コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 y collected clinical specimens (for example, core needle biopsies).
2 sy of 43% (181 true-positive findings of 419 core-needle biopsies).
3 nding of diagnostic techniques, particularly core needle biopsy.
4 ally as atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) by core needle biopsy.
5 neumothorax in patients undergoing CT-guided core needle biopsy.
6 mplications in patients undergoing CT-guided core needle biopsy.
7 aling malignant changes in the vicinity of a core needle biopsy.
8 y of nucleic acid yields from imaging-guided core needle biopsy.
9 without metastatic disease and diagnosed by core needle biopsy.
10 %) patients, open biopsy was performed after core-needle biopsy.
11 e the reliability of diagnoses obtained with core-needle biopsy.
12 To assess the complications of core-needle biopsy.
13 ith 43 benign papillary lesions diagnosed at core-needle biopsy.
14 rformed on tissue obtained with image-guided core-needle biopsy.
15 scopic findings at the time of lumpectomy or core-needle biopsy.
16 easibility of this assay for analyzing small core needle biopsies.
17 tions with limited sample quantities such as core needle biopsies.
18 ncreatic tumors from resection specimens and core needle biopsies.
19 y indicated, ultrasound-guided, percutaneous core needle biopsies.
20 ter numbers of viable cells when compared to core needle biopsies.
21 ing is largely dependent upon examination of core-needle biopsies.
25 agnostic yield (71.5% [40/56]) compared with core-needle biopsy (50% [17/34] P = .04) and fine needle
28 CT-guided transsternal approach for coaxial core-needle biopsy allows safe access to masses in vario
30 , or high-risk (for cancer) breast tissue at core-needle biopsy and had undergone subsequent surgery
31 c accuracy of other interventions, including core-needle biopsy and needle-localized open surgical bi
32 uracy of US-guided FNA is similar to that of core needle biopsy, and there were no complications in t
33 graphic findings, the histologic findings at core-needle biopsy, and the findings at subsequent surgi
36 CT and OCM, which has the potential to guide core needle biopsies, assess surgical margins, and evalu
37 32 male, 192 female) who underwent CT-guided core needle biopsy between January 2021 and October 2022
40 e compared with the Gleason score (GS) after core needle biopsy (CNB) in patients with low, medium an
44 ne needle aspiration biopsy (FNA), and liver core needle biopsy (CNB) samples were collected from par
46 h between breast lesions classified as B3 at core needle biopsy (CNB) that show or do not show atypia
48 ation biopsies (FNAB) controlled with CT and core-needle biopsy (CNB) under real-time CT fluoroscopy
49 chniques (mammography and US), confirmed via core-needle biopsy (CNB), and enrolled between March 201
55 ogic findings in the surgical specimens when core-needle biopsy findings indicated malignancy or foll
56 he MR imaging-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted core-needle biopsy findings of 85 lesions in 75 patients
57 r at least one year; 76 (96.2%) had negative core-needle biopsy findings, and 74 (97.3%) of these rem
60 scape for spectroscopic validation of breast core needle biopsy for detection of microcalcifications
61 wed 101 patients who underwent transthoracic core needle biopsy for the KEYNOTE-001 (MK-3475) clinica
62 re collected from women who underwent breast core-needle biopsy for calcifications that was performed
63 nderwent percutaneous CT-guided coaxial lung core-needle biopsy for suspected primary lung cancer bet
65 ide expression profiling was performed on 50 core needle biopsies from 18 breast cancer patients usin
67 ls that coexpress E-cadherin and vimentin in core-needle biopsies from patients with various advanced
68 ]Ga-ABY-025 PET/CT, [(18)F]F-FDG PET/CT, and core-needle biopsies from targeted lesions were performe
69 es from diagnostic tumor biopsies, including core-needle biopsies frozen in a non-viable format, to e
72 in imaging and medical technology, CT-guided core needle biopsy has largely replaced fluoroscopic-gui
74 vity, specificity, and accuracy of US-guided core needle biopsy in differentiating benign from malign
77 he sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of core-needle biopsy in the detection of malignant neoplas
86 Stereotactic, 14-gauge, automated, large-core needle biopsy (LCNB) was performed in 483 consecuti
89 of metallic clips placed during stereotactic core-needle biopsy may differ substantially from the loc
92 atus in recurrent disease is usually made by core needle biopsy of a single lesion, which may not rep
93 dy (59.4%) would not make it safe to avoid a core needle biopsy of lesions that undergo contrast enha
96 iphering the impact of invasive percutaneous core needle biopsy of the kidney allograft on diagnostic
98 /METHODS: From January, 2012 to May 2013, 76 core-needle biopsies of lung and mediastinum tumors were
106 gh risk for breast cancer and should undergo core-needle biopsy or needle localization with surgical
107 ances in diagnostic techniques, specifically core needle biopsies performed under mammographic and ul
108 on radiographs of the specimens obtained at core needle biopsy performed through the region of color
110 Stereotactic- and ultrasonography-guided core-needle biopsy procedures seem to be almost as accur
114 ing (MITS), a postmortem procedure that uses core needle biopsy samples and does not require opening
116 ul for regular quantification of steroids in core needle biopsy samples of breast tissue to inform do
117 indings were compared with histopathology of core needle biopsy samples or with ultrasound follow-up
118 to whole sections, paired surgical resection/core needle biopsy samples, and paired samples from 69 p
119 psy techniques include stereotactic 14-gauge core-needle biopsy (SC bx), stereotactic 11-gauge suctio
120 aluated the differences between stereotactic core needle biopsy (SCNBx) and needle localization surgi
121 hat papillary lesions diagnosed as benign at core-needle biopsy should be surgically excised because
127 Needle Aspiration, Thorax, CT, Pneumothorax, Core Needle Biopsy, Texture Analysis, Radiomics, CT Supp
128 risk for severe complications is lower with core-needle biopsy than with open surgical procedures (<
129 hic lesions entirely removed at percutaneous core needle biopsy that required wider excision underwen
130 confirmed by computed tomography (CT)-guided core needle biopsy that was performed 2-4 weeks before c
133 to the great increase in the utilization of core needle biopsies under mammographic and ultrasonogra
134 mizing nucleic acid yields in CT-guided lung core needle biopsies used for genomic analysis, there sh
137 uly 1992 through February 1995, stereotactic core needle biopsy was performed in 356 women with 405 n
139 mmography, fine-needle aspiration biopsy, or core-needle biopsy was performed before a definitive dia
142 hom breast cancer was initially diagnosed by core-needle biopsy were more likely than women with canc
145 believe that biopsy procedures - especially core needle biopsies - with CEUS assistance are potent t
146 d ratio (HR) of 3.0 (95% CI, 2-4.5) and, via core needle biopsy, with an adjusted HR of 2.2 (95% CI,