ライフサイエンスコーパス: criticize

1 c resynchronization therapy has been heavily criticized.

2 on a public role for which he was sometimes criticized.

3 s a measure of therapeutic efficacy has been criticized.

4 these studies have recently been extensively criticized.

5 or generic immunosuppressive drugs are often criticized.

6 inspired some of the theories that Frost has criticized.

7 gencies performed, has been both praised and criticized.

8 ticle misunderstands the research program it criticizes.

9 Stern has criticized a body of work from several groups that have

10 A recent commentary to Biophysical Journal criticized a previous study published in the same journa

11 2024;193(10):1313-1317) that criticizes a new proposal for "positive epidemiology." T

12 The app was adopted, used, criticized, adjusted and updated by the scientific and n

13 ociated predictions, and it has been heavily criticized and deemed obsolete.

14 l maps of reforestation potential are widely criticized and highly variable, which limits their abili

15 their emergence, consensus methods have been criticized and their rigour has been questioned.

16 role of the scientific community when using, criticizing and changing an existing method and the role

17 rimental data and extrapolation methods they criticize as being unreliable for evaluating cancer risk

18 While cost-effective, AI has been criticized as a "black box" that may inadvertently penal

19 entives for studies in children and has been criticized as a "windfall" to the innovator drug industr

20 s with community-acquired pneumonia has been criticized as a quality standard because it pressures cl

21 uared) thresholds, an approach that has been criticized as arbitrary and lacking evidence.

22 minor medical problems, and these visits are criticized as being expensive and economically inefficie

23 urrent strategy of drug development has been criticized as being highly inefficient.

24 terature, and the whole concept is sometimes criticized as being too artificial.

25 the bootstrap, is widely used, but has been criticized as biased in the genetics literature.

26 es, as well as proposed revisions, have been criticized as complex, clinically irrelevant, and costly

27 The current allocation algorithm has been criticized as contributing to decreased access to transp

28 Protected areas (PAs) have long been criticized as creations of and for an elite few, where a

29 s defined by diagnostic categories have been criticized as inadequately 'carving nature at its joints

30 This approach has previously been criticized as its accuracy depends on the precise additi

31 ce for their existence, phyla have also been criticized as lacking an objective definition, and conse

32 niques are inherently indirect and have been criticized as limiting the conclusions that can be drawn

33 ng money-centric approaches, which have been criticized as one-dimensional and risk either overestima

34 Spin labels have been criticized as perturbing the phenomena which they measur

35 's conception of cognition has recently been criticized as possibly too broad and unspecific.

36 However, such methods are often criticized as resembling black boxes with limited human-

37 tudies describing negative effects have been criticized as the experimental protocol did not perfectl

38 ture of the debate (above or below) has been criticized as too limiting, especially in light of conte

39 However, it is often criticized as too simple a model to describe animal move

40 Time-limited board certification has been criticized as unnecessary.

41 These approaches have been criticized, as structure alone cannot separate out wette

42 Herbicide use is among the most criticized aspects of modern farming, especially as it r

43 y, the use of 30-day mortality data has been criticized based on a theory that health care profession

44 This conclusion has been criticized based on data quality issues, statistical con

45 s safety and utility, the technique has been criticized because advocates had not provided sufficient

46 However, this contention can be criticized because it is not clear whether these observa

47 id background (B6SJL-Tg(SOD1-G93A) have been criticized because of high noise in this mixed backgroun

48 WGS assembly was initially criticized because of its perceived inability to resolve

49 C) in postcardiac arrest patients have been criticized because of patients with elevated body temper

50 This approach has been criticized because of the bias introduced by the selecti

51 design, molecular approaches are frequently criticized because of the inherent fragility of the resu

52 minal Aortic Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) has been criticized because of the need for frequent secondary in

53 However, this approach has been criticized because of uncertainties associated with rena

54 Nevertheless, these were criticized because some of the findings could be account

55 Nevertheless, programs have been criticized because they do not actually reduce carbon em

56 xisting transcriptomics simulators have been criticized because they fail to emulate key properties o

57 However, such studies have been criticized because they have not shown a direct link bet

58 The RUC's role and performance have been criticized but subjected to little empirical evaluation.

59 The hearing process has been criticized by discouraged whistleblowers who believe tha

60 he originally published FASP method has been criticized by several authors, who reported low digestio

61 s results in a circular analysis-as has been criticized correctly.

