ライフサイエンスコーパス: conspicuity

1 lon cancer border delineation, contrast, and conspicuity.

2 well seen) and identified causes of reduced conspicuity.

3 ) significantly increased pulmonary arterial conspicuity.

4 red for 23 (15%) of 150 patients due to poor conspicuity.

5 , fallopian tube conspicuity, and free spill conspicuity.

6 on overall reader confidence and bowel wall conspicuity.

7 ists to determine lesion detection rates and conspicuity.

8 at triglyceride-enhanced CT, which increased conspicuity.

9 glucagon had a significant effect on lesion conspicuity.

10 o low (scores 0-3) and high (scores 4 and 5) conspicuity.

11 suspicious regions by enhancing their visual conspicuity.

12 ible without loss of image quality or lesion conspicuity.

13 rtifact, pulsation artifact, and main lesion conspicuity.

14 microcalcification clusters and rated their conspicuity.

15 and McNemar tests were used to compare polyp conspicuity.

16 image quality, lesion conspicuity, and vein conspicuity.

17 definition, quantum noise level, and object conspicuity.

18 ty (on a scale of 1 to 5) on the basis of PV conspicuity.

19 were evaluated for image quality and vessel conspicuity.

20 t readers qualitatively assessed small-bowel conspicuity.

21 ide comparison using a 5-point scale, lesion conspicuity (4.3 +/- 0.6), lesion sharpness (4.3 +/- 0.6

22 0.1 vs 4.6 +/- 0.1, P: <.005) and bowel wall conspicuity (4.6 +/- 0.2 vs 4.2 +/- 0.2, P: <.005) compa

23 Qualitative visual scoring of tumor conspicuity also showed shorter overall survival in pati

24 ilters are limited by a compromise in lesion conspicuity and appearance in comparison with lesion con

25 ity and appearance in comparison with lesion conspicuity and appearance on baseline low-dose CT image

26 d the HR-PCCT images as having higher plaque conspicuity and as being the image type that was least i

27 To perform an intraindividual comparison of conspicuity and classification of enhancing breast lesio

28 Tumor conspicuity and CNR were higher with the 60-keV split-bo

29 ieved in all subjects, with excellent vessel conspicuity and depiction of stenoses.

30 mproves image noise without affecting lesion conspicuity and detection on low-dose abdominal and pelv

31 ermined lesion presence and indicated lesion conspicuity and diagnostic certainty.

32 Anatomic conspicuity and diagnostic quality scores were compared

33 ultrafast MRI in fact led to reduced lesion conspicuity and did not improve lesion classification.

34 Lesion conspicuity and image quality of readout-segmented echo-

35 semiquantitatively evaluated images for fat conspicuity and image quality.

36 Readers also graded conspicuity and margins of each stone on a five-point sc

37 sing a five-point scale for assessing lesion conspicuity and margins, image noise, beam hardening, an

38 ults show that optimized contrast and lesion conspicuity and minimized motion artifacts can be obtain

39 independently rated BPE, image quality, and conspicuity and morphology of enhancing lesions, and enh

40 brain 1 month later showed mild decrease in conspicuity and number of these intensities while on ant

41 mages were scored independently for anatomic conspicuity and overall diagnostic quality by two radiol

42 Regression models focused on conspicuity and quantified enhancement were used to esti

43 Lesion conspicuity and radiologist confidence in lesion detecti

44 oss all imaging modalities, varying in their conspicuity and significance.

45 r confidence in the assessment of bowel wall conspicuity and the ability of CT colonography to depict

46 omplications because there was high vascular conspicuity and tissue contrast.

47 aders reviewed each phase for lesion number, conspicuity, and attenuation relative to liver.

48 oise, visibility of small structures, lesion conspicuity, and diagnostic confidence.

49 solution, spatial resolution, fallopian tube conspicuity, and free spill conspicuity.

50 Image quality, lesion conspicuity, and image properties (ie, signal-to-noise r

51 s visually assessed image quality and lesion conspicuity, and image properties (ie, signal-to-noise r

52 -liver contrast-to-noise ratio (C/N), lesion conspicuity, and image quality.

53 noise, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), lesion conspicuity, and radiation dose.

54 nd peripancreatic vasculature, improve tumor conspicuity, and reduce patient radiation dose during th

55 /CT images for overall image quality, lesion conspicuity, and sharpness.

