ライフサイエンスコーパス: correct for

1 uorescence microscope is well understood and corrected for.

2 ities and vacancies must be investigated and corrected for.

3 ated with normal tissue can be estimated and corrected for.

4 mn NO(2) with an improved air mass factor to correct for a known systematic low bias in the operation

5 To correct for a large number of hypothesis tests, most res

6 nisms obtained by different force fields and correct for a wide range of stationary and dynamical obs

7 Each eye is corrected for a different distance, causing one image to

8 SIPMeta corrects for a common visualization artifact by accounti

9 when used as a standalone parameter or when corrected for additional independent predictors of trans

10 on-carriers (990 pg/mL (597-1373), p<0.001) (corrected for age).

11 n all fluid markers, cognition and behavior, corrected for age, education, sex, and clinical dementia

12 All outcome measures were corrected for age, sex and intracranial volume.

13 n's rho = -0.65, p < 0.001; p < 0.0001 after correcting for age, disease duration, and sex).

14 After correcting for age, disease duration, sex, and T2 lesion

15 After correcting for age, sex, and body mass index, the gut mi

16 Correcting for age, sex, body mass index, HbA1c and stat

17 e 2 showed faster clinical progression after correcting for age, sex, level of education and tau leve

18 When corrected for air contamination, these values exceed tho

19 % CI 0.92 to 1.03) using MR-PRESSO estimates corrected for an outlier SNP (rs550057) from the highly

20 0.0% sensitivity and 96.8% specificity after correcting for an initial standard-of-truth misread.

21 ositive predictive value (PPV) or challenge, corrected for ancestry by principal components.

22 tions with striatal D2R were diminished when correcting for ancestry.

23 egments at high resolution, SNVs and Indels (corrected for aneuploidy), regions with loss of heterozy

24 and fluid boundary lines that were manually corrected for assessment of change in EZ parameters and

25 ources of heterogeneity to be quantified and corrected for at the single-subunit level.

26 any argument dependent on effect sizes must correct for attenuation due to instrument reliabilities.

27 Pearson correlation coefficients (r), corrected for attenuation from within-person variation i

28 The inability to correct for axial length on spectral-domain (SD) OCT tra

29 ages, but this approach is slow and does not correct for axial movements.

30 axillary lymph nodes on each examination and corrected for background (18)F-fluciclovine avidity.

31 s (N loss as a percentage of N applied after correcting for background emissions) 18.2%-75.7% less fo

32 water amounts and its isotopic values, after correcting for background.

33 In adjusted models, we corrected for baseline demographic characteristics, i.e.

34 Corrected for baseline differences, the mean IBDQ score

35 nfiltrate and/or scar size at 3 months after correcting for baseline values (95% CI, -1.33 to -0.32 m

36 acuity outcomes compared with UT-DSAEK after correcting for baseline visual acuity: compared with UT-

37 CytofRUV can correct for batch effects and integrate data from large

38 from different studies after diagnosing and correcting for batch effects and retaining the biologica

39 m batch effect correction methods to further correct for between-batch intensity differences.

40 other locations or at finer spatial scale to correct for biased testing and imperfect diagnostic accu

41 of -0.25(-0.45 to -0.05, p = 0.015) at L1-4, corrected for body mass index, compared with individuals

42 lk distance), and quadriceps muscle strength corrected for body weight (QS%).

43 predicted by species' home range size (after correcting for body size).

44 st measurement by calculating using ICP, and correcting for, both translational and rotational misali

45 used by instrumental mass discrimination was corrected for by a combination of internal correction us

46 Correcting for cases without a detectable antibody respo

47 In our empirical data, SVA did not fully correct for cell-type effects, its performance was somew

48 ic effects of the differentiation process by correcting for cell type composition boosted the SZ sign

49 Once diversity was corrected for changes in food resource availability, its

50 e range [IQR]: 6.7 to 59.6 mg/dl) and LDL-C [corrected for cholesterol content in lipoprotein(a)] pre

51 LDL-C was corrected (LDL-C(corrected)) for cholesterol content in lipoprotein(a).

52 ts at high-resolution, SNVs and indels (both corrected for CN in aneuploid regions), loss of heterozy

53 e high-quality SIM data while accounting and correcting for common artifacts.

