戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  to a significant reduction in the number of colorectal polyps.
2 onventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps.
3 h AAPC, those with small or large numbers of colorectal polyps.
4 eds to thousands of precancerous adenomatous colorectal polyps.
5 urden in AAPC patients that develop very few colorectal polyps.
6 s not necessary to generate 3D PVR images of colorectal polyps.
7 sitive association between iron exposure and colorectal polyps.
8 lity of CTC to detect clinically significant colorectal polyps.
9 d these factors in relation to occurrence of colorectal polyps.
10 y provides the greatest rate of detection of colorectal polyps.
11 h indigo carmine dye to diagnosis diminutive colorectal polyps.
12 ferentiation between benign and premalignant colorectal polyps.
13 egression was utilized to find predictors of colorectal polyps.
14 ard for the resection of large, nonmalignant colorectal polyps.
15 idered for the endoscopic resection of large colorectal polyps.
16  to CEMR for large (20-40mm) sessile or flat colorectal polyps.
17 OTAI to analyze colorectal cancer and benign colorectal polyps.
18  to analyze narrow-band images of diminutive colorectal polyps.
19 al-time prediction of histologic features of colorectal polyps.
20 d genetic disease, which is characterized by colorectal polyps.
21 llows real-time histologic classification of colorectal polyps.
22 used technique for resection of large distal colorectal polyps.
23 aracterized by the widespread development of colorectal polyps.
24 ted with the redundant removal of diminutive colorectal polyps.
25 ice has been associated with a lower risk of colorectal polyps.
26 iation between stress and the development of colorectal polyps.
27 e was no extended effect on cancer deaths or colorectal polyps.
28 IQR 52-61]; 106 [37%] women), with 306 small colorectal polyps.
29 s than has previously been observed in whole colorectal polyps.
30 fication system that can be used to diagnose colorectal polyps.
31 ith similar specificity in classification of colorectal polyps.
32 ective study of 451 consecutively identified colorectal polyps.
33 smoking may substantially reduce the risk of colorectal polyps.
34 ged 40-80 y who had undergone removal of all colorectal polyps.
35 mographic (CT) colonography for detection of colorectal polyps.
36 atic review and meta-analysis, we found that colorectal polyps 1 to 20 mm are frequently incompletely
37             The sensitivity for detection of colorectal polyps 10 mm or larger, 5.0-9.9 mm, and small
38 oscopic mucosal resection of nonpedunculated colorectal polyps 20 mm or larger (n = 928) were randoml
39  colography seems promising for detection of colorectal polyps 5 mm and larger.
40 iates, having a first degree relative with a colorectal polyp (8.4% (5742/68 060) in cases and 5.7% (
41 we evaluated differences in risk factors for colorectal polyps according to histological type, anatom
42 y predict the histology of distal diminutive colorectal polyps according to the ASGE PIVI statement.
43  paraffin-embedded pathological specimens of colorectal polyps, adenocarcinomas, and adjacent normal
44 RNAs can be used to screen for patients with colorectal polyps, adenomas, or both.
45  recently diagnosed adenoma and no remaining colorectal polyps after complete colonoscopy.
46 onsidering the high prevalence of neoplastic colorectal polyps among the first-degree relatives of pa
47 APC in which affected patients exhibit fewer colorectal polyps and a later age of onset of colorectal
48 ically localise to neoplastic cells in human colorectal polyps and adenocarcinomas, and virus infecti
49 rmine the incomplete resection rate (IRR) of colorectal polyps and associated factors.
50  have been associated with a reduced risk of colorectal polyps and cancer in observational and random
51 ry, we observe significant associations with colorectal polyps and cancer, with more severely impaire
52 ty for the detection of clinically important colorectal polyps and cancer.
53 es in DNMT1 mRNA expression were detected in colorectal polyps and cancers relative to normal colonic
54  consisting of 3-year surveillance for small colorectal polyps and colonoscopy referral for large pol
55          We highlight the fair prevalence of colorectal polyps and CRC in a Jordanian cohort.
56 ield for endoscopic management of large flat colorectal polyps and early cancer.
