ライフサイエンスコーパス: cross-reaction

1 mercial kits to determine the extent of this cross-reaction.

2 ucrose-containing medium showed little or no cross-reaction.

3 -specific IgA response and an asymmetric IgA cross-reaction.

4 anted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell cross-reaction.

5 genic virus via viral interference or immune cross-reaction.

6 -dimensional features that may promote their cross-reaction.

7 ce of homogeneous DRAG and glutaraldehyde in cross-reaction.

8 This raises the potential problem of cross-reaction.

9 due to a multiple infection rather than to a cross-reaction.

10 only one sample may allow for confusion with cross reactions.

11 to form via gas-phase peroxy radical (RO(2)) cross reactions.

12 tically significant B. burgdorferi serologic cross-reactions.

13 graph theory to disentangle the few existing cross-reactions.

14 000 TCR-peptide MHC class I interactions for cross-reactions.

15 ine against gonorrhoea could be explained by cross-reaction against a diverse selection of antigens d

16 ligand mimetics have low affinities and show cross-reaction among the three selectins, precluding eff

17 The assay was tested for potential cross-reactions among the three pairs of antibodies.

18 ty to the cognate proteases, with negligible cross-reactions among three cancer-related proteases cat

19 he mechanism corresponds more to trapping by cross-reaction and coaggregation rather than classical s

20 nd rye might also trigger EoE as a result of cross-reaction and/or cross-contamination with wheat.

21 information about contaminating antigens or cross-reactions and might exhibit inaccurately high sens

22 studies were performed using seroconversion, cross-reaction, and interference panels, archived clinic

23 ological distance and the strength of immune cross-reaction are expressed separately.

24 ence of new, so far unknown allergies due to cross-reactions are expected.

25 most efficient method of diagnosis, although cross-reactions are possible in patients recently vaccin

26 such as antibody titre boosting, waning and cross-reaction, as well as latent epidemiological proces

27 Possible mechanisms of acid-catalyzed cross reactions between the species are proposed to expl

28 )), high reproducibility (within 5%), and no cross-reaction between SARS1- and MERS-S proteins.

29 Furthermore, cross-reaction between the bacterial OspA and human LFA-

30 n was utilized to prepare a heterodimer by a cross-reaction between the molecules of the two componen

31 Here we investigated the serological cross-reaction between the two viruses.

32 -way LFI was designed to eliminate potential cross-reaction between two targets.

33 In cross-reactions between (bc)Pd(ns(CH)()3) and ns(X) (X =

34 eactivity with the antibody-cannot eliminate cross-reactions between antibodies in FRACTAL.

35 Cross-reactions between antigenic determinants on human

36 Allergic cross-reactions between cypress and peach have been repo

37 Cross-reactions between either 1 or 2 and various disulf

38 apoptosis, although there are no detectable cross-reactions between externally added and endogenous

39 These results indicated that cross-reactions between lentiviral vectors and LTR genom

40 alization assays showed variable immunologic cross-reactions between most of the AAV serotypes.

41 We failed to identify any cross-reactions between the synthetic peptides in the pa

42 etween antibodies can eliminate all forms of cross-reactions between them, enabling simultaneous ampl

43 es ( approximately 1/30,000), explaining why cross-reactions between unrelated pathogens are infreque

44 Interestingly, most co-reactions are cross-reactions but not co-sensitizations.

45 ce acids and bases in both self-exchange and cross reactions, by stepwise mechanisms utilizing the fa

46 amplify desired targets and avoid undesired cross reactions can be a combinatorial challenge.

47 CDR3beta loop that, when altered, modify the cross-reaction capability of the TCR to position 4 and p

48 We identified a single cross-reaction consisting of an anti-self TCR recognizin

49 3+/2+-His18 couple, and E0' = 176 mV for the cross-reaction couple, His82-Fe3+-His18 + e- --> Met80-F

50 ses from those that are part of self, immune cross-reactions do occur.

