ライフサイエンスコーパス: critique

1 experimental investigation relevant to this critique.

2 yed a prominent role in the UNFSS nor in its critique.

3 oach which evokes Alan Newell's 20 questions critique.

4 But so does Jussim's critique.

5 ocess of learning, self-reflection, and self-critique.

6 We advance a two-pronged critique.

7 f grants that are frequently scrutinized and critiqued.

8 animal models, and computer simulations) are critiqued.

9 inimum inclusion standard were described and critiqued.

10 idual studies were identified, reviewed, and critiqued.

11 d several hypotheses on its pathogenesis are critiqued.

12 Gaps in the literature are identified and critiqued.

13 nce related to these impacts is reviewed and critiqued.

14 ting extensions and applications, as well as critiques.

15 s because our findings lend support to these critiques.

16 o examine the conceptual significance of TTC critiques.

17 ata for the ancient presence of O(2) open to critique(10-13).

18 o all affected health care professionals for critique; (3) implementation includes direct feedback on

19 concentration on the issue of abstraction, I critique (a) the philosophical nature of their abstract-

20 However, when critiqued, all studies were classified as weak because t

21 nt practice with intermittent evaluation and critique allows for skill acquisition and time efficienc

22 so the 2003 vaccination recommendations are critiqued along with perceived barriers to proper immuni

23 the observed patterns are provided, and the critique also identifies some potential problems with th

24 rovide published criteria for performing and critiquing an economic analysis.

25 ions are not affected by this methodological critique and clarify that the discrepancies between our

26 A critique and comparison of four published predictive ana

27 By leveraging natural language feedback to critique and suggest improvements to any part of a syste

28 ion and background, measurement options, and critiques and future directions.

29 We aim to summarize existing critiques and guiding principles in measuring gender and

30 Finally, we review previous critiques and identify fundamental weaknesses of this pe

31 However, their critiques and suggested improvements lack biological and

32 ocess incorporates nine steps: (i) review of critiques and suggestions and identification of problems

33 The commentators' critiques and suggestions point to useful refinements an

34 , self-correction, replication, a culture of critique, and controls for bias.

35 The authors provide an updated discussion, critique, and recommendations regarding the need for cle

36 oup discussion, broader Committee review and critique, and subsequent refinement.

37 In this review, the articles are critiqued, and their clinical significance is discussed.

38 nd electro-optical sensing are described and critiqued, and their uses and potential in imaging, phot

39 Values play an outsized role in the visions, critiques, and discussions of politics, religion, educat

40 i-agent reasoning module, which incorporates critique-and-verification loops to reduce hallucinations

41 Here, we argue that these critiques arise from a misinterpretation of the principl

42 The primary focus of this review is to critique articles published over the past 18 months that

43 Sentiment analysis of 76 critiquing articles indicated that opinions were, on ave

44 rpreted within the context of the structural critiques because our findings lend support to these cri

45 , but this approach has received significant critique, being considered by some observers overly ecle

46 e we develop global maps that address common critiques, build on a review of 89 reforestation maps cr

47 n of Gaia, went some way to addressing these critiques but, despite recent success in incorporating n

48 We address each point of their critique by controlling for cross-species body size vari

49 In the present review, we counter this critique by describing recently developed techniques tha

50 e review studies that have responded to this critique by employing a variety of innovative research d

51 I augment Lankford's critique by tracing these views to a simplistic situatio

52 Studies were selected and critiqued by 2 reviewers.

53 These statements were then formally critiqued by representatives of several sientific societ

54 al observations and uncontrolled trials were critiqued by the author.

55 ailable scientific evidence was examined and critiqued by the entire group to assess the strength of

56 l articles were investigated for content and critiqued by Z.T. and S.D.