57 we determined the status of these markers in colorectal polyps and evaluated associated risk factors.
58 d the joint association of family history of colorectal polyps and family history of CRC.
59 he association of meat intake in relation to colorectal polyps and further investigated the associati
60  diagnostic performance of CTC for detecting colorectal polyps and masses is well established, but it
61       This review updates the information on colorectal polyps and summarizes the recent advances in
62 been gathered about the effects of NSAIDs on colorectal polyps and the development of cancers.
63 vides insights into malignant progression of colorectal polyps and their microenvironment, serving as
64  observed in pathologists' classification of colorectal polyps, and improved assessment by pathologis
65 ntake is associated with an elevated risk of colorectal polyps, and this association may be synergist
66     Cold resection of large, nonpedunculated colorectal polyps appears to be considerably safer than
67 d using updated natural history evidence for colorectal polyps applied to a hypothetical 10 000-perso
68                           PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Colorectal polyps are a common cause of gastrointestinal
69                            Distal diminutive colorectal polyps are common and accurate endoscopic pre
70                                              Colorectal polyps are common, and their histopathologic
71 e and in-vivo growth rates of small (6-9 mm) colorectal polyps are not well established.
72 adenocarcinoma, regardless of whether or not colorectal polyps are present.
73 , the siblings and children of patients with colorectal polyps are still at higher risk of CRC, parti
74 trolled study, patients with sessile or flat colorectal polyps between 20 and 40 mm in size were rand
75 e light colonoscopy is widely used to detect colorectal polyps, but flat and depressed lesions are of
76 ribes the histopathology and distribution of colorectal polyps by age and gender in the post-screenin
77           Incomplete resection of neoplastic colorectal polyps can result in postcolonoscopy colorect
78 r Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: for diminutive colorectal polyps characterized with high confidence, a
79 the accuracy of pathologic interpretation of colorectal polyps compared with microscopic assessment.
80 lorectal adenomas in a case-control study of colorectal polyps conducted in Minnesota (1991-1994).
81 d imaging atlas of the two most common human colorectal polyps, conventional adenomas and serrated po
82        Volumetric growth assessment of small colorectal polyps could be a useful biomarker for determ
83 liably determine the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps could greatly reduce the cost of colon
84 NGS: A review of recent literature regarding colorectal polyps demonstrates an estimated detected pre
85 d differentiation of benign and premalignant colorectal polyps detected with CT colonography in an av
86 , unblinded pilot study, CTC is feasible for colorectal polyp detection > or = 0.5 cm in diameter.
87 tudies will investigate EMI-137 for improved colorectal polyp detection during screening colonoscopie
88 ue that has the potential to improve the 22% colorectal polyp detection miss-rate.
89 raphy (CTC) represents a novel technique for colorectal polyp detection.
90  per day was associated with decreased OR of colorectal polyp development (OR = 0.43, CI: 0.19-0.98,
91  Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors may also reduce colorectal polyp development or recurrence as well as re
92 n developed to allow pathology prediction of colorectal polyps during colonoscopies.
93 Standard-of-care (SoC) imaging for assessing colorectal polyps during colonoscopy, based on white-lig
94 etection (CADe) systems for the detection of colorectal polyps during colonoscopy.
95 herence tomography (OCT) probe for assessing colorectal polyps during routine colonoscopy.
96 surgical settings for the resection of large colorectal polyps (Endocut vs forced coagulation), we fo
97 ification is important for the prevention of colorectal polyps, especially advanced and multiple aden
98     Purpose To assess the natural history of colorectal polyps followed with CTC in a clinical screen
99 sed in CRC screening, effectively identifies colorectal polyps >/=10 mm and cancers.