54 he cumulative incidence of visual impairment corrected for competing risks was calculated; and the Ka

55 e interval, 1.11-4.67; P=0.02) in blood when corrected for confounders.

56 cessing and emotional regulation, also after correcting for confounders such as social network size.

57 gene expression and exposure to PCBs, while correcting for confounders, in particular distribution o

58 t these studies tended to substantially over-correct for confounding, and as a result the number of g

59 than a negative control outcome to partially correct for confounding.

60 or two-way interaction between exposures and corrected for confounding by co-exposures.

61 These studies were not systematically corrected for confounding variables.

62 d cohort and cohorts from the literature, 3) correcting for confounding due to lesion type, and 4) id

63 By correcting for corneal-induced artifacts, IOPcc measurem

64 omes and predictor data types, statistically corrects for covariates, and permits statistical inferen

65 Tissue and urinary (corrected for creatinine) arsenic content was higher in

66 normalization approaches are ineffective to correct for degradation bias.

67 Correcting for demography with traditional methods may l

68 Propensity score matching was used to correct for differences in baseline characteristics.

69 Correcting for differences in body mass weakens but does

70 cord with available experimental data, after correcting for differences in native state stability.

71 the whole-body distribution of CLR 124 and, correcting for differences in radioactive decay, predict

72 ntroducing horizontal translation factors to correct for different entry times (r(2) = 0.99 and r(2)

73 nslation factor was added to each dataset to correct for different participants' entry times into the

74 After correcting for differential calendar time of sample coll

75 To maintain perceptual coherence, the brain corrects for discrepancies between the senses.

76 standardized uptake value (SUV) and ADC data corrected for distortion were computed from optimal real

77 While several studies have focused on correcting for DNA cleavage toxicity biases associated w

78 red for death with a functioning graft) were corrected for donor, preservation, and recipient variabl

79 s, experienced night-migratory songbirds can correct for east-west displacements to unknown locations

80 t consisting of diffusion volumes were first corrected for eddy current distortions and motion artifa

81 gand are simply added together, with the sum corrected for effects of charge and 5d metals.

82 stinosis participants at all CKD stages when corrected for eGFR and age, but not when adjusted for se

83 to generate a Bell state with 78% fidelity (corrected for errors in state preparation and measuremen

84 ng Sparse Reduced Rank Regression (sRRR) and correcting for ethnicity and age at birth and imaging.

85 along single tasks or combinations of them, correcting for expectations based on aging; and trained

86 ent studies based on dose-response functions corrected for exposure misclassification are required to

87 id researchers in their choice of methods to correct for false discoveries.

88 After correcting for false discovery rates, changes in the DNA

89 a package, which we call MetaProfiler, that corrects for false identifications and performs phylogen

90 and the thalamus (Pearson r =-0.23; P <.001 corrected for familywise error [FWE]).

91 rection across the two eyes where one eye is corrected for far vision and the other eye is corrected

92 Correcting for field-to-field differences in CH(4) produ

93 l amyloid deposition (t values >3.59; P <.05 corrected for FWE).

94 d fell close to or outside the GCA grid when corrected for ganglion cell displacement.

95 All per-gene scores are corrected for gene length.

96 We included only studies that corrected for gestational age or were restricted to full

97 After correcting for global brain size, there was no significa

98 After correcting for global scaling differences, clusters of s

99 phoid fever and iNTS disease incidences were corrected for health-care-seeking behaviour and recruitm

100 s, Tpe interval should not be systematically corrected for heart rate and similar to the QT interval,

101 mained independent (HR: 2.4, P = 0.009) when corrected for histological type (HR: 2.7, P = 0.030), no

102 thm on average region-of-interest signal and corrected for imperfect inversion pulse efficiency.

