ライフサイエンスコーパス: colorectal surgery

1 5 min (combined with 500 mg metronidazole in colorectal surgery).

2 (1.6% for orthopedic surgeries to 11.3% for colorectal surgeries).

3 t denominator of postoperative outcome after colorectal surgery.

4 ak is still the most dreaded complication in colorectal surgery.

5 with morbidity and mortality after liver and colorectal surgery.

6 reliable, and valid for assessing quality in colorectal surgery.

7 d with a substantial reduction in SSIs after colorectal surgery.

8 teroid-treated IBD patients undergoing major colorectal surgery.

9 n exists in hospital readmission rates after colorectal surgery.

10 anisms for quality assurance of laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

11 enting surgical site infections (SSIs) after colorectal surgery.

12 performed an economic evaluation of ERP for colorectal surgery.

13 on postoperative day (POD) 1 after elective colorectal surgery.

14 mortality (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.11-1.94) after colorectal surgery.

15 conducted among patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery.

16 ay for a new era in pure transanal NOTES for colorectal surgery.

17 ics reduce the risk of deep SSIs in elective colorectal surgery.

18 o safely increase the uptake of laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

19 ecisions for elderly patients considered for colorectal surgery.

20 ation in all patients scheduled for elective colorectal surgery.

21 the most devastating complications following colorectal surgery.

22 accelerate the return of gut function after colorectal surgery.

23 assess technical performance in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

24 e, to our knowledge, of pure transanal NOTES colorectal surgery.

25 predictive of adverse events after elective colorectal surgery.

26 hensive training curriculum for laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

27 infections cause significant morbidity after colorectal surgery.

28 ques and to further define best practices in colorectal surgery.

29 nfectious complications on days 1 to 5 after colorectal surgery.

30 d early discharge of selected patients after colorectal surgery.

31 onic liver disease (CLD) patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

32 ed with significant morbidity and cost after colorectal surgery.

33 are files during the first 2 years following colorectal surgery.

34 was implemented as standard of care prior to colorectal surgery.

35 e among the most dreaded complications after colorectal surgery.

36 h cefotetan, in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery.

37 n patients who have a rising CEA level after colorectal surgery.

38 or acute postoperative pain management after colorectal surgery.

39 laxis are at increased risk of SSI following colorectal surgery.

40 accuracy of postoperative risk prediction in colorectal surgery.

41 for safe early discharge after laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

42 isits improved SDM among patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

43 postoperative infections, and recovery after colorectal surgery.

44 n of postoperative complications in elective colorectal surgery.

45 e functional capacity and recovery following colorectal surgery.

46 sidered without MBP for patients who undergo colorectal surgery.

47 cision after open and laparoscopic-converted colorectal surgery.

48 ine-alcohol for elective, clean-contaminated colorectal surgery.

49 site infection (SSI) prevention in elective colorectal surgery.

50 urgical tool with increasing applications in colorectal surgery.

51 her quality of care or Medicare payments for colorectal surgery.

52 colon cancer cells at the anastomosis after colorectal surgery.

53 troponin elevations and outcomes after major colorectal surgery.

54 liable marker of anastomotic leak (AL) after colorectal surgery.

55 potential reduction of mortality after major colorectal surgery.

56 to be early and reliable markers of AL after colorectal surgery.

57 creened for ESBL-PE carriage before elective colorectal surgery.

58 ins a major source of morbidity and costs in colorectal surgery.

59 of intra-abdominal infection after elective colorectal surgery.

60 tional criteria of discharge protocols after colorectal surgery.

61 ensure a safe early discharge after elective colorectal surgery.

62 ent and life-threatening complications after colorectal surgery.

63 nin in the occurrence of IAIs after elective colorectal surgery.

64 5 ensure safe early discharge after elective colorectal surgery.

65 ded as part of ERAS pathways in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

66 t common and troublesome complications after colorectal surgery.

67 among open abdominal procedures, especially colorectal surgeries.

68 helping to improve postoperative outcomes of colorectal surgeries.

69 ng a single-institution database of elective colorectal surgeries.

70 National Training Programme in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery, 2 external data sets were examined.

