コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 unicipalities, and districts (collectively, "counties").
2 and New York State Department of Health (11 counties).
3 dence interval [CI], 0.5-0.9) in Mecklenburg County.
4 he higher incidence of COVID-19 in Milwaukee county.
5 population-weighted annual averages for each county.
6 n the volume sold of taxed beverages in Cook County.
7 case of Covid-19 had been identified in King County.
8 cy department (ED) visits in 3 United States counties.
9 e rates for various cancer types in 607 U.S. counties.
10 cally brought different hazards to different counties.
11 ction and fatality growth rates in pro-Trump counties.
12 ions in food-energy-water-CO(2) nexus across counties.
13 lected data from 54 referral hospitals in 27 counties.
14 d patient mortality compared to best tertile counties.
15 generating well-being estimates for 1,208 US counties.
16 of cases located in the metropolitan region counties.
17 oordinated and when testing rates vary among counties.
18 ture effects on mortality in urban and rural counties.
19 ies, and 1.98 (95% CI: 1.87, 2.10) for rural counties.
20 We found 48,454 deaths matched to the 253 counties.
21 w individual premises are distributed within counties.
22 l syphilis, and PWID, especially in nonurban counties.
23 siderable existing climate adaptation across counties.
24 for candidemia was conducted in selected US counties.
30 ncentrations for 36,406 CWSs (98%) and 2,740 counties (87%) and compared differences in means and qua
31 er in Democratic- than in Republican-leaning counties, a pattern more pronounced under Republican gov
32 as needed) schools and workplaces county by county, according to triggers for county-specific infect
35 , Washington, Public Health-Seattle and King County, aided by the Centers for Disease Control and Pre
36 l vote-by-mail in a staggered fashion across counties, allowing us to use a difference-in-differences
41 s syndemic in rural reservation and frontier counties and should inform the strategic allocation of p
46 ssociated with all-cause mortality for urban counties, and 1.98 (95% CI: 1.87, 2.10) for rural counti
47 higher in minority counties than nonminority counties, and almost all significant indicators of opioi
48 This study provides a method for cities, counties, and other stakeholders to evaluate the potenti
51 ntucky, Minnesota, New York, and Texas), one county, and one academic medical center and included 6,1
53 se losses are avoided (16% loss), but 57% of counties are allocated crops different from those curren
58 ority patient from a low socially vulnerable county, as well as a markedly higher risk than white pat
59 h population-based CRE surveillance in the 8-county Atlanta (GA) metropolitan area, all Escherichia c
61 l-based obstetric service losses in rural US counties between 2014 and 2018 overall and by county pop
64 reclosing, as needed) schools and workplaces county by county, according to triggers for county-speci
65 ailable dataset consisting of roughly 30,000 county-by-year observations on insurance-based measures
66 IgM antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 in Los Angeles County, California, as a marker of both active and past
67 lt inpatient healthcare facilities in Orange County, California, to explore the impact that detecting
69 years of age to those <55 years of age, and county characteristics associated with the availability
70 vel survey responses from residents of these counties confirm county-level behavioral differences and
72 ing (below/above county-specific median) and county (control: 8 schools, 1,319 participants, mean [SD
73 al Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm County Council, Swedish Research Council, Swedish Founda
74 vel Black population fraction accounting for county COVID-19 burden, comorbidity, and hospital financ
75 ncing than numerous other factors, including counties' COVID-19 cases, population density, median inc
82 t state statutes and regulations, all Kansas county environmental codes, and a representative sample
84 objective was to leverage on the Miami-Dade County, Florida immature mosquito surveillance system ba
86 mentally higher among patients from high SVI counties following colectomy (OR 1.1 95%CI 1.1-1.3), CAB
87 nt evidence for reduced viral spread in both counties following the statewide "Safer at Home" order,
92 s within counties plummeted: in 1940, 88% of counties grew >10 crops, but only 2% did so in 2017, and
95 tion who lived in highly socially vulnerable counties had an estimate 28-68% increased odds of a seri
97 proactive implementation of an SSP in Scott County had the potential to avert more HIV infections th
100 ient-level data were matched to county-level County Health Ranking data using transplant recipient zi
101 ls were used to examine associations between County Health Rankings and graft and patient survival po
103 data from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation County Health Rankings, the United States Renal Data Sys
104 CHS (Charleston Heart Study) and ECHS (Evans County Heart Study) in 1960 and the REGARDS study (Reaso
110 hrough the Emerging Infections Program in 45 counties in 9 states encompassing approximately 17 milli
113 mosquito trap densities in two well-studied counties in Illinois between 2005 and 2016 to determine
