ライフサイエンスコーパス: comment

1 and skin type compatibility (78 of 325 [24%] comments).

2 Reasoning was invited (open-text comments).

3 ted in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Comment.

4 d on the ODP Web site for 5 weeks for public comment.

5 ed a draft report that was posted for public comment.

6 e Prevention Web site for 5 weeks for public comment.

7 posium and after a 3-month period for public comment.

8 e Prevention Web site for 5 weeks for public comment.

9 e Prevention Web site for 4 weeks for public comment.

10 d on the ODP Web site for 2 weeks for public comment.

11 nt benefit existed, thus precluding specific comment.

12 among all panel members for final review and comment.

13 ategory, ER Low Positive, with a recommended comment.

14 We leave you to judge and comment.

15 uding the possible influence of COI on these comments.

16 ings of less than 5, and optionally provided comments.

17 ation on a 9-point Likert scale and provided comments.

18 distribution of the respondents' scores, and comments.

19 The authors analyzed a total of 600 comments.

20 n a deadline for the moratorium or solicited comments.

21 us because participants observe antiminority comments.

22 hundred two participants provided open-text comments.

23 patients and recommends laboratory reporting comments.

24 d activating them by charge transfer is also commented.

25 ith average axial and planar symmetries, are commented.

26 In free-text comments, 76 respondents (11.5%) expressed skepticism th

27 s and, after detailed consideration of their comments, a final revised version of the extension was p

28 Vetter et al. respond to Martin-Olalla's comment about their study linking motor vehicle fataliti

29 identify query genomes as members and submit comments about the LINgroup.

30 ial cultural bridges provoke 2.52 times more comments about their messages from new social media user

31 This Formal Comment addresses a recent challenge to this idea, argui

32 in 6 major categories according to consumer comments: affordability, cosmetic elegance, separate rat

33 Kepp argues in his Comment, among other concerns, that the atomic densities

34 e from the review, presentations, and public comments, an independent panel prepared a draft report t

35 nce report, expert presentations, and public comments, an independent panel prepared a draft report t

36 nce report, expert presentations, and public comments, an unbiased, independent panel prepared a draf

37 nce report, expert presentations, and public comments, an unbiased, independent panel prepared a draf

38 open source framework facilitates community comment and contribution, enabling the tree to be contin

39 A working paper was circulated for comment and presented at the Fourth International Worksh

40 ogy and specific application were eventually commented and approved by each center registered in the

41 Hilda Bastian considers post-publication commenting and the cultural changes that are needed to b

42 th electronic isolate-specific de-escalation comments and daytime antibiotic stewardship program (ASP

43 lowing users to attach personally meaningful comments and hashtags to their uploaded images.

44 hank the contributors for their enlightening comments and look forward to future developments in the

45 They also produce comments and questions about what their interlocutors mi

46 Diplomates' comments and ratings of the usefulness of the activity i

47 , n = 198), or rmPCR reported with templated comments and real-time audit and feedback of antimicrobi

48 ical and biomedical investigations, numerous comments and suggestions have been reported from the use

49 gress, we highlight lessons learned and make comments and suggestions on a number of key aspects, inc

50 Their comments and suggestions were carefully considered by th

51 was refined by considering expert and public comments and through application to case studies.

52 wed by product performance (146 of 325 [45%] comments) and skin type compatibility (78 of 325 [24%] c

53 itation to affirm or refute the message, add comments, and submit an automated, prepopulated electron

54 ssions, postings, abstract views, downloads, comments, and withdrawals on the medRxiv preprint server

55 In addition, comments are provided on mouse studies in cases when hum

56 We show that most of their comments are unfounded and that our observation of a tra

57 This Formal Comment argues that this claim is unfounded.

58 This Comment article makes the complementary argument that eq

59 This Comment article provides a behind-the-scenes perspective

60 of continuum theories, will also discuss his comments as relates to the work of other researchers.