100  trial involving 19 centers, nonpedunculated colorectal polyps >=20 mm were randomly assigned to cold
101 EMR) is standard therapy for nonpedunculated colorectal polyps >=20 mm.
102 e levels to the endoscopic interpretation of colorectal polyp histology allows sufficient accuracy fo
103 ation system for the endoscopic diagnosis of colorectal polyp histology and established its predictiv
104 lowed real-time in vivo prediction of distal colorectal polyp histology and is accurate enough to lea
105 sts made real-time predictions of diminutive colorectal polyp histology and surveillance interval pre
106 , the system allowed endoscopic diagnoses of colorectal polyp histology.
107 y, PA), with narrow-band imaging, to predict colorectal polyp histology.
108 educed both true-positive and false-positive colorectal polyp identification.
109              Seven hundred fifty-six (57.7%) colorectal polyps identified at optical colonoscopy in 4
110 nterology fellows) using 118 high-definition colorectal polyp images of known histology; and (4) vali
111 oup of remaining invitees not diagnosed with colorectal polyps in 10 years preceding the invitation.
112 itted using a training set consisting of 107 colorectal polyps in 63 patients (mean age, 63 years 8 [
113 and cigarette smoking in relation to risk of colorectal polyps in a Nashville, Tennessee, colonoscopy
114               To determine the prevalence of colorectal polyps in a predominantly African American po
115 linical, and pathological characteristics of colorectal polyps in an Iranian population.
116 CTC was used to longitudinally monitor small colorectal polyps in asymptomatic adult patients from Ap
117 med to measure the prevalence of significant colorectal polyps in average-risk individuals and to det
118 , black and Hispanic) are at higher risk for colorectal polyps in childhood.
119                                     Although colorectal polyps in children are generally benign and e
120 hibitor, significantly reduced the number of colorectal polyps in children with familial adenomatous
121 , a selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, on colorectal polyps in patients with familial adenomatous
122 ology and is accurate enough to leave distal colorectal polyps in place without resection or to resec
123 en poultry consumption and the prevalence of colorectal polyps in this study.
124 Accurate optical diagnosis of small (<10 mm) colorectal polyps in vivo, without formal histopathology
125  study of the association between subsets of colorectal polyps, including adenomas and serrated polyp
126        The clinical significance of a distal colorectal polyp is uncertain.
127            Background The natural history of colorectal polyps is not well characterized due to clini
128                                 Detection of colorectal polyps is the cornerstone of the Bowel Cancer
129 N-CAD to identify neoplastic or hyperplastic colorectal polyps less than 5 mm.
130  for treating large ( 20 mm) nonpedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs) has shown efficacy in a rando
131                BACKGROUND & AIMS: Almost all colorectal polyps &lt;/= 5 mm are benign, yet current pract
132  were compared with 2,751 controls without a colorectal polyp, matched on age and follow-up time.
133 s of shared and type-specific etiologies for colorectal polyps may provide insights into colorectal c
134 el genotype, was not associated with reduced colorectal polyp number (incidence rate ratio [IRR]: 0.9
135 ed EPA users with a significant reduction in colorectal polyp number (IRR: 0.50 [0.28, 0.90]), unlike
136      However, because striking variations in colorectal polyp numbers occur among patients carrying i
137 are being applied for the treatment of large colorectal polyps, obviating the need for surgery in mos
138 s secondary analysis of a prospective trial, colorectal polyps of all size categories and morphologie
139                 Accurate optical analysis of colorectal polyps (optical biopsy) could prevent unneces
140 KGROUND & AIMS: Accurate optical analysis of colorectal polyps (optical biopsy) could prevent unneces
141 ated with high red meat intake was found for colorectal polyps or adenomas in subjects with a high HC
142 ts referred for EMR of large sessile or flat colorectal polyps or laterally spreading lesions (>/=20
143  who underwent EMR for large sessile or flat colorectal polyps or laterally spreading lesions, we ass
144 s had 3.29-fold increased odds of developing colorectal polyps (OR = 3.29, 95% CI: 1.13-9.56, P = 0.0
145                                              Colorectal polyp outcomes were included in negative bino
146 28.0 percent reduction in the mean number of colorectal polyps (P=0.003 for the comparison with place
147                     The ability to determine colorectal polyp pathology by endoscopy could reduce the
148 allele identified individuals, who displayed colorectal polyp prevention by EPA with a similar effect
149 ith recently diagnosed adenomas and no known colorectal polyps remaining after complete colonoscopy.
