ライフサイエンスコーパス: conversation

1 rs necessary to promote 'appreciative caring conversations'.

2 rtant when trying to participate in a lively conversation).

3 es of speech/no-speech or general content of conversation.

4 ble processes of clarification and repair in conversation.

5 is experience, and invite you to join in the conversation.

6 nd produced sound levels too high for normal conversation.

7 latter dictates the long-time transport in a conversation.

8 ated this personal history to the authors in conversation.

9 viewing a driving video, with and without a conversation.

10 The secondary task was a hands-free conversation.

11 urnal rhythms underlying a dynamic symbiotic conversation.

12 ding but did not result in an improvement in conversation.

13 HF was not a predictor of having an EOL conversation.

14 ace yet challenging social task: spontaneous conversation.

15 ristics of interviewer-observed cost-of-care conversations.

16 amilies and themselves; and having difficult conversations.

17 monkeys that may facilitate natural primate conversations.

18 ity and creating a counterspace for critical conversations.

19 characteristic of human and nonhuman primate conversations.

20 er changes in firing rate evident for longer conversations.

21 that were embedded in a mixture of competing conversations.

22 better enable us to navigate these important conversations.

23 eeded to better guide shared decision-making conversations.

24 ore the use of "fix-it" in 48 audio-recorded conversations.

25 external staff, followed by case-irrelevant conversations.

26 ather than during actual clinician-surrogate conversations.

27 ed feedback on the oncologists' own recorded conversations.

28 ma changes during spontaneous inter-personal conversations.

29 of, timing of, and ideal person to hold CoC conversations.

30 ities are not universally implementing these conversations.

31 tic individuals are perceived in their daily conversations.

32 ance and action as essential elements of CoC conversations.

33 guide training of personnel involved in CoC conversations.

34 of the tool on the frequency of cost-of-care conversations.

35 understanding of the social use of speech in conversations.

36 lp clinicians introduce and standardize cost conversations.

37 There are limited data to guide these conversations.

38 for 2 separate purposes during preoperative conversations: (1) as an explanatory tool to facilitate

39 In 398 conversations, 37% contained at least one empathic oppor

40 ants, there was an increase in goals of care conversations (47% intervention vs. 38% control; odds ra

41 onger than for the primary task (baseline no conversation (944 ms, SE=48 ms)).

42 ic health crisis can accelerate the national conversation about broader adoption of telemedicine for

43 ol intervention (n = 122) was a parent-nurse conversation about child's future tooth eruption, with a

44 cial disparities are central in the national conversation about Covid-19.

45 Regarding who initiated conversation about donation after cardiac death, nine ca

46 ck of education and reluctance to initiate a conversation about live donor kidney transplantation is

47 s the key points of a shared decision-making conversation about PSA-based prostate cancer screening,

48 Semi-structured conversation about quality of life, expectations, and pl

49 e in Healthcare Summit to begin an important conversation about the challenges patients with cardiova

50 ers that might be important, and join in the conversation about the future of epidemiology.

51 n more than 88% of conferences, there was no conversation about the patient's values regarding autono

52 hould be engaged in a shared decision-making conversation about the risks and benefits of surgery com

53 Comfort in initiating a conversation about transplantation increased over time f

54 restoration occupies centre stage in global conversations about carbon removal and biodiversity cons

55 Conversations about CoC extend beyond discussing costs a

56 sting promise for this approach to promoting conversations about costs of care in settings serving lo

57 Still, evidence shows that conversations about end-of-life care options between phy

58 e not adequately prepared to have meaningful conversations about EOL planning.

59 Conversations about goals of care and cardiopulmonary re

60 EXPOSURE Parent conversations about healthful eating and weight/size.

61 The intervention increased conversations about ICD deactivation and goals of care.

62 ician's opportunities to engage in difficult conversations about poor prognosis may be rare, but such

63 enterologists may find it useful to initiate conversations about probiotics within the context of a c

64 evidence suggests that, too often, realistic conversations about prognosis, the potential benefits an

65 luding reluctance of staff to have difficult conversations about race or other identity traits; uncer

66 s helpful guidance on how to have meaningful conversations about serious illness using telecommunicat

67 h RBT that has become inextricably linked to conversations about sport-related concussion and mild tr

68 persistently engage adolescents directly in conversations about their disease prognosis and correspo

69 have an opportunity to contribute to public conversations about their work, and its potential implic

70 on of the need for clinic-based cost-of-care conversations; access to cost and health plan benefit da

71 d some favorable perceptions of cost-of-care conversations after implementation of community-designed

72 Theoretically, surgeons frame their conversations after systematically assessing the risks a

73 sider ways of making disgust part of a wider conversation, allowing clinicians to engage with their f

74 e support on the basis of these preoperative conversations alone.