61 We comment both on past work in the field and on challenges

62 We further comment briefly on the need for accurate parasite identi

63 In their comment, Bui et al argue that the approach we described

64 We welcome and appreciate the comment by Braun and Schmidt on our recent correspondenc

65 ns about some of the results reported in the comment by Gapsys and de Groot that require clarificatio

66 The Comment by Meunier states that the process we described

67 We are writing to reply to the comment by Pouwels et al., 2019 about our recent study (

68 We reply to the comment by S. Pan and G. Frenking who challenged our int

69 The comment by Sanchez-Tojar et al. (2020, Ecol Lett) questi

70 The comment by Stephen Harvey in this issue of the Biophysic

71 In response to provocative comments by 2 European clinicians and scientists, the Wo

72 Two Comments by Hupe and by Langbein and Puppe address our c

73 elines were presented on websites for public comments by members of both the societies.

74 Till Barnighausen and colleagues respond to comments by the HPTN 071 (PopART) Study Team, noting the

75 Metabolite identities and comments can also be recorded using an interactive table

76 consulted using a Web-based process and all comments carefully considered.

77 The number (percentage) of comments categorized by major themes and subthemes was d

78 The original version of this Comment contained errors in the legend of Figure 2, in w

79 The reviewers' comments contributed to creating the final version of th

80 Her practical comments describe the joy of teaching methods, running a

81 The paper provides introductory comments, describes the basis of human genetic diversity

82 In their comment, Desjarlais et al claim that a small temperature

83 This Comment discusses the role of genetic testing in filling

84 vidence and attendees had the opportunity to comment during open discussions.

85 cussed the body of evidence and participants commented during open discussions.

86 erts discussed the evidence and participants commented during open forums.

87 , and attendees had opportunities to provide comments during open discussion periods.

88 This makes the empirically focused comments especially valuable.

89 went wrong, respondents were more likely to comment females should not have decided to proceed.

90 This comment focuses on difficulties in establishing causalit

91 Shadlen et al's Comment focuses on extrapolations of our results that we

92 ost cited positive feature (198 of 325 [61%] comments) followed by product performance (146 of 325 [4

93 , cycloaromatization processes are initially commented, followed by reactions directed toward the syn

94 ith MS, which include new data and practical comments for electroradiology technicians and radiologis

95 In the present review, a case-and-comment format is used to describe our approach to the m

96 Polypill patients commented frequently on cost-savings, ease, and convenie

97 Systematic qualitative analysis of free-text comments from 316 respondents revealed additional reason

98 acy organizations are more likely to inspire comments from new social media audiences if they create

99 We queried text comments from Reddit, a social media platform and the fi

100 Review Articles, and an occasional Editorial Comment) from the distinct specialties each year.

101 The most comment grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (n=2 [

102 In the accompanying comment, Hadi et al. argued that NMR cells and mouse cel

103 A Formal Comment has challenged the interpretation of a study int

104 The comment has overlooked important evolutionary assumption

105 Comments he wrote in a memoir-diary during World War I e

106 In this Comment, I show that the free energy decomposition from

107 future scenario for the chemical production, commenting in particular the different drivers (economic

108 tions were completed in response to reviewer comments in January 2016.

109 derstand the context of the public speakers' comments, including the possible influence of COI on the

110 The goal of this comment is to show that the "aggregate reactor" framewor

111 A major point we take from the many comments is a prevailing feeling in the research communi

112 from the broad range of partly incompatible comments it has elicited.

113 This comment looks forward to how Arctic science could be con

114 dies of environmental exposures, and we also comment more generally on methods of evidence synthesis.

115 houghtful critique, we argue here that their comment mostly restates our findings with a more complex

116 itivity and specificity of the pathologist's comment of concern for phyllodes tumor on a CNB demonstr

117 rches toward a minority majority, I echo the comments of previous E. E. Just Award recipients on the

118 ot obtaining consensus were revised based on comments of respondents, and then translated and redistr

119 This review provides a summary and comments of the recent updates in the laser adjuvant tec

120 We also comment on 2 alternative approaches for handling competi

121 In this report, we comment on a thorough multi-platform analysis of common

122 essment tool with which faculty can rate and comment on a trainee's operative performance immediately