103 After correcting for imperfect detection, we found that local

104 structure is also an important confounder to correct for in genome-wide association studies.

105 ribute to terminal ileal digesta and must be corrected for in determining coefficients of true ileal

106 rt variant frequencies, which are not easily corrected for in downstream analyses.

107 em during such experiments and are routinely corrected for in x and y dimensions.

108 ding was measured using arterial sampling to correct for individual differences in radioligand metabo

109 status remained a significant predictor when correcting for infant status (P=0.002).

110 All data was corrected for inflation.

111 This estimate increased to 34% after correcting for influenza vaccination exposure misclassif

112 Researchers can correct for information biases using serological assessm

113 es of GCIPL alone (cohorts 1 and 2) or GCIPL corrected for intrathecal B-cell frequencies (cohort 1)

114 ions containing hydroxyethyl starch (HES) to correct for intravascular deficits in high-risk surgical

115 d on standard controls have been proposed to correct for it.

116 warming rates in the North Atlantic, whereas correcting for Japanese measurement offsets leads to inc

117 using a multiple linear regression model to correct for known confounders outperforms factor analysi

118 there was a significant decrease in SUV(max) corrected for lean body mass (SUL(max)) on images obtain

119 of tumor maximum standardized uptake values corrected for lean body mass (SULmax) on [(18)F]fluorode

120 ) in HCM and remained significant even after correcting for LGE, ECV, and wall thickness (p = 0.036).

121 nts underwent 3-T MRI, including R2* mapping corrected for macroscopic B0 field inhomogeneities.

122 ensity (VD), and perfusion density (PD) were corrected for magnification secondary to axial length an

123 roach of using divergence between species to correct for male mutation bias results in biased estimat

124 , when using a relative variability index to correct for mean negative emotion, this association disa

125 es (i.e. survival or death) when unreported, corrected for model imperfection to estimate the CFR wit

126 mes (ie, survival or death) when unreported, corrected for model imperfection to estimate the CFR wit

127 However, FIR cannot correct for motion within 1 predefined scan period, and

128 e compared repeatability of ADC measurements corrected for motion artefact against non-motion correct

129 atasets (n = 16, randomly chosen), which was corrected for motion using MR navigators.

130 False Discovery Rate (q < 0.05) was used to correct for multiple comparisons.

131 Bonferroni correction was used to correct for multiple testing.

132 number of independent SNPs was calculated to correct for multiple testing.

133 Tests were corrected for multiple comparisons across all channels a

134 Results were corrected for multiple comparisons using the false disco

135 ge, education, cognition, scan interval, and corrected for multiple comparisons via false discovery r

136 isher z transformation were used, which were corrected for multiple comparisons with the Bonferroni m

137 ected (t >= +/-7, P < 10-6 family-wise error corrected for multiple comparisons) to a single location

138 the attention and reward network (P < 0.005, corrected for multiple comparisons).

139 ation in the supramarginal gyrus (P < 0.005, corrected for multiple comparisons).

140 nsula, and right cingulate gyrus (P < 0.005, corrected for multiple comparisons).

141 ative temporal changes of hs-cTnT (p < 0.01, corrected for multiple comparisons).

142 UPDRS-III scores in the putamen (all p<0.05 corrected for multiple comparisons).

143 ols in prefrontal cortex and putamen (p<0.05 corrected for multiple comparisons).

144 th slower postoperative Stroop test ability (corrected for multiple comparisons, 5000 permutations).

145 injuries on cortical thickness (Monte Carlo corrected for multiple comparisons, vertex-wise cluster

146 significance of associations and Bonferroni corrected for multiple comparisons.

147 Findings were clusterwise corrected for multiple comparisons.

148 ults were considered significant at p < 0.05 corrected for multiple comparisons.

149 rrogated with ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests corrected for multiple comparisons.

150 differences and group-by-time interactions, corrected for multiple comparisons.