75 s of scientific research aims to further the conversation among all stakeholders in the interactions

76 Conversation among medical microbiologists is needed to

77 cial media messages that inspire far-ranging conversation among social media users, whereas the vast

78 Comparison of 174 day and nighttime conversations among the Ju/'hoan (!Kung) Bushmen of sout

79 pe and limitation of questionnaire-based and conversation analytic approaches to the differential dia

80 by influencing how people behaved within the conversation and also by influencing who chose to join.

81 the frontal cortex persisted throughout the conversation and its magnitude scaled linearly with the

82 9 risk allele is associated with stereotyped conversation and lower pragmatic communication skills, a

83 despread human use of firelight for intimate conversation and our appetite for evening stories.

84 assistive listening devices for face-to-face conversation and, while part of an audience, their satis

85 Secondary outcomes included goals of care conversations and advance directive completion.

86 Whereas cost conversations and CompareMaine.org were perceived as use

87 ing a busy urban setting, including multiple conversations and events recorded from a neighborhood ga

88 that patients want to engage in cost-of-care conversations and factor costs into the formulation of c

89 In contrast, patients valued cost conversations and found the tools useful, and over one h

90 3 days of presentations that spurred active conversations and highlighted the rapidly advancing rese

91 Data were collected via observations, conversations and interviews with people living with dem

92 team communication, a decrease in disturbing conversations and sudden noise peaks (P < 0.05).

93 ing and facilitating more timely end-of-life conversations and supportive care consultations, and (5)

94 e not different between patients who had ACP conversations and those who received usual care.

95 proach (Ask-Tell-Ask) that promotes tailored conversations and value-based recommendations.

96 adults in 2011, enumerating "close" (shared conversation) and "casual" (shared indoor space) social

97 wake), lightly sedated (a slowed response to conversation), and deeply sedated (no conversational res

98 spent on EHR use, 4.7 (4.2) minutes (42%) on conversation, and 3.5 (2.3) minutes (31%) on examination

99 mologists directly with patients on EHR use, conversation, and examination as well as total time requ

100 ents on the following 3 activities: EHR use, conversation, and examination.

101 der 3 conditions (no distraction, cell phone conversation, and texting).

102 nds on specific issues, join national policy conversations, and express themselves publicly-all key c

103 out the frequency and nature of cost-of-care conversations, and frequencies of patient- and provider-

104 These end-of-life conversations are important because they affect consent

105 nt, understandable concerns about initiating conversations are reduced.

106 subtilis build a multicellular biofilm, some conversations are unidirectional.

107 viders experience difficulties in initiating conversations around sexual health and history.

108 althcare providers are reluctant to initiate conversations around sexual health or offer appropriate

109 our visual gaze, e.g when shadowing a nearby conversation at a cocktail party.

110 the cultural context, timing, and content of conversations at the end of adolescents' lives.

111 patient- and provider-reported cost-of-care conversations before and after the intervention.

112 Understanding these natural conversation behaviours could inform broader models of i

113 on the phrase structure of spoken or signed conversation, being akin to punctuation in written text.

114 The tool guided an MI-based conversation between coach and patient to identify barri

115 report the fine-grained dynamics of natural conversation between interlocutors of varying hearing ab

116 omeostasis in the gut/pancreas and reveals a conversation between the nervous and immune systems usin

117 tterning in the sea urchin embryo requires a conversation between the skeletogenic primary mesenchyme

118 Observational study of audio-recorded conversations between 253 adolescents (mean age, 14.3 ye

119 The data were drawn from decision-making conversations between 32 older inpatients with an acute

120 We audio-recorded 398 clinic conversations between 51 oncologists and 270 patients wi

121 pate indirect costs can promote cost-of-care conversations between clinicians and low-income patients

122 sions as to which technology to use and fuel conversations between expert imaging laboratories, resea

123 of-pocket costs are creating a need for cost conversations between patients and physicians.

