コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
3 resentation, low use of invasive procedures, coronary access issues) and were associated with a poor
8 ocol-based monitoring consisting of repeated coronary angiographies together with systematic assessme
9 nary angiography (78.3% versus 81.4%), early coronary angiography (49.2% versus 54.1%), percutaneous
10 3% versus 35.7%), and received less-frequent coronary angiography (78.3% versus 81.4%), early coronar
12 AR preprocedurally in patients who underwent coronary angiography and patients who underwent cardiac
13 y, NIRS was performed in patients undergoing coronary angiography and possible percutaneous coronary
14 h an initial invasive strategy consisting of coronary angiography and revascularization (if appropria
15 T) Program to analyze patients who underwent coronary angiography between January 1, 2009, and Septem
16 ious clinical trials, does not support early coronary angiography for comatose survivors of cardiac a
17 use of coronary physiology as an adjunct to coronary angiography to guide percutaneous coronary inte
18 hest pain with troponin elevation and normal coronary angiography) occurred in 15% of patients with D
22 Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) occurs in 6% to 15% of myocar
24 cular mechanisms underlying the formation of coronary arteries during development and during cardiac
25 O (Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries) severe/life-threatening/moderate and
26 data on intravascular lithotripsy use in the coronary arteries, and future directions for adoption of
30 was correlated with desmosine (p<0.001), and coronary artery (p=0.002) and thoracic aortic (p<0.001)
32 redominantly afflicts young children, causes coronary artery aneurysms and can result in long-term ca
36 mic vascular disease that included aorta and coronary artery atheroma, cardiac hypertensive disease,
38 his study is to compare HCR and conventional coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery medium-term
39 tio, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.59-0.79]; P<0.0001) and coronary artery bypass grafting (hazard ratio, 0.61 [95%
40 y (1.85; 95% CI, 1.33-2.58) and lowest after coronary artery bypass grafting + mitral valve surgery (
41 us Vein Graft Patency in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery) investigated wh
42 eficiaries who underwent elective colectomy, coronary artery bypass grafting, abdominal aortic aneury
43 their performance to predict adjudicated non-coronary artery bypass grafting-related GUSTO (Global Us
44 YNTAX Study: TAXUS Drug-Eluting Stent Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for the Treatment of Narr
47 acute myocardial infarction hospitalization; coronary artery bypass surgery; heart valve repair/repla
48 ate analysis identified donor age >40 years, coronary artery bypass, and no aspirin after LT as indep
49 extent, defined by a combined metric of the coronary artery calcification score and 2-dimensional va
50 ardiac maladaptations, including accelerated coronary artery calcification, exercise-induced cardiac
52 ntify carotid and femoral plaque volume; and coronary artery calcium score (CACS) at baseline and 2.8
55 , irrespective of cardiovascular risk score, coronary artery calcium score, or coronary artery area s
56 olled phase 2b trial compared progression of coronary artery calcium volume score and other measureme
59 ly 1 case in the MIS-C group (4%) manifested coronary artery dilatation (z score = 3.15) in the acute
61 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.60 to 2.41), coronary artery disease (10.2%, vs. 5.2% among those wit
66 in the circulation of patients with unstable coronary artery disease (CAD), and their recruitment to
67 ch demonstrate one or more associations with coronary artery disease (CAD), atrial fibrillation, or r
70 on clinical read and no known macrovascular coronary artery disease (n=783), MPR remained independen
71 s ratio, 4.22 [95% CI, 1.71-10.4], P=0.002), coronary artery disease (odds ratio, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.16-
72 nfidence interval (CI), 1.2-3.4, P = 0.009), coronary artery disease (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1-3.7; P = 0
73 32 145 patients: 14 095 (43.8%) with stable coronary artery disease and 18 046 (56.1%) with acute co
77 cardial ischaemia resulting from obstructive coronary artery disease is a major cause of morbidity an
80 i-tissue gene expression associations to key coronary artery disease processes and clinical phenotype
81 litus and hypertension to slow and stabilize coronary artery disease progression and improve clinical
82 ients with de novo 3-vessel and/or left main coronary artery disease randomized to treatment with PCI
87 the use of paclitaxel DCBs for treatment of coronary artery disease was not associated with increase
88 , ST-segment elevation, and absence of known coronary artery disease were independent predictors of u
89 acute myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary artery disease were randomly assigned to one of
91 e by age 75 years ranged from 17% to 78% for coronary artery disease, 13% to 76% for breast cancer, a
94 has been shown that in patients with chronic coronary artery disease, ischemic episodes lead to a glo
95 therapy is secondary prevention, concomitant coronary artery disease, particularly with prior myocard
99 investigating the effects of prediabetes in coronary artery disease, stroke and chronic kidney disea
100 mong patients with angina and nonobstructive coronary artery disease, those with coronary microvascul
101 n diet reduces the incidence and severity of coronary artery disease, whereas supplementation with ni
102 erotic cardiovascular disease-in particular, coronary artery disease-and its contribution to disease
103 anisms, further establishing a role for this coronary artery disease-associated gene in fundamental S
104 Residential remoteness was associated with coronary artery disease-related SCD (odds ratio, 1.44 [9
113 d atheroprotective marker, in particular for coronary artery disease; however, HDL particle concentra
117 9) underwent left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery ligation to mimic vulnerable atheroscler
118 ramagnetic shift associated with duration of coronary artery occlusion and the presence of iron.
