ライフサイエンスコーパス: creativity

1 rmance outcomes (e.g., helping behaviors and creativity).

2 The framework remains a three-level model of creativity.

3 ng the relationship between intelligence and creativity.

4 o frontal and temporal lobe contributions to creativity.

5 slab) would relate to laboratory measures of creativity.

6 hich may reflect a shared vulnerability with creativity.

7 in an environment stimulating excellence and creativity.

8 sign to sketch ideas for a theory of "big C" creativity.

9 erence is intricately linked to learning and creativity.

10 .e., how close we feel to others) influences creativity.

11 ity, we better understand the brain basis of creativity.

12 emistry and neural oscillations that underly creativity.

13 thus, homogenizing the culture and stifling creativity.

14 gatively impacting the outcomes of divergent creativity.

15 ability and credibility without constraining creativity.

16 s' dependency on stereotypes and boost their creativity.

17 s we related measures of social cohesion and creativity.

18 l evidence of the effects of psychedelics on creativity.

19 a novelty-seeking model linking curiosity to creativity.

20 as AUT performance aligns more with artistic creativity.

21 a male network) we see a negative impact on creativity.

22 sinhibited thought expression and deliberate creativity.

23 , and practitioners interested in bolstering creativity.

24 ts in .04-.09 standard deviation increase in creativity.

25 ealing key search strategies associated with creativity.

26 , and the rewarding effects of curiosity and creativity.

27 ry into the role of crystalized knowledge in creativity.

28 tory expectation) are linked to learning and creativity.

29 onditions and leverages parameter-controlled creativity.

30 ople understand the time course of their own creativity.

31 pattern-recognition skills rather than human creativity.

32 gyrus was predictive of trait differences in creativity.

33 predictive of state or trait variability in creativity.

34 does not significantly increase the level of creativity.

35 sing the diversity of thought and individual creativity.

36 zophrenia and bipolar disorder would predict creativity.

37 on resource sharing, research integrity, and creativity.

38 ted the specific effects of training musical creativity.

39 sociative networks of importance for musical creativity.

40 n related areas such as work performance and creativity.

41 of the models of organizational climate for creativity.

42 ikely to experience pathologically obsessive creativity.

43 undation called it one of the ten cradles of creativity.

44 roach to the life sciences or do they stifle creativity?

45 e diverse enough to truly bolster collective creativity?

46 e to AI-made art impact evaluations of human creativity?

47 ctional units for curiosity, motivation, and creativity?

48 13, 95% credible interval [-0.24, 0.49]) and creativity (0.22, [-0.14, 0.58]) to sizeable improvement

49 erent pathways and subtypes of curiosity and creativity; (4) creativity and curiosity "in the wild";

50 Creativity also plays an important role in supply the mi

51 otential contribution of gender diversity to creativity, also noted challenges stemming from conflict

52 terature, reveals both a growing interest in creativity among psychologists and a growing fragmentati

53 ocial determinants of health, communication, creativity and ability to collaborate and lead, statisti

54 rauma, often constrained only by the child's creativity and age.

55 The primary outcomes were creativity or no creativity and alignment with a creativity circuit or no

56 computational, and neuroscience research on creativity and associative thinking.

57 Based on evidence linking creativity and bipolar disorder, a model has been propos

58 s indicate a domain-independent link between creativity and brain health.

59 A potential path for enabling greater creativity and collaboration is through increased arts a

60 based scientific exploration that encourages creativity and cooperation.

61 nd subtypes of curiosity and creativity; (4) creativity and curiosity "in the wild"; (5) the possible

62 argue that the neurocognitive mechanisms of creativity and curiosity both rely on the interplay amon

63 Scientists and artists are both motivated by creativity and curiosity, and science and art can be mut

64 fixed), and how such flexibility may impact creativity and curiosity.

65 the wild"; (5) the possible link(s) between creativity and curiosity.

66 that might underlie developmental change in creativity and curiosity.

67 swering moral questions, which requires both creativity and curiosity.

68 pelling unifying framework for understanding creativity and curiosity.

69 et of cognitively complex tasks that require creativity and deep and deliberate information processin

70 significant challenges that require ongoing creativity and discipline, particularly with the emergen

71 The creativity and drive of young researchers has the potent

72 out the sessions, and behavioral measures of creativity and emotion recognition were obtained at expe

73 ata will multiply their value, while tapping creativity and expertise from every source.