51 Cross-reactions due to infection with environmental myco

52 s homology filtering, minimizes non-specific cross-reaction, filters target sites based on RNA duplex

53 and HPV-45) exhibited detectable serological cross-reaction for the class of antibodies that inhibit

54 A cross-reaction has also been developed, allowing for the

55 and Schizosaccharomyces pombe proteins, and cross reactions have also been examined.

56 To probe this effect further, HAT cross-reactions have been performed with sterically hind

57 calculations highlight the need to consider cross reactions in the cell and suggest that localizatio

58 he sole carbon source showed a high anti-MTD cross-reaction in the cytoplasm, whereas cells that were

59 al for the probability of celecoxib inducing cross-reactions in AERD patients was calculated to be be

60 om each other, with only subtle effects from cross-reactions influencing the yields of specific oxida

61 This cross-reaction is intriguing yet important since it illu

62 ver, the directionality and quality of these cross-reactions is critical in determining their biologi

63 constant for the Cr(aq)OO(2+)/CH(3)C(O)OO(*) cross reaction, k(Cr) = 1.5 x 10(8) M(-1) s(-1), was det

64 in females are "bad" in males--analogous to crossing reaction norms.

65 Cross-reactions occurred in 96.3% of patients with histo

66 3) to 10(5) template copies/reaction, and no cross-reactions occurred with other Mycoplasma species c

67 oduce [(tpy)(bpy)Ru(III)OH](2+); and (3) the cross reaction of [(tpy)(bpy)Ru(III)OH](2+) and [(bpy)(2

68 -alpha and PCaPK-beta, and the immunological cross-reaction of expressed cloned fragments of these ge

69 There was no cross-reaction of human or AGM sera between RSV and PVM

70 normal host self-proteins, thus leading to a cross-reaction of immune response against virus with hos

71 Importantly, serological cross-reaction of M. restricta with C. albicans may lead

72 Paraneoplastic retinopathy is caused by the cross-reaction of neoplasm-directed autoantibodies again

73 SOA contained a product consistent with the cross-reaction of phenoxy and naphthoxy radicals.

74 Furthermore, the demonstrated cross-reaction of T cells with two common skin-specific

75 n within the ventricle can be explained by a cross-reaction of the anti-KChIP2 antibody with a differ

76 an anti-keratin 19 antibody, which is due to cross-reaction of the antibody with Nmi, and suggests an

77 plex V in leaves was not meaningful due to a cross-reaction of the antibody with the chloroplast form

78 pe II/1b (primers 389 and 492) abolished the cross-reaction of the antisense primer for genotype II/1

79 The cross-reaction of the BK.T-1 antibody suggests a possibl

80 Cross-reaction of the sensor with four reference molecul

81 tudied plant enzymes was demonstrated by the cross-reaction of the yeast enzyme to a antiserum direct

82 Unlike the reactions of lectins, the cross-reactions of most rabbit antisera with these polys

83 ns to evaluate whether co-reactions are true cross-reactions or co-sensitizations by allergens with t

84 lusive serotyping results due to nonspecific cross-reactions; or novel genotypes.

85 bioreagents in a multiplexed assay leads to cross-reactions, producing false positive signals that i

86 t (k(11)) has then been calculated from each cross reaction rate constant using the Marcus cross rela

87 For each complex, the cross-reaction rate constants have been determined with

88 oton and electron transfer self-exchange and cross-reaction rates have been determined for reactions

89 m hydrated protons and constituents and from cross-reactions that follow the initial step of ionizati

90 With these cross-reactions, the biological properties of the SW wer

91 motifs revealed a hierarchy in the degree of cross-reaction: The more frequent an allergen was positi

92 oated with ErbB2-specific antibodies with no cross-reaction to ErbB3 or ErbB4.

93 This now appears to be due to cross-reaction to multiple copies of 18-bp inverted repe

94 y detected all S. pneumoniae genomes without cross-reaction to negative controls.