119 mmon, occurring even in the absence of acute coronary artery occlusion, and contributes to high rates
121 This study analyzed data from the CARDIA (Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study).
122 uded 191 participants from the CARDIA study (Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults), a com
124 phy angiography (CTA) may be used to exclude coronary artery stenosis >=50% in patients with NSTEACS.
125 was the ability of coronary CTA to rule out coronary artery stenosis (>=50% stenosis) in the entire
127 luzole died from ischaemic heart disease and coronary artery thrombosis, and one patient assigned flu
128 e rejection (>1 y) have been associated with coronary artery vasculopathy (CAV) in pediatric heart tr
130 c_0001445 levels were associated with higher coronary atherosclerosis extent and severity with a 2-fo
131 f physical activity and exercise training on coronary atherosclerosis in athletes who are middle-aged
136 lity failed to deliver effective guidance of coronary bypass surgery to a reduction of adverse cardia
141 sion of coronary artery disease using serial coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) is of cli
142 The purpose of this study was to test if coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) may be us
143 c naive psoriasis patients (n=209) underwent coronary computed tomography angiography at baseline and
144 g further supportive evidence for the use of coronary CT angiography as the first-line test for the e
146 The primary endpoint was the ability of coronary CTA to rule out coronary artery stenosis (>=50%
147 component of the trial, a clinically blinded coronary CTA was conducted prior to ICA in both groups.
149 hies/Congenital & Genetics, Cardio-Oncology, Coronary Disease & Interventions, Hypertension, Imaging,
151 ne the difference between MEndoT-derived and coronary endothelial cells is essential for understandin
153 associated risk was only observed for major coronary events (1.64 [1.35, 2.00]) and ischemic stroke
154 ascular events (MVEs), including 7,326 major coronary events (MCEs), 37,992 ischemic heart disease (I
156 ex quintile were 2.15 [1.72, 2.69] for major coronary events, 1.65 [1.50, 1.80] for ischemic stroke,
158 nts (including myocardial infarctions, fatal coronary events, silent infarctions, revascularization p
160 otein(a) (Lp[a]) and family history (FHx) of coronary heart disease (CHD) are individually associated
161 d 15,837 incident CVD cases, including 9,794 coronary heart disease (CHD) cases and 6,174 strokes.
163 zed, single-blind, controlled trial in 1,002 coronary heart disease (CHD) patients, whose primary obj
167 was associated with a lower risk of incident coronary heart disease among participants with the Hp2-2
168 n for the management of patients with stable coronary heart disease and discuss implications for the
172 ion Trial to show a significant reduction in coronary heart disease or total mortality to the design
173 isease after menopause and typically develop coronary heart disease several years later than men.
174 , they also proposed an alternative: whether coronary heart disease was preventable at all by simulta
175 2 diabetes, inflammatory bowel disease, and coronary heart disease, all of which have available earl
176 eclassification improvements for early-onset coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation and prostate
177 idence interval, 8.38 to 15.50), followed by coronary heart disease, atrial fibrillation, and stroke.
178 ling was used to determine hazard ratios for coronary heart disease, CVD, and all-cause mortality acc
179 South Asian populations including premature coronary heart disease, early type 2 diabetes mellitus,
180 k for certain cardiovascular diseases (e.g., coronary heart disease, heart failure, and atrial fibril
181 rbanization level, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, coronary heart disease, migraine, hypotension, and obstr
185 influence of a modern lifestyle in abetting Coronary Heart Diseases (CHD) have mostly focused on det
187 than control immediately after percutaneous coronary intervention (14.1+/-4.1% versus 12.0+/-3.3%; P
188 giography (49.2% versus 54.1%), percutaneous coronary intervention (59.2% versus 64.0%), and mechanic
189 ent ethyl significantly reduced percutaneous coronary intervention (hazard ratio, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.59-
190 (HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.59-0.90]), percutaneous coronary intervention (HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.63-0.95]), an
191 outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ISR in the United States
194 onship has not been studied for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of chronic total occlusion (
195 mpared with aspirin alone after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or acute coronary syndrome b
196 levation myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduces mortality when compa
197 ospitals in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) treated with MCS (Impella or
201 fter unprotected left main stem percutaneous coronary intervention (uLMS-PCI) is poorly defined.
