戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ard-approved protocol and signed an informed consent form.
2 obtained and all patients signed an informed consent form.
3 sence of a nurse, and careful reading of the consent form.
4  and other issues and to address them in the consent form.
5  their notification preference on the biopsy consent form.
6 d failure to understand and sign the written consent form.
7 press consent with a signed written informed consent form.
8 pproved the study, and all patients signed a consent form.
9 etermine the frequency and effect of missing consent forms.
10 pitfalls of specific and separate anesthesia consent forms.
11  enhance subjects' understanding of informed consent forms.
12  inadvertent role in promulgating unreadable consent forms.
13                   Reading levels of informed consent forms.
14 s of informed consent were included in their consent forms.
15 approval of scientific protocols and written consent forms.
16 ligible for inclusion and 697 (78%) returned consent forms.
17 asing complexity of requirements of informed consent forms.
18 uded in the study after they signed informed consent forms.
19                     Of 15 trials of enhanced consent forms, 6 showed significant improvement in under
20  unknown addresses or who did not return the consent form and 163 nonresponders did not participate.
21                      553 students signed the consent form and indicated their voluntary participation
22 included all patients who signed an informed consent form and were enrolled in the study.
23 ents; simplifying and standardising informed consent forms and processes; and developing mechanisms t
24 Single Alcohol Screening Question [M-SASQ]), consent forms, and a short survey collecting contact det
25 creening, preapproved template protocols and consent forms, and clearer guidance regarding co-enrollm
26 volving human biological materials, existing consent forms, and literature on informed consent to cre
27 % of faculty felt dissatisfied with resident consent forms, and more than two-thirds felt patients we
28 p searches of records, reimbursed for signed consent forms, and supported by a dedicated clinician.
29 tion and a suggestion for an updated patient consent form are presented.
30 itute consent form template, not signing the consent form at initial discussion, presence of a nurse,
31  viewing and reading about the study and the consent form at the subject's own pace with testing and
32 eon-generated RBAs used in signed electronic consent forms at an academic referral center in San Fran
33 und that 66% of patients were missing signed consent forms at surgery and that this caused a delay fo
34                                      Missing consent forms at surgery can lead to delays in patient c
35 In this article, we recommend that (1) donor consent forms be expanded to include consent to research
36 institutional review board-approved informed consent forms before enrollment.
37 ng the approval of the protocol and informed consent forms by the respective IRBs at the University o
38                                        Three consent forms contained all of the basic elements of inf
39  and nurses were introduced to the universal consent form during orientation to the ICU.
40        Ethicists have suggested that written consent forms encourage participants in phase 1 cancer t
41 sized that text provided by IRBs in informed-consent forms falls short of the IRBs' own readability s
42                              After signing a consent form, five patients with at least two comparable
43                A hospital-approved universal consent form for 8 commonly performed procedures (arteri
44 ption of direct benefit as well as risk, all consent forms for 1999 phase 1 cancer trials were compil
45                                              Consent forms for phase 1 oncology studies almost never
46 udy ultrasound examinations, interviews, and consent forms for review of medical records.
47                         Analysis of informed consent forms for the presence and the adequacy of descr
48 g through the use of multimedia and enhanced consent forms have had only limited success.
49                                   Electronic consent forms have the potential to facilitate patient c
50 t 12-month medical visit, and signed patient consent form in the electronic health record (EHR).
51 reviewed using the iPad (introductory video, consent form, interactive quiz).
52               In many instances, the missing consent forms interfered with team rounds and resident e
53                       At our center, missing consent forms led to delayed cases, burdensome and inade
54  a specific and separate anesthesia informed consent form may be useful, it should not undermine the
55                    After signing an informed consent form, men referred for transrectal prostate biop
56 ng indication of laterality on the patient's consent form (n=10), absence of a site mark on the patie
57 eed to address, if relevant, in the informed consent forms of critical care clinical trials.
58 ng time spent reviewing the risk sections of consent forms, perceived research risks, trial understan
59  agent as "treatment" or "therapy." Only one consent form promised direct benefit to subjects.
60                        Reading levels of the consent forms ranged from grades 8.2 to 13.4 (mean +/- s
61 ent form, type of review performed, types of consent forms required, preparation time, and number of
62 he general required elements of the informed consent form stipulated by the 45 Code of Federal Regula
63                   The literature on informed consent forms suggest that shorter informed consent form
64 ome, use of the US National Cancer Institute consent form template, not signing the consent form at i
65 d for IRB readability standards and informed-consent-form templates.
66  trial, which includes designing an informed consent form that sets the expectation that and the alte
67                                          The consent form that will be used for such a trial and that
68      IRBs commonly provide text for informed-consent forms that falls short of their own readability
69                                       Hence, consent forms that satisfy the U.S. federal regulations
70         The panel reached consensus on 9 OIT consent form themes: benefits, risks, outcomes, alternat
71          Centers also provided a copy of all consent forms they generated and IRB correspondence rega
72                        Providing a universal consent form to patients, proxies, and health care clini
73 nation in their study protocols and informed consent forms to facilitate more opportunities for the g
74     Patients were excluded if their original consent forms to report transplant outcomes were not sig
75 ssion and approval, use/nonuse of a specific consent form, type of review performed, types of consent
76 ntation of the same study and its associated consent form using an iPad device in two populations: cl
77                          A questionnaire and consent form were sent to the surviving 132 patients of
78                         Study procedures and consent forms were approved by the institutional review
79                                     Informed consent forms were gotten from the studied patients with
80                     Surveys and IRB-approved consent forms were obtained from all of the contacted IR
81 al of 231 patients were recruited, and their consent forms were obtained.
82                                     Informed consent forms were read and explained to 49 schizophreni
83 erials and Methods: The study procedures and consent forms were reviewed and approved by each site's
84  consent forms suggest that shorter informed consent forms written at a lower reading level, when rea