57 The Hansen et al critique centers on the lack of spatial agreement betwee

58 It will also critique current utilization models and highlight some u

59 In addition, this review discusses and critiques current experimental and computational models

60 In their critique, Durif et al.[2] seem to conflate the separate

61 31, 2024, which comprised agents for content critique, dynamic search, knowledge retrieval, medicatio

62 The authors rightly critique existing social sciences approaches.

63 De-extinction critiques focus on animal welfare, ecosystem disruption,

64 The critique focuses on their treatment of the Paradox of Fi

65 My critique focuses on two interconnected foundational issu

66 erapy in the last 14 days of life), has been critiqued for focusing only on care for decedents and no

67 ene paleodemographic profiles that have been critiqued for having too few older individuals for subsi

68 However, it has been critiqued for its failure to predict a broader range of

69 ut previous literature on the topic has been critiqued for its reliance on cross-sectional data.

70 al sector's use of antimicrobials is heavily critiqued for its role in allowing resistance to develop

71 transplant system which has previously been critiqued for lack of transparency.

72 sonography has been developed, refined, and critiqued for over 18 years.

73 ng people's lives for the better, it is also critiqued for showcasing decontextualized perspectives t

74 ice, but have often also been accompanied by critique from within and without the field.

75 This critique has been a substantial part of congressional de

76 The critique has value but fails to appreciate the progress

77 However, several critiques have also emerged; taken together, they sugges

78 While industry setbacks and methodological critiques have highlighted gaps in evidence and challeng

79 We review these tools and critiques here.

80 This critique highlights one problem that is particularly rel

81 addition, the model allows one to frame and critique hypotheses about how the division cycle is regu

82 al neural networks (ANNs)) are presented and critiqued in reference to their use in chemical sensing.

83 dies of spatial frequency are reanalyzed and critiqued in this article.

84 ctical guide exists for addressing these new critiques in public health research.

85 was used to undermine evidence; this form of critique insisted on methodological perfection, rejected

86 It is proposed that the rationality critique is compelling and rightfully gaining influence

87 In other words, the main target of our critique is the model of change that underlies prejudice

88 Moving beyond critique, it is time to develop new research methods tha

89 biology applied to metabolite production and critiques its advantages and disadvantages compared to w

90 perators and device experts to summarize and critique key elements of contemporary RA technique, to i

91 thinking on definitions, conceptualisation, critiques, measurement, and capabilities.

92 From their unique perspective, the authors critique medical organizations' current MP discovery gui

93 ydration constancy hypothesis and provides a critique of applied methodology.

94 constituents and is therefore not a specific critique of articles espousing remote sensing of foliar

95 The critique of Barth et al centers on three points: (i) the

96 Borsboom et al. have written a trenchant critique of biological reductionism in psychopathology.

97 Finally, we focus on one common critique of cultural evolution experiments, the appropri

98 ers in a Series on oral health, we present a critique of dentistry, highlighting its key limitations

99 be the central feature in any discussion or critique of examinations given for the privilege of prof

100 From an informed critique of existing methods to the development of origi

101 as developed on the basis of an analysis and critique of existing science to (1) describe the psychol

102 d by J. C. Schank and T. J. Koehnle in their critique of experimental design.

103 Charney's target article continues a critique of genetic blueprint models of development that

104 In this Viewpoint, we present an empirical critique of how widely used implementation frameworks, r

105 In this Perspective, I outline the critique of informal reverse inference and describe a nu

106 A long-standing critique of latent factor theories is that the correlati

107 ayama and Jach offer a thoughtful and timely critique of motivation constructs.

108 A detailed critique of objective measurements of gastroesophageal r

109 Naylor's valuable critique of our study "Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and End

110 in recent reviews, provide a more systematic critique of past research, identify current research tre

111 Previous critique of phylogenetic reconstruction has claimed that

112 d time averages for quantitative outcomes; a critique of potential misuses; availability of statistic

113 In this article, the authors provide a critique of previous analyses of the relationship betwee

114 problems, as does the legacy of the postwar critique of psychodynamic psychiatry.

