ライフサイエンスコーパス: criticism

1 (Suggestion and Solution, Examples, Praise, Criticism).

2 turalism about mental content have sustained criticism.

3 cial stimuli, the communication of praise or criticism.

4 f operative risk, which is the basis of much criticism.

5 tly revised (to 6 hours) in response to this criticism.

6 dez-Diaz et al. provide more firmly grounded criticism.

7 tics, anthropology, archaeology, and textual criticism.

8 arental disease status and hence are open to criticism.

9 Moore retracted his claim after professional criticism.

10 d's first WET, then retracted his claim amid criticism.

11 alidity of adult ADHD initially faced strong criticism.

12 has been espoused several times with minimal criticism.

13 OM and PBM is challenging and under mounting criticism.

14 s instead met with substantial and sustained criticism.

15 s and accept the automated diagnosis without criticism.

16 ngle red fluorescent protein to address this criticism.

17 , generated substantial social and political criticism.

18 their contribution to the emergence of self-criticism.

19 lp from health professionals without fear of criticism.

20 ze the supporting data for and against these criticisms.

21 nd interpretation are not imperiled by these criticisms.

22 nd milk - the agency has been beleaguered by criticisms.

23 than measures of infection have been 2 major criticisms.

24 modification to incorporate suggestions and criticisms.

25 al legitimacy in response to antipsychiatric criticisms.

26 ed the supporting data for and against these criticisms.

27 proposal and respond to the following major criticisms: 1) Medical futility is simply an attempt to

28 Excessive criticism (49.3%, n=212/444), verbal abuse (42.6%, n=187

29 the evidence for such a decrease is open to criticism, a different type of evidence is needed.

30 evealed lingual gyrus activation during self-criticism, a marker of visual mental imagery, correlated

31 d that posts on Twitter tend to express more criticism about retracted than about control papers, sug

32 The criticisms acknowledge that data supporting the approval

33 We argue that many of the criticisms actually target the more restrictive account

34 A common criticism against such neural network models is that it

35 lation, examined the effects of key types of criticism against the Agency for Healthcare Research and

36 ch those observed in vivo, addresses several criticisms aimed at pure oscillatory interference and co

37 and self-forgiveness, helping to reduce self-criticism and build emotional resilience.

38 Participants commonly reported internalising criticism and described disconcertingly low self-esteem;

39 Contrary to prediction, relatives' criticism and hostility did not predict how well patient

40 Results starkly demonstrate the criticism and lack of support participants faced from so

41 To avert criticism and losses of trust, robots that adopt social

42 ping research has spawned healthy debate and criticism and offered insight into the question of why s

43 se, we carefully discuss each suggestion and criticism and reiterate the importance of having a theor

44 two fundamental self-regulatory styles, self-criticism and self-reassurance.

45 er patients') experiences of felt or enacted criticism and the consequent hidden anxiety.

46 end these to improve the transparency of our criticism and the speed with which quality data and idea

47 We discuss the proposed criticisms and extensions, with a focus on moving beyond

48 We have evaluated both criticisms and find that all samples display virtually i

49 Finally, we address potential criticisms and make testable predictions for future rese

50 ost hoc analyses revealed that the number of criticisms and odd thoughts correlated significantly (r

51 nteraction in which the number of relatives' criticisms and patients' unusual thoughts was assessed.

52 response we address additions to as well as criticisms and possible misinterpretations of our propos

53 We reply here to these criticisms and provide some additional clarification, in

54 We address these criticisms and reinforce the conclusion that plants that

55 As evidenced by recent criticisms and retractions of high-profile studies deali

56 endency to respond in such a way as to avoid criticism) and social approval (the tendency to seek pra

57 trengths of science-openness, humility, self-criticism, and self-correction-are exploited for politic

58 Here, we therefore address these criticisms, and in doing so provide a contemporary updat

59 other test statistics such as SKATs, higher criticism approaches, and maximum-single-variant-statist

60 ch as variance components statistics, higher criticism approaches, and maximum-single-variant-statist

61 Despite this adequate criticism, archaeology must retain a central role for st

62 Scientific scrutiny and criticism are the only viable remedies for bad science.

63 We argue that these criticisms are misplaced and explain why a coherent theo

64 We show here that all three criticisms are misplaced.

65 We concluded that these recent criticisms are unconvincing.

66 Those criticisms are unjustified, both within the approaches o

67 The current discussion focuses on criticism as a positive force for improving epidemiologi

68 This approach can be subjected to strong criticism as substantial aspects of the biological syste

69 f the influence of attachment styles on self-criticism at a neurobiological level.

