print materials on

71 Differences between ConTxt plus health-coaching calls and ConTxt only were not significant (-1.

72 ion team using toolkit resources, along with coaching calls and engagement of key stakeholders.

73 icantly different between ConTxt plus health-coaching calls and the control group (-3.0 [-4.99 to -1.

74 sponded more favorably to ConTxt plus health-coaching calls than English speakers (Spanish contrast:

75 rompt dyadic actions to meet diabetes goals, coaching calls to help dyads prepare for primary care vi

76 th close outpatient follow-up and subsequent coaching calls to improve postdischarge care and avoid s

77 olved 3 months of biweekly physical activity coaching calls.

78 or in combination with brief, monthly health-coaching calls.

79 -3.63 (-5.05 to -2.81) in ConTxt plus health-coaching calls.

80 Results show AI coaching can effectively teach performance driving skill

81 This study evaluates whether video-based coaching can enhance laparoscopic surgical skills perfor

82 tools (tracking group) versus EHR tools plus coaching (coaching group).

83 k engagement were observed after 3 months of coaching compared with no intervention.

84 P management protocol, or diet and lifestyle coaching consisting of photographs, stories, and recipes

85 Intervention participants received 10 health coaching contacts, sitting reduction goals, and a standi

86 eedback, peer learning support) and surgical coaching content (technical skills, nontechnical skills)

87 aching principles were cross-referenced with coaching content; c-coefficient measured the strength of

88 s report that the safe spaces of intentional coaching contributed to their ideas about how surgeons,

89 and brief coaching would be greater than no coaching (control).

90 coaching (12 calls during weeks 5-16), or no coaching (control).

91 onal training (CT) or comprehensive surgical coaching (CSC).

92 In 5 practices randomized to CDS + coaching, decision support was augmented by individualiz

93 ssions on child behavior management, emotion coaching, dialogic reading, and interactive play.

94 s with young children, weekly virtual health coaching did not detectably improve family health and re

95 After 6 months of professional coaching, emotional exhaustion decreased in the interven

96 al laparoscopic skills training, video-based coaching enhanced the quality of laparoscopic surgical p

97 Comprehensive surgical coaching enhances surgical training and results in skill

98 Overall, 44 unique coaching examples were identified in 10 operations.

99 Overall, 326 coaching examples were identified, demonstrating applica

100 this performance measure is associated with coaching experience across all teams in the National Bas

101 elieved to be a positive association between coaching experience and effective use of team timeouts.

102 timeout factor is negatively associated with coaching experience.

103 Older adults receiving dietary coaching experienced a low incidence of major depressive

104 Coaching faces unique challenges in the context of a pow

105 the intervention group received peer health coaching for 12 months with mandatory and optional educa

106 and twice-monthly telephone-based self-care coaching for 3 months.

107 g an adaptive intervention, the provision of coaching for individuals with suboptimal response improv

108 S: This qualitative analysis of the Surgical Coaching for Operative Performance Enhancement (SCOPE) p

109 Through the Surgical Coaching for Operative Performance Enhancement (SCOPE) p

110 persistent asthma with telephone-based peer coaching for parents reduced asthma impairment and risk

111 cluded oncologist communication training and coaching for patients with advanced cancer was effective

112 que, thus the underpinning principles of the coaching framework may not be the only key aspect govern

113 ucted by the operative attending; although a coaching framework was provided, participants determined

114 re their procedure, with or without decision coaching from a trained nurse.

115 Organization physicians who volunteered for coaching from August 5 through December 1, 2021.

116 Phase 2 incorporated peer coaching from cancer genetics experts for medical oncolo

117 Prominent coaching gaps-constructive feedback and peer learning su

118 For every pound 1 invested, lifestyle coaching generated social values ranging from pound 4.12

119 ent; (2) 6 months telephone-based education, coaching, goal setting, and support for evidence-based r

120 ng group (89 participants [65.9%]) and brief coaching group (77 participants [58.5%]) vs control grou

121 r WL at 4 months was greater in the extended coaching group (89 participants [65.9%]) and brief coach

122 ack, and contact with a coach) or a light PA coaching group (including an activity tracker, a fixed s

123 At 24 months, 65% of participants in the coaching group and 50% in the tracking group maintained

124 of life improved significantly in the health coaching group compared with the control group at 6 and

125 The coaching group received 24 months of personalized coachi

126 COPD-related rehospitalization in the health coaching group were 7.5% (P = 0.01), 11.0% (P = 0.02), 1

127 cking group) versus EHR tools plus coaching (coaching group).