117 E percentages have increased in 41 out of 46 counties in the top 10 metropolitan areas of Texas.
119 lity from a sample of mobile phones in 3,100 counties in the United States during March 2020, county-
122 ars between 2011 and 2013 in Pozega-Slavonia County in Croatia, where we capitalized on a natural exp
126 ky, Illinois, and Texas); one county (Marion County, Indiana); and one academic medical center in Phi
127 odel, we simulated HIV transmission in Scott County, Indiana, a rural county with a 1.7% prevalence o
128 ases in the Milwaukee metro area versus Dane County, indicating that the effect of social distancing
129 ation in CVE percentages across metropolitan counties is explained by median income, the proportion o
130 rms, but at intermediate aggregation levels (counties) it is possible to estimate temporal diversity
134 omic vulnerability index is developed at the county level across the Contiguous United States (CONUS)
136 oning mortality between 2000 and 2015 at the county level among white, black, and Latino people.
138 ted an open-source data set with data at the county level on exposure to four tropical cyclone hazard
141 site combines documented case reports at the county level with ascertainment bias information obtaine
143 ntegrate several public datasets to generate county-level annual estimates of total 'bee toxic load'
144 ) investigate patterns and agreement between county-level assessments of tropical cyclone exposure ba
145 ses from residents of these counties confirm county-level behavioral differences and help attribute t
146 health care entities for lost revenues, and county-level Black population fraction accounting for co
147 d, reporting aggregate data at the state- or county-level can result in substantial underestimates of
148 ation data from 62,000 weather stations, and county-level census data on population demographics to e
153 iable linear regression models to adjust for county-level covariates related to demographics (ie, rac
156 investigate this concern, we combined daily, county-level data on shelter-in-place policies with move
157 the model's predictions empirically using US county-level data on the impact of Internet access on th
159 fixed effects and controlled for child- and county-level factors, and standard errors were clustered
160 SD increase from the climatic mean decreases county-level fishing employment by 13%, on average.
164 on in Lyme disease incidence than unobserved county-level heterogeneity, but the strongest climate-di
166 Here we incorporated 18 years of annual, county-level Lyme disease case data in a panel data stat
168 ties in the United States during March 2020, county-level partisan preferences, information about the
170 component-related CV mortality, adjusted for county-level population characteristics and baseline PM2
171 redict corn yields, specifically focusing on county-level prediction across 10 states of the Corn-Bel
172 to the 2017-2018 school year, we identified county-level predictors of median CVE percentage among p
173 most comprehensive multivariable analysis of county-level predictors of rates of COVID-19 cases and d
175 al procedural volume, hospital market share, county-level procedures per 10 000 persons, and patient-
176 e, 0-1; reflecting 0%-100% of market share); county-level procedures per 10 000 persons; and patient-
177 y in among-county mortality was explained by county-level race/ethnicity, poverty, uninsured rates, d
178 k communities that are typically obscured in county-level risk assessments and found that public scho
180 ed the association between a broad set of US county-level sociodemographic, economic, and health-stat
186 characterize the association between patient county-level vulnerability with postoperative outcomes.
187 echanical Turk [LabMT]) yielded inconsistent county-level well-being measurements due to regional, cu
188 Research data from 2009 to 2018 to calculate county-level, age-adjusted liver disease-related death r
191 ew York, Kentucky, Illinois, and Texas); one county (Marion County, Indiana); and one academic medica
192 Emory University (EU) in Atlanta, Georgia (5 counties), Massachusetts Department of Public Health (st
194 n New York HIV/AIDS, Referral Center at Erie County Medical Center (ECMC), 1422 participated in the c
195 er's Office (Seattle, WA, USA) and Snohomish County Medical Examiner's Office (Everett, WA, USA) in n
196 14 people who died with COVID-19 at the King County Medical Examiner's Office (Seattle, WA, USA) and
201 PANTS: Retrospective cohort study in Olmsted County, Minnesota, involving 550 patients who had their
202 the authors identified residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, who delivered between 1976 and 1982.
203 prospectively recruited residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, who experienced an event associated w
208 erval, 2.9 to 5.8%) and was highest in urban counties Mombasa (8.0%), Nairobi (7.3%), and Kisumu (5.5
209 able models, 61% of the variability in among-county mortality was explained by county-level race/ethn
210 ted group of population centers representing counties, municipalities, and districts (collectively, "
212 ure to wildfire PM(2.5) and mortality in 253 counties near a major wildfire between 2008 and 2012.