123 In this perspective, we comment on and review medicinal chemistry efforts aimed

124 Here we comment on application of some of these generalized case

125 However, the General Comment on Article 12 of the CRPD threatens to undermine

126 interfaces with semiconductor nanowires and comment on both material choice and device design to for

127 nglish translation of the original paper, we comment on Broca's contribution and its influence on the

128 ate in different stages of atherogenesis and comment on complexities, controversies, and gaps in know

129 Although we do not comment on cost-effectiveness of LDCT screening, we outl

130 Finally, we comment on current, state-of-the-art informatic tools fo

131 promiscuity arising from off-target effects, comment on drug repurposing, and introduce approaches to

132 Here, we comment on efforts to develop tools and approaches to de

133 im of this policy statement is to review and comment on existing recommendations for and current appr

134 We comment on fundamental questions raised by this new find

135 Finally, we comment on future approaches and models to better define

136 ons in bioimaging are also presented, with a comment on future challenges and applications.

137 he genetic epidemiology of birth defects and comment on future challenges and opportunities.

138 As a comment on Hibbing et al.'s paper, we discuss the evolut

139 We comment on how corona signatures may be linked to effect

140 Finally, we comment on how the incorporation of these advances into

141 scuss aspects of mast cell heterogeneity and comment on how the plasticity of this lineage may provid

142 Finally, we comment on how these cell culture models contributed to

143 We also comment on how to use our knowledge of cell death signal

144 We also comment on implications of the present findings for a no

145 eanderthals is a prime example, which I will comment on in some detail; the issues are much more comp

146 e intestinal space in living animals, and we comment on its implications for timescales of host-micro

147 We are unable to comment on long-term antibody sensitisation effects.

148 iously considered by Kim et al., and briefly comment on other use cases.

149 In a comment on our Article "Evidence of the hydrogen release

150 ritical stage, we are uniquely positioned to comment on our training.

151 of the PC surrounding various nano-systems, comment on PC signature, address PC complexity in fluids

152 I comment on Pessoa's (2013) idea that the interaction bet

153 We take this opportunity to further comment on physical activity measurement in epidemiologi

154 We comment on possible origins of the large discrepancy.

155 We comment on potential economic causes and consequences of

156 In this opinion article, we comment on recent breakthroughs in our understanding of

157 In this perspective, we summarize and comment on recent findings in the field of ribosomopathi

158 This review will comment on recent progress and point out emerging questi

159 We take this opportunity to comment on self-selection, exposure measurement, outcome

160 reovirus entry, trafficking, and egress and comment on shared themes for diverse viruses.

161 We now comment on some of its interpretations and have attempte

162 We also examine and comment on technologies used to experimentally identify

163 Tong et al. comment on the accuracy of the dating analysis presented

164 Here we comment on the basic metabolic pathways in T cells, foll

165 The prime aim of our work is to report and comment on the bioaccessible concentrations - i.e., the

166 o protect against COVID-19, the authors also comment on the broader implications of these trials.

167 ed literature within the last 18 months that comment on the causes of nocturia, varying with age.

168 Here I comment on the conceptual and critical side of their rev

169 Our purpose is to comment on the contributions of the BRINDA to advance gl

170 Finally, we comment on the critical limitations that need to be addr

171 antages of inverse probability weighting and comment on the desirability of the described parameter.

172 A cost analysis to comment on the feasibility of implementing MNW hybrids i

173 ing functional DNA with redox reporters, and comment on the function-oriented signaling pathways.

174 Finally, we comment on the future of the research autopsy as an inte

175 olecular mechanism for this selectivity, and comment on the general design principles that should hel

176 systems with proposed LLPS activity, and we comment on the general role LLPS plays in bacteria and h

177 of these disparate mutational phenomena and comment on the importance and interpretation of these mu

178 of the writing group had the opportunity to comment on the initial drafts and approved the final ver

179 ur current understanding of heart repair and comment on the main contributors and mechanisms involved

180 state to the manifold of quintet states and comment on the mechanism and conditions for the transiti

181 thrombosis (second section); and we briefly comment on the most frequent applications of selective s

182 Finally, we comment on the need for improved communication and colla

183 In their Comment on the our recent Report, Nakamura et al argue t

184 rvature for lipid droplet sequestration, and comment on the possibility of cross talk between lipopha

