ライフサイエンスコーパス: committee

1 Pharmacists vancomycin consensus guidelines committee.

2 and for further confirmation by an end point committee.

3 y an external Variant Adjudication Oversight Committee.

4 Coordinating Committee and the AHA Executive Committee.

5 sponse, as assessed by an independent review committee.

6 e Evidence Development and Coverage Advisory Committee.

7 pproval by the independent safety monitoring committee.

8 ents were centrally adjudicated by a blinded committee.

9 esponse), as judged by an independent review committee.

10 wed and classified by a blinded adjudicating committee.

11 SD attack, as determined by the adjudication committee.

12 and SCD cases were adjudicated by an expert committee.

13 sociation of Immunologists' Minority Affairs Committee.

14 sing central review and a study adjudication committee.

15 y an independent and blinded Clinical Events Committee.

16 atic NAS diagnosed by a blinded adjudication committee.

17 ittee Report, and 2014 Eighth Joint National Committee.

18 lation, as assessed by an independent review committee.

19 cal Research Council, and WHO Polio Research Committee.

20 hed in Cell in collaboration with the Lasker Committee.

21 ce and relevant publications reviewed by the committee.

22 mphoma, assessed by an independent radiology committee.

23 te after obtaining approval from the Ethical Committee.

24 nse), as determined by an independent review committee.

25 s was provided by a multidisciplinary expert committee.

26 ibility for this goal to a diversity-focused committee.

27 dinal trial and approved by the local ethics committee.

28 erapy groups, assessed by independent review committee.

29 ord research review; and both ethical review committees.

30 Following approval by the ethics committee, a long-term supplementation treatment was int

31 assessed by an independent radiologic review committee according to the Lugano classification.

32 djudicated by an independent clinical events committee according to Valve Academic Research Consortiu

33 A blinded independent committee adjudicated all clinical events.

34 An independent committee adjudicated all end points.

35 An independent clinical event committee adjudicated investigator-reported and eventual

36 An independent review committee adjudicated IRIS events.

37 mography, and an independent clinical events committee adjudicated major adverse cardiac events.

38 Therefore, a blinded endpoint committee adjudicated the incidence of CLABSI.

39 Clinical Events Committee-adjudicated causes of death were balanced betw

40 Endpoint Committee adjudication of endpoints improved POAG incide

41 ience pedagogy, while its Minorities Affairs Committee aims to strengthen the scientific workforce by

42 -four physicians worldwide (10 on a steering committee and 14 on an expert committee) from discipline

43 vival, determined by an independent response committee and assessed in the intention-to-treat populat

44 viewed by an expanded international advisory committee and endorsed by the International Society on T

45 peer review by the Clinical Practice Updates Committee and external peer review through standard proc

46 peer review by the Clinical Practice Updates Committee and external peer review through standard proc

47 Cohen weighted kappa between the committee and model was 0.86, comparable to intraexpert

48 y the independent data monitoring and ethics committee and only five patients were withdrawn from dru

49 This draft was shared with the AGS Executive Committee and other members of the AGS Board of Director

50 the AGA Institute Clinical Practice Updates Committee and the AGA Governing Board to provide timely

51 the AGA Institute Clinical Practice Updates Committee and the AGA Governing Board to provide timely

52 by the AHA Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee and the AHA Executive Committee.

53 f the Veneto Regional Authority's Bioethical Committee and the revision of the Italian National Trans

54 ctive study was approved by the local ethics committee and written informed consent was obtained from

55 re value and support collaboration among key committees and task forces to identify and implement pro

56 events were adjudicated by a Clinical Events Committee, and all imaging including venograms, intravas

57 ors, trial site staff, clinical adjudication committee, and sponsor's clinical and laboratory personn

58 tudy was approved by an institutional ethics committee, and the need for patient consent was waived.

59 l safety committee, the independent external committee, and the personnel involved in defining the an

60 nents of systems interventions: (1) steering committees; and (2) causal loop diagrams (CLDs), used to

61 c organization, the presence of a guidelines committee, applying the GRADE methodology, consensus pro

62 had the appropriate national research ethics committee approval for the countries where the study was

63 ely registered on January 12th, 2018; Ethics Committee approved the study (ID: 1.790.088) on October

64 itution's echocardiography clinical practice committee approved use of EMW for patients with LQTS, ma

65 PCR was negative in all 45 committee-approved cases.

66 Clinical event committees are commonly employed for event validation in

67 red at the Witten/Herdecke University Ethics Committee as 140/2016 and retrospectively registered at

68 sease, and were judged by the medical ethics committee as not being related to the therapy.