214 New York City, Long Island, and Westchester County, New York, within the Northwell Health system.
216 period, 34 AHC outbreaks were reported in 20 counties of 9 cities in Hunan Province, with a mean tota
217 schools including Year 9 students in the UK counties of Cambridgeshire and Essex were eligible for i
218 to what extent the health of LT recipients' counties of residence influence long-term LT outcomes.
219 ive at mitigating major disparities based on county of residence and helps yield equitable outcomes i
220 rolling for age at follow-up, calendar year, county of residence, and parental characteristics, inclu
221 City-based health system by age, sex, race, county of residence, and prior PCR-confirmed viral expos
224 raphic data are only available aggregated at county or coarser scales, so disease models must rely on
226 lyses performed on a local level (municipal, county, or state), with results communicated in a clear,
229 mitantly, the diversity of crop types within counties plummeted: in 1940, 88% of counties grew >10 cr
233 ication of IRS with Actellic 300CS in Migori County provided ten months protection and resulted in th
234 tween the annual proportion of children in a county receiving medical POHS and the probability that a
235 tion between the proportion of children in a county receiving medical POHS and the probability that a
237 income (1.35 [1.08-1.69]; p < 0.001), fringe county residence (1.08 [1.01-1.16]; p = 0.049), discharg
239 nd 39% larger in West Los Angeles and Orange counties, respectively, if outdoor water usage had remai
241 nce of human West Nile virus cases across US counties responded unimodally to average summer temperat
244 RS cases from 2005 to 2018 in Jiangxi at the county scale. The epidemic of HFRS showed the characteri
245 aft and patient survival, with worst tertile counties showing a 13% increased hazard of both graft fa
246 We show that the findings generalized to county socioeconomic and health outcomes and were robust
248 d-related posts on social media, to estimate county-specific flood thresholds for shoreline counties
249 county by county, according to triggers for county-specific infection prevalence, to a global strate
250 ool-level pupil premium funding (below/above county-specific median) and county (control: 8 schools,
255 carcinoma (PDAC) and the association between county surgery rates and cancer-specific survival (CSS).
256 es were correlated (r = 0.54; P < 0.001) and county surgery rates explained approximately half of cou
257 grams in women aged 40-74 years in Stockholm County, Sweden, who underwent screening with full-field
259 infection rate is 4 times higher in minority counties than nonminority counties, and almost all signi
260 trategy, we use a panel dataset of 211 pilot counties that received targeted PV investments from 2013
261 illion smartphones per day, we found that US counties that voted for Donald Trump (Republican) over H
262 COVID-19 cases and deaths were higher in US counties that were more urban or densely-populated or th
264 1998 and 2014, were matched on age, sex, and county to five controls from the population. Incidence,
265 but data are lacking at the local level (eg, county) to identify factors associated with variability
268 es and person-days lost to closure rise when county triggers are not coordinated and when testing rat
270 oncerted effort to remove wild pigs from the county until the last wild pig (of 376 total) was succes
271 ross the 10 top metropolitan areas in Texas, counties vary considerably in the proportion of school s
272 on among patients from a high versus low SVI county was 10-20% higher following colectomy (OR 1.1 95%
273 vid-19 in a skilled nursing facility in King County, Washington, Public Health-Seattle and King Count
274 a microsimulation model, calibrated to King County, Washington, that captured the spread of HIV and
277 ation in media markets for 771 matched rural counties, we show that rural residents are more likely t
279 ges associated with outbreak clusters in two counties were defined by a single base substitution in t
280 rmitted animals in Weld, Morgan, and Larimer counties were estimated at 1.9 Gg month(-1), 50% greater
281 2017, 4 California residents from 2 adjacent counties were hospitalized with suspected foodborne botu
285 asitological parameters of malaria in Migori County, western Kenya in 2017, in an area where primary
287 New Vaccine Surveillance Network in a single county, while reported norovirus outbreaks from 7 middle
288 find evidence that plant closures attenuated county-wide cases and that plants that received permissi
291 of wetlands varies widely across coastal US counties with an average value of about $1.8 million/km(
293 l mitigation, we identify several states and counties with higher risks of continuous community trans
294 d States between 1996 and 2016 and show that counties with more wetland coverage experienced signific
295 months [interquartile range (IQR) 13-14] in counties with surgery rates of 49.9% to 56.9% to 18 mont
297 ansmission in Scott County, Indiana, a rural county with a 1.7% prevalence of injection drug use.
298 any of 11,189 samples from 594 sites in 223 counties within 35 U.S. states and one site in Mexico.
299 set the foundation for a publicly available county yield prediction effort that complements existing