56 image quality, lesion diagnostic confidence, conspicuity, and small lesion (<=1 cm) visibility.

57 o-noise ratio, signal-to-noise ratio, lesion conspicuity, and vascular pulsation artifact.

58 ment was performed for image quality, lesion conspicuity, and vein conspicuity.

59 r cuff, glenoid labrum, and anterior capsule conspicuity; and partial-thickness or full-thickness rot

60 visual score (SVS) was defined as the sum of conspicuity, artifact, and noise scores individually ran

61 o readers visually graded the 3D LGE images (conspicuity, artifact, noise) on a five-point Likert sca

62 a nonmetallic twinkle marker and compare its conspicuity at color Doppler US with that of standard br

63 Results Cancers were more likely to be high conspicuity at DBT than at DM (odds ratio [OR], 2.4; 95%

64 of patients at CT, 80% at MR), and decreased conspicuity at portal venous and delayed-phase imaging.

65 and DBT, cancers were more likely to be high conspicuity at the CC than the MLO view (DM vs DBT OR, 1

66 moderate to substantial agreement in vessel conspicuity between 4D flow acquisitions in arteries and

67 is known about differences in breast cancer conspicuity between DM and DBT or by mammographic view.

68 e image quality, diagnostic performance, and conspicuity between single-energy and multi-energy image

69 y, there was no significant difference in PV conspicuity between the techniques.

70 Osteoid osteomas can be imaged with greater conspicuity by using dynamic gadolinium-enhanced instead

71 for presence, number, margins, attenuation, conspicuity, calcification, and enhancement of lesions,

72 Image interpretation comprised lesion conspicuity defined as visual lesion-to-background contr

73 all diagnostic preference in terms of lesion conspicuity, detectability, and diagnostic confidence wa

74 Assessed were image quality, lesion conspicuity, diagnostic confidence, and the benefit of a

75 Tumor conspicuity (difference in attenuation between tumor and

76 s in neurooncology, including improved tumor conspicuity, distinguishing actual response to therapy f

77 Subjective analysis revealed that tumor conspicuity during the PPP and PVP was equivalent but su

78 d instead of nonenhanced MR imaging and with conspicuity equal to or better than that obtained with t

79 liver, and pancreatic attenuation and tumor conspicuity equal to or greater than that with multiphas

80 er diagnostic confidence for accurate lesion conspicuity (especially in the nasopharynx and in the la

81 Two radiologists independently scored lesion conspicuity for contrast-enhanced breast CT versus mammo

82 For both readers, lesion conspicuity for solid lesions on enhanced images was sig

83 Conspicuity grades were dichotomized into low (scores 0-

84 ncreased quantitative and qualitative border conspicuity (high delta) is associated with shorter surv

85 Participants' judgments of target conspicuity, however, showed that Diamonds were not perc

86 Lesion conspicuity, image artifacts, and incidental findings we

87 Organ or region conspicuity, image quality, and the limitations of image

88 Regarding small-bowel conspicuity, images obtained during the enteric phase we

89 Constant conspicuity implies that reduced compression would have

90 pear to affect hepatic enhancement or lesion conspicuity in humans.

91 well in eight of 11 patients and with better conspicuity in three of 11 patients, although this diffe

92 The greatest tumor conspicuity occurred during the delayed phase.

93 conditions, as well as the effects on lesion conspicuity of (a) collimation, (b) table pitch, and (c)

94 The conspicuity of 12 anatomic characteristics (comprising t

95 Three radiologists independently graded the conspicuity of 16 simulated lesions.

96 iastinum, cardiac chambers, and aortic wall; conspicuity of abnormality; intraluminal signal void uni

97 clarity of the mediastinum and aortic wall, conspicuity of any abnormality other than aortic dissect

98 In a third session, readers assessed conspicuity of biopsy-proved lesions on T2-weighted MR i

99 ging processing system that can suppress the conspicuity of bones was applied to the standard radiogr

100 Purpose To compare conspicuity of breast cancers at DM versus DBT and by ma

101 und Ultrafast breast MRI promises to improve conspicuity of cancers by avoiding masking due to backgr

102 artifacts, the pulsation artifacts, and the conspicuity of cranial nerves in the posterior fossa.