128 Parents in the enhanced primary care plus coaching group, but not in the enhanced care alone group

129 In the enhanced primary care plus coaching group, the adjusted mean (SD) BMI z score was 1

130 28) higher in the enhanced primary care plus coaching group.

131 NP follow-up was superior to self-management coaching (group 1 vs group 3, 1.29 [95% CI, 0.72-1.86];

132 no difference between the 2 self-management coaching groups (-0.52 [95% CI, -1.09 to 0.05]; P = .07)

133 er rates were similar for the full and light coaching groups at 12 months (19% and 22%, respectively)

134 L, -4.9% [6.1%]).Both the brief and extended coaching groups watched more lessons and self-monitored

135 ized to the full (n = 77) and light (n = 73) coaching groups.

136 at implemented the SCC with medium-intensity coaching had an increased rate of application for 5 of 3

137 The SDM tool (with or without coaching) had no impact on stent selection or concordanc

138 However, the SDM tool (with or without coaching) had no impact on stent selection or concordanc

139 Coaching has been successfully used in various industrie

140 lowed by 4 months of individual teaching and coaching (home visits and telephone calls).

141 health worker-led home intervention (health coaching, home BP monitoring, and BP audit and feedback)

142 based on established principles of effective coaching: (i) self-identified goals, (ii) collaborative

143 PCPs were randomized to either the peer coaching (ie, Peer-Assisted Lifestyle) intervention or E

144 tudy was to determine whether individualized coaching improved surgical technical skill in the operat

145 ess feedback including data and peer-to-peer coaching improves resident performance, and results in a

146 so describe why lifestyle interventions like coaching in healthy dietary practices may hold promise a

147 ial for older adults, the authors found that coaching in healthy dietary practices was potentially ef

148 and included a personalized action plan and coaching in proper use of asthma inhalers.

149 zed 1:1 to a personalized schedule of online coaching in two to four modules (targeting physical acti

150 Coaching included education, problem solving, and goal s

151 implementation recommendations for surgical coaching, including how to optimize coach-coachee relati

152 Finally, behavioral coaching informed by personal data helped participants t

153 rvivors were randomly assigned to the health coaching intervention (11 theory-based telephone-deliver

154 articipants were randomized to either a full coaching intervention (including an activity tracker and

155 LvL UP is a smartphone-based lifestyle coaching intervention aimed at improving health behaviou

156 enrolled, 67 were randomly allocated to the coaching intervention and 71 to the control group.

157 ntrolled trial to determine whether a parent coaching intervention delivered when the infants are 6,

158 cal trial, a low- to moderate-intensity peer-coaching intervention did not result in greater weight l

159 seling, a brief individualized education and coaching intervention for outpatients with cancer-relate

160 lop and evaluate a postoperative video-based coaching intervention for residents.

161 s randomized clinical trial, a communication coaching intervention improved 2 key communication behav

162 udy confirming the effectiveness of a health coaching intervention in achieving and sustaining clinic

163 he effect of an individualized education and coaching intervention on pain outcomes and pain-related

164 Conclusions: A full coaching intervention providing dynamic individualized s

165 e cardiologists were randomized to receive a coaching intervention that involved three 1:1 sessions,

166 ffectiveness of a 12-month fully deployed PA coaching intervention to improve and maintain PA in pati

167 A CHW-led health coaching intervention was effective in achieving BP cont

168 cts on PA at 12 months compared with a light coaching intervention.

169 program continued for up to 1 year after the coaching intervention.

170 in patients with COPD, compared with a light coaching intervention.

171 the first oncologist visit following patient coaching (intervention group) or enrollment (control).

172 PA coaching interventions are effective to improve PA in th

173 Mindfulness-based and professional coaching interventions were generally more than 4 weeks

174 a 1-day conference, and 1 year of quarterly coaching interview

175 Secondary outcomes were parental emotion coaching, involvement in child reading and play, and par

176 Sponsorship, distinct from mentorship or coaching, involves advancing the careers of individuals

177 Surgical coaching is a developing strategy for improving surgeons

178 Video-based coaching is a feasible method of maximizing performance

179 Video-based coaching is a novel and feasible modality for supplement

180 Peer surgical coaching is a promising approach for continuing professi

181 ining using digital technology and telephone coaching is a promising public health strategy for provi

182 Coaching is an effective tool that seeks personal reflec

183 sclosure education, ensuring that disclosure coaching is available at all times, and providing emotio

184 Surgical coaching is maturing as a tangible strategy for surgeons

185 re limited for practicing surgeons; surgical coaching is one strategy to address this need.