70 nce in bacterial infections, it faces strong criticism because of inter-operator variability and the

71 ing additive interaction has come under some criticism because of possible misspecification of the lo

72 The criticisms Brosnan and de Waal offered of Roma et al. ig

73 I illustrate my criticism by addressing the heritability of imitation an

74 and then explore some common methodological criticism by analyzing a sample of contemporary coronary

75 eraging advanced language models, we measure criticism by analyzing whether reporting supports or is

76 In response to criticism by Guerrero-Bosagna regarding our statistical

77 Following criticism by Kondrashov, here we defend our methods for

78 "four questions" approach to strengthen the criticism by Maestripieri et al. of the non-evolutionary

79 tamin A deficiency, while faced with intense criticism by many leading scientists in the nutrition co

80 ion of patients' neurocognitive deficits and criticism by others would predict the emergence of patie

81 with captive chimpanzees has addressed this criticism by showing that experimentally created traditi

82 immediate, working memory, and the number of criticisms by family members, the interaction of CPT per

83 This explanation may lend support to the criticisms by Leggett and others to the standard tunneli

84 ch involving humans has been turbulent, with criticism coming from the federal government, the academ

85 entire history it has drawn both praise and criticism concerning its reliability, limitations, succe

86 regions as a baseline, we overcome previous criticisms concerning short time series and neglect of c

87 The criticisms, corrections, or suggestions present in 694 o

88 determine whether they included compliments, criticisms, corrections, suggestions, or questions, as w

89 ualism, but from a scientific viewpoint such criticism could be easily answered.

90 r alone or in combination with interpersonal criticism, did not predict the number of patients' unusu

91 The criticisms do not always recognize that the decision to

92 Perhaps most critically, the criticisms do not appreciate the urgency of strong scien

93 These criticisms do not detract from our key findings, includi

94 Traditional desalination methods face criticism due to high energy requirements and inadequate

95 his approach has recently faced considerable criticism due to issues such as high comorbidity and wit

96 his purpose, but this solution has come into criticism due to various disadvantages like notable toxi

97 s report and regional summaries, which faced criticisms due to its reliance on big data from the Glob

98 We believe that our target article and the criticisms, elaborations, and extensions of the commenta

99 Contra May's rationalist criticisms, emotions are not only able to carry morally

100 d than about control papers, suggesting that criticism-expressing tweets could contain factual inform

101 tional trust should pay special attention to criticisms featuring integrity-based trust-undermining n

102 of the Americas, but that work was met with criticism focused on the reliability of the materials us

103 Our criticism focuses on two main points: the undervaluation

104 Our work, which we term "quantitative criticism," focuses on case studies involving two influe

105 was the subject of extensive discussion and criticism following its online publication.

106 healthcare professionals have also attracted criticism for close relationships with the formula indus

107 However, this policy has faced criticism for its inability to enhance post-transplant s

108 Medical boards engendered widespread criticism for not imposing forceful sanctions, but consi

109 lantation (LDLT), the procedure has received criticism for the risk it imposes on healthy persons.

110 ill disappoint those who await complaint and criticism, for example, about the difficulties of doing

111 ctors used to triage patients and have faced criticism from advocacy groups due to the potential for

112 medicines, but this accord has been met with criticism from international aid organizations.

113 mited resources and confronted by skepticism/criticism from medical establishment.

114 l recent US Supreme Court rulings have drawn criticism from the medical community, but their health c

115 f hypervalency is commonly used despite some criticism from theoretical chemists.

