ライフサイエンスコーパス: correlation coefficient

1 ility was assessed by calculating intraclass correlation coefficient.

2 ducibility was evaluated by using intraclass correlation coefficient.

3 sessed using the McNemar test and intraclass correlation coefficient.

4 st, Student t test, chi(2) test, and Pearson correlation coefficient.

5 ucibility was determined by using intraclass correlation coefficient.

6 the measured membrane area versus the volume correlation coefficient.

7 per patient and to estimate the concordance correlation coefficient.

8 ict-level prevalence ranking using Kendall's correlation coefficient.

9 monary function tests by using Spearman rank correlation coefficient.

10 cted by estimating normalized ensemble cross-correlation coefficient.

11 ssion and change-point analyses and Spearman correlation coefficients.

12 peatability coefficients (RC) and intraclass correlation coefficients.

13 from each region were analyzed with Pearson correlation coefficients.

14 quantified by using Pearson r and intraclass correlation coefficients.

15 spiked soils, depicted as changes in partial correlation coefficients.

16 based on the statistical significance of the correlation coefficients.

17 ns, repeatability limits (r), and intraclass correlation coefficients.

18 ndard peptides were linear and had excellent correlation coefficients.

19 outcomes were assessed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients.

20 of missing values, and estimated intra-class correlation coefficients.

21 e concentration correlation based on Pearson correlation coefficients.

22 information criterion (AIC), and intraclass correlation coefficients.

23 correlations was evaluated by using Spearman correlation coefficients.

24 observed postintervention (n = 8; Pearson's correlation coefficient 0.75; P = 0.03).

25 hy in 51 cases with paired data (intra-class correlation coefficient 0.78, 95% CI 0.68-0.84), with fe

26 e degree of IOP reduction (n = 13; Pearson's correlation coefficient 0.7; P = 0.007) and the improvem

27 elation between the 2 measurements (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.802, P<0.0001).

28 olumn were strongly correlated, with Pearson correlation coefficient 0.993.

29 d potassium, magnesium and calcium contents (correlation coefficients -0.49, -0.68 and -0.69).

30 (28% improvement over DFLpred) and Matthews correlation coefficient = 0.42 (180% increase over DFLpr

31 nd correlated with tumor perfusion (Spearman correlation coefficient = 0.671, P = 0.020).

32 were excellent (Pearson r = 0.97, intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.93).

33 V(max): R (2) = 0.988, P < 0.001, interclass correlation coefficient = 0.997).

34 Intermodal reliability was high (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.998, P < .01).

35 halate metabolite concentrations (intraclass correlation coefficients = 0.17-0.35).

36 19 and 0.831), and repeatability (intraclass correlation coefficients = 0.947 and 0.942).

37 l citation count and time since publication (correlation coefficient = -0.051, P = 0.656).

38 nt negative association of citation density (correlation coefficient = -0.610, P < 0.01) with time si

39 l studies and randomized trials (concordance correlation coefficient, 0.083; 95% CI, -0.068 to 0.230)

40 ay risk-adjusted complication rates (Pearson correlation coefficient, 0.213, P = 0.303).

41 fidence and accuracy of prediction (pairwise correlation coefficient, 0.26; p < 0.001).

42 that in the anesthetized animals (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.491-0.629) over the different

43 J), mechanical potential energy (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.57; bias, -0.04+/-0.03 J), an

44 3 J), and ventricular efficiency (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.84; bias, 3.5+/-2.1%).

45 ame deformation (minimum-diameter intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.84; maximum-diameter intracla

46 efficient, 0.84; maximum-diameter intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.88; perimeter intraclass corr

47 onsistently preferred DLR images (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.89; 95% CI: 0.83, 0.93).

48 rrelation coefficient, 0.91; area intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.91), more than mild paravalvu

49 tion coefficient, 0.88; perimeter intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.91; area intraclass correlati

50 and model-calculated stroke work (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.93; bias, -0.02+/-0.03 J), me

51 respectively) compared with TTE (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.940 and 0.871; respectively).

52 LVMI and MWT was higher for MRI (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.951 and 0.912, respectively)

53 e from truncated 30-min datasets (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.96).

54 efficient (distance measurements: intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.979-0.999; P <

55 9; P < 0.001; number of ampullae: intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.988-0.999; P <

56 with manually traced TKV and TLV (intraclass correlation coefficients, 0.998 and 0.996, respectively)

57 donors was attributed to center (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.232, P < 0.001).

58 ers showed excellent reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.93; 95% confidence interval:

59 ing and Bablok regression (Lin's concordance correlation coefficient: 0.97).