71 this cohort study of 842 patients undergoing colorectal surgery, a care bundle consisting of an indiv

72 of perioperative probiotic administration in colorectal surgery, aiming for improved patient outcomes

73 remains the most dreaded complication after colorectal surgery and causes high morbidity and mortali

74 biome in patients undergoing colonoscopy and colorectal surgery and determine factors influencing its

75 n the skin microbiota of patients undergoing colorectal surgery and determine if dysbiosis contribute

76 city of data on the effects of smoking after colorectal surgery and in particular for malignant compa

77 development of the use of neuromodulation in colorectal surgery and much of the literature has been i

78 Screening for ESBL-PE carriage before colorectal surgery and personalizing prophylaxis for car

79 higher than that of perioperative DVT after colorectal surgery and preoperative screening LEVD shoul

80 regarding the optimal timing of CTP in major colorectal surgery and the incidence of OP-DVT remains u

81 n the skin microbiota of patients undergoing colorectal surgery and to determine if dysbiosis contrib

82 that the effect could be more pronounced in colorectal surgery, and in clean-contaminated/contaminat

83 sex, type of colorectal surgery, years since colorectal surgery, and stage were significantly associa

84 Laparoscopic colorectal surgery appears to be a safe and reasonable o

85 SSIs after colorectal surgery are a common cause of morbidity.

86 Surgical site infections (SSIs) in colorectal surgery are associated with increased morbidi

87 ERPs for colorectal surgery are clinically effective, but their c

88 POD 1) serum laboratory tests after elective colorectal surgery are clinically warranted and valuable

89 icosteroid-treated patients undergoing major colorectal surgery are commonly prescribed HDS to preven

90 Postoperative infectious complications after colorectal surgery are frequent and associated with rele

91 Routine POD 1 lab tests after elective colorectal surgery are rarely abnormal, and they even le

92 k of surgical site infection (SSI) following colorectal surgery as noncarriers.

93 Patients were identified who underwent colorectal surgery at 182 hospitals participating in the

94 undergoing open or laparoscopically assisted colorectal surgery at 39 U.S. sites to undergo either th

95 y of 13,082 patients undergoing bariatric or colorectal surgery at 47 hospitals in Washington State f

96 ive study of 49 patients with IBD undergoing colorectal surgery at a single institution between July

97 Patients having colorectal surgery at high-volume hospitals are signific

98 270 colorectal patients undergoing inpatient colorectal surgery at our institution.

99 nts included consecutive patients undergoing colorectal surgery between January 1, 2006, and December

100 for patients undergoing pancreas, liver, or colorectal surgery between January 1, 2010, and August 3

101 Patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery between January 1, 2015 and December

102 All patients undergoing major colorectal surgery between January 1, 2016, through Dece

103 2 Italian referral centers were analyzed for colorectal surgery between January 2000 and December 201

104 National Training Programme in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery, between July 2008 and July 2012, wer

105 d Recovery After Surgery started mainly with colorectal surgery but has been shown to improve outcome

106 te infection in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery but may be associated with an increas

107 bolism (VTE) is an important complication of colorectal surgery, but its incidence is unclear in the

108 ajor cause for morbidity and mortality after colorectal surgery, but the mechanism behind this compli

109 copy has demonstrated a protective effect in colorectal surgery, but these effects have not been gene

110 e all patients undergoing elective inpatient colorectal surgery by one of the colorectal surgeons at

111 This retrospective study analyzed colorectal surgery cases from the 2018-2022 ACS National

112 conducted from March 2022 to June 2023 at a colorectal surgery clinic at an academic medical institu

113 eeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass), colorectal surgery (colectomy, proctectomy), or hiatal h

114 my patients across a Healthcare Network-wide Colorectal Surgery Collaborative (5 hospitals).

115 zed clinical trials to improve outcome after colorectal surgery compared to traditional care.

116 ecovery Program (ERP) impacts recovery after colorectal surgery, compared with usual care.