103 ed the image noise and the visualization and conspicuity of CT features of ILD.

104 The median scores for US conspicuity of each device were 3.9 (range, 3.7-5.0) for

105 Detection and conspicuity of endoleaks and subjective image quality we

106 Conspicuity of endoleaks was comparable between SEI (med

107 Image appearance and conspicuity of enhancing lesions on the real versus synt

108 ZTE exhibited greater conspicuity of enthesopathic cysts and marrow edema.

109 In this Research Advance, we show that the conspicuity of feature information at the saccade target

110 mation (MI = 0.475) and also maintained good conspicuity of fine features.

111 n T2-weighted MR images, which increases the conspicuity of focal hepatic lesions with negligible ret

112 r on T1-weighted images, which increases the conspicuity of focal lesions that do not contain hepatoc

113 f four peak voltage settings on the in vitro conspicuity of gallstones in an anthropomorphic phantom

114 Conspicuity of hypodense liver lesions was rated by four

115 Evaluation of ADC maps can improve conspicuity of hypoxic-ischemic injury in the acute and/

116 The conspicuity of images was better with the Flex-M coil.

117 myocardium in all patients and in excellent conspicuity of infarcted myocardium in all nine patients

118 n of gray matter (GM)/white matter (WM), and conspicuity of ischemic demarcation, if any.

119 Conspicuity of ischemic segments was significantly great

120 No significant difference was shown for conspicuity of kidney stones in 22 patients who underwen

121 ection is attributable primarily to the poor conspicuity of lesions.

122 Conspicuity of malignant breast lesions, including ducta

123 high tube current CT technique improves the conspicuity of malignant hypervascular liver tumors duri

124 bust fat and blood suppression for increased conspicuity of nerves at 3.0 T in clinically feasible ac

125 Conspicuity of pulmonary arteries in the central zone wa

126 a dual-detector CT system, yielding greater conspicuity of small lesions and improved lesion detecti

127 The conspicuity of small renal calculi at CT increases with

128 The conspicuity of stone fragments increased with increasing

129 se and improves diagnostic confidence in and conspicuity of subtle abdominal lesions at 8.4 mGy when

130 The conspicuity of subtle and medium clusters with the 16 de

131 ith dementia or mild brain trauma; increased conspicuity of superficial siderosis in Alzheimer diseas

132 To improve the conspicuity of synovial enhancement, postcontrast CT was

133 Despite the simplicity and conspicuity of the appearance of the CC on anatomical ma

134 ay overcome this limitation by improving the conspicuity of the contrast agent, but more data are nee

135 , number of enhancing levels, and quality of conspicuity of the depiction of lymph nodes and lymph ve

136 The extent, severity, and conspicuity of the disease were determined.

137 Dual-energy CT significantly improved the conspicuity of the ischemic bowel compared with conventi

138 nd blood suppression, resulting in increased conspicuity of the nerves, in clinically feasible imagin

139 ed with all three techniques were scored for conspicuity of the osteoid osteoma relative to the surro

140 We found that EPC improves the conspicuity of the PVS and aid resolving a larger number

141 h all imaging modalities and helped increase conspicuity of the tumor as well as its feeding arteries

142 e lobular carcinoma (ILC) demonstrates lower conspicuity on (18)F-FDG PET than the more common invasi

143 very initial and reconstructed 2D image, but conspicuity on 3D reconstructions varied as the imaging

144 Visual lesion conspicuity on PET was comparable for PET/CT (mean ratin

145 very lesion using a 4-point scale for lesion conspicuity on PET, a 4-point scale for anatomic allocat

146 Two observers independently assessed vessel conspicuity on phase-contrast three-dimensional angiogra

147 Polyp conspicuity on the initial and reconstructed 2D images a

148 diameter polyp was clearly depicted (grade 2 conspicuity) on every initial and reconstructed 2D image

149 diameter polyp was clearly depicted (grade 2 conspicuity) on every initial and reconstructed 2D image

150 diameter polyp was faintly depicted (grade 1 conspicuity) on the initial and reconstructed 2D images

151 ere analyzed for mass and microcalcification conspicuity, or the ratio of the lesion contrast to the

152 s were compared for lesion detection, lesion conspicuity, overall image quality, and signal-to-noise

153 e-point Likert scale for image SNR, anatomic conspicuity, overall image quality, imaging artifacts, a

154 QIR-4 superior to other strengths for lesion conspicuity (P value range, <.001 to .04).

155 MRI conspicuity peaked at 4h after incubation of the nanocom

156 maintain comparable tumor uptake and lesion conspicuity, PET centers should not reduce the injected

157 glandular dose, mass and microcalcification conspicuity remained approximately constant with decreas

158 ion and the liver parenchyma (ie, subjective conspicuity score [SCS]).

