ライフサイエンスコーパス: coefficient of variation

1 and high repeatability as low as 10% in CoV (Coefficient of Variation).

2 r liver transplantation and expressed as the coefficient of variation.

3 fied with the normalized optical density and coefficient of variation.

4 e intraclass correlation coefficient and the coefficient of variation.

5 ntraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and coefficient of variation.

6 detection efficiency by 35% with an improved coefficient of variation.

7 SBP related to postural change, expressed as coefficient of variation.

8 rogeneity was assessed by using the regional coefficient of variation.

9 ratch density, namely standard deviation and coefficient of variation.

10 w total expression and with large biological coefficient of variation.

11 4 log magnitude and reproducibility of <10% coefficient of variation.

12 the least sensitive individual), with a 26% coefficient of variation.

13 consistency with 8% intra- and 12% interday coefficient of variations.

14 es, intraclass correlation coefficients, and coefficients of variation.

15 educed in baskets compared to single crudes (coefficient of variation = 0.2 for a typical basket when

16 The "DARQ" assay is highly reproducible (coefficient of variation ~0.8-0.7%) and rapid (5 min), a

17 rae per specimen (0.76 bacilli per reaction; coefficient of variation, 0.65%-2.44%) and 122 M. leprom

18 good within-session baseline repeatability (coefficient of variation, 0.8%-5.2%; intraclass correlat

19 in turnover rates among rats was low (median coefficient of variation: 0.09).

20 uted, on average, 15% to the total TV sales (coefficient of variation: 0.21).

21 (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.986, coefficient of variation = 1.11).

22 ows pronounced population-based variability (coefficient of variation 102.9%).

23 mong surgeons performing the same procedure (coefficient of variation, 118.4% for colorectal, 89.0% f

24 recovery values in the range of 72.3-103.2%, coefficients of variation 12%, and detection limits in t

25 tion, 0.89 +/- 0.01) and renal segmentation (coefficient of variation = 12.6%; ICC = 0.86) were consi

26 within-subject test-retest reliability (mean coefficient of variation, 13% in samples collected 8-11

27 in (range in quality 35-66% [16/46-232/350]; coefficient of variation 18.2).

28 variation <2%), followed by time-domain OCT (coefficient of variation 2%-2.9%), scanning laser polari

29 iation 2%-2.9%), scanning laser polarimetry (coefficient of variation 2.6%-4.5%), and confocal scanni

30 tent amplification of the SARS-CoV-2 target (coefficient of variation = 2.95%) using the Abbott RealT

31 nd major polyunsaturates were more constant (coefficient of variation = 21%, 26% and 4% compared to 6

32 ment was excellent for Rvol(FLOW) (r = 0.95, coefficient of variation = 27%) and moderate for Rvol(VA

33 py allowed the precise copper determination (coefficient of variation = 3.1%, n = 10) and enhanced de

34 variation, 46.1%) for lotion; and 1.8 ng/mL (coefficient of variation, 32.1%).

35 ocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy rim area (coefficient of variation 4.2%-7.6%).

36 pp during home 6MWTs were highly repeatable (coefficient of variation =4.6%) and correlated with in-c

37 was extremely variable between individuals (coefficients of variation, 41.4% to 73.6%).

38 of variation, 77.3%) for spray 2; 4.3 ng/mL (coefficient of variation, 46.1%) for lotion; and 1.8 ng/

39 of age and was consistent across the sites (coefficient of variation = 56.3%).

40 27%) and moderate for Rvol(VALVE) (r = 0.72, coefficient of variation = 57%).

41 AUCtau of elvitegravir was 33 814 ng x h/mL (coefficient of variation 58%), and the mean AUClast of t

42 aximum plasma concentrations were 4.0 ng/mL (coefficient of variation, 6.9%) for spray 1; 3.4 ng/mL (

43 wever, DeltaRnet showed a lower intersubject coefficient of variation (64%) than all of the other tes

44 The imprecision of the LPT was low (coefficient of variation 7.2%).

45 rs old but was more geographically variable (coefficient of variation = 71.5%).

46 of variation, 6.9%) for spray 1; 3.4 ng/mL (coefficient of variation, 77.3%) for spray 2; 4.3 ng/mL

47 el for 96% of measures) and reproducibility (coefficient of variation 8.56%) in real-time (30s) over

48 rics (intraclass correlation, 0.80 +/- 0.07; coefficient of variation, 9% +/- 3).