115 Firestone & Scholl's (F&S) critique of putative empirical evidence for the cognitiv

116 Our review and critique of recent large randomized trials in patients w

117 Finally, we attempt to integrate our critique of reductionism into a broader social framework

118 de worthwhile recommendations but that their critique of research by Levin and Banaji (2006) is unfou

119 Jussim's critique of social psychology's embrace of error and bia

120 A critique of such programs focuses on the uncertainty aro

121 Then, I suggest that the critique of the 'cranio-sacral outflow' invites, in turn

122 Finally, a written analysis and critique of the article was performed by each fellow.

123 into a transaction rather than an objective critique of the article.

124 Guala does not go far enough in his critique of the assumption that human decisions about sh

125 This review is an evidence-based critique of the available treatment approaches considere

126 5 for a critique of the binding by neural synchrony hypothesis).

127 Our exposition also constitutes a critique of the existing edge-centric studies, showing t

128 or virus detection is included, along with a critique of the experimental work dedicated to various v

129 tematic integration of search results; and a critique of the extent, nature, and quality of evidence

130 One critique of the ladder is that it prioritizes technology

131 s, their involvement in dissemination, and a critique of the limitations of PPI were not reported.

132 ponse clarifies, qualifies, and develops our critique of the limits of intergroup liking as a means o

133 A critique of the literature on this topic is given that l

134 We then offer a critique of the main intervention approaches designed to

135 We end with a critique of the model with regard to current views on po

136 ther organismal group and motivate a broader critique of the mutation cluster phenomenon.

137 erent variables in this practice and offer a critique of the quality control measures before, during,

138 onducting RBC transfusion RCTs have prompted critique of their design, analyses, and interpretation.

139 In this manuscript, we provide a rigorous critique of these advanced deep learning methodologies,

140 An important critique of these findings raises the plausible concern

141 A methodological critique of these studies follows, providing a springboa

142 o previously published screens, plus a later critique of these studies.

143 ne article from the literature and present a critique of this article to the group and faculty (Journ

144 A critique of this database and how it could serve the sci

145 They end by proposing that future critiques of and solutions to vulnerability, disaster, a

146 nt practices, alternative methods, published critiques of CEAs, and criticisms of general CEA methods

147 erian, extended mind, and niche construction critiques of computationalism - that is, views prioritis

148 Indeed, the sharpest critiques of Darwin's theory of evolution by natural sel

149 Now several critiques of ENCODE's narrative have been published, and

150 ccountability and equity underpin Indigenous critiques of genetic research and the sharing of genomic

151 The critiques of inclusive fitness theory have provided neit

152 We also address critiques of IST that have been raised over the years, s

153 The authors review critiques of Kraepelin's work published in his lifetime

154 Responding to critiques of nudging (e.g., that it does not promote age

155 We first describe critiques of professionalism and current challenges to i

156 anuscript, I walk through some of the common critiques of significance testing and how they relate to

157 article articulates Indigenous concerns and critiques of the conceptual and ontological framework of

158 Despite long-standing critiques of the conduct of underpowered clinical trials

159 ory of ethical and social challenges through critiques of the medicalization of deviance.

160 espite points of agreement with the authors' critiques of the motivation literature, I argue that the

161 Recent critiques of the paradox, claiming the time series relat

162 eds; we also acknowledge the limitations and critiques of using the apology-forgiveness cycle to prom

163 new model on effort and performance and the critique on existing resource-based models.

164 This is followed by a detailed critique on infrared spectroscopy applied to DNA conform

165 Norby et al center their critique on the design of the data set and the response

166 These agreements are frequently subject to critique on the grounds that ABS is either fundamentally

167 Lake et al. offer a timely critique on the recent accomplishments in artificial int

168 Newell and Shanks provide a useful critique on unconscious decision making.

169 D diagnosis to patients with cancer has been critiqued on conceptual and methodological grounds, and

170 Chen et al. critiqued our seed removal analysis, advocating correcti

171 Gusakov critiques our methodology for comparing the cellulolytic

172 We aimed to collate and critique papers reporting on interventions targeted at i

173 series was almost immediate, with a defining critique published in same journal 2 years later.