185 We comment on the possibility that even at infinite time th

186 We comment on the possible contribution of the DFG-in to DF

187 molecular dynamics simulations allows us to comment on the possible factors resulting in better perf

188 al features required for dual inhibition and comment on the potential of this approach in anticancer

189 We comment on the proposition "that lower temperatures and

190 h respect to De Dreu and Gross's article, we comment on the psychological functions for attack and de

191 We are writing to comment on the recent study by Olesen et al., 2018 on an

192 nt development of vaccines is needed, and we comment on the role that an independent, expert group su

193 re, function, and development literature and comment on the similarities and differences between the

194 s evolution from "bench to bedside." We also comment on the task faced by electrophysiologists and HF

195 clarify the term differentiation of selves, comment on the two-step nature of our model, offer theor

196 touch on cross-talk among these systems and comment on the utility of animal models in charting the

197 terature and create a concise evaluation and comment on the ways to provide financially efficient cat

198 In making these points we comment on their discussion of the literature on experti

199 I comment on their significance and discuss current challe

200 tometry data, outline their differences, and comment on their strengths and limitations.

201 Here, we comment on these two studies in the wider context of the

202 n through which faculty members may rate and comment on trainee operative performance at the end of t

203 test work being performed in these areas and comment on trends in the field.

204 We further comment on unknowns and on the outstanding challenges in

205 stics of cardiac MRI are more challenging to comment on using our data as there was only one confirme

206 We comment on ways in which Lake et al. advance our underst

207 Finally, we will comment on what is known about neuroinflammation in the

208 serologic assays reported in the literature, comment on what we do and do not know regarding our immu

209 These effects will be commented on by putting into perspective catalytic resul

210 Although age was commented on in many articles, it was never the primary

211 sociation of Endocrine Surgeons reviewed and commented on preliminary drafts of the content.

212 elop better drugs suitable for patients, and commented on the future perspectives of targeting Hv1 in

213 In this review, we have commented on the implications of this novel MPS classifi

214 Sherman et al. commented on the precedence of enantiodivergence, listin

215 rking in a variety of scientific disciplines commented on the theoretical model of CLimate, Aggressio

216 Gapsys and de Groot have commented on this work but do not provide convincing evi

217 o are receiving long-term dialysis cannot be commented on.

218 lth policy changes in the provision of care, commenting on a study by James Lopez Bernal and colleagu

219 the impact of air pollution on human health, commenting on a study by Yaohua Tian and colleagues that

220 g guidelines, while critically reviewing and commenting on any differences and deficiencies of eviden

221 After commenting on recent controversies concerning the networ

222 d disubstituted diazo compounds are covered, commenting on the complex regiochemistry of the reaction

223 al and specific reactivities, presenting and commenting on their gold-catalyzed transformations as we

224 Comments on current and future challenges are also provi

225 Finally, comments on current challenges and potential opportuniti

226 Of 68 negative results, 10 included comments on decreased sensitivity due to high DNA backgr

227 Goncharov and Struzhkin present comments on our observation of metallic hydrogen.

228 Liu et al present negative comments on our observation of the Wigner-Huntington tra

229 In our response, we review and address the comments on our target article made in the 25 commentari

230 ary parasitic nematodes in recent years, and comments on overarching themes stemming from this work t

231 This review comments on recent developments in N,O-ligated late tran

232 ittee's Subcommittee on Laboratory Practices comments on testing of asymptomatic individuals relative

233 From the 174 selected reviewers, 94 sent comments on the second draft, which steering committee m

234 ollected EOR evaluations and SIMPL narrative comments on trainees' operative performance from 3 unive

235 In the version of this Comment originally published, the Acknowledgements secti

236 In the version of this Comment originally published, the authors omitted a fund

237 In the version of this Comment originally published, the image was incorrectly

238 In the version of this Comment originally published, the name of the author of

239 were rated from good to excellent; positive comments outnumbered negative ones by a ratio of 5:1.

240 ndations with strong agreement from the open comment participants.

