コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 while maintaining PM perfusion, confirmed by contrast echocardiography.
2 d ethanol injection technique and the use of contrast echocardiography.
3 the presence and size of a PFO using saline contrast echocardiography.
4 as determined by intravenous (IV) myocardial contrast echocardiography.
5 ho enhancement by QW7437 microbubbles during contrast echocardiography.
6 w reserve are possible using second harmonic contrast echocardiography.
7 flow (MBF) were completed with standard and contrast echocardiography.
8 rial pacing with high-resolution Doppler and contrast echocardiography.
9 lative to the cell counts at sham myocardial contrast echocardiography.
10 PAVA was assessed using transthoracic saline contrast echocardiography.
11 ocardial perfusion produced by IV myocardial contrast echocardiography.
13 size and perfusion defect size on myocardial contrast echocardiography after reperfusion (r = .82), w
14 o a stenosis can be measured with myocardial contrast echocardiography, allowing coronary stenosis de
16 arct size and perfusion defect on myocardial contrast echocardiography also remained good in the pres
17 m and detect coronary stenosis by myocardial contrast echocardiography and (2) compared the response
18 graphy and fluoroscopy as well as epicardial contrast echocardiography and angiography at the time of
19 ients with the use of dipyridamole real-time contrast echocardiography and followed them for a median
20 -um microspheres and compared the results to contrast echocardiography and MIGET-determined gas excha
22 e heart block, but the risk was reduced with contrast echocardiography and slow ethanol injection.
23 specimens obtained 24 hours after myocardial contrast echocardiography and then either fresh frozen o
24 anatomical shunt with 25-um microspheres to contrast echocardiography, and gas exchange shunt measur
25 inase (CK), smaller septal area opacified by contrast echocardiography, and higher residual gradient
26 ological advances have positioned myocardial contrast echocardiography as a safe and feasible techniq
27 ological advances have positioned myocardial contrast echocardiography as a safe, practical bedside t
28 y underwent high-mechanical-index myocardial contrast echocardiography at 15 Hz to allow measurement
35 nonrejecting myocardium and that myocardial contrast echocardiography can therefore detect acute rej
37 ardiography (HE), and after intravenous (IV) contrast echocardiography (CE) using a score for each of
43 phy for assessment of inotropic reserve, and contrast echocardiography for evaluation of microvascula
44 teams; 3) use of (3-dimensional) myocardial contrast echocardiography for selecting the correct sept
47 erfusion analysis using real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography has been shown to have higher
49 sis of myocardial perfusion using myocardial contrast echocardiography has higher diagnostic accuracy
50 dex imaging techniques (real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography) have the advantage of permitt
51 , magnetic resonance imaging, and myocardial contrast echocardiography, have emerged as techniques wi
54 n (MP) imaging during dipyridamole real-time contrast echocardiography improves the sensitivity to de
57 a review of the current status of myocardial contrast echocardiography in acute coronary syndromes.
61 creased during hypoglycemia using myocardial contrast echocardiography in patients with type 1 diabet
62 ontrast agent microbubbles during myocardial contrast echocardiography in rats, and the numbers of in
64 with impaired tissue perfusion on myocardial contrast echocardiography in the setting of myocardial i
75 surgical septal reduction therapy, guided by contrast echocardiography, is an effective procedure for
76 Postdestruction time-intensity myocardial contrast echocardiography kinetic data were fit to the e
79 esigned to determine the value of myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) and dobutamine echocardi
80 etermine the relative accuracy of myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) and low-dose dobutamine
81 of each free wall was measured by myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) and terminal morphometri
82 sought to compare the accuracy of myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) and wall motion analysis
84 for detecting microbubbles during myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) based on the registratio
85 is study was to determine whether myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) can be used to detect co
86 f the study was to assess whether myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) can identify underlying
87 is study investigated whether (1) myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) can quantify changes in
88 ne whether three-dimensional (3D) myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) could provide an accurat
89 is study was to determine whether myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) during exogenous vasodil
94 ermittent triggered and real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) have been proposed to de
95 ta on the accuracy of intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) in detecting myocardial
96 accuracy of real-time imaging of myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) in detecting myocardial
97 Although defects on intracoronary myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) indicate loss of viabili
99 authors hypothesized that bedside myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) ischemic memory imaging
100 validate the ability of real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) measures of opacificatio
101 ons, Albunex microbubbles used in myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) pass unimpeded through t
102 We sought to determine whether myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) performed before and ear
103 bundle-branch block (LBBB) using myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) to ascertain the value o
104 examined the ability of real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) to delineate abnormaliti
106 rtaken to evaluate the ability of myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) to guide the targeted de
107 was to evaluate the potential for myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) to provoke microscale bi
108 s the feasibility and accuracy of myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) using standard imaging a
111 tered as a constant infusion, and myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) was performed with the u
112 utamine echocardiography (DE) and myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) was superior to either t
114 de microbubble (SonoVue)-enhanced myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) with single-photon emiss
115 tery, whether normal perfusion by myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) would accurately predict
116 luate the comparative accuracy of myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE), quantitative rest-redis
117 eled microsphere-derived MBF, and myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE)-derived myocardial perfu
123 ernating myocardium include 99mTc-sestamibi, contrast echocardiography, nuclear magnetic resonance sp
125 ubble kinetics using quantitative myocardial contrast echocardiography permits the evaluation of myoc
128 hocardiography during dipyridamole real-time contrast echocardiography provides independent, incremen
132 erfusion imaging (MPI) obtained by real-time contrast echocardiography (RTCE) and intravenous ultraso
133 ardial perfusion (MP) imaging with real-time contrast echocardiography (RTCE) improves the sensitivit
134 nt outcome after stress real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography (RTMCE) versus conventional st
137 QIPAVA , assessed by transthoracic saline contrast echocardiography, significantly increased as Pa
138 and portable hand-held echocardiography, to contrast echocardiography, stress echocardiography, and
141 measuring the increase in aBV on myocardial contrast echocardiography that occurs distally to the st
143 to evaluate the potential of second harmonic contrast echocardiography to assess coronary vasculature
144 ulsed and Doppler color flow ultrasound, and contrast echocardiography to evaluate flow in the ductus
145 010 underwent burst-replenishment myocardial contrast echocardiography to quantify myocardial perfusi
147 aim of this study was to evaluate myocardial contrast echocardiography using aortic root injections w
149 basis of detection of stenosis by myocardial contrast echocardiography using venous administration of
152 flow through IPAVAs as detected with saline contrast echocardiography was not different between cond
159 vered as a constant infusion, and myocardial contrast echocardiography was performed using different
163 ng (WT) and myocardial perfusion (myocardial contrast echocardiography) were assessed at each stage.
164 scular reserve, studied by use of myocardial contrast echocardiography, were measured both before and
167 Hg (or > or =20 mm Hg if age > 64 years) and contrast echocardiography with late appearance of microb