124 Patient observations included 91 recorded conversations between patients and surgeons and 61 patie

125 al study of laughter during seminaturalistic conversations between patients with dementia and familia

126 n the intervention arm included scripted ACP conversations between patients, family members, and cert

127 f medical knowledge and discovery as ongoing conversations between professionals and their extended n

128 Vocal laughter fills conversations between speakers with normal hearing and b

129 norms visible prevented unruly and harassing conversations by influencing how people behaved within t

130 After preconference telephone and e-mail conversations by the panelists in which questions to be

131 s about poor prognosis may be rare, but such conversations can be crucial.

132 Participating in end-of-life care conversations can be emotionally challenging for everyon

133 Can a single conversation change minds on divisive social issues, suc

134 er, these studies have had limited access to conversation content, rendering changes in expression as

135 nd colleagues (2020) uncover an inter-domain conversation, defining a relationship in which a non-pat

136 mmunity-designed messages about cost-of-care conversations delivered to patients on fliers.

137 Sixteen percent of patients found ACP conversations distressing.

138 ed brain activations for conversation vs. no conversation during such simulated driving was found not

139 As epidemiologists spark new conversations (e.g., see Kawachi (Am J Epidemiol.

140 e show that a single approximately 10-minute conversation encouraging actively taking the perspective

141 at selectively listening to specific target conversations, even in the presence of multiple concurre

142 lescent disordered eating behaviors, whereas conversations focused on healthful eating are protective

143 Parent conversations focused on weight/size are associated with

144 explore ways to generalise new vocabulary to conversation for patients with chronic aphasia post-stro

145 Eliciting wishes stimulates conversations for people of diverse spiritual orientatio

146 provide additional context to goals of care conversations for transplant recipients with prolonged i

147 approach positions clinicians to change the conversation from political diatribe of pro-gun and anti

148 ion by shifting the focus of decision-making conversations from an isolated surgical problem to a dis

149 This paper builds on the ideas and conversations from the session to provide a more nuanced

150 Overt and covert conversation gave rise to longer visual event reaction t

151 A national conversation, guided by the best data and information, a

152 rs and fathers who engaged in weight-related conversations had adolescents who were more likely to di

153 Physicians ought to initiate a deactivation conversation, ideally at the time of implantation.

154 u are sitting in a plane, and you can hear a conversation in a foreign language in the row behind you

155 Surgeons regularly proceeded through the conversation in a manner that suggested they believed bu

156 ir findings with the public and to engage in conversation in a relaxed setting.

157 s, and distal ones, such as national Twitter conversation in broad policy areas.

158 While participants were able to sustain conversation in noise of up to 72 dB, changes in convers

159 nts of community rules to large-scale online conversations in a science-discussion community with 13

160 answer pairs were presented amidst competing conversations in an ongoing, spatially dynamic listening

161 sease-specific agendas dominate many current conversations in global health, this is nonetheless a ti

162 e is known about how to promote cost-of-care conversations in health care settings.

163 How do people have conversations in noise and make themselves understood?

164 n everyday situations, such as understanding conversations in noise.

165 People with hearing loss struggle to follow conversations in noisy environments.

166 n use the telephone and follow auditory-only conversations in quiet environments.

167 me points to investigate the role of climate conversations in shaping beliefs and feelings about glob

168 e to the spread of COVID-19, probably during conversations in social interactions.

169 needed to learn how to best structure these conversations in the emergency surgical setting.

170 These data can be used to inform conversations in the scientific community, with regulato

171 However, it is challenging to hold sensitive conversations in this environment.

172 available on how to conduct these sensitive conversations in ways that are acceptable to both patien

173 ontent analysis to analyze each preoperative conversation inductively.

174 DR-BNI is a 30-min structured conversation informed by motivational interviewing with

175 Irrelevant conversations initiated by surgeons were associated with

176 t assignment and psychological encouragement conversations/interactions that increase the participant

177 for how to integrate effective cost-of-care conversations into clinical practice or to address speci

178 te, relationship-centred care but that these conversations involve practitioners taking risks.

179 more topics, having one-on-one and repeated conversations, involving families in discussions and ini

180 Conversation is an important and ubiquitous social behav

181 n utilised for thousands of years, but a new conversation is emerging on the role of these materials

182 al benefit of seeing a speaker's face during conversation is especially pronounced in challenging lis

183 Natural conversation is multisensory: when we can see the speake

184 olitical divides to support end-of-life care conversations is needed to promote care that is consiste

185 n order to determine the potential influence Conversation Map can have on long-term health outcomes.