74 process, biomedical AI agents combine human creativity and expertise with AI's ability to analyze la

75 mpassing most subspecialties in the study of creativity and focusing on twenty-first-century literatu

76 rlines its cost, whereas its relationship to creativity and future planning suggest its potential val

77 , but also has been associated with enhanced creativity and future planning.

78 solid-state sources is limited only by human creativity and imagination.

79 ce, which is critical for the advancement of creativity and innovation in science.

80 ardiovascular medicine has led the drive for creativity and innovation with a culture that has been a

81 nces constitute the most abundant sources of creativity and innovation, as they are based on the pass

82 f scientists who have a greater capacity for creativity and innovation.

83 eview of published literature and sources on creativity and innovation.

84 l education depends to a large extent on the creativity and innovative strategies used by educators a

85 both art and science, a blend of individual creativity and innovative technology.

86 ody of work in which an exceptional level of creativity and intellectual ingenuity has been used to d

87 and speed of performance as well as enhanced creativity and lower stress levels.

88 ich have been used successfully to encourage creativity and other employability skills in both large

89 Creativity and other positive traits have repeatedly bee

90 inated interdisciplinary effort, a fusion of creativity and practicality, and a healthy dose of luck.

91 ognitive domains and was observed to benefit creativity and problem-solving.

92 tely, there has been a recent decline in the creativity and productivity of the pharmaceutical indust

93 ings together suggest that language ability, creativity and psychopathology might stem from overlappi

94 ls and those with psychoses, indicating that creativity and psychosis share genetic roots.

95 regarding instructor expectations of student creativity and scientific accuracy.

96 setups - bridging the gap between scientific creativity and technical implementation.

97 nisms that potentially link stereotyping and creativity and the implications for marketing communicat

98 ction between the neural systems involved in creativity and those involved in emotion has not been st

99 is the very reason behind the inexhaustible creativity and world-leading research of this country.

100 interested in metacognitive categories like "creativity" and "innovation." As a way of thinking, hist

101 nal state, drug intensity, mood, energy, and creativity) and post-acute (anxiety) scales showed small

102 l variability in creative performance (state-creativity), and that in more creative individuals (trai

103 cent years have seen a wave of technological creativity, and a flurry of new methods and technologica

104 hods, it is inherently limited by the skill, creativity, and chemical intuition of the practitioner.

105 s correlates negatively with each measure of creativity, and correlates positively with three out of

106 weakening but also supports problem solving, creativity, and emotional regulation.

107 dagogical tool to foster student engagement, creativity, and higher-level thinking.

108 del does not address the iterative nature of creativity, and how it restructures one's worldview, res

109 greater discrimination and inequality, lower creativity, and lower happiness relative to loose states

110 s focused on the constructs of intelligence, creativity, and motivation.

111 nfluence on perception, imagery, memory, art/creativity, and numeracy.

112 These phenomena are clearest in verbal creativity, and roughly parallel the pressured communica

113 children to develop the intellectual skills, creativity, and wellbeing required to become healthy and

114 gative evaluation, and lower mathematics and creativity anxiety, replicating and extending previous w

115 rget article, we proposed that curiosity and creativity are both manifestations of the same novelty-s

116 Curiosity and creativity are central pillars of human growth and inven

117 ghted, and the various costs and benefits of creativity are discussed.

118 Curiosity and creativity are expressions of the trade-off between leve

119 Curiosity and creativity are manifestations of novelty-seeking mechani

120 itive-motivational concepts of curiosity and creativity are often viewed as intertwined.

121 These findings suggest that emotion and creativity are tightly linked, and that the neural mecha

122 urrence of synaesthesia, and its relation to creativity, are briefly discussed in respect of two unus

123 rugs demonstrated enhanced verbal and visual creativity as compared to neurologically healthy control

124 cessary nor sufficient to link curiosity and creativity as stated in the target article.

125 The phenomena also shape non-linguistic creativity, as in that of frontotemporal dementia.

126 tion framework supports scientific rigor and creativity, as opposed to the oft-repeated suggestion th

127 Creativity assessment included Comprehension of Novel Me

128 ernative uses task (AUT), a well-established creativity assessment, participants propose alternative

129 demonstrates the importance of understanding creativity beliefs for predicting creative performance.