151 ed data, respectively, and Bonferroni method corrected for multiple comparisons.

152 All P values were corrected for multiple hypothesis testing by controlling

153 ive a significance level that was Bonferroni corrected for multiple subcortical region comparisons (p

154 hbor-adjusted p-values that are additionally corrected for multiple testing based on the Benjamini-Ho

155 We corrected for multiple testing by controlling the tail p

156 osure passed the significance threshold when corrected for multiple testing in ExWAS, and none was se

157 P values were corrected for multiple testing using false discovery rat

158 We corrected for multiple testing, yielding a significance

159 at week 2 (-40.0% vs. -13.9%; p < .001 after correcting for multiple comparisons by Bonferroni [effec

160 ral, temporal, and spatial specificity while correcting for multiple comparisons using nonparametric

161 these associations remained significant when correcting for multiple comparisons, suggesting that fur

162 hese associations were not significant after correcting for multiple comparisons.

163 significantly associated with CVD risk after correcting for multiple comparisons.Although the MedDiet

164 white populations in either tumor type after correcting for multiple hypothesis testing.

165 th NEHI.Measurements and Main Results: After correcting for multiple testing, children with NEHI (n =

166 After correcting for multiple testing, the 3 genetic instrumen

167 Diet + nuts group remained significant after correcting for multiple testing.

168 itators with a strong statistical trend when correcting for multiple testing.

169 effects on any of the other phenotypes after correcting for multiple testing.

170 After correcting for multiple tests, four of the SDG-aligned t

171 baseline outcomes and socio-demographics and correcting for multiple-hypothesis testing using the Ben

172 ellite data and introducing a technique that corrects for multiple-comparison bias in functional netw

173 variables age, sex, and follow-up time (and correcting for multiplicity of tests), 89 proteins were

174 cted mass spectrometer (MS) tracing data and correct for natural isotope abundance, generate publicat

175 orrected for far vision and the other eye is corrected for near vision.

176 aluated 5 alternative approaches designed to correct for nonresponse bias under different attrition m

177 ated alternative approaches to assessing and correcting for nonresponse bias in a longitudinal survey

178 idence interval: 0.27-0.74; P = 0.002), when corrected for number of tumors, bilobar disease, and int

179 Here we show that correcting for offsets among groups of bucket measuremen

180 Correcting for offsets in German measurements decreases

181 day 10, week 6, and month 6, and values were corrected for osmolality (mOsm).

182 g diabetes, hyperglycemia, and hypoglycemia, corrected for other factors, was analyzed using a genera

183 Our internal validation was corrected for overoptimism using bootstrap.

184 wer anxiety in upper cranial persisted after correcting for pain and dystonia severity.

185 )F]FPEB total volumes of distribution (V(T)) corrected for partial volume effects were measured using

186 ametric binding images of (18)F-MK-9470 were corrected for partial-volume effect.

187 rgdorferi is the antibody index assay, which corrects for passive diffusion of serum antibodies into

188 and pseudophakic FECD eyes (P = .066) after correcting for patient age and preoperative BCVA.

189 Correcting for per-unit withdrawal time, the mean dyspla

190 e images were projected stereographically to correct for peripheral distortion and obtain accurate me

191 re of the motors needs to be considered when correcting for photobleaching.

192 SPC, data from this method can be rigorously corrected for pile-up distortions, allowing operation wi

193 onent analysis (PCA) is a standard method to correct for population stratification in ancestry-specif

194 and the first three principal components to correct for population stratification.

195 informative markers (AIMs) may appropriately correct for population stratification.

196 IMs accurately estimated global ancestry and corrected for population stratification in association s

197 discrepancies highlight (1) that methods for correcting for population stratification in GWAS may not

198 Correcting for population structure in these studies can

199 Statistical analyses were designed to help correct for possible bias due to reduced sample size in

200 Besides being essential to correct for possible systematic errors in interstellar m

201 ee diagnostic groups (glaucoma, OHT and GLD) correcting for potential confounding factors, IOP and ag

202 Our results demonstrate that after correcting for potential over-estimates of the effects o

203 ions were not statistically significant when corrected for potentially confounding factors.

