戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ess/anxiety, respectively, and during social confrontation.
2 nfection, little is known about this initial confrontation.
3 nd an increase in dopamine to 120% after the confrontation.
4 collected before, during, and after a 10 min confrontation.
5 gnificantly increased up to 60 min after the confrontation.
6 rotonin levels were seen during or after the confrontation.
7 e achieved approximately 20-30 min after the confrontation.
8 es should be shared between the two modes of confrontation.
9 ndently or downstream from the DER:fork head confrontation.
10 might be characterized as a decade of active confrontation.
11 straint, predator odor, and male-male social confrontation.
12 s during shock anticipation and actual shock confrontation.
13 istic, standardized, aggressive, and intense confrontations.
14 in the resident's home cage with brief daily confrontations.
15 f discrepancies and the importance of future confrontations.
16 k vary along a spectrum from minimization to confrontation; 4) the health care workplace is often sil
17 d aggressors (ANAs) during resident-intruder confrontations after self-administering 1.0 g/kg alcohol
18  80% of baseline levels during and after the confrontation and an increase in dopamine to 120% after
19 ly, in those countries where use of physical confrontation and social ostracism is rated as less appr
20 nce status [1, 5] can eliminate the need for confrontation and the associated energetic expense and r
21 lones, A2b2, A2bi, and C2a4, in the spheroid confrontation assay.
22                                              Confrontation assays between wild-type and clock mutant
23                          Interestingly, when confrontation assays were performed under light/dark cyc
24 primed with a cytokine cocktail and used for confrontation assays with C. albicans.
25 med ex vivo whole-blood infection assays and confrontation assays with primary human NK cells.
26                                           In confrontation assays with saprobic fungi that were commo
27                      Characterization of the confrontation between rotaviruses and their host cells h
28  of a multiple sites environment, as well as confrontation between species featuring different swarmi
29 sive CD-1 mice, followed by agonistic social confrontations between the CD-1 and C57BL/6J mice, and c
30  social defeat stress consists of four brief confrontations between the experimental rat and an aggre
31                       We postulate that the 'confrontation' between the 'evil' alliance and 'benign'
32                                         Such confrontations can reveal previously unknown constituent
33 ntly the strongest predictor of judgments of confrontation, compared to other emotions.
34                                              Confrontation does not appear to lead to patient acknowl
35 n = 48) we demonstrate that anticipation and confrontation evoke bradycardic and tachycardic response
36                                     In vitro confrontation experiments showed that the SH3-N domain o
37 g which Travis Bickle rehearses an imaginary confrontation in front of a mirror.
38 ity in corticolimbic areas during aggressive confrontations in rats.
39 tients had normal early responses to picture confrontation, indicating intact visual processing.
40  research on the relationship between visual confrontation naming and hippocampal function has been i
41                                          The confrontation naming fMRI task also revealed impaired ac
42 ognitive deficits on both letter fluency and confrontation naming in the ALS group.
43    Previous research has demonstrated intact confrontation naming in the presence of verbal fluency d
44                                              Confrontation naming is impaired in neurodegenerative co
45 indicates that event-related ECoG HGA during confrontation naming predicts ECS interference with nami
46 ivated in normal subjects on the same visual confrontation naming task.
47                                              Confrontation naming was tested at baseline, and 1, 4, a
48 diated letter fluency, not temporal-mediated confrontation naming, demonstrating the clinical relevan
49 ecutive dysfunction, or were also present in confrontation naming, indicating language dysfunction.
50                                              Confrontation naming, noun fluency, recognition, and per
51 rment on other word retrieval tasks, such as confrontation naming, which do not place heavy demands o
52  paradigms were employed, letter fluency and confrontation naming, which were developed for use with
53  from the Mini Linguistic State Examination, confrontation naming, words per minute derived from a sp
54 s of executive function, episodic memory and confrontation naming.
55 he overall neuroanatomical network of visual confrontation naming.
56 tate Examination: 7.71 [95% CI, 3.06-12.35], confrontation naming: 23.81 [95% CI, 11.85-35.77], Inter
57 om shock anticipation to the moment of shock confrontation neural activity shifted from a region anat
58                    Defining replication as a confrontation of current theoretical expectations clarif
59 a disease-suppressive soil predicts that the confrontation of plant with a phytopathogen can lead to
60                                          The confrontation of these two approaches confirmed the impo
61                                       In the confrontation of this challenge, research should benefit
62             Our experience suggests that the confrontation of time-series data with mechanistic model
63 esizes that error detection results from the confrontation of two signals: a fast and unconscious mot
64 cial groups to examine the effects of social confrontation on the reinforcing effects of cocaine usin
65  a norm violation are more likely to endorse confrontation, ostracism and, to a smaller extent, gossi
66 associated with aberrant brain activation in confrontation paradigms with phobic stimuli.
67 video clips of spiders and domestic animals (confrontation phase) after being primed on the content o
68 ges, which followed rather than preceded the confrontation, points to a significant role of accumbal
69              For the group, following social confrontation, sensitivity to cocaine reinforcement was
70 iateness ratings of responses in the form of confrontation, social ostracism and gossip.
71                              Here, we show a confrontation strategy adapted by V. cholerae O1 in whic
72 mplement diverse strategies to avoid hostile confrontations, the extent to which social influences af
73 Warren employed a simple stratagem of public confrontation to discover from Morton the true nature of
74                            By using a social-confrontation tube test to assess the dominant-subordina
75 ordinates exposed to 28 d (1 hr/d) of social confrontations was compared with that from control nonst
76 R1 antagonists, CP-154,526 or MTIP, before a confrontation with a male conspecific.
77 cial stress was defined as defeat in a brief confrontation with an aggressive resident mouse and subs
78 ls were neither activated nor inactivated by confrontation with APCs from I-Ab-Ep mice in which I-A(b
79           Compared to dams without intruder, confrontation with intruder robustly activated PMv(CART)
80 energetic needs may motivate females to risk confrontation with more powerful rivals.
81                                    Thus, the confrontation with T. arundinaceum results in an up-regu
82 tum demonstrated the strongest coloration of confrontation zones.