69 ' lives, and variation in how ethical review committees assess adolescent studies.

70 The primary endpoint was independent review committee-assessed progression-free survival in the inte

71 Independent review committee-assessed progression-free survival was also si

72 ignificant improvement in independent review committee-assessed progression-free survival with veneto

73 The ACP Clinical Guidelines Committee based these recommendations on a systematic re

74 commended by the independent data-monitoring committee, because of a clear demonstration of efficacy.

75 mmittee Report or 2014 Eighth Joint National Committee BP goals but could also lead to more serious a

76 ospectively designed by the HERMES executive committee, but not registered.

77 logic Research (SER) Diversity and Inclusion Committee by which several aspects of participation by s

78 portance of MI reported by a clinical events committee (CEC) or site investigators (SIs).

79 fulness of adjudication by central end point committees (CECs) is poorly assessed in heart failure (H

80 lege of Physicians (ACP) Clinical Guidelines Committee (CGC) aims to disclose all health care-related

81 ACP's Clinical Guidelines Committee (CGC), in collaboration with staff from the Cl

82 An independent Clinical Events Committee classified and coded all adverse events (AEs)

83 e complex interdependencies between steering committee collaboration and their actions in the CLD.

84 This year, the Lasker Committee commissioned an essay to reflect on the histor

85 An ASN-commissioned, independent Advisory Committee comprehensively reviewed the literature and av

86 The ADA Professional Practice Committee comprises physicians, adult and pediatric endo

87 020 Standards, the ADA Professional Practice Committee, comprising physicians, adult and pediatric en

88 al step in implementing our mission, the D&I Committee conducted a survey of SER membership.

89 in the Netherlands and Belgium, and a review committee confirmed lung cancer as the cause of death wh

90 to develop a process that would help inform committees considering product-related recommendations.

91 To develop the 2019 standards, the committee continuously searched MEDLINE through November

92 an Heart Association, through its Statistics Committee, continuously monitors and evaluates sources o

93 orkforce, and provide suggestions on how the Committee could expand its influence by considering meas

94 oval from ASCO's Clinical Practice Guideline Committee (CPGC) leadership to proceed with endorsement

95 ial solution to this vexing problem, where a committee created through a partnership of academia, pro

96 ); and HbA(1c) based on International Expert Committee criteria, IEC-HbA(1c), (HbA(1c) >=42 mmol/mol

97 "The mission of the Diversity and Inclusion Committee (D&I) in the Society for Epidemiologic Researc

98 Evaluation) approach.Results: The guideline committee defined HP, and clinical, radiographic, and pa

99 elder law, and health law.Main Results: The committee designed its policy recommendations to promote

100 The scientific committee developed 17 Population/Intervention/Compariso

101 search directions.Conclusions: The guideline committee developed a systematic approach to the diagnos

102 interprofessional, multidisciplinary expert committee developed this policy statement by using an it

103 consisting of members from both Federal DRI committees, developed an open and transparent nomination

104 An independent safety monitoring committee discontinued the APR40 dosage.

105 Herein, the PI-RADS Steering Committee discusses how the MRI pathway should be incorp

106 in recusal from authorship, voting, and all committee discussions.

107 ssessment, by an independent data monitoring committee; disease severity was based on a modified Vazq

108 A total of 33% used a data-monitoring committee (DMC), and 50.6% incorporated blinding.

109 Data monitoring committees (DMCs), or data and safety monitoring boards,

110 he Dermatologic and Ophthalmic Drug Advisory Committee (DODAC) and the Ophthalmic Devices Panel (ODP)

111 The Disease Transmission Advisory Committee (DTAC) was created to review and classify repo

112 as discontinued by the Scientific Monitoring Committee due to the early termination of the ENDO trial

113 The central review committee, EDSS raters, laboratory personnel, and radiol

114 Immunology Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases Committee established a work group that reviewed and sum

115 ducation and Prevention Program Coordinating Committee Expert Panel Report 4 Working Group has issued

116 ducation and Prevention Program Coordinating Committee Expert Panel Working Group was coordinated and

117 mpared with a consensus of three ACR TI-RADS committee experts and nine other radiologists, all of wh

118 fter receiving authorization from the ethics committee for health research.