62 Hydraulic fracturing is often criticized due in part to the potential degradation of g

63 EDM is often criticized due to its low machining rates, therefore, in

64 in INS-1 cells, but these studies have been criticized due to: 1) the small insulin secretion respon

65 Commentators criticized, extended, and explored the implications of t

66 lack of interpretability and trust is a much-criticized feature of deep neural networks.

67 s rather than relative risk estimates and is criticized for assuming normally distributed errors.

68 Attachment theory is criticized for being based on momentary stressful situat

69 However, it has been criticized for being coercive and paternalistic.

70 Peer review is often criticized for being flawed, subjective and biased, but

71 Public health evaluation methods have been criticized for being overly reductionist and failing to

72 However, such experiments are sometimes criticized for being played for low stakes and by misrep

73 However, the 16S rRNA gene has been criticized for being too conserved to differentiate betw

74 Still, the bill is criticized for being too limited in scope, and also for

75 s testing global change hypotheses have been criticized for being too small-scale and overly simplist

76 nd naming main changes of oocytes, have been criticized for confusing and inconsistency of terms and

77 these areas, and medical students are often criticized for deficiencies in these skills.

78 Although the rankings have been criticized for emphasizing the subjective reputation of

79 The news media are often criticized for exaggerated coverage of weak science.

80 ical societies, although they have also been criticized for excessive relaxation regarding risk facto

81 p-shaped patterns, these syntheses have been criticized for failing to account for methodological dif

82 e the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) has been criticized for failing to protect stocks [2, 7-10], whil

83 ation [1-3], but global approaches have been criticized for failing to render global biodiversity val

84 ologic studies have been mixed and have been criticized for inadequate exposure assessment that often

85 ITS is repeatedly criticized for indel-induced alignment problems and the

86 y used Python DataFrame package and has been criticized for inefficiencies and scalability issues, wh

87 roborate the association, but they have been criticized for involving small numbers of cases, homogen

88 tcome, the number of OST-free days, has been criticized for its composite nature, which can obscure i

89 ican Lymphoma (REAL) classification has been criticized for its emphasis on the unproven clinical rel

90 edicted small liver remnants, which has been criticized for its high mortality rate.

91 ALPPS has been criticized for its high mortality, which is reported bey

92 The subunit approach has been criticized for its inability to elicit effectively cytot

93 However, the AUC has recently been criticized for its insensitivity in model comparisons in

94 However, the model is repeatedly criticized for its lack of proximity to original patient

95 sive tool for biological imaging; yet, it is criticized for its lack of specificity, slow acquisition

96 and cargo vessels known as reefers-is often criticized for its opacity and poor governance.

97 ICISS, however, has been criticized for its poor calibration.

98 ed using mean squared error, which is widely criticized for its poor correlation with perceptual qual

99 he English National Health Service, is being criticized for its small scale, isolation, and lack of a

100 e literature on father absence is frequently criticized for its use of cross-sectional data and metho

101 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been criticized for its weak enforcement of laws regulating s

102 The difference method has been criticized for lacking a causal interpretation when it i

103 se based on multiplicative models) have been criticized for lacking a causal interpretation.

104 Previous studies have been criticized for lacking experimental realism and appropri

105 tt ID NOW provides fast results but has been criticized for low sensitivity.

106 However, these approaches have been criticized for low sensitivity.

107 shown positive results, but these have been criticized for methodological reasons and conflicting da

108 This system has been criticized for neglecting to consider varying population

109 lobal carbon cycling; these models have been criticized for not accurately representing mechanisms of

110 lant graft survival assessments are commonly criticized for not identifying clinically meaningful dif

111 However, this rule is criticized for overestimating the predictability of FM-U

112 For example, HOT has been criticized for overintellectualizing consciousness.

113 bility for medical malpractice is frequently criticized for poorly performing its theoretical functio

114 gorithms of social media platforms are often criticized for recommending ideologically congenial and

115 They are then criticized for refusing to define religion and for relyi

116 elated age-at-onset outcomes, which has been criticized for requiring a stringent assumption about th

117 rimarily unresectable liver tumors, has been criticized for safety issues with high variations in the

118 ion of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans has been criticized for several of its evaluations, and also for

119 ndomized trials in cancer treatment has been criticized for suboptimal non-representative inclusion.