116 such data are extensively collected-despite criticism from, especially, economists-by governments an

117 Here, we respond to criticisms from commentators and attempt to clarify and

118 parent negligence, the authors explore these criticisms from the perspectives of both the plaintiff-p

119 temperament rather than anger in reaction to criticism, frustration, or unfair treatment places normo

120 based testing algorithms: Generalized Higher Criticism, Gene Set Analysis and Gene Set Enrichment Ana

121 These assumptions have faced strong criticism, given implicit biases in metrics used and a l

122 Criticism has been levelled at climate-change-induced fo

123 of biological compartments using this assay, criticism has been raised that this method underestimate

124 A frequent criticism has been that phenol in DNA extraction solutio

125 One of the criticisms has been that the AI does not have any sense

126 tly been exempted from general discussion or criticism, has become an opportunity for the elected lea

127 However, the points of criticism have changed, reflecting recent paradigm shift

128 Criticisms have emerged that cancer medicines offer mode

129 Criticisms have focused on 2 areas: internal deficiencie

130 Criticisms have included that study designs and reportin

131 We acknowledge that some of these criticisms have merit, but assert that the foundational

132 old selection, based on the notion of higher criticism (HC).

133 Here, we explore their key criticism in more detail, clarify our position and expla

134 recognition to identifying nuanced political criticism in news articles.

135 r fostering yield resilience, but subject to criticism in others for their low productivity.

136 public policies, which have faced increasing criticism in recent years.

137 nce community, has become subject to acerbic criticism in recent years.

138 e is, first, to present and consider Paley's criticism in some detail and, then, to discuss some of t

139 We address these criticisms in our Response.

140 Other criticisms include insufficient data on the use of the p

141 Criticisms include the lack of a clear conceptualization

142 These criticisms include the suggestions that (a) neural respo

143 Criticism includes that SSD does not take time-dependenc

144 e organize these proposals, suggestions, and criticisms into four thematic categories and assess thei

145 at is the best way to ensure that scientific criticism is heard and understood?

146 has been said that "a writer's idea of sound criticism is ten thousand words of closely reasoned adul

147 ieve that the principal error of Blinkhorn's criticism is that he does not consider our result in the

148 A recent major criticism is that large randomised trials do not always

149 One criticism is that the benefits of rights-based reforms a

150 It is shown here that neither of those criticisms is valid.

151 e of the '-isms' in scientific discourse and criticism, it is important for there to be consensus and

152 s' working memory deficits and interpersonal criticism jointly predicts psychotic thinking, consisten

153 hese refinements, we suggest, overcome older criticisms, justifying the value of the new wave of rese

154 The criticism leveled against magnetogenetics as being physi

155 to increase in recent years in spite of the criticisms leveled against it.

156 In this Comment, we discuss the criticisms leveled in detail, and review some recently p

157 from equal-sized plots, it is robust to some criticisms levelled at fragmentation research.

158 Furthermore, we explain that many of the criticisms levied against differential privacy would be

159 However, it has faced challenges and criticisms, most notably a lack of clinical translation.

160 results show that, in contrast to published criticisms, neutral evolution in an exponentially growin

161 We support May's criticism of attempts to reduce morality to being primar

162 So too can it serve as a framework for criticism of biomedical research, theory, and practice.

163 general failure of management and results in criticism of contemporary management procedures.

164 These objections are often couched as criticism of determinism, reductionism, or methodologica

165 ronic diseases, contributing to both diverse criticism of guidelines and low degrees of trust in nutr

166 However, there is growing criticism of in vitro CRP studies that use commercial CR

167 A common criticism of LFA tests is that they have poor detection

168 We offer a friendly criticism of May's fantastic book on moral reasoning: It

169 Much of the criticism of meta-analysis has been based on simple misu

170 aches, provides a structured process for the criticism of observational studies, and helps avoid comm

171 Criticism of orthodox models of prejudice reduction is p

172 We respond to criticism of our recent paper by examining assumptions a

173 Most importantly, the criticism of our study design by Watts et al. and the de

174 Significant criticism of patient care was reported in 13% of cases w

175 ance for police reform in a period of strong criticism of policing.