119 the US Food and Drug Administration and the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use of the Eu

120 al review, a final draft was approved by the Committee for the Governance of Perioperative and Surgic

121 the Reef Restoration and Adaptation Program committees for new intervention and restoration strategi

122 Its Education Committee fosters this process by creating educational a

123 on a steering committee and 14 on an expert committee) from disciplines related to bleeding particip

124 The P-COSCA Steering Committee generated a list of potential survival, life i

125 als, or achieving 2014 Eighth Joint National Committee goals could prevent 3.0 million (UR, 1.1-5.1 m

126 ls, and achieving 2014 Eighth Joint National Committee goals, respectively.

127 determined according to European task force committee guidelines.

128 stases as assessed by the independent review committee had an intracranial objective response.

129 could be assessed by the independent review committee, had an objective response.

130 The EFS committee has developed and implemented processes to add

131 The Steering Committee held a virtual consensus conference to determi

132 The HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC) based at EMBL's European Bioinformatics

133 e present the current HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC) guidelines for naming not only protein-

134 lthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC) has provided advice and guidance to t

135 y the International Cell Line Authentication Committee (ICLAC) and the Cellosaurus database.

136 Since the formation of the IDSA Women's Committee in 1992, women have played an increasing role

137 n 1.1), as assessed by an independent review committee in all patients who received at least one dose

138 elines and regulations of the medical ethics committee in Hospital of Stomatology, Hebei Medical Univ

139 nt of Mongolia activated the State Emergency Committee in January, 2020, on the basis of the 2017 Dis

140 oints were assessed by an independent review committee in the efficacy-evaluable set (comprising all

141 ival assessed by a masked independent review committee in the intention-to-treat population.

142 CARE, International Rescue Committee (IRC), and Save the Children, in collaboration

143 ee survival per independent radiology review committee (IRRC), and objective responses per IRRC in in

144 tions by engaged community leaders (steering committees) is of critical importance to influence a com

145 A global Landscape Analysis Committee (LAC) was established to act as an independent

146 nt types of memristive devices, we show that committee machines employing ensemble averaging can succ

147 ing a well-known concept in computer science-committee machines-in the context of memristor-based neu

148 basis of the available evidence, the expert committee made 1 strong recommendation for baseline seru

149 ng approval from the clinical studies Ethics Committee, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies of p

150 The committee makes the following recommendations: 1) instit

151 ome, assessed by an independent adjudication committee masked to treatment allocation, was clinical s

152 Meetings with at least 1 female program committee member filled non-paper podium faculty roles w

153 d to resign as elected chairman in 1933, and committee member Julius Bauer are investigated.

154 Meetings with at least one female program committee member were significantly more likely to inclu

155 linical needs, and an integration of all the committee members' suggestions, were formulated.

156 iprocated and transitive collaboration among committee members, as well as some evidence of more comp

157 Genders of program committee members, first author main podium presenters o

158 licies, including triage criteria and triage committee membership.

159 If rejection criteria were met, a committee mock-refused PCR unless the patient was clinic

160 y the UK Ministry of Defence research ethics committee (MODREC 165/Gen/10 and 692/MoDREC/15).

161 but determined as cGVHD by the adjudication committee (non-NIH-CC) had immune profiles similar to NI

162 endent test dataset annotated by a consensus committee of board-certified practicing cardiologists, t

163 A committee of experts guided item reduction, including pi

164 tions were formulated by a multidisciplinary committee of experts in the field of interstitial lung d

165 A committee of international experts in pediatric nephrolo

166 stry recognised by WHO and the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE).

167 the NASH Clinical Research Network Pathology Committee of Pioglitazone versus Vitamin E versus Placeb

168 he study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Qom University of Medical Sciences (ethical

169 ation of Anthropological Genetics, Executive Committee of the American Association of Physical Anthro

170 otocol (NCT03480152) was approved by the IRB committee of the NIH and the FDA.FUNDINGCenter for Clini

171 In 2014, the Tele-ICU Committee of the Society of Critical Care Medicine publi

172 variables were discussed within the Surgical Committees of SIOP Europe International Neuroblastoma St

173 Retrospective registration with local ethics committee on 21 March 2019.

174 Currently, clinical FDA and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAS

175 Standards Institute (CLSI)-FDA and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAS

176 tory Standards Institute (CLSI) and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAS

177 crobial susceptibility testing, the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAS

178 When evaluated using European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAS

179 Standards Institute (CLSI) and the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAS

180 and Drug Administration (FDA), and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAS

181 rates (20.7 to 21.7%) using CLSI or European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing breakp

182 ial susceptibility testing followed European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing guidel

183 The breakpoint coincides with a European Committee on AST decision to remove previously establish

184 sion criteria were (1) having American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 7th edition T0-T3, N0-N2c, M0

185 ralia for 1,918 patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition stage III melanom

186 of the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and Union for International C

187 lder with surgically treated, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Stage I-III invasive triple-n

188 he influence of tumor size by American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, Collaborative Ocular M

189 erver agreement regarding the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor stage at each criterion

190 tive oropharyngeal carcinoma; American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition clinical categories T1-T

191 IIIC cutaneous melanoma, per American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition criteria, with a BRAF(V6

192 IIC cutaneous melanoma as per American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition criteria, with BRAF(V600

193 resected cutaneous melanoma (American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition stage IIIB, IIIC, M1a, o

194 Neuroendocrine Tumors Society/American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th staging scheme (c-index 0.76, P

195 Thirty-nine patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage IIA-IV resectable MCC received

196 gnostic covariates, including American Joint Committee on Cancer stage, tumor grade, R-status, and ad

197 Patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer stages IIb to IV were scheduled to r

198 According to the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual (7(th) edition), 67 p

199 lete lymph node dissection of American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual (seventh edition; AJC

200 current eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system is prognostically rob

201 The eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system was used.

202 to IIIA (7(th) edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system) EGFR-mutant NSCLC we

203 e compared with the published American Joint Committee on Cancer version 8 (AJCCv8) stage III surviva

204 This forms the basis for the American Joint Committee on Cancer's (AJCC) Staging Manual, 8th edition

205 s or older and had resectable American Joint Committee on Cancer-defined stage IB-IIIA non-small-cell

206 ly documented treatment-naive American Joint Committee on Cancer-defined stage IIIA NSCLC that was de

207 ual, eighth edition, from the American Joint Committee on Cancer.

208 de status, in contrast to the American Joint Committee on Cancer/tumor nodes metastasis (TNM) system

209 The international American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Contr

210 a standardization project within the Nordic Committee on Food Analysis (NMKL).

211 trol rates (using the Seventh Joint National Committee on hypertension targets) achieved over 4 years

212 epatitis A vaccination according to Advisory Committee on Immunization Practice (ACIP) guidelines.

213 nfirmed infection is not available, Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) criteria are

214 epatitis A vaccination according to Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) guidelines.

215 13th birthday is recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices and vaccination befo

216 Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recently developed r

217 ternational travel according to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommendations and

218 maturely on the advice of the Trial Steering Committee on Nov 1, 2012.

219 and Massachusetts General Hospital Executive Committee on Research.

220 as commissioned by the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation and resulted in the developme

221 tes published when the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation completes a literature review

222 tes published when the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation completes a literature review

223 Representatives of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation developed an updated in-hospi

224 The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Expert Systematic Reviewer an

225 mmary statement of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation First Aid Task Force Consensu

226 The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation has initiated a continuous re

227 annual summary of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation International Consensus on Ca

228 owed consultation with International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation member resuscitation councils

229 In 2018, the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation sponsored the COSCA initiativ

230 n evidence reviewed by International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Task Force science experts.

231 Members from 6 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task forces have assessed, di

232 ary publication of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation's 2020 International Consensu

233 It aligns with the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation's continuous evidence review

234 r agreement within the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation, new or revised treatment rec

235 recommendations of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation, only systematic reviews coul

236 review process of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation, with updates published when

237 n conjunction with the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation.

238 tric Task Force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation.

239 port Task Force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation.

240 port Task Force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation.

241 ed as chair of the National Research Council Committee on Space Biology and Medicine, advisory to the

242 d on the guidelines set by the International Committee on Standardized Nomenclature for Mice.

243 Current guidelines from the US Army's Committee on Tactical Combat Casualty Care (CoTCCC) for

244 recommendation by the data safety monitoring committee on the basis of interim data suggesting greate

245 In October 2017, the United Kingdom Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) recomme

246 tor of each hospital's adult clinical ethics committee, or a suitable alternate representative famili

247 -203]) at the request of the data monitoring committee owing to increased serious adverse events (mai

248 and (3) achieving 2014 Eighth Joint National Committee panel member report BP goals.