202 ated this evolving physiological guidance of coronary intervention and its use is supported by large
203 dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention and the withholding of aspirin amo
204 s in timely delivery of primary percutaneous coronary intervention are expected, a modern fibrinolyti
205 to perform expeditious primary percutaneous coronary intervention for patients presenting with ST-se
206 igh-risk patients after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment-elevation myocardia
207 y syndrome and those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention had less bleeding with apixaban th
208 risk (HBR) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention have been widely excluded from ran
209 ly versus immediate multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in patients presenting with acute
210 r an acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with atrial fibrillati
212 ting intravascular imaging with percutaneous coronary intervention may overcome the barriers to utili
213 cularization strategies: either percutaneous coronary intervention of the culprit-lesion-only or imme
215 -hospital transfers for primary percutaneous coronary intervention that reflects inter-facility commu
216 ocated for saphenous vein graft percutaneous coronary intervention to decrease the incidence of dista
217 , and had higher AMI volume and percutaneous coronary intervention use during the AMI hospitalization
219 ere assessed and compared after percutaneous coronary intervention with bare-metal stents (BMS) and f
220 py reduces major bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents, whereas
222 eated with sonothrombolysis and percutaneous coronary intervention) or control (50 patients treated w
223 Acute Coronary Syndrome and/or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention), patients with atrial fibrillatio
234 iplatelet prescribing following percutaneous coronary intervention.The primary outcome was the rate o
235 heart valve repair/replacement; percutaneous coronary intervention; or heart/heart-lung transplant).
237 o coronary angiography to guide percutaneous coronary interventions has accumulated over the past 25
240 Coronary artery stenosis is a narrowing of coronary lumen space caused by an atherosclerotic lesion
241 s uncover a SHF vasculogenic contribution to coronary lymphatic development through a local niche at
243 tructive coronary artery disease, those with coronary microvascular dysfunction have a poor outcome.
244 maging and analysis toolset to visualize the coronary microvasculature in intact embryonic hearts and
248 -10 was also inversely associated with total coronary plaque (rho = -0.19; P = .02) and noncalcified
254 increasing use and success of interventional coronary reperfusion strategies, morbidity and mortality
255 e, defined as the time from symptom onset to coronary reperfusion, was a pre-specified subgroup of in
256 or other acute coronary syndrome, stroke, or coronary revascularisation) per 1 mmol/L reduction in LD
258 /CT, identifies patients unlikely to undergo coronary revascularization within 90 days of a PET/CT.
259 I, recurrent CHD events (ie, recurrent MI or coronary revascularization), heart failure hospitalizati
260 cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, and stroke through December
261 e stenosis is located in proximal and middle coronary segments and the FFR value is close to the cuto
263 for diagnosis of hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis was 98% and 96% respectively, compared
264 n of Fractional Flow Reserve in Intermediate Coronary Stenosis With Guiding Catheter Disengagement) r
265 logists to accurately assess the severity of coronary stenosis without resorting to invasive techniqu
267 Outcomes trial in patients with recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS) determined whether alirocumab-in
268 T, a prospective multicenter cohort of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), in relation to BB use: prior to
270 04]; P=0.11); non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome (RR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.72-0.97]; P=0.02)
271 thresholds, in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome admitted to Swedish coronary care unit
272 elevated risk for recurrent MACE after acute coronary syndrome and a larger absolute and relative ris
273 were associated with increased odds of acute coronary syndrome and its manifestations in individuals
274 with atrial fibrillation and a recent acute coronary syndrome and those undergoing percutaneous coro
275 Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Acute Coronary Syndrome and/or Percutaneous Coronary Intervent
276 taneous coronary intervention (PCI) or acute coronary syndrome but with increased risk of bleeding.
278 tal admissions in England for types of acute coronary syndrome from Jan 1, 2019, to May 24, 2020, tha
279 nducted in 18 924 patients with recent acute coronary syndrome on intensive or maximum-tolerated stat
280 uration of the use of aspirin after an acute coronary syndrome or percutaneous coronary intervention
283 on of Cardiovascular Outcomes After an Acute Coronary Syndrome), which was conducted in 18 924 patien
284 es the risk of PAD events or VTE after acute coronary syndrome, and if such effects are related to le
285 death, myocardial infarction or other acute coronary syndrome, stroke, or coronary revascularisation
288 esenting with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTEACS) in the EARLY ACS (Early Gly
290 ) Receptor Blockers In Non-ST Elevated Acute Coronary Syndromes With Initial Invasive Indication [DUB
291 mputerized Tomography in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes) trial (NCT02061891) evaluated the ou
292 e Optimal Strategy to Medically Manage Acute Coronary Syndromes) was a double-blind, placebo-controll
293 myocardial dysfunction and arrhythmia, acute coronary syndromes, acute kidney injury, gastrointestina
297 sing of CT data included segmentation of the coronary tree and heart contours, calculation of CT FFR
298 fy proangiogenic apelin as a key mediator of coronary vascular repair and a pharmacotherapeutic targe