60 ing and Bablok regression (Lin's concordance correlation coefficient: 0.97).

61 nt interobserver reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.96, 1.00).

62 .001 and tau = -0.88) of human rabies cases (Correlation coefficient: -0.82) have been observed.

63 tate levels in postarrest patients (Spearman correlation coefficient=0.48; P=0.045).

64 ent accuracy (mean R(2) [square of Pearson's correlation coefficient]: 0.966, range [min, max]: 0.904

65 (TV50): R (2) = 1.000, P < 0.001, interclass correlation coefficient = 1.000; SUV(max): R (2) = 0.988

66 water content [W] and pressure [P] with high correlation coefficients (82% < R(2) < 87%).

67 The method showed correlation coefficients above 0.99, LOQs between 0.13 a

68 Calculating intraclass correlation coefficients after controlling for case-mix,

69 formation at the mutation sites, the average correlation coefficient almost doubled to 0.82 (range: 0

70 Correlation coefficients among these different operation

71 Correlation plots and intraclass correlation coefficient analysis confirmed bilirubin int

72 The MAC + ONH achieved 0.76 Spearman's correlation coefficient and 0.87 Pearson's correlation f

73 ct calorimetry was analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analyses.

74 al images was demonstrated with the Spearman correlation coefficient and chi(2) distance.

75 Interobserver comparison (intraclass correlation coefficient and Cohen kappa) was followed by

76 The intraclass correlation coefficient and intergrader correlation coef

77 We used a Pearson correlation coefficient and linear regression to study t

78 correlation and concordance by Spearman rank correlation coefficient and the agreement in classificat

79 MT-SCCALR yields better or similar canonical correlation coefficients and classification performances

80 ng data, the complexity of the change of the correlation coefficients and expression values of the mi

81 Pearson correlation coefficients and one-way repeated measures A

82 ologic measures were assessed using Spearman correlation coefficients and t tests.

83 We estimated intraclass correlation coefficients and variance partition coeffici

84 lass correlation coefficient (ICC), Spearman correlation coefficient, and Wilcoxon signed-rank test w

85 del, predicts the diffraction profile with a correlation coefficient as high as 0.996.

86 ed methods (e.g. autoregulation index, ARI), correlation coefficient - based methods (e.g. mean flow

87 r from 0.105 ug L(-1) to 51.8 ug L(-1), with correlation coefficient better than 0.998.

88 Results: The global correlation coefficient between BG and DDG signals was 0

89 The Pearson correlation coefficient between estimated and experiment

90 Correlation coefficient between full finger reperfusion

91 Pearson correlation coefficient between method prediction and gr

92 The intraclass correlation coefficient between point of care and expert

93 onvergent validity of the questionnaire, the correlation coefficient between the CDAT score and anti-

94 The Pearson's correlation coefficient between the forecasted value and

95 The correlation coefficient between the SRF area at baseline

96 lead SOI prediction was the slowest, and the correlation coefficient between the worst SOI prediction

97 are typically expressed as, or reducible to, correlation coefficients between baseline scores and rec

98 regression models, and calculated Spearman's correlation coefficients between costs and benefit level

99 Correlation coefficients between CRP and vitamin B-12 fo

100 easure striatal dopamine synthesis capacity; correlation coefficients between rs-fMRI time series of

101 res computed from day 3, the highest Pearson Correlation coefficients between the top two features se

102 The correlation coefficients between the two sets of measure

103 ween-vendor, differences were analyzed using correlation coefficients, Bland Altman plots, and a mixe

104 , right upper arm, right wrist) had adequate correlation coefficients but were statistically signific

105 features were selected using the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC > 0.85).

106 was then assessed using the Lin concordance correlation coefficient (CCC).

107 Reliability was determined by intraclass-correlation coefficient, differences between M1 and M2 d

108 was found between graders with an intraclass correlation coefficient (distance measurements: intracla

109 alyzed accuracy of these methods; intraclass correlation coefficient examined reproducibility.

110 The correlation coefficient for azoxystrobin, difenoconazole

111 The Pearson correlation coefficient for double-positive samples was

112 ent of ICU benefit was poor (mean intraclass correlation coefficient for each vignette: 0.06; range:

113 ole transplant biopsies, the mean intraclass correlation coefficient for glomerular counting performe

114 Mean concordance correlation coefficient for human annotators was 0.862,

115 Pearson correlation coefficient for yield and peroxisome abundan

116 ute-agreement, single-measurement intraclass correlation coefficients for interobserver measurements

117 Distributions of the F scores and Matthew's correlation coefficients for ligand-bound versus ligand-

118 Estimates of intraclass correlation coefficients for MAGNIFI-CD, the modified Va

119 Intraclass correlation coefficients for short-term variability amon

120 seline and follow-up scores (eg, intra-class correlation coefficients for total score = 0.78).