49 y, hsa-miR-1271-5p and hsa-miR-182-5p showed coefficients of variation above 100% indicating a strong

50 milar physiological responses and expression coefficients of variation across experiments masked high

51 ons varies by as little as five per cent (by coefficient of variation) across a wide range of annual

52 The intersubject coefficients of variation after PBMC (43%) and IMC (42%)

53 assessed by using intraclass correlation and coefficient of variation analysis.

54 We observed that both the coefficient of variation and autocorrelation increased b

55 were associated with reintubation, including coefficient of variation and autocorrelation of the resp

56 ive breaths and calculate variability terms, coefficient of variation and autocorrelation, in commonl

57 ata with superimposed noise provided smaller coefficient of variation and higher contrast-to-noise ra

58 ge and 9 anatomic sectors by calculating the coefficient of variation and intraclass correlation coef

59 cRn in tissue matrices, typically within 20% coefficient of variation and relative error.

60 ed on calibrator samples to characterize the coefficient of variation and signal-over-background inte

61 that measures based on population skewness, coefficient of variation and synchrony are effective pro

62 Within-examination coefficients of variation and Bland-Altman analyses were

63 Coefficients of variation and intraclass correlation coe

64 (under the constraint of a certain rate and coefficient of variation) and exemplify its ability to a

65 ptable accuracy (92%-100%), precision (2%-6% coefficient of variation), and linearity (mean correlati

66 lycemia, glucose variability, as measured by coefficient of variation, and hypoglycemia (p for trend

67 baseline in endothelial cell density (ECD), coefficient of variation, and percentage of hexagonal ce

68 earson correlation, Cohen kappa measurement, coefficient of variation, and SD.

69 as evidenced by the greater amplitude, lower coefficient of variation, and shorter latency of motor e

70 s were evaluated by using extremal quotient, coefficient of variation, and systematic component of va

71 y: SD, average successive variability (ASV), coefficient of variation, and variation independent of m

72 Assay coefficients of variation are comparable with other micr

73 ammaDry showed a high inter- and intra-assay coefficient of variation at 10 min (28.4% and 24.7%, res

74 n vary over an order of magnitude, and large coefficients of variation at each timepoint measurement

75 cal replicates (90% of quantified sites with coefficient of variation below 11%).

76 g Glx (Glu+Gln), tNAA (NAA+NAAG), mI all had coefficient of variations between 9-25%.

77 accuracy of the quantification and observed coefficients of variation between replicates of the same

78 2%, and the best standard filter reduced the coefficient of variation by 88%.

79 Results: The best CNN reduced the coefficient of variation by, on average, 92%, and the be

80 tric mean concentrations (GMCs) (% geometric coefficient of variation), calibrated against WHO-1 and

81 Bland-Altman analysis of agreement and coefficient of variation comparisons were undertaken.

82 vital rates, but also between their temporal coefficients of variation, correlations and elasticities

83 take between patients was analyzed using the coefficient of variation (COV%).

84 ity and reproducibility were assessed by the coefficient of variation (CoV) and intraclass correlatio

85 cient was used to assess correlation between coefficient of variation (CoV) and the year the study st

86 The average coefficient of variation (COV) in the differences betwee

87 The coefficient of variation (COV) of each feature across di

88 Gene stability ranking was assessed using coefficient of variation (CoV), GeNorm and NormFinder.

89 inter-rater assessment), by calculating the coefficient of variation (COV).

90 variability was calculated using percentage coefficient of variation (COV).

91 ween-individual variability was evaluated by coefficient of variation (COV).

92 tched control individuals (mean differences [coefficient of variation (COV)]: 0.98 mm2 [9.2%]; P = .0

93 Coefficients of variation (CoV) for DTI parameters were

94 pact of system variables on precision (using coefficient of variation, COV), including acquisition wa

95 s, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variation, critical percentage difference

96 The intra- and inter-run precision (coefficient of variation (CV%)) was within 11.5% and 10.

97 rregularity by calculating the square of the coefficient of variation (CV(2)) in interspike intervals

98 es (10 muL) were detected with less than 10% coefficient of variation (CV) across a range from nearly

99 tion (Sw), intrasubject precision (1.96xSw), coefficient of variation (CV) and intraclass correlation

100 ficant difference (p = 0.000012) in the mean coefficient of variation (CV) between the two groups wit

101 ellent retention time repeatability with <1% coefficient of variation (CV) for 96% of analyzed peaks.