130 am performance, study 8 found that declining creativity beliefs negatively influenced task persistenc

131 Demonstrating the impact of creativity beliefs on downstream performance, study 8 fo

132 a evaluation in the task allows us to assess creativity beyond idea generation.

133 s associated with a trade-off between higher creativity but lower order.

134 The model relates curiosity to creativity but this commentary focuses on creativity: (i

135 ing Model can explain incubation's effect on creativity by assuming an adaptive decision threshold.

136 plore the relationship between curiosity and creativity, by suggesting they align through novelty-see

137 These results demonstrate that human creativity can extend beyond the macroscopic challenges

138 adoption as a natural extension of synthetic creativity, capable of enhancing safety, reducing waste,

139 Damage to this creativity circuit by lesions (n = 56 patients) or neuro

140 tivity or no creativity and alignment with a creativity circuit or no alignment.

141 Cancer research relies on key values such as creativity, collaboration, research integrity and resour

142 Courage, confidence, creativity, compassion, charisma, character, and controv

143 osterior probability) of improved ratings of creativity, connectedness, energy, happiness, irritabili

144 Creativity, curiosity, openness, and flexibility all har

145 radiologists to revive enthusiasm, stimulate creativity, deepen their involvement, and intensify thei

146 Following this, we demonstrate that this creativity deficit dissipates when people co-create with

147 sualizations, comics, gesture, joint action, creativity, design, and more.

148 Second, creativity differences are pronounced at the extremes of

149 larly diversity of viewpoints--for enhancing creativity, discovery, and problem solving.

150 and then within disciplinary perspectives on creativity (e.g., biological, cognitive, developmental,

151 ed: memory accesses existing knowledge while creativity enhances it.

152 gly, a great deal of research has focused on creativity, especially in the past 20 years.

153 navigation, decision-making, sociality, and creativity evolved, in part, to enable success in food a

154 how that the FIT captures a unique aspect of creativity-goal-directed innovation-not assessed by the

155 Creativity has clear benefits for individuals and societ

156 To be sure, research into the psychology of creativity has grown theoretically and methodologically

157 Creativity has long been thought to involve associative

158 Chemical creativity has recently explored the development of more

159 Innovation and creativity have led to tremendous advancements in the ca

160 Neuroimaging studies seeking to map creativity have yielded conflicting results, and studies

161 ural bases of creativity, including artistic creativity, have become a topic of interest.

162 evidence of a link between stereotyping and creativity; here, we explore this link in marketing comm

163 In some cases the algorithm achieves "creativity," i.e., structures result that are better tha

164 to creativity but this commentary focuses on creativity: (i) It assesses the SoM + NSM model of creat

165 romote or suppress mind wandering, influence creativity in a writing task.

166 known about the biological underpinnings of creativity in children.

167 y, which potentially influence curiosity and creativity in distinct ways.

168 et of coordinates from additional studies of creativity in healthy participants.

169 tious diseases, they benefited from Rivera's creativity in melding microbiology's unique technologica

170 The genetic basis for the emergence of creativity in modern humans remains a mystery despite se

171 cognitive and neurobiological framework for creativity in nonhuman animals based on the framework pr

172 Several reports described enhanced artistic creativity in Parkinson disease (PD) patients treated wi

173 o challenge misconceptions about the role of creativity in science and technical precision in art.

174 Creativity in science requires the ability to recall inf

175 The role of creativity in the discovery and invention processes is a

176 ing greater variability and higher levels of creativity in the right-hand tail of the distribution.

177 Not that we needed a reminder of nature's creativity in the time of a pandemic.

178 The need is bringing forth great creativity in uncovering new candidate fuel molecules th

179 vity: (i) It assesses the SoM + NSM model of creativity-in-the-lab, showing that the focus on semanti

180 rries the potential for harm - curiosity and creativity included.

181 In recent years, the neural bases of creativity, including artistic creativity, have become a

182 ge content are generally used to investigate creativity, including CPS.

183 regions involved in human self-awareness and creativity, including late-myelinating and phylogenetica

184 ertain brain diseases, including paradoxical creativity increases.

185 of each participant, from which a "Composite Creativity Index" (CCI) was created.

