ライフサイエンスコーパス: contamination rate

1 eposition to Lake Annecy explains its lowest contamination rate.

2 Brazilian samples showed the highest contamination rate.

3 ringent standard of less than or equal to 1% contamination rate.

4 may result in substantial bias in estimated contamination rates.

5 procedure can be complicated by high sample contamination rates.

6 uency information for accurate estimation of contamination rates.

7 t wheat from the littoral area showed higher contamination rates (53 %) compared to the continental a

8 Coffee capsules had the highest contamination rate (63.64 %), primarily OPP, especially

9 mputation accuracy drastically decreased for contamination rates above 5%.

10 idis after 1 month of treatment, whereas the contamination rate among conventional containers reached

11 significant differences in the blood culture contamination rates among these four antiseptics, althou

12 monstrate that our method robustly estimates contamination rates and genetic ancestries across popula

13 We recommend this method to reduce contamination rates and improve SSCC studies in African

14 The main drivers of cost were baseline contamination rates and the duration of antibiotics give

15 ncy rooms should help mitigate blood culture contamination rates and the unnecessary microbiology wor

16 The blood culture contamination rate associated with each antiseptic was t

17 ed a prospective comparison of blood culture contamination rates associated with dedicated phlebotomi

18 n=486) were similar (approximately 28%); the contamination rates at the two hospitals were 1.3% (7/51

19 However, the average BC contamination rate (CR) in U.S. hospitals is 2.9%, poten

20 To determine whether this practice reduced contamination rates (CR), we assessed the results of IVC

21 from 7.39% to 8.85% (P < .001), whereas the contamination rate did not change and remained low.

22 primary outcome was change in environmental contamination rate during treatment.

23 In addition, we reviewed the contamination rates for a cohort of patients already hos

24 ucted retrospective, comparative analyses of contamination rates for cultures of blood obtained in th

25 owever, this must be balanced against higher contamination rates from catheter cultures.

26 Young age was associated with increased contamination rate in both the baseline and postinterven

27 0.05); however, the CB-18 method had a 20.8% contamination rate in liquid culture versus a rate of ap

28 Contamination rate in the postintervention period compar

29 an adapted filter significantly reduces the contamination rates in autologous serum eyedrops, thus e

30 , sentinel testing has revealed wide-ranging contamination rates in mammalian culture.

31 ed sequence tag (EST) subset of EMBL found a contamination rate of 0.27%.

32 samples was culture positive, equating to a contamination rate of 2.7%.

33 nto the case had a subsequent positive glove contamination rate of 23% compared with 13% among surgeo

34 The extracapsular technique showed a contamination rate of 33.33% (n = 8) compared to phacoem

35 in a hospital utilizing RDT with a baseline contamination rate of 6%, ISDD use was associated with a

36 %) with adult patients met the standard of a contamination rate of less than 3% and only 2 hospitals

37 cular surface microbial profile and vitreous contamination rate of performing such procedures outside

38 the developed sampling solution reduces the contamination rate of probable non-skin microbes compare

39 the respiratory specimens, with breakthrough contamination rates of 5.4% and 4.4% for RGM30 and RGM35

40 The contamination rates of blood cultures collected by phleb

41 Breakthrough contamination rates (percentages of isolates) for each o

42 y outcomes will include persistent bacterial contamination rates (post automated reprocessing) and ER

43 True pathogen detection rate, contamination rate, proportion of adults with blood cult

44 n and significantly reduce our blood culture contamination rate (R).

45 d temporal distributions of well testing and contamination rates; relationships between contamination

46 e no data demonstrating persistent bacterial contamination rates, technical success rates, or clinica

47 at SiO-free syringes had significantly lower contamination rates than siliconized syringes (OR 0.05;

48 sover study directly comparing blood culture contamination rates using chlorhexidine versus iodine ti

49 For iodine tincture, the contamination rate was 2.7%; for chlorhexidine, it was 3

50 The overall contamination rate was 59 of 3,276 (1.8%), which is cons

51 The inpatient blood culture contamination rate was higher postimplementation (1.5% p

52 The MGIT contamination rate was reduced to 12%; the BACTEC rate w

53 limits of 99.99% prediction intervals of the contamination rate were adopted as cut-off values of con

54 Contamination rates were 14% and 6% for the standard and

55 Overall contamination rates were 17.1% for BACTEC MGIT 960, 18.9

56 The contamination rates were 4.8, 22.6, and 20.0%, respectiv

57 nce testing data, we observed that microbial contamination rates were 7.1-10.5 times higher within th

58 Blood culture positivity rates and contamination rates were compared before and after Virtu

59 During the study, the contamination rates were determined to be 2.93% with pov

60 Blood culture contamination rates were lower when specimens were drawn

61 tomists to collect blood cultures in the ED, contamination rates were lowered to recommended levels,

62 For the MNH and LCH blood cultures, lower contamination rates were observed when skin was disinfec

63 ospective clinical validation, blood culture contamination rates were reduced from 3.04% for 70% isop

64 rowth and detection of mycobacteria, and the contamination rates were similar.

65 We conclude that while contamination rates were slightly higher with FAN than w

66 The contamination rate with MGIT was 29%; the BACTEC rate wa

67 , we confirm that ContamLD accurately infers contamination rates with low standard errors: for exampl

68 Of the 292 units, 97% had a mean BC contamination rate within 3% of the recommended threshol