186 rnout in resident physicians, yet individual coaching is resource intensive and infeasible for many t

187 However, if coaching is to be a successful strategy for continuing p

188 enting intervention with real-time therapist coaching led to significant and maintained improvements

189 Drawing on executive coaching literature, a 3-part framework was developed to

190 Sports are replete with strategies, yet coaching lore often emphasizes 'quieting the mind', 'tru

191 ive evaluation demonstrates that video-based coaching may be particularly useful for teaching higher-

192 Professional coaching may improve well-being, but generalizable evide

193 Medium-intensity coaching may not be sufficient to increase uptake of the

194 Health coaching may represent a feasible and possibly effective

195 ol, -3.9% [7.4%]; P = .03) but not for brief coaching (mean [SD] WL, -4.9% [6.1%]).Both the brief and

196 am-based self-directed videos, handouts, and coaching messages via an online platform or US mail for

197 For instance, coaching methodologies that rely on reinforcement or 're

198 the GROW (Goals, Reality, Options, Wrap-up) coaching model.

199 ng the coaching session were summarized from coaching notes; one office visit after the coaching sess

200 consisted of opinion-leader-led training and coaching of front-line health workers, a point-of-care C

201 leverages videoconferencing to provide live coaching of home-based caregiver-child interactions.

202 Careful monitoring and coaching of patients receiving neurotoxic chemotherapy f

203 More intensive direct coaching of supporters, or targeting patients with less

204 o different tasks, assistive technology, and coaching offered during the first 3 months after injury.

205 have examined the effectiveness of lifestyle coaching on clinical outcomes, however, little is known

206 w best to assess the effect of communication coaching on patient perceptions of care and clinical out

207 Of the 4 principles of surgical coaching, only self-identified goals and collaborative a

208 plied in multitude of sports for recruiting, coaching, opponent, self-analysis etc.

209 tional resources, and telephone-based health coaching over 6 months.

210 you are so good at so much, why bother [with coaching]?" P009), worry about appearing incompetent ("I

211 Eleven introductory 1-hour meetings between coaching pairs participating in a statewide surgical coa

212 Coaching pairs underwent training and were instructed to

213 who reported excellent first sessions, had a coaching partner in the same clinical specialty, and wer

214 For the scorecard plus coaching period, significantly more residents prescribed

215 Potential coaching pitfalls are identified that could interfere wi

216 r (1) motivational interviewing-based health coaching plus a written action plan for exacerbations (t

217 Antimicrobial stewardship in ICUs with coaching plus audit and feedback is associated with sust

218 sset with consumption support, training, and coaching plus savings encouragement and health education

219 on abstract concepts that underlie effective coaching practices in other fields.

220 oded using an existing framework of surgical coaching principles (self-identified goals, collaborativ

221 Coaching principles were cross-referenced with coaching

222 Coaching principles were cross-referenced with intraoper

223 es and among a mixture of HCPs, professional coaching probably reduces burnout among physicians, part

224 lign role and process expectations about the coaching process, to establish rapport, and to cultivate

225 ram combining multi-omic data with lifestyle coaching produces clinically meaningful improvements, an

226 The authors describe the dietary coaching program (highlighted in a case example) as well

227 interviews of surgeons who participated in a coaching program and demonstrate how their narratives ch

228 antly in the year after cessation of the SEE coaching program but remained significantly higher than

229 Participation in a coaching program challenged how surgeons thought of them

230 discussed the ways that participation in the coaching program initially conflicted with their identit

231 essing the impact of a personalized glaucoma coaching program on medication adherence.

232 PRISM is a brief, skills-based coaching program targeting 4 resilience resources (stres

233 pairs participating in a statewide surgical coaching program were audiorecorded, transcribed, and co

234 lf-awareness who may benefit from a surgical coaching program.

235 A 4-month, web-based, group coaching program.

236 ric surgeons at the end of a 2-year surgical coaching program.

237 ly based strategies to inform other surgical coaching programs are provided.

238 To develop peer coaching programs that integrate with surgical culture,

239 Participants expressed 3 main concerns about coaching: questioning the value of technical improvement

240 management training with home visiting, peer coaching, reading tutoring, and classroom social-emotion

241 this randomized clinical trial, professional coaching reduced emotional exhaustion and impostor syndr

242 unterproductive activities for building peer-coaching relationships in the surgical context to inform

243 r surgical coaches to develop effective peer-coaching relationships with their coachees.

