ライフサイエンスコーパス: conditioning paradigm

1 ehavior and hippocampal plasticity in a fear-conditioning paradigm.

2 exhibit facilitated learning in a Pavlovian conditioning paradigm.

3 st, on ethanol's rewarding effect in a place conditioning paradigm.

4 a single test session in a modified operant conditioning paradigm.

5 lay (Experiment 1) or a trace (Experiment 2) conditioning paradigm.

6 nce or learning in either a delay or a trace conditioning paradigm.

7 measured by performance in a contextual fear-conditioning paradigm.

8 -HNK 1 week before a 3-shock contextual fear conditioning paradigm.

9 orts and physiological measures in a two-day conditioning paradigm.

10 naive, head-restrained mice learned a trace conditioning paradigm.

11 eurons and reduced fear expression in a fear-conditioning paradigm.

12 earning and memory as assessed by trace fear conditioning paradigm.

13 ic resonance imaging during a Pavlovian fear conditioning paradigm.

14 can serve as the reinforcer in an appetitive conditioning paradigm.

15 cohol as a positive reinforcer in an operant conditioning paradigm.

16 pharmacological strategies in a social-fear-conditioning paradigm.

17 urons in either structure during a classical conditioning paradigm.

18 erently by midbrain dopamine neurons in each conditioning paradigm.

19 essed greater associative learning in a fear conditioning paradigm.

20 test, and cognition, using a contextual fear conditioning paradigm.

21 n learning and memory in the contextual fear-conditioning paradigm.

22 rated elevated freezing in a contextual fear conditioning paradigm.

23 arning using a combined trace and delay fear conditioning paradigm.

24 behavior to the tone was increased in a fear-conditioning paradigm.

25 od approach in mice trained with a Pavlovian conditioning paradigm.

26 l dopamine in the striatum using a Pavlovian conditioning paradigm.

27 ormance in an open-field and contextual fear-conditioning paradigm.

28 ibe a simple, unrestrained associative place-conditioning paradigm.

29 isition than extinction, validating the fear-conditioning paradigm.

30 h an aversive air-puff to the eye in a trace-conditioning paradigm.

31 uice reward with a visual cue in a classical conditioning paradigm.

32 ng the hippocampal-dependent trace eye-blink conditioning paradigm.

33 opamine, we used a food-reinforced Pavlovian conditioning paradigm.

34 patory activity in a D1R-dependent Pavlovian conditioning paradigm.

35 sensory cues paired with food in a classical conditioning paradigm.

36 pathways used to detect the CS depend on the conditioning paradigm.

37 ved to a food-sated state in an instrumental conditioning paradigm.

38 ere trained in an unsignaled contextual fear conditioning paradigm.

39 rm association memories in a contextual fear conditioning paradigm.

40 onse to appetitive versus aversive events in conditioning paradigms.

41 POR or PER were tested in 2 contextual fear conditioning paradigms.

42 g associative learning using classical delay conditioning paradigms.

43 tracortical microstimulation or by classical conditioning paradigms.

44 irement observed in most mammalian classical conditioning paradigms.

45 er, are the age differences in the different conditioning paradigms.

46 dala focused on learned behaviors using fear conditioning paradigms.

47 s in both self-administration and contextual conditioning paradigms.

48 has been dominated by pavlovian and operant conditioning paradigms.

49 ceptors in memory processes in fear and drug conditioning paradigms.

50 les in the description of numerous classical conditioning paradigms.

51 esions and both signaled and unsignaled fear conditioning paradigms.

52 as assessed through contextual and cued fear conditioning paradigms.

53 haracterized by a deficient response to fear-conditioning paradigms.

54 ired stimulus reinforcement and instrumental conditioning paradigms.

55 e the conditioned rewarding effects in place-conditioning paradigms.

56 1402 healthy participants underwent a fear conditioning paradigm (acquisition training, generalizat

57 e final sample) completed a Pavlovian threat conditioning paradigm across two days.