121 entrations predicted by the models exhibited correlation coefficients greater than 0.83 when compared

122 re used to filter stable radiomics (Spearman correlation coefficient > 0.7).

123 inations with high repeatability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient > 0.85), our results indicate th

124 n the (19)F and (89)Zr content in the blood (correlation coefficient > 0.99).

125 tures showed high repeatability (concordance correlation coefficient >= 0.80).

126 The majority of analytes achieved linear correlation coefficients >0.99, and all 105 analytes wer

127 cibility of CT was excellent (all intraclass correlation coefficients >= 0.95) without significant bi

128 dant in absolute terms (Spearman and Pearson correlation coefficients >=0.94).

129 dant in absolute terms (Spearman and Pearson correlation coefficients >=0.95).

130 idence interval: 0.88, 1.00], and intraclass correlation coefficient, > 0.99, respectively).

131 tors with sufficient concordance (intraclass correlation coefficient, >0.8; kappa > 0.6) underwent un

132 reproducibility of MRI were good (intraclass correlation coefficients, >0.99 and >0.99, respectively)

133 d lncRNAs significantly correlated (|Pearson Correlation Coefficient|>= 0.9) with 91 up-regulated gen

134 linear in the range 5.0-500 ng g(-1) with a correlation coefficient higher than 0.99.

135 ear over the range of 5-1000 ng g(-1) with a correlation coefficient higher than 0.9991.

136 ty was verified in the range 5-320 mg L(-1) (correlation coefficients higher than 0.9914) and the rec

137 planation tonometry (GAT) with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC(3,k)) of 0.783 (95% confide

138 played tracking in both children [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.905, P < 0.001] and th

139 is remarkably stable: The median intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) across all metabolites and

140 reliability was analysed using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and patient ranking consis

141 The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Spearman rank correlat

142 Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between the four PS measur

143 were assessed by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) from linear mixed effects

144 th or without T1D (n = 16) had an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.985 (95% CI 0.961 to

145 The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of each scan setup was cal

146 The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) ranged from 0.703 to 0.989

147 The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.55 (95% CI: 0.40-0.6

148 The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was estimated to assess re

149 The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to measure the re

150 Bland-Altman analysis, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Spearman correlation coef

151 assessed by Cronbach's alpha and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC).

152 l protocol was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

153 The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) between the automated det

154 a perfectly regular pattern) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to determine in

155 th 95% confidence intervals (CI), intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and Bland-Altman plots w

156 ted interhospital variation using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).

157 bserver agreement was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).

158 s bra was valid only during rest (Intraclass correlation Coefficient [ICC] = 0.79, mean absolute perc

159 higher for the reference cohort (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.94) than the prospecti

160 31.7 +/- 23.9 decibel-steradians (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.96).

161 ient and 3D FMBV reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]).

162 ordance between methods was good (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], 0.71), with absolute diff

163 Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland- Altman analys

164 Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman plots w

165 Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman plots w

166 olume on IRV was studied by using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and linear mixed models.

167 hm performance was evaluated with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between DL and manual (A

168 ETT-carina distances and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for the radiologists and

169 s across India, we compute the intra-cluster correlation coefficients (ICCs) of five major CVD risk f

170 Coefficients of variation and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for the

171 Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated, and Bla

172 Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to estimate re

173 Descriptive statistics, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and linear mixed-effect

174 Variability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).

175 erimetry (KP) were evaluated with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).

176 r variability was tested by using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).

177 d by using Bland-Altman plots and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).

178 tability was measured with use of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).

179 he distribution and dynamics (via intraclass correlation coefficients, ICCs) of the miRNA profile ove

180 In exploratory analyses, the correlation coefficients in these three regions between

181 ed from prior and post-treatment images, the correlation coefficient increased to 0.679.

182 ip is well established, and the value of the correlation coefficient is 0.9984.

183 d t tests, Wilcoxon rank sum tests, Spearman correlation coefficients, linear regression, and general

184 piration distribution, correlated (p < 0.05, correlation coefficient, Mann-Whitney) with those volume

185 ng high-quality contacts having the Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) >= 0.5 improves threading

186 pathogenicity predictor achieved a Matthew's Correlation Coefficient (MCC) of up to 0.77 and 0.73, ou

187 We first introduce the maximal correlation coefficient (MCC) to represent the between-n

188 The median correlation coefficient measuring the morphological simi

189 th lower monthly percentile ranking (Pearson correlation coefficient of -0.69; P = .01).