244 Executive coaching research suggests that effective coaches first

245 t loss of at least 5%, use of EHR tools plus coaching resulted in less weight regain than EHR tools a

246 Self-care coaching resulted in significantly greater improvement i

247 ideo formed the basis of a 1-hour one-on-one coaching session conducted by the operative attending; a

248 Patient-supporter dyads received a health coaching session focused on dyadic information sharing a

249 ived a previsit individualized communication coaching session that incorporated a QPL.

250 t intervention component, a previsit patient coaching session that used a question prompt list (QPL).

251 ved a 20-minute individualized education and coaching session to increase knowledge of pain self-mana

252 ting how likely they were to recommend their coaching session to others, with 9 to 10 indicating prom

253 m coaching notes; one office visit after the coaching session was audio recorded, transcribed, and an

254 f interest identified by patients during the coaching session were summarized from coaching notes; on

255 ideo recorded before the first SEE in-person coaching session, which included teaching eye drop insti

256 consultation, structured PC telehealth nurse coaching sessions (once per week for six sessions), and

257 (11 theory-based telephone-delivered health coaching sessions delivered over 6 months focusing on ph

258 Participants were randomized to 6 coaching sessions facilitated by a peer coach over 3 mon

259 ngs with 30-minute individualized behavioral coaching sessions over 6 months.

260 Teaching in the video-based coaching sessions was more resident centered; attendings

261 were compared with those in the video-based coaching sessions with respect to initiator, content, an

262 to receive three structured weekly telephone coaching sessions, monthly follow-up, and a bereavement

263 t training and were instructed to complete 3 coaching sessions-consisting of preoperative goal settin

264 by staff and nine 20-minute behavior change coaching sessions.

265 chee relationships and facilitate productive coaching sessions.

266 ed in the operating room and the video-based coaching sessions; iterative inductive coding, followed

267 interventions using Fitbit and personalized coaching showed promise but require further validation w

268 How to cultivate effective coaching skills among practicing surgeons is uncertain.

269 ailable for surgeons seeking to develop peer-coaching skills.

270 weight loss programme delivered by community coaching staff in 12 sessions held every week.

271 95% CI, 0.04-0.53); parents' use of emotion-coaching strategies, including feelings of uncertainty o

272 Differences in coaching style were associated with differences in IV re

273 rceived differences in supportive vs abusive coaching styles (eg, athlete autonomy, team culture, and

274 s can help practicing surgeons use effective coaching techniques to guide their peers' performance im

275 ved 1 in-person and up to 12 individual peer-coaching telephone sessions over 1 year.

276 ing group received 24 months of personalized coaching through the EHR patient portal, with 24 schedul

277 nhanced-support group were made eligible for coaching through the lowering of cutoff points for predi

278 rompt lists and individualized communication coaching to identify issues to address during an upcomin

279 Many professions utilize coaching to improve performance.

280 ng evidence supports the use of professional coaching to reduce burnout in resident physicians, yet i

281 dations, which can be facilitated by regular coaching to support behavioral changes.

282 ation plus personalized education and health coaching (treatment) or care navigation plus written edu

283 lus contextually tailored, individual health coaching (twice-weekly text messages and telephone or vi

284 lly provided psychosocial support and health coaching, using motivational interviewing, goal-setting,

285 pproach, combining automated health literacy coaching via conversational agent with digital tools suc

286 months was significantly higher in extended coaching vs control (mean [SD] WL for extended coaching,

287 After 3 months, weekly coaching was concluded, and on-demand coaching was initi

288 In this pilot randomized clinical trial, coaching was feasible and acceptable and had a large eff

289 weekly coaching was concluded, and on-demand coaching was initiated for relapse prevention; patients

290 Among physicians, professional coaching was probably effective in reducing some aspects

291 coaching, and 136 receiving the tool without coaching were interviewed.

292 t losing autonomy ("To me that would be real coaching where it's self-identified, I'm motivated, I fi

293 Models compared the wearable feedback and coaching with advice and self-monitoring with each contr

294 erapy and received automated self-management coaching with an activity tracker without (group 1) and

295 y supervised facility, HBCR relies on remote coaching with indirect exercise supervision and is provi

296 ational intervention that incorporates nurse coaching within the framework of self-care can improve t

297 82% completion rate), 90% rated the Surgical Coaching Workshop "good" or "excellent." CONCLUSIONS: Sh

298 All attended a 3-hour Surgical Coaching Workshop-developed using evidence from the fiel

299 hypotheses for WL were that WL for extended coaching would be greater than for brief coaching, and b

300 brief coaching, and both extended and brief coaching would be greater than no coaching (control).