58 Exposing mice to a fear conditioning paradigm also triggers Top2B dephosphorylat

59 e rats were trained using the trace eyeblink conditioning paradigm, an associative learning task that

60 ors promotes memory consolidation in several conditioning paradigms, an effect primarily associated w

61 hen subjects were exposed to a novel operant conditioning paradigm and modulated MU beta activity, co

62 s measured using delayed eye blink classical conditioning paradigm and results were compared with the

63 or LA/BA nuclei in rats in a contextual fear conditioning paradigm and unconditioned fear to a predat

64 raining in the Drosophila aversive olfactory conditioning paradigm and we used mutants to define the

65 ctivity of each of the identified neurons in conditioning paradigms and can be used for flexible beha

66 inbred mice in two different contextual fear conditioning paradigms and transitive inference to test

67 tinction in contextual or auditory-cued fear conditioning paradigms and whether M. vaccae NCTC 11659

68 rent, or a stranger, being exposed to a fear conditioning paradigm, and (2) the subsequent fear extin

69 y evoke behavior in an optogenetic pavlovian conditioning paradigm, and activation of SC->VTA/SNc neu

70 duced CPP was established using an eight day conditioning paradigm, and expression of CPP was tested

71 icipation induced by a well-established fear conditioning paradigm applied in both humans and rodents

72 of the eyeblink EMG response in this general conditioning paradigm are considered.

73 amework whereby the temporal features of the conditioning paradigm are critical in determining the ab

74 ior analysis in the cued and contextual fear conditioning paradigm, as well as immunohistological and

75 uch, this study goes beyond well-established conditioning paradigms associating non-pain cues with pa

76 In this conditioning paradigm, asymptotic performance is reached

77 Using a fear-conditioning paradigm called the AX+, BX- discrimination

78 of a variety of drugs after training in fear-conditioning paradigms can impair consolidation of fear

79 In classical conditioning paradigms, conditioned stimuli trigger a tr

80 The authors applied a novel fear conditioning paradigm consisting of socially relevant un

81 y participants underwent a differential fear conditioning paradigm during 7T magnetic resonance imagi

82 an subjects were trained in a Pavlovian fear conditioning paradigm during functional magnetic resonan

83 ins are required for associative learning in conditioning paradigms, e.g., two-way active avoidance a

84 This indicates that, under the current fear conditioning paradigm, early-life FGF2 has protective ef

85 report that learning in the contextual fear conditioning paradigm engenders a decrease in eIF2alpha

86 Finally, in an auditory-cued fear conditioning paradigm exploring short-term memory and fe

87 However, most Pavlovian fear conditioning paradigms focus only on freezing behavior,

88 were administered a 4-shock contextual fear conditioning paradigm followed by immediate or delayed c

89 To test this prediction, we developed a fear conditioning paradigm for mice based on gap detection.

90 etic resonance imaging (fMRI) and an operant conditioning paradigm for the discrete delivery of small

91 Recently, in a classical Pavlovian fear conditioning paradigm, Gruene and colleagues described a

92 This conditioning paradigm has been used to show that the hip

93 in the hippocampus-dependent contextual fear-conditioning paradigm in adulthood.

94 ncies during a differential pavlovian threat-conditioning paradigm in eight patients with a bilateral

95 de details for a novel context threat (fear) conditioning paradigm in humans using a commercially ava

96 However, the use of a single-trial conditioning paradigm in Lymnaea solves this problem.

97 togenetics during a social reward contextual conditioning paradigm in male mice, we show that vH neur

98 We used a fear-conditioning paradigm in mice to condition footshock to

99 show that training with a single pulse in a conditioning paradigm in vivo does not result in learnin

100 We used a classic conditioning paradigm in which 3 neutral stimuli (differ

101 Here, we developed a classical conditioning paradigm in which 6- to 8-d-old larvae deve

102 n the acquisition of a novel contextual fear conditioning paradigm in which a unimodal (olfactory) cu

103 We designed a human parallel aversive conditioning paradigm in which different Pavlovian visua

104 bjected rats to a differential auditory fear conditioning paradigm in which one conditioned auditory

105 , nondependent volunteers (N=90) completed a conditioning paradigm in which they received a moderate

106 only and mixed-valence cue-outcome Pavlovian conditioning paradigms in male and female mice to dissoc

107 being systematically examined with eyeblink conditioning paradigms in nonprimate mammalian animal mo

108 essing amygdala-dependent memories using cue-conditioning paradigms in rodents, which were subsequent

109 oned responses (CRs) in both delay and trace conditioning paradigms in the rabbit (Oryctolagus cunicu

110 ammation with a two-day multiple-threat fear conditioning paradigm involving interoceptive and extero

111 e response topography formed under a complex conditioning paradigm, involving 2 randomly alternating

112 The trace version of the conditioning paradigm is a particularly good system to e

113 The eyeblink conditioning paradigm is used to describe a neural mecha

114 mical circuitry underlying the auditory fear-conditioning paradigm is well characterized.

115 campus could not learn a standard trace fear-conditioning paradigm, lesioned rats trained on CTC show

116 ablation abolished learning in an olfactory conditioning paradigm, MB-ablated males were able to lea

117 learning and memory formation of an operant conditioning paradigm occur better during the day than d

118 -born controls performed a differential fear conditioning paradigm on two consecutive days.