102 The coefficient of variation (CV) for intra-assay imprecisio

103 3 blood trough levels available to calculate coefficient of variation (CV) from month 4 to 12, (2) gr

104 sized that the risk associated with high TAC coefficient of variation (CV) is a result of low TAC TTR

105 ry were satisfactory (73.97-119.38%), with a coefficient of variation (CV) less than 20%.

106 acrolimus variability was assessed using the coefficient of variation (CV) measured between 1 month p

107 n (SD) of 0.14 log10 copies/ml or less and a coefficient of variation (CV) of </=6.1% for each level

108 depletion, is high, with a process replicate coefficient of variation (CV) of <12%.

109 epeatability of the XyCAM RI was high with a coefficient of variation (CV) of 1.84 +/- 1.13% across b

110 o 1.5 U/g Hb; p < 0.001) and study-wise mean coefficient of variation (CV) of replicate measures (fro

111 in-flow at a droplet rate of few hertz and a coefficient of variation (CV) of up to 2% over 10000 eve

112 The coefficient of variation (CV) was 1-10% and 1-25% for in

113 lthy individuals) the median interlaboratory coefficient of variation (CV) was 7.6%, with 85% of meta

114 all peptides was 71.5 amol/muL (nM), and the coefficient of variation (CV) was less than 15% at the l

115 on (MNAD), analysis of variance (ANOVA), and coefficient of variation (CV) were used for analysis.

116 Intraclass correlation (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CV) were used for the reliabil

117 nd accurate ( R(2) > 0.99) and reproducible (coefficient of variation (CV)) < 25%, n = 6) quantitatio

118 sing within-subject standard deviation (SW), coefficient of variation (CV), and intraclass correlatio

119 Repeatability was assessed as coefficient of variation (CV), and Pearson's correlation

120 The EC density, coefficient of variation (CV), and percent hexagonal cel

121 eparation for one of the peptides was </=13% coefficient of variation (CV).

122 evaluated by using the extremal quotient and coefficient of variation (CV).

123 everity diagnosis related groups measured as coefficient of variation (CV); and care costs and compos

124 In this study, we compared coefficient of variation (CV, the ratio of the standard

125 Overall, we find a drop size coefficient of variation (CV; i.e., polydispersity) of a

126 Using intra-individual coefficients of variation (CV%), patients were classifie

127 s and quantitation limits were achieved, and coefficients of variation (CV) for repeatability and rep

128 old (CT) values for B. pertussis samples had coefficients of variation (CV) ranging from 10% to 28%.

129 Within and between batches coefficients of variation (CV) were 2.5% and 3.2% respec

130 Regional PBV and PBV coefficients of variation (CV), a measure of spatial blo

131 analysis to obtain weighted mean and percent coefficient of variation (%CV) values.

132 okines varied on a continuum from minimally (coefficient of variation [CV] <= 50%) to moderately vari

133 u for elvitegravir was 23 840 ng x h per mL (coefficient of variation [CV] 25.5%), and the mean AUCla

134 and showed intra-assay heterogeneity (E1L3N coefficient of variation [CV], 6.75%-75.24%; SP142 CV, 1

135 aximum plasma concentrations were 7.1 ng/mL (coefficient of variation [CV], 73.9%) for lotion, 3.5 ng

136 recision was good for oxalate and glycolate (coefficients of variation [CV] were <6.3% and <4.2% for

137 y lower when expressed on a leaf mass basis (coefficient of variation, CV = 36%) than when expressed

138 April body mass showed no long-term trend (coefficient of variation, CV = 8.8%) and was higher foll

139 through consistency in adjusted R(2) (i.e., coefficient of variation, CV) and in regression coeffici

140 ity of chromatographic retention time (<0.3% coefficient of variation, CV) and protein quantification

141 rall precision expressed as root-mean-square coefficient of variation (CVRMS) improved with increasin

142 The within and between-batch coefficient of variations (CVs) of present biosensor wer

143 ranging from 93% to 105%, and precision with coefficients of variation (CVs) < 15%.