176 Second, I argue that Brette's criticism of predictive coding as being intellectualisti

177 gs in light of the relevance of the specific criticism of previous experimental studies that purport

178 Second, try to avoid knee-jerk, obstructive criticism of proposed measurements.

179 A perennial criticism of provisioning ecotourism is that it alters t

180 A common criticism of randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) is tha

181 We argue that his criticism of research on foresight in great apes is misg

182 A criticism of studies observing fear conditioned cue-elic

183 raising technologies, and address the recent criticism of the appraisal programme with regard to trea

184 One criticism of the approach is an inability to validate it

185 nd gender diverse (TGD) youth-there has been criticism of the assessment and its recommendations, and

186 The criticism of the CDC investigation consists largely of a

187 en followed by a torrent of almost universal criticism of the claim on scientific and ethical grounds

188 Brette's criticism of the coding metaphor focuses on its presence

189 n this paper, the authors extend the growing criticism of the concept of pseudoreplication.

190 A common criticism of the field is that whilst the systems produc

191 A major criticism of the hypothesis that life arose in an early

192 AD is more complex and less clear, prompting criticism of the hypothesis.

193 The most compelling criticism of the latter 'methane hydrate' hypothesis has

194 One criticism of the overall sleep and memory literature-lik

195 contrary to public perceptions, local media criticism of the police has remained relatively stable a

196 ogether, our results thus add to the ongoing criticism of the standard practice of administering aggr

197 This study should not be interpreted as a criticism of the trend to use guidelines in general; rat

198 ulated much clinical research on AP but also criticism of the validity of the criteria for possible A

199 A frequent criticism of the WTO system is that it reduces national

200 Their desire to avoid such criticism of their moral status as 'good' parents create

201 Criticism of these methods (e.g. see Cooper, this issue,

202 One major criticism of these studies might be based on the unavail

203 re not found or only rarely found, prompting criticism of this heterogeneity.

204 A common criticism of this hypothesis is that mitochondrial funct

205 A criticism of this model is its reliance on unpredictable

206 care unit has largely escaped the withering criticism of those bent on measuring and improving the q

207 ssay sensitivity are also inadequate for the criticism of treatment guidelines.

208 A major criticism of using SECM in feedback mode for corrosion s

209 We tackle traditional criticisms of "no-fault" compensation systems for medica

210 One of the major criticisms of ALPPS is the associated high mortality rat

211 Over the years, criticisms of both the avoidance paradigm and the two-fa

212 ve methods, published critiques of CEAs, and criticisms of general CEA methods and reporting practice

213 ciliate Paramecium aurelia, and suggest that criticisms of her findings can now be reinterpreted.

214 One of the justifiable criticisms of human genetic studies is the underrepresen

215 The advantages and historical criticisms of meta-analysis are described, as are the ba

216 Criticisms of meta-analysis that are applicable are equa

217 We address theoretical criticisms of our approach by pointing out that while a

218 on obesity and chronic diseases and consider criticisms of past and existing dietary guidance.

219 This commentary considers their criticisms of positive epidemiology and suggests that th

220 has also been its shortcoming, with frequent criticisms of sampling inadequacies and questions regard

221 In addition to general criticisms of scientific studies on empirical aesthetics

222 discrimination across disciplines, consider criticisms of such definitions and show how other forms

223 Criticisms of such models have focussed on at least two

224 Criticisms of the ACA include the increased role of gove

225 In this viewpoint, we join recent criticisms of the gene-centric view and call for reinsta

226 We examined criticisms of the IARC classification process to determi

227 these and other ideas evolved, and I discuss criticisms of the ideas and our responses to critics.