120 tisers and magazine editors have been widely criticized for taking digital photo retouching to an ext

121 ed; however, many of these studies have been criticized for their biases (eg, use of opioids, sex sel

122 Lower-income individuals are frequently criticized for their consumption decisions; this researc

123 Salmon farms have been criticized for their ecological effects, but the potenti

124 n studies of psychiatric disorders have been criticized for their lack of explaining a considerable p

125 near (stepwise) regression methods have been criticized for their lack of flexibility, their ignoranc

126 While Republican states have been criticized for their limited efforts to contain the spre

127 Although reservoirs and dams are criticized for their negative social and environmental i

128 the presence of TCMs, such studies have been criticized for their pre-/post- designs.

129 of these previously published studies can be criticized for their retrospective and nonrandomized des

130 s) in operative surgery have previously been criticized for using weak methodology despite no evidenc

131 minal shear bond test, despite being heavily criticized, has made it a routine procedure for the dete

132 We criticize his estimates of the extent of framing effects

133 This explanation has been criticized, however, due to a lack of evidence that micr

134 Our results were criticized, however, on two grounds.

135 diet and cardiac death, which was vigorously criticized in an article by Jacob Yerushalmy calling for

136 Subsidies are widely criticized in fisheries management for promoting global

137 rd divergence as the calibration point, were criticized in recent publications.

138 esearch in the United States has been widely criticized in recent years for requirements that delay r

139 tice of rewilding has been both promoted and criticized in recent years.

140 recurrence, its use as an end point has been criticized in several of these nomograms.

141 mined by the Draize eye test, which has been criticized in the past for its lack of reproducibility a

142 ssed caution about its use, and none heavily criticized it or prohibited its use.

143 been useful to foster research, it has been criticized mainly as it does not distinguish those forms

144 l personality disorders were associated with criticized/mistreated countertransference, and borderlin

145 However, such "A/B tests" are often criticized on ethical grounds even as similar, untested

146 lectrophoresis of polyelectrolyte chains, is criticized on several grounds.

147 as "reverse inference," has been previously criticized on the basis that it does not take into accou

148 Tredennick et al. criticize one of our statistical analyses and emphasize

149 d deceptive quotation of scientific work and criticize opposing science more than pro-mask communicat

150 Wicherts and Scholten criticized our study on statistical and psychometric gro

151 A commentary [1] criticized our systematic review regarding the use of di

152 pigenetic inheritance (TGEI) in mammals when criticizing our work.

153 which renowned scholars and Islamic clerics criticized polio vaccines.

154 uperior cognitive abilities has been heavily criticized, primarily because of the lack of experimenta

155 heuristics of medicine should be discussed, criticized, refined, and then taught.

156 elopment of these devices are underlined and criticized, respectively.

157 companying commentary, Rose and van der Laan criticize the relative excess risk due to interaction (R

158 oduct manufacturers, they are less likely to criticize the safety or efficacy of these agents.

159 Here, we criticize the underlying conflation between the predicti

160 Murayama and Jach criticize the use of high-level motivational constructs

161 von Storch et al. criticized the ability of the "hockey stick" climate fie

162 They strongly criticized the alternate approach of fitting g(s) distri

163 Recent reports have criticized the design of antidepressant studies and have

164 SHS increased atherosclerosis, the industry criticized the findings and withdrew funding.

165 Council issued a report in 2009 that heavily criticized the forensic sciences.

166 Farr and Nightingale, in turn, criticized the poor quality of hospital data.

167 The tobacco industry has criticized the surgeon general's estimates because they

168 nsive education about vaccine mechanisms and criticized the use of coercive financial incentives and

169 In recent years, some have criticized the use of placebo-controlled trials when eff

170 Brette criticizes the notion of neural coding as used in neuros

171 Brette criticizes the notion of neural coding because it seems

172 Lankford criticizes the notion that suicide terrorists are "norma

173 uite variable with recent systematic reviews criticizing the field for its lack of overall follow-up.

174 ed ways: circulating ideas, and defending or criticizing the ideas of others.

175 the results, no physician published a letter criticizing the Tuskegee study.

176 In this commentary, I criticize their teleocentric view as being incompatible

177 , we discuss pollutants abatement techniques criticizing their implementation in swine buildings and

178 Newell & Shanks (N&S) criticize theories on decision making that include uncon

179 However, we have criticized these analyses and conclusions because, from

180 We criticize this approach as being blind to the multiple c

181 We criticize this assumption and argue that top-down effect

182 Recently, Ferguson has criticized this framework and proposed two alternative e

183 Ramachandran criticizes Trivers' conjecture, arguing that the costs o