204 The effect on obesity prevalence corrected for poverty, race education and temperature wa

205 g or vision loss) at 22 to 26 months of age, corrected for prematurity.

206 mental impairment at 22 to 26 months of age, corrected for prematurity.

207 oth multivariable logistic regression models correcting for propensity score 1 (aOR 1.15 95%CI 1.03-1

208 57 for IGF1 to 872 for IGF2R, although when corrected for protein length the rate ranged from 0.22 t

209 e's 'trim and fill' were used to examine and correct for publication bias.

210 (1993-1994 and 1999-2016) were obtained and corrected for quantile-specific self-reporting bias with

211 QT and JT, and JTp intervals should also be corrected for race.

212 sponse to perturbation, while simultaneously correcting for random effects in the data.

213 After correcting for refractive errors, the model can only rea

214 E) = .015, peak-level familywise error [FWE] corrected for region of interest).

215 asurements from up to 14,149 participants to correct for regression dilution bias.

216 The correlations among OBP, HBP, and ABP, corrected for regression dilution bias, were 0.74 to 0.8

217 vanced POAG was tested by linear mixed model correcting for relatedness and population stratification

218 productive lifespan), and social group size, correcting for research effort.

219 nfidence interval: 1.01, 1.11; P = .03) when corrected for risk factors including age, diabetes, rena

220 bels as fiducial markers, we computationally correct for rotational and translational drift, reduce o

221 rmore, we demonstrate that this approach can correct for sample drift, tilt and other aberrations, al

222 meta-analysis (GWAMA) of related traits that correct for sample overlap.

223 Data were harmonized to correct for scanner-specific variations in diffusion mea

224 Emission data were corrected for scatter, attenuation, and decay supplement

225 We developed methods to correct for self-reporting bias and to estimate state-sp

226 Here we report a computational approach to correct for sequencing process-induced artifacts, valida

227 usly estimates the transcript abundances and corrects for sequencing bias through an EM algorithm.

228 When correcting for severity of disease, we did not observe a

229 ed with DESeq2 software, using covariates to correct for sex, age, library batches, and 1 surrogate v

230 blood input curve (SUV(AUC,WB)); and SUV(BW) corrected for sex hormone-binding globulin levels (SUV(S

231 ences in JT, JTp and Tpe intervals should be corrected for sex.

232 To correct for short-term effects of postoperative complica

233 ite; use of proactive learning algorithms to correct for site-specific biases and increase robustness

234 peratures in ship-board buckets, and must be corrected for substantial biases(7-9).

235 ystematic statistical method to identify and correct for such confounding effects in population growt

236 that ignore contamination, while our method corrects for such biases.

237 o systems was good in all three groups after correcting for systematic biases related to the 2-D mark

238 variants, and the necessity to statistically correct for testing millions of genetic variants.

239 ese methods are on average approximately 40% correct for the 100 strongest predicted contacts in each

240 is real (objective) and primarily attuned to correct for the colour temperature of black-body illumin

241 rmore, the proposed technique can be used to correct for the decay of signal due to T2* effects to im

242 herefore, the RS can serve as a calibrant to correct for the difference between instruments or sample

243 We describe a method to correct for the differences in size ranges as used by st

244 Altogether, this toolset allows us to correct for the diversity of microplastic, to address it

245 is was used to create predictive models that correct for the effects caused by confectioner's sugar,

246 Finally, we use this method to correct for the incompatibility of data as used in curre

247 We used a bias analysis approach to correct for the known inaccuracy of plasma HIV RNA level

248 expression by genomic locus repair failed to correct for the phenotypic and expression hysteresis.

249 To correct for the response bias, selected tethered multiva

250 sCMOS analysis algorithm that are needed to correct for the RQE differences.