117 He was evaluated by our tertiary center of colorectal surgery complaining diarrhoea and abdominal p

118 PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The field of colorectal surgery continues to move forward as technica

119 nitrogenous nutrition in patients undergoing colorectal surgery depends on the patient's preoperative

120 National Training Programme in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery designed the Lapco TT curriculum to i

121 Although ERAS is well established in colorectal surgery, experience after esophagectomy has b

122 The debate around colorectal surgery for endometriosis has been ongoing, b

123 3 and September 2014, 504 patients underwent colorectal surgery, for malignant colorectal diseases, i

124 This association was isolated to nonelective colorectal surgery, for which the leak rate was 12.3% in

125 atients over the age of 45, undergoing major colorectal surgery from March 2015 to January 2016, were

126 To determine the role of NSAIDs in colorectal surgery, future evaluations should consider s

127 ic gastroenterology, urology, urogynecology, colorectal surgery, geriatrics, neurology, nursing, and

128 Early discharge after colorectal surgery has been advocated.

129 Warming patients during colorectal surgery has been shown to reduce infection ra

130 he use of epidural analgesia in laparoscopic colorectal surgery has demonstrated superiority over con

131 OABP for elective colorectal surgery has fallen out of favor.

132 New developments in colorectal surgery have been driven primarily by technic

133 , matching, and data reporting existed, with colorectal surgery having the best matching of male and

134 of postoperative ileus in enhanced recovery colorectal surgery; however, data are equivocal regardin

135 results like expert surgeons in laparoscopic colorectal surgery if supervised by an experienced train

136 a-abdominal infections (IAIs) after elective colorectal surgery impact significantly the short- and l

137 ort study of patients who underwent elective colorectal surgery in 3 hospitals in Israel, Switzerland

138 Colorectal surgery in CLD patients is associated with si

139 Colorectal surgery in elderly patients is associated wit

140 ive hyperglycemia is frequent after elective colorectal surgery in nondiabetic patients.

141 Of the 1410 patients, 352 underwent colorectal surgery in the control period and 1058 in the

142 Overall, 842 patients had major colorectal surgery in the study period (mean [SD] age, 6

143 ostoperative outcomes in patients undergoing colorectal surgery in the United States.

144 Patients undergoing open colorectal surgery, including creation of a permanent en

145 abscess) through 90 days after bariatric and colorectal surgery involving anastomoses.

146 Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is a complex procedure, often being s

147 Anastomotic leak after colorectal surgery is a severe complication associated w

148 erative oral antibiotic prophylaxis prior to colorectal surgery is associated with a significant decr

149 istration as an element of enhanced recovery colorectal surgery is associated with faster return of b

150 LRD, rather than CF, on POD1 after colorectal surgery is associated with less nausea, faste

151 BACKGROUND/Postoperative ileus (POI) after colorectal surgery is associated with prolonged hospital

152 Colorectal surgery is associated with substantial morbid

153 Colorectal surgery is associated with the highest SSI ra

154 Hospital readmission after colorectal surgery is common, with reported 30-day readm

155 determine whether the risk of SSI following colorectal surgery is higher in ESBL-PE carriers than in

156 GC dosing among patients with IBD undergoing colorectal surgery is highly variable even within a sing

157 scopic surgery using the rectum as access in colorectal surgery is intuitively better suited than oth

158 ve use of epidural analgesia in laparoscopic colorectal surgery is limited in the United States.

159 We considered patients who had colorectal surgery lasting at least 1 hour at the Clevel

160 SIs) are a significant cause of morbidity in colorectal surgeries, mainly due to the contaminated nat

161 The incidence of IH in colorectal surgery may be as high as 40%.

162 s associated with laparoscopic conversion in colorectal surgery may be institution dependent.

163 Elevated troponin concentrations after colorectal surgery may facilitate identifying patients a

164 In colorectal surgery, minimally invasive approaches are pa

165 gynecology, pain medicine, gastroenterology, colorectal surgery, neurology, physiotherapy, and psycho

166 ve serum laboratory tests are a part of many colorectal surgery order sets.

167 Transanal NOTES for colorectal surgery overcomes all of these issues; howeve

168 gical-site infection in patients who undergo colorectal surgery; paradoxically, it appears to result

169 We identified 28,751 colorectal surgery patients at 170 hospitals participati

170 This randomized trial involved 99 colorectal surgery patients in an established ERP (media

171 The subset analysis of colorectal surgery patients increased the probabilities

172 111 elective colorectal surgery patients were randomized to CF (n = 5

173 f a benefit to hyperoxia in reducing SSIs in colorectal surgery patients; however, the magnitude of b

174 ty of overlapping surgery in a tertiary care colorectal surgery practice.