150 rn in 14 (82%) of 17 and seven (78%) of nine colorectal polyps, respectively, and 12 (80%) of 15 and
151  that the FADS insertion (I) allele predicts colorectal polyp risk reduction in a secondary analysis
152 gated the association of n-3 PUFA intakes on colorectal polyp risk.
153 clarify the association of HCA exposure with colorectal polyp risk.
154 ch case and control, we identified the first colorectal polyp(s) that underwent a biopsy or were exci
155 y hospital in New Hampshire, 100 slides with colorectal polyp samples were read by 15 pathologists us
156                                          All colorectal polyp specimens(CRPS) for 2011-2017 in a regi
157            In assessments of 100 slides with colorectal polyp specimens, use of the AI-augmented digi
158 opy-based, case-control study, the Tennessee Colorectal Polyp Study.
159  1306 polyp-free controls from the Tennessee Colorectal Polyp Study.
160 re 2.73 times more susceptible to developing colorectal polyps than non-smokers (OR = 2.73, 95% CI: 1
161 5-49 years exhibited a greater likelihood of colorectal polyps than younger counterparts (34.2% vs. 2
162  provides morphological detail of diminutive colorectal polyps that correlates well with polyp histol
163      Artificial intelligence (AI) may detect colorectal polyps that have been missed due to perceptua
164 ents had a total of 49 histologically proved colorectal polyps that were 5 mm and larger.
165             Next, the relative dimensions of colorectal polyps to adjacent structures were evaluated
166 nostic bias over time in their evaluation of colorectal polyps to assess how this may impact the util
167 epidemiology and clinical characteristics of colorectal polyps to formulate an appropriate screening
168 rst systematic comparison of risk factors by colorectal polyp type in a large colonoscopy-based case-
169                             Conclusion Small colorectal polyps ultimately proving to be histopatholog
170 irtual chromoendoscopy for classification of colorectal polyps using histopathology as a gold standar
171 en colorectal cancer susceptibility SNPs and colorectal polyps varies by polyp type.
172 4 years with and without a family history of colorectal polyp was, respectively, 94.3 and 67.9 per 10
173 Real time histology of 121 diminutive distal colorectal polyps was evaluated using high-definition en
174 stinguishing adenomatous from nonadenomatous colorectal polyps were 93% and 95% respectively.
175                                  Eight of 49 colorectal polyps were depicted only on images obtained
176 orrelated with a lesser or greater number of colorectal polyps were detectable within approximately t
177 s referred for endoscopic treatment of large colorectal polyps were enrolled in this pilot clinical s
178  significant differences in the detection of colorectal polyps were found between the three technique
179                                        Large colorectal polyps were identified at CT colonography in
180                                           T1 colorectal polyps with at least 1 risk factor for metast
181 e differentiation of benign and premalignant colorectal polyps with CT colonography.
182  We aimed to test whether the association of colorectal polyps with intake of calcium, magnesium, or
183 n has gained great acceptance to manage flat colorectal polyps with the two major complications being
184 reased the detection of small and diminutive colorectal polyps with unknown clinical impact.
185 al dominant inheritance of multiple types of colorectal polyp, with colorectal carcinoma occurring in
186 high confidence for 75% of consecutive small colorectal polyps, with 89% accuracy, 98% sensitivity, a
187 -neoAg landscape of microsatellite loci from colorectal polyps without malignant potential (PWOMP), p

 
Page Top