戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ity, and diagnostic odds ratio using a 2 x 2 contingency table.
2 ll correlation between rows and columns in a contingency table.
3 s and controls can be expressed as a two-way contingency table.
4 n = 179) control subjects using a chi-square contingency table.
5 ty, specificity, and accuracy) using a 2 x 2 contingency table.
6  pairwise t test and the McNemar test in 2x2 contingency tables.
7 vel, with sufficient data to construct 2 x 2 contingency tables.
8 ios (ORs) extracted or calculated from 2 x 2 contingency tables.
9  predictive parameters were calculated using contingency tables.
10  analyses and by Fisher exact test for 2 x 2 contingency tables.
11 tion and having sufficient data to calculate contingency tables.
12 nd accuracy were calculated by using two-way contingency tables.
13  Genotype frequencies were compared by 2 x 2 contingency tables.
14  statistic, and power and subject population contingency tables.
15               Data were analyzed using r x c contingency tables.
16 t presented data that allowed calculation of contingency tables.
17  to partition the original data into two-way contingency tables.
18 e (OASIS), a family of statistical tests for contingency tables.
19      Groups were statistically compared with contingency tables.
20  of the well-known cause of the HDE in 2 x 2 contingency tables.
21  characteristics were calculated using 2 x 2 contingency tables.
22 pain with analysis of variance, t tests, and contingency table analyses.
23          Sex differences were assessed using contingency table analysis (for categorical variables) a
24             Associations were assessed using contingency table analysis and the chi2 test, using a tw
25                                              Contingency table analysis showed that all MS affected i
26                                         This contingency table analysis suggests that many amino acid
27                                      We used contingency table analysis to compare allele and genotyp
28                                      Two-way contingency table analysis was used to determine the cor
29  MDR using a variety of measures for two-way contingency table analysis.
30  of traditional analysis techniques, such as contingency-table analysis, regression methods, and anal
31 e they ignore the information content of the contingency table and, second, because their symmetric n
32 of allele counts across multiple pools using contingency tables and (ii) evaluating the probability o
33  explored variables by defining double-entry contingency tables and calculating Odds Ratio (OR) with
34                                    They used contingency tables and chi-square statistics to examine
35  composition of these faunas, we analyze via contingency tables and detrended correspondence analyses
36 he effect of meniscal damage was analyzed by contingency tables and logistic regression.
37 mance of the four methods was compared using contingency tables and McNemar's test.
38                                              Contingency tables and multivariate models were used to
39 ion of paired t tests, analysis of variance, contingency tables, and chi2 tests.
40 pports any statistical test that is based on contingency tables, and enables both family-wise error r
41 ata were presented to allow recalculation of contingency tables, and established diagnostic criteria
42 all portion of the individuals to update the contingency tables, and it achieves at least an order of
43 d were evaluated with longitudinal models or contingency tables as appropriate.
44 rsus expected prevalence (calculated using a contingency table assuming independence across cells) of
45 o demonstrates superior performance over two contingency table based over-representation methods.
46 s were completed for SP and LP, using 2-by-2 contingency tables, comparing the IDSA/ATS indications (
47 stratification, or those from which data for contingency tables could not be extracted were excluded.
48 elopments in the analysis of categorical and contingency-table data.
49                                              Contingency tables, data represented as counts matrices,
50                      The McNemar test on the contingency table demonstrated that the proportion of wr
51                                              Contingency tables exceeding 2x2 with ranked alternative
52 luded for analysis were 42 studies, with 115 contingency tables extracted from 32 studies (55 061 ima
53  Student t test for continuous variables and contingency tables for categorical variables were used.
54                               We constructed contingency tables for each diagnostic test and calculat
55 ure, the algorithm incrementally updates the contingency tables for epistatic tests without scanning
56  chi-square test for the [Formula: see text] contingency table generated by associated variants.
57 for specific HLA-B allele was estimated from contingency table generated from the HLA-B and -C haplot
58 h early-onset AMD were estimated using 2 x 2 contingency tables in the validation dataset (All of Us)
59                           A chi2 analysis of contingency tables indicated that the beta2a subunit cau
60                        Data were analyzed by contingency table methods.
61  by introducing bias-correction terms in the contingency table needed for calculating the Fisher's Ex
62                            Then, a series of contingency tables nested according to the cladogram hie
63                         For each mutation, a contingency table of binary phenotypes and presence or a
64 parametric tests are used to analyze a 2 x 2 contingency table of categorical data.
65 Statistical analysis involved use of a 2 x 2 contingency table of diskogram results for each of the s
66 he reference standard, and for which a 2 x 2 contingency table of lesion diagnosis could be construct
67             We fit a log-linear model to the contingency table of spine features such as spine type a
68  FIPSA maximizes the likelihood ratio of the contingency table of the allele counts multiplied by the
69    Using descriptive analyses, frequency and contingency tables of specific indicators within each ar
70 y into the standard statistical framework of contingency tables primarily due to the serious under-sa
71 umeracy were more accurate in evaluating the contingency table, regardless of whether or not the tabl
72 nostic accuracy were extracted to form 2 x 2 contingency tables separately for endometrial cancer and
73 ool to analyze such correlations using 2 x 2 contingency table statistics.
74 nicopathologic variables were assessed using contingency table tests and Cox proportional hazard mode
75 d disease-free survival, were assessed using contingency table tests and Cox proportional hazard mode
76 served when the analysis was performed using contingency tables that split sibs into three age-at-ons
77          By a traditional method (two-by-two contingency table), the sensitivities for detection of l
78 ographics and medical comorbidities, we used contingency tables to assess whether patients with (1) a
79 stic analyses or Fisher exact test for 2 x 2 contingency tables using subsequent histologic analysis
80 ntitative data required for building a 2 x 2 contingency table were extracted, and study quality was
81             Descriptive statistics and 2 x 2 contingency tables were assessed at the patient level.
82 enty-three studies with 2196 patients and 25 contingency tables were included.
83                                    Two x two contingency tables were reconstructed, and test sensitiv
84 rs in sufficient detail to reconstruct 2 x 2 contingency tables were reviewed.
85 ticipants were more accurate in evaluating a contingency table when the outcome aligned with their po
86        The ELISA results were analyzed using contingency tables with Fisher's exact test and compared
87                         These operate on the contingency table, with i, jth element equal to the numb