175 clinically important predictor of SSI after colorectal surgery, probably because the outcomes are ov

176 system temperature data for adult abdominal colorectal surgery procedures at a large tertiary center

177 ffective in the setting of enhanced recovery colorectal surgery protocols, and should therefore be co

178 Laparoscopic colorectal surgery RCTs have all employed quality assura

179 Seventeen patients undergoing colorectal surgery received intravenous infusion of gluc

180 including adult patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery, receiving OAB with or without MBP wa

181 howed that an enhanced recovery protocol for colorectal surgery reduces postoperative morbidity and m

182 Although active warming during colorectal surgery reduces SSIs, there is limited eviden

183 s undergoing abdominal surgery, particularly colorectal surgery, remains uncertain despite their well

184 ex vivo training curriculum for laparoscopic colorectal surgery results in improved technical knowled

185 However, for colorectal surgery, serious morbidity was lower at HSHs

186 teroid-treated IBD patients undergoing major colorectal surgery should be treated with low doses of s

187 In colorectal surgery specifically, small studies have show

188 appeared to be useful in minimally invasive colorectal surgery, splenectomy for splenomegaly, living

189 In an ERP for colorectal surgery, staff-directed facilitation of early

190 ery patients and 71%, 75%, and 80% among the colorectal surgery subset.

191 motic leakage is a severe complication after colorectal surgery that can significantly affect clinica

192 performance measure for patients undergoing colorectal surgery, the effects of intraoperative hypoth

193 ents undergoing elective, clean contaminated colorectal surgery, the use of IPA failed to meet criter

194 With increased use of robotic technology in colorectal surgery, there is a burden to demonstrate the

195 ate a risk prediction score for laparoscopic colorectal surgery training cases.

196 to facilitate case selection in laparoscopic colorectal surgery training was developed and validated.

197 training/interest; n = 68) or the Society of Colorectal Surgery (training; n = 61) during the study p

198 tailors key teaching skills for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: training structure, skills deconstru

199 Patients undergoing major colorectal surgery underwent preoperative lower extremit

200 s to gradually reduce the length of stay for colorectal surgery, until ambulatory management.

201 fee-for-service beneficiaries who underwent colorectal surgery using administrative claims data.

202 dictive models of laparoscopic conversion in colorectal surgery using the Mayo Clinic, Rochester (MCR

203 cluding 175,787 patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery using the Premier database between 20

204 luate female sexuality/quality of life after colorectal surgery using validated instruments.

205 Pain management after colorectal surgery varies widely and predicts significan

206 PWT on primarily closed incisions after open colorectal surgery was not associated with a decrease in

207 trial, 300 patients undergoing elective open colorectal surgery were assigned to receive prophylactic

208 coring systems of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery were developed and published based up

209 general health of female patients undergoing colorectal surgery were evaluated preoperatively, at 6 a

210 Patients undergoing simultaneous liver and colorectal surgery were excluded.

211 undergoing major elective enhanced recovery colorectal surgery were identified from a prospectively-

212 Patients undergoing colorectal surgery were identified from the National Sur

213 consecutive patients who underwent oncologic colorectal surgery were included in a prospective digita

214 utive adult patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery were included.

215 70 years and older undergoing major elective colorectal surgery were prospectively enrolled.

216 Two hundred patients undergoing colorectal surgery were randomly assigned to routine int

217 nts (median age 52, 45% male), 55% underwent colorectal surgery, whereas 45% had noncolorectal GI sur

218 luencing gut microbial composition following colorectal surgery, while mechanical bowel preparation h

219 ration, and (B) patients (n = 15) undergoing colorectal surgery who received surgical bowel preparati

220 patient data to identify patients undergoing colorectal surgery who survived to discharge.

221 Consecutive patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery with anastomosis were included.

222 secutive series of adult patients undergoing colorectal surgery with primary anastomosis was enrolled

223 uded were adult patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery with the American-Society-of-Anesthes

224 sk of complications after all types of major colorectal surgery, with the greatest risk apparent for

225 In multivariate analysis, sex, type of colorectal surgery, years since colorectal surgery, and

226 the pathogenesis of complications following colorectal surgery, yet perioperative changes in gut mic