249 The Committee proposed best practices to support public trus

250 diverse interprofessional, multidisciplinary committee rather than ad hoc by treating clinicians; 4)

251 Dose increases followed data review committee recommendations (cohort 1: 2/6/8/9 mg/kg; coho

252 toxicity was reported and the trial's safety committee recommended a flat dose of 750 mg for the coho

253 s, (2) achieving 2003 Seventh Joint National Committee Report BP goals, and (3) achieving 2014 Eighth

254 evels, achieving 2003 Seventh Joint National Committee Report goals, and achieving 2014 Eighth Joint

255 evels, achieving 2003 Seventh Joint National Committee Report goals, or achieving 2014 Eighth Joint N

256 s than achieving 2003 Seventh Joint National Committee Report or 2014 Eighth Joint National Committee

257 he subject of a National Academy of Medicine committee report titled Integrating Clinical Research in

258 C/AHA guideline, 2003 Seventh Joint National Committee Report, and 2014 Eighth Joint National Committ

259 ant for the Ophthalmic Technology Assessment Committee Retina/Vitreous Panel to review in full.

260 ssified, usually as L-aGVHD, following study committee review.

261 topped early, after a data safety monitoring committee review.

262 The Endpoint Committee reviewed 267 first endpoints from 1636 partici

263 se groups occurred after a safety monitoring committee reviewed the data following vaccination of the

264 Development by a guidelines committee, routine guideline output, and adhering to the

265 The Relative Value Scale Update Committee (RUC) of the American Medical Association play

266 logy Clinical and Public Health Microbiology Committee's Subcommittee on Laboratory Practices comment

267 With committee scores used as ground truth, the model had an

268 ch recommendation was discussed by an expert committee, screened for conflicts of interest, according

269 The committee selected and reviewed the studies, developed t

270 hocardiographers from the guidelines writing committee, sensitivity for elevated LV filling pressure

271 Data monitoring committees should have access to all data, including eff

272 opose an N-best policy: Hiring and promotion committees should solicit a few research products as the

273 eloped by an international multidisciplinary committee sponsored by the American College of Radiology

274 An independent Safety Review Committee (SRC), supported by Novartis Pharma AG, analyz

275 ssessments from an independent Safety Review Committee (SRC); and (3) their clinical experience.

276 ionists are credentialed by a multispecialty committee that reviews experience, lesion selection, tec

277 The internal safety committee, the independent external committee, and the p

278 After some years agonizing by serial expert committees, the National Heart Institute opted against a

279 After some years agonizing by serial expert committees, the National Heart Institute opted against a

280 b creation for systems managed by villagers' committee through collection of monthly tariffs.

281 The use of a blinded independent committee to adjudicate the primary endpoint by subject

282 ng central adjudication by a clinical events committee to classify cause of death.

283 ricter policies to manage COIs, allowing the committee to fully understand the context of the public

284 ic hepatotoxicity caused the data monitoring committee to stop enrolment six patients short of target

285 nomination process prompted the Federal DRI committees to address previously identified issues relat

286 presentatives from several such STEM society committees to serve as a hub for a growing community of

287 mendation of the independent data monitoring committee, treatment assignment was unmasked on Dec 11,

288 The ACC CVD in Women Committee undertook a review of the recent guidelines an

289 pants' care, and monitored by an independent committee using an adaptive approach with interim analys

290 Fibrosis was staged by a central pathology committee using the Ishak fibrosis score (F).

291 arthritis Initiative staged by a radiologist committee using the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) system were u

292 ree survival according to independent review committee was 22.4 months (95% CI 15.3-not estimable) wi

293 te (95% CI) per independent radiology review committee was 84% (71% to 93%), with 67% (52% to 79%), a

294 PVE adjudication by a clinical events committee was based on modified Duke Criteria.

295 The independent review committee was masked to treatment assignment, and funder

296 f the American Society of Nephrology Quality Committee, we evaluated existing kidney quality metrics

297 met rejection criteria and were reviewed by committee, which endorsed refusal in 110 of 155 cases (7

298 ed radiologist and hospital radiation safety committee who required the attending radiologist to set

299 rmed as follows: 1) multidisciplinary sepsis committee with sepsis coordinator and data abstractor; 2

300 same age from 2014 to 2019 (Cantonal Ethics Committee Zurich registry number: KEK-ZH-2017-01395) for