144 nalyzed by using between- and within-subject coefficients of variation (CVs) and analysis of variance

145 fat, lung, and IT) were assessed by means of coefficients of variation (CVs) calculated across the 3

146 The comparison of intragroup coefficients of variation (CVs), median absolute deviati

147 By incorporating coefficient of variation estimates into a theoretical mo

148 Thus, a coefficient of variation exceeding 1 is a fingerprint of

149 Coefficient of variation for CD34 cells was 2.9% and 4.8

150 oreover, the elder mother cells showed lower coefficient of variation for Pdr5p levels compared to th

151 The coefficient of variation for peaks detected in replicate

152 The coefficient of variation for quantitative BPU measuremen

153 ble in terms of fidelity and accuracy with a coefficient of variation for repeatability and reproduci

154 atability was excellent, with less than a 2% coefficient of variation for SUV(max), %ID, and CAA and

155 At the lesion level, the coefficient of variation for SUVmax, SUVmean, and SUVtot

156 on cohort demonstrated the lowest intravisit coefficient of variation for the global RNFL thickness.

157 t all bias values were < +/-0.25 mm, and the coefficients of variation for 5 replicates were <11%.

158 Intraclass correlation coefficients and coefficients of variation for assessing repeatability.

159 The average coefficients of variation for each organ for each patien

160 The range in the coefficients of variation for lymph-node harvest (0.07-0

161 ouse validation ranged from 89% to 109%, and coefficients of variation for repeatability ranged from

162 on capture and kinematic data, the means and coefficients of variation for step length, time, width a

163 The coefficients of variation for the organs across all scan

164 Coefficients of variation for ventilatory and MSNA burst

165 (LOD) of 1E-4 ng/mL (i.e. 1 pg/mL) at 7% CV (coefficient of variation) for cTnT in HS was demonstrate

166 a decline from west to east, the increase in coefficient of variation from west to east confirmed gre

167 Recoveries and coefficients of variation from fortified samples were wi

168 4%, with no individual brain region having a coefficient of variation greater than 13%.

169 Coefficient of variation greater than 30% (hazards ratio

170 variation (64%) than all of the other tests (coefficient of variation, >/=99%).

171 The coefficient of variation in 2016 is expected to be 20.3%

172 stability typically measured by empiricists (coefficient of variation in biomass) to stability measur

173 kness (CCT), endothelial cell density (ECD), coefficient of variation in cell size (CV), cell area (C

174 n the inter-researchers differences based on Coefficient of Variation in children, young and middle-a

175 ance in PC inputs also accounts for the high coefficient of variation in CN spike trains, while the b

176 eters were assessed by measuring the SUV and coefficient of variation in different regions (aorta, li

177 cinar flow heterogeneity was assessed by the coefficient of variation in flow magnitudes across all a

178 rregularity by calculating the square of the coefficient of variation in interspike intervals (CV(2))

179 variation in GPP propagated through to a 27% coefficient of variation in net biome productivity (NBP)

180 nsity or basal nuclear area, comparable with coefficient of variation in nuclear area and collagen de

181 parameters of nuclear area, nuclear density, coefficient of variation in nuclear area in the basal ep

182 ntrations ranging from 419 mug/mL (geometric coefficient of variation in percentage [CV%] 26.2) to 48

183 tilevel model, 5.19% (intraclass correlation coefficient) of variation in 14-day EOL chemotherapy was

184 r-to-sensor reproducibility characterized by coefficients of variation in the range of 3-7% across th

185 (DeltaBMD), and precision was defined as the coefficient of variation (in percentage).

186 rformance of seven EWS: the autocorrelation, coefficient of variation, index of dispersion, kurtosis,

187 The coefficient of variation, intraclass correlation coeffic

188 a on MRI, a quantitative ROI-based analysis (coefficient of variation) is also proposed.

189 ameters was evaluated as the log-transformed coefficient of variation (LCV) for one year's worth of d

190 verall standard error of less than 15% and a coefficient of variation less than 12% (n = 3) was found

191 recoveries ranged from 93.7% to 108.2% with coefficient of variations less than 16.3%.

192 y measures endogenous kinase activation with coefficients of variation less than 20%.

193 brain, with good identifiability (percentage coefficient of variation < 5%).

194 ysis, 2,377 proteins were quantified, with a coefficient of variation </=25% among technical and biol

195 etabolic features with good reproducibility (coefficient of variation <10%) compared to the targeted

196 ess was best for Fourier-domain OCT (overall coefficient of variation <2%), followed by time-domain O

197 shown to be highly reproducible (drift time coefficients of variation < 1.0% and isotopic pattern ro

198 .0 fmol/mug of total lysate protein and with coefficients of variation < 15%.