241 There was an open comment period followed by a public hearing in early Jan

242 passed the RAND process and, after the open comment period, the ACPC council approved 18 metrics.

243 ine (ACh) and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) Comment: Please use the greek letter for gamma reduces t

244 Although their comment points to interesting ideas of improvement, we f

245 This Formal Comment presents an update to citation databases of top-

246 We include step-by-step commented R code (R Foundation for Statistical Computing

247 The online Supporting Information provides commented R code for all our analyses.

248 s based on our taxonomy and motivated by the comments received by our domain experts.

249 Of the 22 213 comments received, 3458 (15.6%) were negative.

250 rmPCR reported with templated comments reduced treatment of contaminants and use of br

251 Two surgeon raters categorized comments relating to operative skills as being specific

252 The General Comment requires urgent consideration with the full part

253 rol, n = 207), rmPCR reported with templated comments (rmPCR, n = 198), or rmPCR reported with templa

254 Higher levels of interactivity (eg, posting comments) seem to enhance the appeal and usability of av

255 This Comment sets out a practical approach to protecting the

256 n a written plan, and following a reviewer's comments, some material was moved to supplementary files

257 errors and could be replaced by a rejection comment specifying clinical situations that might warran

258 Arimbasseri et al., in their Comment, suggest that to terminate transcription in vivo

259 This comment summarizes recent advances and expectations for

260 lysis of overall sentiment and negativity in comment text was performed using the Valence Aware Dicti

261 Natarajan et al. and Chen and Savidge comment that comparing the electric field in ketosteroid

262 e description of the Ham test for PNH, Dacie commented that "the essential basis of the disease is st

263 the Westmead Hospital in Sydney, Australia, commented that a major challenge for the future is impro

264 nicate more directly with patients, but many commented that changes to reimbursement and compensation

265 f you had asked me before then, I might have commented that parasites were rather disgusting.

266 Teachers and mentors commented that their roles in programme delivery were un

267 I have tried to distinguish comments that argue for extensions of the theory from th

268 Goff comments that faulting is important for creation of abys

269 Wang comments that the diffraction data for the structure of

270 spondents wrote in the section for their own comments that they would like a clear description of the

271 In this Formal Comment, the authors challenge the claims of a recent th

272 eigh these points in the context of reviewer comments, the existing literature, and current investmen

273 7 to 9 (critically important), and analyzed comments thematically.

274 saccades land, after providing some critical comments to the "hic-et-nunc" hypothesis.

275 ontent included product promotion, demeaning comments toward patients, aggression toward health profe

276 In their comment, Vinken and Vogels [1] take issue with our claim

277 The percentage of negative comments was highly correlated with lower monthly percen

278 In this comment we offer two challenges aimed at showing that H&

279 We appreciate the depth and breadth of comments we received.

280 In this comment, we cover some potential obstacles to implementi

281 In this Comment, we discuss the immunological impacts of glucoco

282 In our comment, we elucidate complementary aspects of the two t

283 In this Comment, we propose a management algorithm on the basis

284 In this comment, we summarize the present status and future pros

285 Illustrative consumer comments were also collected.

286 Changes in the percentage of negative comments were correlated with changes in a practice's na

287 3% of SIMPL operative performance evaluation comments were deemed effective (P < 0.0001).

288 Following manual review, 1272 comments were included for analysis.

289 Comments were manually reviewed to assess for relevance

290 The frequencies with which comments were rated as effective were compared using Chi

291 experience survey, 26 210 surveys and 22 213 comments were received from May 2017 to April 2018.

292 Public comments were solicited and considered in preparation of

293 Comments were then classified as effective, mediocre, in

294 nce report, expert presentations, and public comments were weighed, an unbiased independent panel pre

295 reviewers will receive written responses to comments, when appropriate.

296 nts submitted for publication, each reviewer comment will be discussed, and reviewers will receive wr

297 encourage working while sick, and free-text comments written in response to open-ended questions.

298 This iterative process of ratings and comments yielded a strong consensus on standards for ski

299 vance: This iterative process of ratings and comments yielded a strong consensus on standards for ski

300 In their Comment, Zeitler et al. do not challenge our results or