コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ed, by household, to continue or discontinue cotrimoxazole.
2 n or to ceftiaxone, and 13 were resistant to cotrimoxazole.
3 tinuing (n = 452) vs discontinuing (n = 384) cotrimoxazole, 0.4 vs 12.2%, respectively, had at least
4 = -2 (adjusted odds ratio, 1.70 vs not using cotrimoxazole [95% confidence interval, 1.28-2.25], P <
7 >25% became significantly different between cotrimoxazole and non-cotrimoxazole users after 6 months
11 g resistance (MDR)(resistance to ampicillin, cotrimoxazole, and chloramphenicol), extensive drug resi
13 e study is limited by uncertain estimates of cotrimoxazole coverage in programmatic settings; an inab
26 cocci and carriage of PCV7-type pneumococci, cotrimoxazole-nonsusceptible (COT-NS) pneumococci, or pe
27 ated children, the proportion colonized with cotrimoxazole-nonsusceptible pneumococci increased from
28 ated children, the proportion colonized with cotrimoxazole-nonsusceptible pneumococci increased from
30 ompared to current recommendations, starting cotrimoxazole only after a positive HIV test had the gre
32 participants with advanced HIV randomised to cotrimoxazole or enhanced antimicrobial prophylaxis in t
33 old treated with sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine, cotrimoxazole, or no antimicrobial agent were enrolled i
34 emic antibiotics (azithromycin, amoxicillin, cotrimoxazole, or placebo) on the gut resistome in child
38 indicated in HIV-infected women taking daily cotrimoxazole prophylaxis (CTXp) because of potential ad
41 alth Organization (WHO) guidelines recommend cotrimoxazole prophylaxis for children who are HIV-expos
42 is required in HIV-positive women not using cotrimoxazole prophylaxis for opportunistic infections.
43 anges in health care alongside the unchanged cotrimoxazole prophylaxis guidelines and call for a chan
44 -Saharan Africa and who abruptly discontinue cotrimoxazole prophylaxis have an increased incidence of
46 evidence has been generated from the use of cotrimoxazole prophylaxis in infants who are HEU, includ
52 confidence interval {CI}, 0.24-0.98]) after cotrimoxazole prophylaxis was introduced than before; th
53 ed with development of nocardiosis; low-dose cotrimoxazole prophylaxis was not found to prevent nocar
60 maintaining current recommendations; shorter cotrimoxazole provision for 3, 6, 9, or 12 months; and s
61 Changing current guidelines from universal cotrimoxazole provision for children who are HIV-exposed
62 d to see if either increases the carriage of cotrimoxazole-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in Mala
63 we model the potential impact of alternative cotrimoxazole strategies on mortality in children who ar
64 can help inform policymaker deliberations on cotrimoxazole strategies, recognising that the risks and
65 e and compared microbiome signatures between cotrimoxazole treated HEU infants (CTX-T infants) and HE
71 sted but was attenuated when modelling lower cotrimoxazole uptake, smaller mortality benefits, higher
73 In those underweight (WAZ < -2) at baseline, cotrimoxazole use was associated with a follow-up WAZ >/
74 ren who were stunted (HAZ < -2) at baseline, cotrimoxazole use was not associated with a follow-up HA
76 ntly different between cotrimoxazole and non-cotrimoxazole users after 6 months of ART and remained s
77 an change in HAZ among cotrimoxazole and non-cotrimoxazole users did not differ significantly over th
78 sistance to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and cotrimoxazole was 38.11%, with regional differences in s
79 ver injury due to antiretroviral therapy and cotrimoxazole was a frequent clinicopathological finding
82 fections with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (cotrimoxazole) was assessed to see if either increases t
85 herichia coli), only 24% were susceptible to cotrimoxazole, whereas 90% were susceptible to ciproflox