186 Building on the creativity, innovation, and brilliance of individuals an

187 itical to harnessing the full range of human creativity, innovation, and talent necessary to realizin

188 ced enormously in the past decade or so, but creativity, input, and ingenuity of scientists from all

189 that sparked particular investigations, the creativity involved in imagining alternative outcomes an

190 These findings suggest that creativity involves an expert balance of two brain netwo

191 Creativity is core to being human.

192 The psychological study of creativity is essential to human progress.

193 frontal and other brain networks involved in creativity is highly modulated by emotional context.

194 Creativity is important for problem solving, adaptation

195 One of the most complex forms of creativity is musical improvisation where new music is p

196 Creativity is progressively acknowledged as the main dri

197 ed to healthy controls and to verify whether creativity is related to an impulse control disorder (IC

198 erogeneous conditions in which this artistic creativity is seen.

199 The expression of creativity is suspected to be different whether novel id

200 tudy suggests that holding together loss and creativity is the ordinary, but nonetheless remarkable,

201 The role of semantic memory in creativity is theoretically assumed, but far from unders

202 gh domain-relevant knowledge (study 2), when creativity judgments were elicited retrospectively (stud

203 both decreases and paradoxical increases in creativity, leaving the neural basis of creativity uncle

204 the arguments offered to support a curiosity-creativity link - a shared association with a common cor

205 The creativity literature is replete with dualistic construc

206 lts across three separate cognitive domains (creativity, mathematics, and spatial reasoning) reliably

207 d, and that the neural mechanisms underlying creativity may depend on emotional state.

208 idate on a measure of response divergence, a creativity measure that measures response variability.

209 etween semantic distance and two widely used creativity measures (the Alternative Uses Task and the B

210 elated at least as strongly with established creativity measures as those measures did with each othe

211 due to heterogeneous sample sizes, different creativity measures, and methodological diversity in the

212 QUIP-RS scores did not correlate with creativity measures.

213 Given that creativity might be affected by external execution, anot

214 esults suggest that children possess nascent creativity networks that form the roots for later adult

215 networks that form the roots for later adult creativity networks.

216 mage to this circuit aligned with changes in creativity observed in individuals with certain brain di

217 aligned with both decreases and increases in creativity observed in these disorders.

218 ents, we asked British residents to rate the creativity of advertisements and purchase intentions tow

219 s was inconsistent and often depended on the creativity of charities and industry and labour stakehol

220 close to giving adequate credit to the great creativity of chemists in the field.

221 on consumer information-while enhancing the creativity of ideas.

222 lems--can be an important way to harness the creativity of individual investigators, stimulate innova

223 iative and optimally leverage the effort and creativity of individual laboratories involved in it.

224 ructure has already accelerated the pace and creativity of many areas of Chemistry, Biology, and Medi

225 generation in healthy people by reducing the creativity of options produced.

226 aphic diversity can detrimentally affect the creativity of scholarship published in journals, the pro

227 ectrum of properties they cover, inspire the creativity of scientists and place perovskites in the le

228 interactions (PPIs) speaks volumes about the creativity of scientists in hunting for the optimal tech

229 pite persistent efforts in understanding the creativity of scientists over different career stages, l

230 networks are now empowered by the unlimited creativity of smartphone applications.

231 ich reactivity of these heterocycles and the creativity of the approaches involved.

232 ourcing, drawing from the vast knowledge and creativity of the machine learning (ML) community?

233 ecognized that will continue to exercise the creativity of the mass spectrometry community.

234 Creativity often entails gaining a novel perspective, ye

235 ress are known to impair problem-solving and creativity on a broad range of tasks.

236 First, human creativity on average is slightly higher than that of LL

237 with prior research, we found that people's creativity, on aggregate, remained constant or improved

238 cognition tied to complex processes such as creativity or meta-cognitive reasoning.

239 The primary outcomes were creativity or no creativity and alignment with a creativ

240 ty-seeking model suggests that curiosity and creativity originate from novelty processes.

241 However, classic creativity paradigms that minimize knowledge content are

242 hubs showed increased connectivity linked to creativity, particularly in areas related to expertise a

243 We tested the idea that creativity (planning an artwork) would influence the fun

244 gn of generative AI systems influences human creativity (poetry writing).