228 As there have been many criticisms of the model, particularly regarding its rele

229 Then, the major criticisms of the SDT theory are outlined, and these iss

230 orous support for the recent hypothesis that criticisms of the state, its leaders, and their policies

231 We also discuss potential criticisms of this approach as well as strategies that c

232 Next, three criticisms of this overlap model are presented and addre

233 One of the criticisms of this research is that the exposure has not

234 These approaches have drawn criticism on ethical, empirical and theoretical grounds.

235 To what extent might institutional criticism on social media be responsible for such politi

236 Bowers et al. focus their criticisms on research that compares behavioral and brai

237 rnational policy instruments exposes them to criticism or abandonment and reduces opportunities to im

238 Poor sensitivity, hostility, criticism, or disinterest characterize maternal-child in

239 ons of biologists and a target of continuous criticism over many years.

240 pirical support, it has received substantial criticism over the years since it was proclaimed in the

241 we argue in the article, in formulating his criticism, Paley completely overlooks a rich tradition o

242 y has not been complacent in its response to criticism: preclinical stroke studies now demonstrate co

243 omparison individuals, to negative comments (criticism) referring to themselves.

244 lopment of such tools is essential for model criticism, refinement, and calibration.

245 This criticism reflects changing views on patient autonomy an

246 One main criticism regarding neural network potentials is that th

247 owever, P-values are coming under increasing criticism relating to their questionable accuracy and re

248 available evidence and multinational expert criticism, revised the Rome II diagnostic criteria for t

249 bers, the interaction of CPT performance and criticism significantly predicted the number of patients

250 While criticism spiked in the aftermath of high-profile police

251 These criticisms state that the brain disease view is determin

252 Both criticisms suffer from a miscomprehension of the definit

253 ave been subjected to a variety of technical criticisms suggesting that the specificity may not be re

254 Felt or enacted criticism teaches parents informal social rules which di

255 s using prior sensitivity analysis and model criticism techniques.

256 efore looking carefully at the real thing--a criticism that applies also to studies with microRNAs.

257 nitive Gadgets provided some 30,000 words of criticism that are of much greater scientific value than

258 One criticism that has been posed regarding the validity of

259 ctual or biased; this feeds into the general criticism that machine learning models are designed to o

260 A recent criticism that the biological species concept (BSC) undu

261 However, they are too quick to dismiss the criticism that their proposed paradigm is atheoretical.

262 art of this two-part series will discuss the criticisms that have been leveled at the pharmaceutical

263 Part 1 of this two-part series discussed the criticisms that have been leveled at the pharmaceutical

264 In this article, we evaluate the criticisms that have been leveled at this approach and p

265 lex interventions, and considers some of the criticisms that have been published in response to the g

266 It has also been the target of numerous criticisms that have elicited the introduction of a plet

267 h they become vulnerable to some of the same criticisms that they level against stereotype theory As

268 Lastly, the criticisms that were raised by a subset of commentaries

269 Faced with mounting criticism, the ABIM suspended certain content requiremen

270 d itself at the center of a growing storm of criticism, the complexities of the ongoing nutrition deb

271 Despite this criticism, the use of variables encoding racial/ethnic c

272 not been validated and have been subject to criticism, they are prompting prospective studies and mo

273 be concerned about all types of social media criticism, those featuring morally charged trust-undermi

274 Second, we address criticisms to the effect that our article was misdirecte

275 ine platforms and identify at scale audience criticism toward them.

276 al cancer, is intended to offer constructive criticism towards the TNM classification of colorectal c

277 attachment styles and neural markers of self-criticism using fMRI.

278 Criticisms usually regarded interpretation (n = 286), me

279 a single exposure to any of the key types of criticism was sufficient to undermine institutional trus

280 The main criticism was that the Virtual ACE Tracker that displaye

281 Despite recent criticism, we argue that the supergene concept remains r

282 Affirming and expanding earlier criticism, we demonstrate that inclusive fitness is inst

283 In response to this criticism, we have developed a freely available tutorial

284 duction of symbols was met with considerable criticisms which could not be easily deflected with exis

285 ses and mental imagery when engaging in self-criticism, which have important clinical and broader soc

286 This criticism will be positioned in a wider range of finding

287 s attention to technical details who opposed criticism with hard work and strong family values.

288 r clinical phenomenon, has come under rising criticism with increasing calls for an etiologically bas