199 Acceptable precision with coefficients of variation <20% and accuracies of 100% +/

200 covery clenbuterol rates are 82.8-92.4% with coefficients of variation <9.4%.

201 Image quality was assessed via the coefficient of variation measuring nonuniformity of the

202 a for skewness, mu for median, sigma for the coefficient of variation) method to develop scores that

203 ction limit was equal to 17.5 mug L(-1), the coefficient of variation (n = 8; 100 mug L(-1)) was 2.7%

204 A coefficient of variation (n=8; 5mgL(-1)) of a 2.1% and a

205 Coefficients of variation (n=8) were estimated at 0.4% a

206 00; mean tidal volume = 6 mL/kg), with a 30% coefficient of variation (normal distribution).

207 Specifically, we prove that the coefficient of variation obtained from this distribution

208 d and known thickness masks, with an overall coefficient of variation of 0.00%.

209 below 1000 bacteria per mL, with an average coefficient of variation of 10% achieved with the develo

210 ction at ppb concentration level and average coefficient of variation of 10% were achieved with the d

211 urable from FDG PET/CT with a within-subject coefficient of variation of 10%-12%.

212 patient level variance was 0.042 kPa, with a coefficient of variation of 10.7%.

213 e between 1 and 100 mug/L and an intra-assay coefficient of variation of 11%.

214 o 0.22 muL with a standard error of 6.5% and coefficient of variation of 11.3%.

215 Reliability was demonstrated by an average coefficient of variation of 14% between all of the micro

216 n 85-115%, as well as within and between-day coefficient of variation of 2 and 14%, respectively.

217 erfusion pressure were reproducible within a coefficient of variation of 2%.

218 The reproducibility study yielded a coefficient of variation of 2.2% and intraclass correlat

219 rred within +/-20 g CO2e MJ(-1) of the mean (coefficient of variation of 20-45%), with economic model

220 with a recovery rate of 44.6 +/- 9.1% and a coefficient of variation of 20.4%.

221 ient was 0.946 (95% CI, 0.940-0.952), with a coefficient of variation of 3.2% (95% CI, 3.1%-3.3%).

222 ession repeatability of CAP was good, with a coefficient of variation of 4.5%.

223 n of the assay was evaluated, resulting in a coefficient of variation of 5-7%.

224 mean recovery was found to be 97.12% with a coefficient of variation of 6.42% (n=5); consequently, t

225 ed plasma resulting in an average interassay coefficient of variation of 7.1% and a limit of detectio

226 to protocol, tumor SUV has a within-subject coefficient of variation of approximately 10%.

227 e at any point along the PK profile within a coefficient of variation of approximately 5%.

228 mely, gamma distribution shape factors and a coefficient of variation of inter-spike interval - we sh

229 ed increase in paired-pulse ratio and in the coefficient of variation of IPSPs, consistent with decre

230 configurations each had an individual median coefficient of variation of less than 10%.

231 Most qualitative traits showed a coefficient of variation of less than 30%, and the analy

232 ncrease) to stride time variability (ie, the coefficient of variation of mean stride time).

233 esolution FTICR-MS, both in terms of m/z and coefficient of variation of peak intensities among biolo

234 We evaluated the coefficient of variation of PEF (CVpef) and the scaling

235 On average, the coefficient of variation of regional brain volumes acros

236 n; P = 0.0002), and a 15.7% reduction in the coefficient of variation of regional ventilation compare

237 Children with either low PiMax or high coefficient of variation of respiratory rate had a nearl

238 s such as age and neurologic diagnosis, both coefficient of variation of respiratory rate(p < 0.001)

239 The coefficient of variation of retinal blood flow under res

240 The coefficient of variation of the method was <6% measured

241 The study demonstrates that mean coefficient of variations of 4% were obtained even at on

242 SUVmean and SUVmax resulted in coefficients of variation of 5.6% and 6.6%, respectively

243 H broadened the action potentials, increased coefficients of variation of the interspike interval, an

244 increased the half-width and produced larger coefficients of variation of the interspike interval, su

245 The coefficients of variation of the intra-assay reproducibi

246 The coefficients of variation of the novel method did not ex

247 detection was below 0.03mug/ml and the assay coefficient of variation ranged from 0.3 to 9%.

248 od showed good repeatability; the calculated coefficients of variation ranged from 2% to 13%.