174 These critiques raise important concerns that deserve our best

175 argue that it falls prey to many of the same critiques raised about the existing construct level of a

176 This review will highlight and critique recent attempts to understand some of the cellu

177 dvocates for universal models of reading and critiques recent models that concentrate in what has bee

178 ing ideas of improvement, we find that their critique reflects an incomplete understanding of our met

179 s commendable, we do have a few constructive critiques regarding technical elements of their analysis

180 plinary expert panel searched, reviewed, and critiqued relevant English-language literature published

181 This review synthesizes and critiques research on early life adversity and stress ef

182 Frost's critique reveals the limitations of the reverse-engineer

183 Elliott's critique seems to single out psychiatric research with d

184 This Series paper critiques some of the key areas and controversies, summa

185 We critique studies that use science and math tests to pred

186 Two reviewers independently critiqued studies included in a recent systematic review

187 sible to readily integrate additional primer critique tests based on iterative feedback from the labo

188 e protected areas than outside, refuting the critique that they only occur in pristine areas.

189 s orthodox view has been subject to numerous critiques that question whether the ANS genuinely repres

190 Here, we critique the current mammalian models of GH/IGF-1 defici

191 Here we describe and critique the current models concerned with the proximate

192 he goal of this overview is to summarize and critique the current state of knowledge of the immunolog

193 David McCoy and colleagues critique the dominance of "lives saved" models of assess

194 We critique the evidence for patient selection techniques a

195 To critique the feasibility of this methodology as a qualit

196 Tropek et al. critique the Hansen et al. global forest loss paper in t

197 Here, we summarise and critique the last 10 years or so of molecular genetic (D

198 We also critique the myopic focus on prejudice reduction, but we

199 elected approaches to cultural tailoring, we critique the quality of research in this domain with a f

200 3-5) and 'filter bubble'(6,7) debates, which critique the roles that user choice and algorithmic cura

201 cal analysis in the Journal, Hutcheon et al. critiqued the existing evidence of the fetal benefits of

202 Studies have tested and constructively critiqued the procedure, hoping to increase the success

203 Numerous authors have critiqued the use of race as an etiologic quantity in me

204 -based perspective this review discusses and critiques the most recent advances in the field of subst

205 This article critiques the RVU-based system, highlighting its limitat

206 t failures and successes and collaboratively critiquing the experiments you're planning for your retu

207 ing careful attention to the methodology and critiquing the importance of the insight gained.

208 We distinguish three lines of critique - the arguments from congruency, confounds, and

209 Nearly a decade after our initial critique, the field remains reliant on a tool that model

210 Using participants' personal opinions and critiques, the AI mediator iteratively generates and ref

211 reviewers in better understanding, and thus critiquing, the methodology and results of submissions t

212 available information and, more importantly, critique their current practice, before employing this t

213 ng peptides administered once weekly, and we critique their proposed use for longer dosing intervals.

214 pain in their children, recent studies have critiqued their underuse of prescribed analgesics to tre

215 While supporting Brette's critique, these findings also suggest the need for more

216 These findings, however, have never been critiqued thoroughly for their statistical and biologica

217 This review then discusses and critiques three prevailing approaches focused on the ind

218 Further, a prominent critique to many examples of proposed animal cultures is

219 etermining 'significance', others extend the critique to suggest the 'p-value' should be dispensed wi

220 ogical perspective, discuss points of common critique to which GxE research is vulnerable, and addres

221 Second, 'mimicked scientific critique' was used to undermine evidence; this form of c

222 expectation, and appreciate their thoughtful critique, we argue here that their comment mostly restat

223 In this critique, we draw from work in healthy human populations

224 e spirit of disciplinary reflection and self-critique, we identify and review the manifestation of th

225 to 1) identify the use of and 2) review and critique Web-based resources for critical care education

226 usiasm for our findings, but we reject their critiques, which we find misleading and biased.

227 Bowers et al.'s critique will not make these models go away, but it is l

228 thods for the 16 replicate datasets from the critiqued work, and then comparing the ensemble statisti