119 A classical conditioning paradigm (P3-P4) showed that the learning g

120 Using separate single-cue and differential conditioning paradigms, participants were fear condition

121 the region during blocks of a trace eyeblink conditioning paradigm performed in two environments and

122 In a fear-conditioning paradigm, PPEKO mice significantly increase

123 bital shock as both the CS and US in a US-US conditioning paradigm previously shown to be effective i

124 el of forebrain dependence between these two conditioning paradigms should produce a differential blo

125 In the trace conditioning paradigm, significant conditioning deficits

126 behaving mice during training in a cued fear-conditioning paradigm slowed the extinction of learned f

127 area stimulation with a sound in a backward conditioning paradigm specifically reduced representatio

128 This conditioning paradigm stimulated the cortical site for a

129 s in rodents have predominantly used context conditioning paradigms, studies in humans have used comp

130 commonly assessed using effort-based operant conditioning paradigms such as the Effort for Reward tas

131 Classical conditioning paradigms, such as trace conditioning, in w

132 An olfactory conditioning paradigm tested the hypothesis that newborn

133 Finally, using a novel conditioning paradigm that decouples reward contingency

134 We also describe a novel courtship conditioning paradigm that established long-term memory,

135 and report behavioral results using a trace conditioning paradigm that is sensitive to hippocampal d

136 d female adult C57BL/6 J mice to a Pavlovian conditioning paradigm that paired footshock with a seria

137 nd memory duration using an associative fear conditioning paradigm that trained zebrafish to associat

138 In a typical conditioning paradigm, the placebo-distraction was intro

139 Collapsing across conditioning paradigms, there is a general tendency for

140 studies using a well-validated human threat conditioning paradigm to examine amygdala involvement du

141 tion of motor cortex and eye blink classical conditioning paradigm, to test whether dystonia symptoms

142 dred and twenty individuals performed a fear conditioning paradigm twice 6 months apart.

143 , subjects were trained in a delay classical conditioning paradigm using a tone conditioned stimulus

144 In the auditory Pavlovian threat conditioning paradigm using C57BL/6J mice, retrieving a

145 mphetamine as a reinforcer and in an operant conditioning paradigm using sucrose reinforcement.

146 Rabbits were trained in a delay classical conditioning paradigm, using a tone as the conditioned s

147 The first experiment assessed whether a conditioning paradigm, using clearly visible cues for hi

148 use, or domestic violence), completed a fear conditioning paradigm utilizing blue and yellow bells as

149 During a sucrose taste classic conditioning paradigm, violations of learned association

150 ulus), whose performance in a delay eyeblink conditioning paradigm was compared with that of intact c

151 A discriminable context conditioning paradigm was developed that demonstrated bo

152 A forelimb-withdrawal classical conditioning paradigm was used in awake cats (n = 4) to

153 A second-order fear-conditioning paradigm was used to test whether the dopam

154 l discrimination in trace and delay eyeblink conditioning paradigms was investigated.

155 Using an operant conditioning paradigm, we demonstrated that rats cannot

156 Using a trace fear conditioning paradigm, we found that elevating PFC 2-AG

157 Using a conditioning paradigm, we investigated how directly and

158 s the hind-paw formalin model with the place-conditioning paradigm, we measured a learned behavior th

159 Using EEG and an aversive classical conditioning paradigm, we observed sharpening of visuoco

160 By using an operant conditioning paradigm, we show that CNGA4-null mice are

161 r for sucrose in a progressive ratio operant-conditioning paradigm when administered peripherally.

162 hances associative learning in an appetitive conditioning paradigm, where flies associate an odor wit

163 ablished a Pavlovian serial feature-negative conditioning paradigm, where male mice are trained on a

164 aired with cocaine, as measured by the place conditioning paradigm, whereas blockade of IRS-2 activit

165 fMRI) in an olfactory version of a classical conditioning paradigm, whereby neutral faces were paired

166 We trained mice with a fear conditioning paradigm while imaging their brains with st

167 and quinine paired with cues in a classical conditioning paradigm while the electrophysiological act

168 ulation as a CS in the well studied eyeblink conditioning paradigm will facilitate characterizing sen

169 dults who completed a differential cued fear conditioning paradigm with 24 h delayed extinction while

170 Using an unbiased place-conditioning paradigm with two doses of cocaine (10 mg/k

171 ibility of employing remotely delivered fear conditioning paradigms with affective ratings as outcome

172 3T fMRI utilized a passive aversive conditioning paradigm, with neutral faces as conditioned