249 arameters ranged from 0.74 to 0.92, and mean coefficients of variation ranged from 3.03% to 7.45%.

250 inical specimens had standard deviations and coefficients of variation ranging from 0.87 to 1.86 and

251 t fitting metric for variability signals was coefficient of variation (rather than SD or variance), b

252 on status (Q = 16.95, p < .001) due to lower coefficient of variation ratio (CVR) in medication-naive

253 Variability ratio (VR) and coefficient of variation ratio (CVR) were used to quanti

254 d using the log variability ratio (lnVR) and coefficient of variation ratio (CVR)).

255 as indexed by the variability ratio (VR) and coefficient of variation ratio (CVR).

256 ebo-treated individuals was quantified using coefficient of variation ratio (CVR).

257 quantified using variability ratio (VR) and coefficient of variation ratio.

258 The coefficients of variation reduced from 4.3% and 6.2% wit

259 ion were larger in the study group while the coefficient of variation revealed no difference.

260 cient of determination R(2)), repeatability (coefficient of variation RSD), limit of detection and qu

261 l variability (as measured by the population coefficient of variation (s.d./mean, %)) in postprandial

262 The coefficient of variation showed a nonlinear increase, pr

263 al (ss = 0.026, P < .01) and temporal sector coefficient of variation (ss = 0.099, P < .01).

264 We calculated a coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) for e

265 me aspects of masting, most importantly high coefficient of variation, supporting individual-level be

266 The coefficient of variation then, for the number of molecul

267 We also used the relative coefficient of variation to estimate with 95% confidence

268 The coefficient of variation values indicated good repeatabi

269 The intra- and interassay coefficients of variation values for the Carba-R assay w

270 The % CV (coefficient of variation) values obtained for each analy

271 Intrabatch coefficients of variation varied between 3.9% and 9.6%.

272 ve percentage of lung involvement was 17.2% (coefficient of variation) versus 34.7% for visual analys

273 The measurement precision of coefficient of variation was 1.8% (repeatability, 0.6% d

274 e lot CT variability measured as the average coefficient of variation was 2.8% (95% CI, 1.2% to 3.2%)

275 The median coefficient of variation was 22%.

276 Median tacrolimus coefficient of variation was 28%.

277 The mean coefficient of variation was less than 20%.

278 efined as the lowest concentration where the coefficient of variation was less than 20%.

279 mages was used as difference metric, and the coefficient of variation was used to estimate noise redu

280 tablets, the geometric mean (GM) C(trough) (coefficient of variation) was 0.32 mg/L (94%), which was

281 n data point-level precision, expressed as a coefficient of variation, was 1.4% (interquartile range,

282 ravisit variability, as measured by the mean coefficient of variation, was 3.57% (range 0.44-9.68%).

283 For SUV(max), the within-subject coefficient of variation (wCV) appeared higher for PET/C

284 nce, 95% limits of agreement, within-subject coefficient of variation (wCV), and repeatability coeffi

285 using percentage difference, within-subject coefficient of variation (wCV), repeatability coefficien

286 t statistically significant increases in the coefficient of variation were observed for multiple anat

287 orrelation coefficients were 0.996-0.998 and coefficients of variation were 1.5%-3.6%.

288 Respective coefficients of variation were 10.0% and 9.2%, 4.6% and

289 Respective coefficients of variation were 10.8% and 4.3%, 7.3% and

290 Coefficients of variation were 6.9% and 7.7%, 3.3% and 8

291 The within-day (between-day) coefficients of variation were 7.7% (17%) and 5.4% (6.1%

292 Recoveries were between 76.3% and 109.6% and coefficients of variation were below 20%.

293 ents were greater than or equal to 0.994 and coefficients of variation were less than or equal to 7.3

294 CAP (0.95 vs 0.65, respectively; P = .0015); coefficients of variation were similar (19% vs 11%, P =

295 gonal regression, Bland-Altman analysis, and coefficients of variation were used to assess agreement

296 pe (P = .032), estimated by using the median coefficient of variation, were significantly higher in a

297 years, increasing interannual precipitation coefficient of variation while maintaining a precipitati

298 Scanner variability was +/-18.4% (coefficient of variation) with same-vendor follow-up.

299 The best metric for encoding variability is coefficient of variation, with heterogeneity in this enc

300 ation coefficients (ICCs) and within-subject coefficient of variation (WSCV).