190 rdant between CGMs, with a mean Kendall rank correlation coefficient of 0.43 +/- 0.05.

191 Our initial mathematical model obtained a correlation coefficient of 0.43 between predicted and ex

192 mutagenesis experiments, showing a Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.59.

193 nsSNPs with an accuracy 0.80 and a Matthews correlation coefficient of 0.601, which is 9.1% higher t

194 ffective predictor of gene expression with a correlation coefficient of 0.67 (GPS) versus 0.33 (WGBS)

195 ulti-domain classifications with a Matthew's correlation coefficient of 0.799, which was 19.1% (or 5.

196 acy of 0.900, an F-value of 0.903, Matthew's correlation coefficient of 0.803 and an area under the c

197 An intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.83 was reached between the

198 with seizure reduction, with a Spearman rank correlation coefficient of 0.83.

199 the physiologically predicted values with a correlation coefficient of 0.84.

200 acy of 93.7%, recall of 96.63% and Matthew's correlation coefficient of 0.868.

201 tration of NAs in the samples with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.89.

202 1 600 proteins with a median CV of 10.9% and correlation coefficient of 0.98.

203 agreement between -1.68 and 1.69 bpm, and a correlation coefficient of 0.998 with reference to a sta

204 sity of GO-AuNPs linearly increases with the correlation coefficient of 0.9980 and the limit of detec

205 The intraclass correlation coefficient of 2TC V (T) values ranged from

206 The intraclass correlation coefficient of all observations was 0.988.

207 Intraclass correlation coefficient of full finger reperfusion time

208 Validity was confirmed by a Pearson correlation coefficient of r = 0.95 (EPCO r = 0.93; POCO

209 d 0.59 for the entire ligand, while the same correlation coefficient of the energy calculated from do

210 With data from six methyl groups, Spearman's correlation coefficient of the experimental scoring func

211 no difference in absolute error, gradient or correlation coefficient of the relationship between join

212 The average ensemble cross-correlation coefficient of the thyroid ultrasound images

213 tamorphic versus monomorphic with a Matthews correlation coefficient of ~0.36 and true positive/true

214 tides demonstrated high reproducibility with correlation coefficients of >0.995 between any two sampl

215 , and f(lumen) (all P < .001), with Spearman correlation coefficients of 0.74 (95% confidence interva

216 t than a Caco-2 Transwell system (Spearman's correlation coefficients of 0.906 and 0.302, respectivel

217 90, and 0.988, with intraobserver intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.989, 0.989, and 0.995.

218 ndent variables were items having intraclass correlation coefficients of at least 0.4 and the depende

219 owed high agreement, with overall intraclass correlation coefficients of between 0.82 and 0.95.

220 With age, the correlation coefficients of LT, LD, and LV were 0.526, 0

221 with experimental observations, with Pearson correlation coefficients of r = 0.79 and r = 0.86 respec

222 Intraclass correlation coefficients of the automatic pipeline with

223 weights correspond to the absolute values of correlation coefficients of the time-series of the two n

224 RDKit molecular descriptors achieved Pearson correlation coefficients of up to 0.836, 0.780 and 0.821

225 The concordance-correlation-coefficients of automatically measured stent

226 t variability (represented by the intraclass correlation coefficient) of the regional SUV quantificat

227 ing is estimated to be 0.68 (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient; overall survival, 0.71; progres

228 icantly associated with parasitemia [partial correlation coefficient (P(corr)) = 0.34; P = 0.01] and

229 GS was observed in all laboratories (Pearson correlation coefficient r = 0.996).

230 Duplicate TIMFIE sampling showed Pearson's correlation coefficient r = 0.998.

231 ver 2,900 human proteins exhibit a Pearson's correlation coefficient R between the hydrophobicity pro

232 The high Pearson's correlation coefficient R values are obtained from the c

233 the adsorption of Sb(III) by Fe(3)O(4)/HCO (correlation coefficient R(2) = 0.993).

234 correlated with each subject's Kendall rank correlation coefficient (r = -0.95; P < 0.0001).

235 rvival and overall survival using Spearman's correlation coefficient (r(s)), and the association betw

236 lationships were evaluated with the Spearman correlation coefficient (r(S)).

237 Correlation coefficient (R) and Bland-Altman analysis we

238 d with noble gas MRI scans using the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) and mean absolute error.

239 Pearson correlation coefficient (r), two-sample t test, or analy

240 voxelwise and patientwise analyses, Pearson correlation coefficients (r (voxelwise) and r (patientwi

241 Spearman correlation coefficients (r(s)) between the standardized

242 ity measures were compared by using Spearman correlation coefficients (r), and conditional logistic r

243 decreased total lung capacity (Spearman rank correlation coefficient [r(s)] = -0.40, P = .004).