251 igher than previous estimates, which did not correct for the sizes of the outgroup species and ancest

252 peated with placement of the contact lens to correct for the spherical equivalent of the refractive e

253 ime, and temperature and enables a method to correct for the successive loss.

254 delayed sensory feedback can then be used to correct for the unexpected-perturbations, motor noise, o

255 estigate whether a compensation method could correct for the variations of radiomic feature values ca

256 t hearing loss mice (C3H/HeJ), and from mice corrected for the Cdh23(ahl) mutation (C57BL/6NTac(Cdh23

257 The scattering signals are corrected for the differences in electron density in the

258 However, previous studies have not properly corrected for the fact that some protein targets have mu

259 synchrotron emission model, when adequately corrected for the finite width of emitting electron bunc

260 This error has been corrected for the HTML, PDF and print versions of the ar

261 Conditional analysis corrected for the most significant variants at each locu

262 uld be due to chance (P = 0.1) if Bonferroni corrected for the multiplicity of hypotheses tested (n =

263 s assessed using the deuterated water method corrected for the potential confounding contribution of

264 tive to that in ZnTPP-PDI, when the data are corrected for the statistics of having two electron acce

265 Based on delta(13)C values, corrected for the Suess effect, habitat had changed over

266 hazard ratio (HR), 95% CI, and P value were corrected for the three previous interim analyses by the

267 from two-dimensional (2D) leaf sections and corrected for the three-dimensional (3D) geometry of mes

268 racts, with positive correlations (P <= .05, corrected for the voxel-wise multiple comparisons) betwe

269 After correcting for the "Suess Effect," delta(13) C in feathe

270 After correcting for the effect of ethnolinguistic boundaries,

271 als for asthma using logistic regression and correcting for the known sampling fractions from stage 1

272 After correcting for the population near the sampling sites, f

273 ightly modified RICS calculation that allows correcting for the significant bias of the autocorrelati

274 free Footprint Enrichment Test (BiFET), that corrects for the biases arising from the differences in

275 The method automatically corrects for the effect of ionic strength on the activit

276 mance differences between cohorts, even when corrected for their own cognitive and sensorimotor defic

277 hich the activation density was too high and correct for them, in both live- and fixed-cell experimen

278 ion ratios of applied internal standards to correct for these interferences.

279 n-atmosphere CO(2) fluxes from 1992 to 2018, corrected for these effects.

280 Importantly, induced expression of SLP-2 corrected for these mitochondrial alterations caused by

281 To correct for this bias, it was suggested to discard the d

282 study describes a computational approach to correct for this copy number effect, increasing the spec

283 Using two-component mixing models to correct for this effect, the (15)N(15)N data allow extra

284 spectroscopy, thus highlighting the need to correct for this TDS-influenced self-attenuation.

285 cell-based cardiac repair therapies aimed at correcting for this loss.

286 We have designed a method that fully corrects for this source of error.

287 We introduce a method to correct for tilting of the sensor array, as might be cau

288 Ordinal logistic regression models corrected for time from onset confirmed abnormal MRI at

289 Serum metabolites were corrected for total body water and the sum of 24 hr urin

290 After correcting for total oral morphine equivalency, the incr

291 Adjusted Cox regression, corrected for treatment adjustments, showed that intensi

292 All analyses were corrected for TSPO rs6971 polymorphism (which is implica

293 10(6) counts per second at saturation, after correcting for uncorrelated photon background.

294 cluding autologistic isolation measures that corrected for unsurveyed patches and imperfect detection

295 A pregnancy-specific profile of estrogens corrected for urinary specific gravity was identified du

296 ty of internal standards that can adequately correct for variability in sample preparation and the MA

297 nsfer components lost during freeze/thaw and correcting for variable permeabilization of mitochondria

298 n variation in beta diversity patterns after correcting for variation in regional species pools.

299 k SCG metagenomes, we show that our approach corrects for variation among draft genomes predicted by

300 urine collections, which were statistically corrected for within-person variance.