戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 s do not support an advantage for the use of conscious sedation.
2 al programs to train residents in the use of conscious sedation.
3  maintain sleep, reduce seizures, and induce conscious sedation.
4 cy department to monitor patients undergoing conscious sedation.
5 heter ablation for atrial fibrillation under conscious sedation.
6 heter ablation for atrial fibrillation under conscious sedation.
7 87%] of 52 private practice) respondents use conscious sedation.
8 lses did not change and no patients required conscious sedation.
9 lters were placed using local anesthesia and conscious sedation.
10 in the prepectoral subfascial position under conscious sedation.
11 lated local anesthesia, versus the SoC using conscious sedation.
12 s above the established threshold), by using conscious sedation and 8-12-F catheters.
13 n raw analyses, intraprocedural success with conscious sedation and general anesthesia was similar (9
14                                        Under conscious sedation and local anesthesia or local anesthe
15 gents for general anaesthesia as well as for conscious sedation and their respective drawbacks.
16 roidectomy (ex-MIP; locoregional anesthesia, conscious sedation, and exploration via a limited incisi
17                     Locoregional anesthesia, conscious sedation, and exploration via a limited incisi
18                 New pharmacologic agents for conscious sedation are being used with increasing freque
19 nces between 'monitored anesthesia care' and conscious sedation are defined.
20           The first seven patients underwent conscious sedation, but the other 22 patients required o
21  time and labor intensive, and often require conscious sedation by a pediatric anesthesiology team.
22 examination, 4,761 patients (78.1%) received conscious sedation by the MR conscious sedation service.
23 nesthesia was noted in 102 of 1737 (5.9%) of conscious sedation cases.
24 f 5 mL of 1% lidocaine injected locally, and conscious sedation consisted of 50 microg of fentanyl an
25 alves (BEV) as well as local anesthesia with conscious sedation (CS) and general anesthesia (GA) in p
26  balloon-expandable valves (BEV), as well as conscious sedation (CS) and general anesthesia (GA), cli
27  In clinical practice, local anesthesia with conscious sedation (CS) is performed in roughly 50% of p
28             Guidelines to triage patients to conscious sedation (CS) or monitored anaesthesia care (M
29 o investigate whether the sedation mode (ie, conscious sedation [CS] vs general anesthesia [GA]) affe
30 ion who underwent left atrial ablation under conscious sedation, digital cine-fluoroscopic imaging of
31 ications such as fever), use of analgesia or conscious sedation, drainage method, and imaging techniq
32                             In 162 patients, conscious sedation during ICD placement was achieved wit
33 edation (BPS) titrated to moderate sedation (conscious sedation) for endoscopic procedures.
34 , -3.2 points [95% CI, -5.6 to -0.8]) vs the conscious sedation group (mean NIHSS score, 17.2 at admi
35  anesthesia group (n = 73) or a nonintubated conscious sedation group (n = 77) during stroke thrombec
36 the general anesthesia group vs 18.2% in the conscious sedation group P = .01]).
37                                          The conscious sedation group was less likely to experience i
38             In the general anesthesia vs the conscious sedation group, substantial patient movement w
39 l anesthesia was noninferior to the SoC with conscious sedation, highlighting the safety and efficacy
40 erformed in one session with US guidance and conscious sedation in 20 euthyroid patients (mean age, 4
41 can be performed safely and effectively with conscious sedation in patients with malignant compressio
42 ic agents and their possible application for conscious sedation in the ambulatory care setting.
43          These results suggest the safety of conscious sedation in this population, although comparat
44                              In US practice, conscious sedation is associated with briefer length of
45                                              Conscious sedation is safe and has a high effectiveness
46                 Objective: To assess whether conscious sedation is superior to general anesthesia for
47                                              Conscious sedation is used during transcatheter aortic v
48                           MT performed under conscious sedation non-GA had significantly shorter onse
49 ctomy (MT) under general anaesthesia (GA) or conscious sedation non-GA through a systematic review an
50 tional radiologists, to document patterns of conscious sedation, nursing assistance, and care before
51                           Implantation under conscious sedation of ICDs in the prepectoral subfascial
52 nesthesia with patients undergoing TAVR with conscious sedation on an intention-to-treat basis for th
53        Although ablations are performed with conscious sedation or general anesthesia, microwave abla
54 cancer, or a comorbidity that would preclude conscious sedation or general anesthesia.
55  either under sedation, which is deeper than conscious sedation, or under anaesthesia.
56  performed safely with general anesthesia or conscious sedation, provided that there are properly tra
57                                A database of conscious sedation records for MR imaging at the Johns H
58 78.1%) received conscious sedation by the MR conscious sedation service.
59                         Has this new form of conscious sedation the potential to be safer and more ef
60                              Conversion from conscious sedation to general anesthesia was noted in 10
61 nterior circulation undergoing thrombectomy, conscious sedation vs general anesthesia did not result
62 tment-weighted adjustment for 51 covariates, conscious sedation was associated with lower procedural
63                                              Conscious sedation was associated with reductions in pro
64                                              Conscious sedation was used in 1737/10 997 (15.8%) cases
65                                              Conscious sedation was used in 59.9% of transfemoral pro
66                   Implantation of ICDs under conscious sedation with combined hypnotic agents and dee
67 s) in the electrophysiology laboratory using conscious sedation with combined hypnotic agents and dee
68 logy laboratories under local anesthesia and conscious sedation with intravenous midazolam and propof
69  with the patient under local anesthesia and conscious sedation, with the cryoprobe covering the lesi