244 correlation between FFR and CT-FFR (Pearson correlation coefficient, R=0.64, P<0.0001).

245 D improved the baseline predictors by 12% in correlation coefficient (r2) and 19% in root mean square

246 The dynamic range from 10 to 100 uM with a correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.985 was observed for t

247 correlated with anterior chamber cell count (correlation coefficient range 0.41-0.81).

248 and agreement was almost perfect (intraclass correlation coefficient range, 0.87-0.99).

249 Interreader correlation coefficients ranged from 0.918 to 0.995 (r r

250 Spearman's rank correlation coefficient revealed that there was a strong

251 The Spearman rank correlation coefficient (rho) was calculated to evaluate

252 istency was assessed using a Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (rho).

253 r sampling is estimation of the intracluster correlation coefficient (rho): the degree of relatedness

254 ations, we utilized a time-varying Pearson's correlation coefficient, spike-sorting, wavelet transfor

255 gression coefficients (SRCs) and semipartial correlation coefficients squares (SPCC(2)) were used to

256 Intraclass correlation coefficient suggested that 27% (95% CI, 19%-

257 SPRINT-Gly is 18% and 50% higher in Matthews correlation coefficient than the next best method compar

258 of Li-Fraumeni-like syndrome with a Matthews correlation coefficient that is 27% higher than the cont

259 We used Spearman's correlation coefficient to determine the degree of assoc

260 e used descriptive statistics and Spearman's correlation coefficient to investigate the association b

261 g, agglomerative hierarchical clustering and correlation coefficients to provide insight into outlier

262 in vitro peptidome resulted in satisfactory correlation coefficients, up to 0.8.

263 ection (down to ~100 bacteria/mL) and a high correlation coefficient value (> 0.99) in the range of 2

264 The intraclass correlation coefficient value showed excellent reliabili

265 The concordance correlation coefficient values ranged from 0.74 (A/H1N1

266 The intraclass correlation coefficient was >0.90 for OCT-derived maximu

267 ge features computed from day 6, the highest correlation coefficient was 0.680.

268 The median within-eye correlation coefficient was 0.72 (IQR, 0.59-0.79).

269 s obtained at the same visit, the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.946 (95% CI, 0.940-0.952),

270 The repeatability as measured by intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.977 for LPA and 0.958 for

271 The partial Spearman correlation coefficient was calculated for the correlati

272 Pearson correlation coefficient was used to analyze for correlat

273 Intraclass correlation coefficient was used to assess agreement bet

274 The Spearman rank correlation coefficient was used to assess correlations

275 Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to assess the associati

276 Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to assess the relations

277 Lin's concordance correlation coefficient was used to estimate the repeata

278 Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to investigate the rela

279 epeatability, measured using the intra-class correlation coefficient, was inconsistent and generally

280 sitivity, specificity, accuracy and Mathew's correlation coefficient were 0.7013, 0.7989, 0.7562, and

281 lass correlation coefficient and intergrader correlation coefficient were calculated.

282 relation coefficient (ICC) and Spearman rank correlation coefficient were calculated.

283 Test-retest intraclass correlation coefficients were >=0.90.

284 Concordance correlation coefficients were above 0.92 and the normali

285 All intraclass correlation coefficients were at least 0.97.

286 Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated for correlation

287 Subsequently, intraclass correlation coefficients were determined between feature

288 Pearson (r) or Spearman (r(s)) correlation coefficients were generated and evaluated.

289 Intraclass correlation coefficients were greater than 0.98 for all

290 Intraclass correlation coefficients were greater than or equal to 0

291 Pearson correlation coefficients were measured using bivariate c

292 egatively correlated with BP, but phenotypic correlation coefficients were relatively weak; HR was po

293 or primary and metastatic subgroups and that correlation coefficients were superior with mRECIST.

294 Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were used to assess correlation

295 ct Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and Spearman rank correlation coefficients were used to assess the associa

296 e to 24 weeks for both BCVA and CST, Pearson correlation coefficients were: ME from RVO, -0.35 (95% C

297 For baseline BCVA and CST, Pearson correlation coefficients were: ME from RVO, -0.56 (774 e

298 alterations could be distinguished based on correlation coefficients with chlorophyll a and often sh

299 tbands were found to have similar or greater correlation coefficients with respective urinary biomark

300 curacy, 18% in recall and 0.253 in Matthew's correlation coefficient, with an average accuracy of 93.