159 the liver in all cases; the median objective conspicuity score was -4.7% (all scores were <6%), and t

160 7% (all scores were <6%), and the subjective conspicuity score was 1 or lower for both observers.

161 with more variability; the median objective conspicuity score was 41% (range, 9%-72%), and the media

162 e assessed with videodensitometry (objective conspicuity score), and two observers assessed each lesi

163 esion by using a six-point scale (subjective conspicuity score).

164 stant metastases (n = 66) were evaluated for conspicuity (scored 0-4), artifacts (scored 0-2), and re

165 ificantly higher CNR (8.2 vs 6.4) and lesion conspicuity scores (4.6 vs 4.1) than protocol A, along w

166 always depicted in group 2, with subjective conspicuity scores (a) improved in group 2 for ground-gl

167 Analysis of average conspicuity scores showed that the direct coronal and di

168 % (range, 9%-72%), and the median subjective conspicuity scores were 2 (range, 1-4) and 3.5 (range, 1

169 ere > or =43%), respectively, and subjective conspicuity scores were 2 or higher for both observers.

170 imulated acoustic emission; median objective conspicuity scores were 70% and 68% (all scores were > o

171 Reader evaluation of tumor conspicuity showed a significant preference for precontr

172 images, scoring them as equal or better for conspicuity, spatial resolution, and image noise in 94.1

173 tion images and assigned scores for relative conspicuity, spatial resolution, image noise, and image

174 t blinded radiologists visually scored tumor conspicuity (subjective delta score) on a 1-5 scale, and

175 t scale for each of four categories (namely, conspicuity, temporal fidelity of wall motion, artifact,

176 ignificantly higher image quality and lesion conspicuity than single-shot echo-planar imaging by redu

177 omosynthesis provided higher sensitivity and conspicuity than wide-angle DBT digital breast tomosynth

178 e radiologists independently analyzed lesion conspicuity to assess sensitivity and specificity.

179 ructed 2D images and 3D reconstructions, but conspicuity varied on the 3D reconstructions as the imag

180 The highest lesion conspicuity was achieved with the 80-kVp protocol.

181 For intramodality analyses, conspicuity was analyzed by view, CC versus MLO, within

182 The change in conspicuity was analyzed for significance by using a boo

183 ders' perception of image quality and lesion conspicuity was consistently ranked superior with SAFIRE

184 Lesion conspicuity was graded as well seen on both FBP and ASIR

185 Materials and Methods Lesion conspicuity was graded by three readers by using a 0-5 n

186 s with metastatic melanoma, and liver lesion conspicuity was graded.

187 Anatomic conspicuity was not significantly different for groups 2

188 Despite this mild reduction in BPE, lesion conspicuity was rated lower at ultrafast than at DCE MRI

189 Lesion conspicuity was rated on a continuous scale.

190 the majority of lesions, the greatest tumor conspicuity was seen during the portal venous phase.

191 Lesion conspicuity was significantly better at 4.2 mGy on ASIR

192 nd reduced compression levels, the mean mass conspicuities were 1.39 +/- 0.15 (standard error of the

193 ast phantom, and the mean microcalcification conspicuities were 16.2 +/- 2.87 and 18.6 +/- 2.63 for a

194 Relative attenuation and lesion conspicuity were assessed.

195 ise), and presence and number of lesions and conspicuity were assessed.

196 rterial branches and parenchymal enhancement conspicuity were evaluated independently by two radiolog

197 and subjective qualitative analysis of tumor conspicuity were performed.

198 hite matter differentiation, and main lesion conspicuity were significantly higher for DL-enhanced im

199 small liver lesions (<10 mm), detection and conspicuity were significantly higher with MBIR than wit

200 reader rankings of image quality and lesion conspicuity when compared with routine-dose FBP.

201 improving contrast-to-noise ratio and lesion conspicuity without compromising image texture or CT att