186 tion in the Managing Diabetes During Ramadan Conversation Map improved patient glucose and HbA1c leve

187 ting non-significant differences between the Conversation Map intervention and the control groups.

188 ness of the Managing Diabetes During Ramadan Conversation Map intervention in improving short-term cl

189 The Managing Diabetes During Ramadan Conversation Map is a self-management education group-ba

190 Our review shows that although the Diabetes Conversation Map program holds the potential to improve

191 REVIEW Studies that evaluated the Conversation Map program since 2005 were included.

192 ence regarding the effects that the Diabetes Conversation Map program, an educational tool that engag

193 lized to identify studies that evaluated the Conversation Map program.

194 Conversation may contribute to increased reaction times

195 cause of costs, suggesting that cost-of-care conversations may be an important factor in health equit

196 ing preferences at end of life, however such conversations may not often occur.

197 ht not be available to listeners in everyday conversations, meaning that speech recognition in conven

198 During informal conversations, most staff also tended to say that they i

199 These conversations need to occur multiple times, allowing sig

200 It is unknown whether and how cost-of-care conversations occur in primary encounters, especially se

201 funded health centers studied, cost-of-care conversations occurred in a minority of clinical visits,

202 This experiment is part of the global conversation on maximizing returns on research investmen

203 gated the neural mechanisms of the effect of conversation on visual event detection during a driving-

204 objective of this article is to stimulate a conversation on, and advance research in, EHL.

205 trol areas, fully natural switching within a conversation only engaged auditory cortices.

206 patients died; there were no differences in conversations or deactivations among decedents.

207 lection, organization, and interpretation of conversations or textual data with patients to explore t

208 logy (OR = 1.8), and prior attempt at breast conversation (OR = 1.7) to be independent predictors of

209 fore, productive inflammation results from a conversation, or mutually responding signals, between th

210 roponents of some ideologies seek debate and conversation, others create echo chambers.

211 and health plan benefit data to support each conversation pathway; clear team member roles and respon

212 The mean number of ACP conversations per patient was 1.3.

213 trates that engaging in 'appreciative caring conversations' promotes compassionate, relationship-cent

214 e comprehension of a fully natural bilingual conversation recorded "in the wild." Our results showed

215 Conversation reduced the strengths of these regression r

216 tivated when participants, engaged in social conversations, refer to objects with numerical content.

217 ogy providers and patients to help encourage conversations regarding weight management in cancer surv

218 hat a highly local intramyocardial IL-33/ST2 conversation regulates the heart's response to pressure

219 to investigate how the temporal dynamics of conversations shape the formation of collective memories

220 The person to hold these conversations should be compassionate, helpful, and know

221 ty to join them in an ongoing Web-based blog conversation so that together we might develop novel app

222 ially more with each other, distribute their conversation somewhat more equally, and perceive their g

223 ersation in noise of up to 72 dB, changes in conversation structure suggested increased difficulty at

224 content analysis to characterize patterns in conversation structure, description of outcomes, and del

225 A randomized trial found that these conversations substantially reduced transphobia, with de

226 ch as "What is your birth date?" RTs for the conversation task (1043 ms, SE=65 ms) were slightly long

227 this study, 66 adults took part in the Body-Conversation Task (BCT), a dyadic movement task promotin

228 The covert conversation task was then undertaken by ten right-hande

229 ained event detection performance during the conversation task while watching the driving video.

230 reaction time effects from overt and covert conversation tasks in this paradigm.

231 Cell phone conversation, texting, and no distraction while driving.

232 ing the use of memory to fill in bits of the conversation that are missed.

233 ders should engage in shared decision-making conversations that include full disclosure of evidence i

234 n and decisional support during preoperative conversations that included clarification of treatment o

235 Clinic-based workflows for cost-of-care conversations that optimize patients' care experience re

236 It illustrates the conversations that should be initiated with transplant c

237 r obese adolescents whose mothers engaged in conversations that were focused only on healthful eating

238 e in practice, based on 'appreciative caring conversations' that enable all parties to gain two forms

239 that describes the placement of laughter in conversation, the dominance of speech over laughter, the

240 hen both parents engaged in healthful eating conversations, their overweight or obese adolescent chil

241 tute of Technology in 1964, and a fortuitous conversation there ignited my interest in DNA ring forma

242 otocol is a new technology that allows voice conversations to be routed over computer networks.