245 a and technology, increases performance on a creativity, problem-solving task by a full 50% in a grou

246 nts also completed the AUT and two real-life creativity questionnaires.

247 Creativity ratings of physical activity interventions we

248 A broadly accepted definition of creativity refers to the production of something both no

249 transition of brain activity from scientific creativity regions pre-training (left middle frontal and

250 Data on Nobel Laureates show that the age-creativity relationship varies substantially more over t

251 rch productivity, inform theories of the age-creativity relationship, and provide observable predicto

252 nd depth of the scientific workforce invites creativity, relevance, and differing views that directly

253 With planning, communication, and creativity, remote postdocs can be a fully functioning a

254 Great headway is being made in creativity research, but more dialogue between perspecti

255 This chapter reviews the creativity research, first looking to the relevant trait

256 easantness and the generation of novelty via creativity separately.

257 argue that any comprehensive brain model of creativity should consider multiple cognitive processes

258 Individuals higher in creativity showed more prolific technique generation acr

259 rain efficiency and biophysical coupling, in creativity-specific delayed brain aging.

260 guage-based feats such as reading books, and creativity such as musical performances.

261 Traditional neuroscientific models of creativity, such as the left brain - right brain hemisph

262 were relatively independent of learning and creativity, suggesting that these higher-level processes

263 In contrast to previous approaches to creativity support tools that required manually defining

264 nd divergent thinking remain key to enabling creativity support using technology(6,7), yet these prac

265 By assigning a standard creativity task on the same objects out of the scanner,

266 s) to generate novel ideas in an established creativity task.

267 Creativity tasks activated heterogenous locations, with

268 d to examine PD patients' ability to perform creativity tasks compared to healthy controls and to ver

269 tudy suggest that brain regions activated by creativity tasks map to a brain circuit defined by negat

270 reativity, while reversely studies assessing creativity tended to foster creative physical activities

271 Prior literature finds that creativity tends to improve across an ideation session.

272 (CNM), Remote Association Test, and Tel Aviv Creativity Test (TACT).

273 canner, as well as a battery of psychometric creativity tests, we could assess whether stimulus-bound

274 ex may give rise to specific forms of visual creativity that can be liberated by dominant inferior fr

275 r than undermines, the critical thinking and creativity that define scientific authorship.

276 and artificial intelligence (AI) to augment creativity that quantitatively demonstrate the promise o

277 plinary research, based on a systems view of creativity that recognizes a variety of interrelated for

278 g examples of technological improvements and creativity that will ultimately improve patient outcomes

279 the opportunity to express my curiosity and creativity, that a young person contemplating the scient

280 t occurs because people mistakenly associate creativity (the novelty and usefulness of an idea) with

281 ious funding, and focusing on innovation and creativity, the HDF is an integral partner in key discov

282 avior research, behavioral neuroscience, and creativity theories.

283 and that in more creative individuals (trait-creativity) this response was more strongly expressed in

284 uch semiosic qualities, as with higher-level creativity, this might be how they are able to overcome

285 nefits but require considerable planning and creativity to be successful.

286 onsistently found that people expected their creativity to decline over time.

287 ty of Texas, based on earlier evidence-based creativity training programs.

288 s in creativity, leaving the neural basis of creativity unclear.

289 essible targets, which is a testament to the creativity, utility and practicality of the underlying r

290 e neurological substrates of visual artistic creativity (VAC) are unknown.

291 ls with FTD and emergence of visual artistic creativity (VAC-FTD) were matched to 2 control groups ba

292 on the role of semantic memory structure in creativity, via measures of connectivity, distance, and

293 idated retrospective questionnaire and story creativity was evaluated by both human raters and a sema

294 gnment with effects of focal brain damage on creativity was tested using data from patients with brai

295 neuro-cognitive correlates of curiosity and creativity, we better understand the brain basis of crea

296 ubstantiating the link between curiosity and creativity, we propose a novelty-seeking model (NSM) tha

297 , FIT performance correlates with scientific creativity, whereas AUT performance aligns more with art

298 ity without inclusion does not contribute to creativity, while at maximal inclusion one standard devi

299 -task behaviour (k = 5) tended not to foster creativity, while reversely studies assessing creativity

300 uggested psychedelic-induced improvements in creativity with enduring psychedelic-induced improvement

301 In this review, we operationalize creativity within an emerging cognitive control framewor