243 ake, nearly all Japanese users changed their conversations to earthquake-related content.

244 perience use speech patterns in preinterview conversations to judge the fit, competence, starting sal

245 d decision-making approach, engaging in open conversations to learn about the mother's preferences an

246 tion can help surgeons structure challenging conversations to promote shared decision making in the a

247 e non-Japanese speakers did not change their conversation topics significantly after the earthquake,

248 We scored conversation transcripts using OPTION 5, an observer mea

249 ies, such as watching a movie or engaging in conversation, unfold over many minutes.

250 m was to create consensus through structured conversations via a range of stakeholders (general denta

251 Increased brain activations for conversation vs. no conversation during such simulated d

252 When costs were discussed, the conversation was not organized and did not take place in

253 Optimal timing for CoC conversations was felt to be after an initial consult vi

254 Additionally, in a conversation, we can predict upcoming sounds through obs

255 In this Conversation, we explore some of these driving forces an

256 Four scripted videos of a bad news conversation were created that differed only in the leve

257 Case-irrelevant conversations were associated with poorer team performan

258 Conversations were coded for the presence of empathic op

259 Conversations were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed.

260 The response rate was low, cost-of-care conversations were self-reported, generalizability of th

261 It is not known whether improvements in COM conversations were sustained beyond 3 months.

262 for clinicians to consider when engaging in conversations where cost is relevant.

263 Participants completed two kinds of tasks: conversation, which had high social demand, and repetiti

264 te the reaction time to visual events during conversation while driving.

265 able Cardioverter-Defibrillator Deactivation Conversations [WISDOM]; NCT01459744).

266 After a simulated informed consent conversation with a surgeon by using semiquantitative te

267 The article concludes in a conversation with four oncologists regarding what they f

268 onal goals and preferences after an informed conversation with her physician.

269 of this belief and more explicitly spiritual conversation with the patient by his treating team might

270 iplinary review and consensus, and a careful conversation with the patient, before deciding it is not

271 ation should be available routinely and that conversation with their personal physician or endorsed,

272 loratory, qualitative study that used guided conversations with 18 people with dementia, living in si

273 We recorded preoperative conversations with 3 to 7 patients facing high-risk surg

274 eepen understanding and facilitate difficult conversations with adolescents, parents, and other famil

275 ntervention and share what they learned from conversations with doctors and patients during the plann

276 der patients (OR = 1.37; 95% CI, 1.13-1.65), conversations with explicit confidentiality discussions

277 ing practice recommendations for end-of-life conversations with families of potential donors.

278 These findings suggest that climate conversations with friends and family enter people into

279 n of opinion change, but only in the wake of conversations with gay canvassers.

280 We audio-recorded their conversations with patients considering high-risk surger

281 Overall, COM conversations with patients increased from 17% at baseli

282 ans alter the content of their goals-of-care conversations with patients or families to accommodate i

283 tation in the patients' charts, and detailed conversations with patients.

284 ge needed for clinicians to have substantive conversations with patients.

285 drug adherence, lifestyle modification, and conversations with providers (patient education).

286 eferences near the EOL beginning with making conversations with providers and families something that

287 evere reduction in direct eye contact during conversations with real people, together with an abnorma

288 ty, partner-mutuality, and self-mutuality in conversations with spouses/partners in the whole sample

289 RA patients' perceptions of mutuality in conversations with spouses/partners predicted better hea

290 ructured interviews (n=56) and informal open conversations with staff and carers (family members).

291 aff, 150 h of ward observations and informal conversations with staff, scrutiny of medical and nursin

292 We recorded 43 patients' conversations with surgeons, 34 preoperative, and 27 pos

293 Based on a literature search and conversations with the carbon capture community, we revi

294 s subjects' perceptions of responsiveness in conversations with their spouse/partners, is linked with

295 icians should have frequent, well-documented conversations with these patients about end-of-life wish

296 atory response, the extent of its "molecular conversations" with recruited leukocytes, and its influe

297 eural activity scaled with the length of the conversation, with greater changes in firing rate eviden

298 ng paradigm compared to just driving with no conversation, with negligible effect on miss rates.

299 measured by masked ratings of video-recorded conversations, with the use of Therapy Outcome Measures

300 models, including outcomes; (2) initiates a conversation within the American Heart Association on th