95 on and on autoimmune diabetes occurring as a cross-reaction to viral antigens.

96 Plasma immune to DENV showed substantial cross-reaction to ZIKV and was able to drive antibody-de

97 Identification of proteins, cross-reactions to nuts, and ELISA inhibition tests sugg

98 s also has the potential to provoke allergic cross-reactions to plant foods.

99 a nearby tyrosine residue in an intersystem-crossing reaction to give a ferromagnetically coupled (S

100 with all group B reagents, but the number of cross-reactions varied with each kit.

101 No cross-reaction was observed with other HPV types.

102 No significant cross-reaction was observed.

103 timization of the microarray composition and cross-reaction was performed using an original approach

104 PE membrane were observed as expected, while cross reactions were spotted for P(4,5)BP/PtdIns(4)P and

105 Cross-reactions were detected with all group B reagents,

106 No cross-reactions were detected with other mycoplasmas, ur

107 One-way cross-reactions were observed by CCIF between TGEV Mille

108 Effects of cross-reactions were observed in the distribution of iso

109 No significant interference or cross-reactions were observed.

110 No cross-reactions were seen with other parasites or human

111 Although the specificities of the "cross-reactions" were similar for KIR2DL2*001 and KIR2DL

112 Cross reaction with antibodies against mucin gene produc

113 recognised gTSSA-I (74/146; 50.7%), with no cross reaction with common components of gTSSA-II/V/VI r

114 seropositive status of animals and to avoid cross reaction with other flavi-viruses.

115 base mutations with high sensitivity and no-cross reaction with the wild-type background, we show th

116 Arabidopsis mitochondrial RecA protein shows cross-reaction with a soybean protein of about 44 kDa, i

117 and extensive LC-MS/MS sequence analysis and cross-reaction with an anti-ES-10 antibody.

118 atory pathogens showed only one low-level H3 cross-reaction with an H10N7 avian strain and only at 5.

119 h B cells become anergic as a consequence of cross-reaction with autoantigen in the bone marrow.

120 ven commonly used grains, with only a slight cross-reaction with barely.

121 A, cMyc and AcV5 tags show relatively little cross-reaction with endogenous proteins in a variety of

122 hought to be pathogenic in the kidney due to cross-reaction with glomerular antigens, leading subsequ

123 le mollusk species in raw and heated without cross-reaction with non-mollusk species.

124 r therapeutic T cells, but toxic "off-tumor" cross-reaction with normal tissues that express low leve

125 west detection limit of 60ng/ml and shows no cross-reaction with other analogous organophosphates or

126 The system exhibits no visible cross-reaction with other common pathogenic bacteria, ev

127 eveloped to specifically detect ZIKV without cross-reaction with other FLAVs.

128 ae has been recognized in the MIF system and cross-reaction with other species is negligible.

129 sensitivity and a 100% specificity, with no cross-reaction with other viruses observed.

130 rt the idea that protection is mediated by a cross-reaction with self hsp58 in the joints.

131 oss-reactivity with each other and a one-way cross-reaction with T. phagedenis.

132 The antibody showed some cross-reaction with tetrahydro substance S (36%) which d

133 birch pollen allergen Bet v 1 and subsequent cross-reaction with the apple protein Mal d 1.

134 ose of the nonimprinted films and negligible cross-reaction with the tested nonspecific analyte.

135 In addition to the functional cross-reaction with Tn4399, a second distinguishing feat

136 Using rejection classifiers eliminated cross-reactions with acute injury, permitting separate a

137 Cross-reactions with certain hemodialysis filters, beta-

138 of the performance values were mainly due to cross-reactions with DNA from non-target species, which

139 vian and human assays exhibited unacceptable cross-reactions with feces from other hosts.

140 nical strains of S. porcinus were tested for cross-reactions with group B streptococcal reagents from

141 e distributions appear to be due to antibody cross-reactions with more abundant proteins.

142 There were no cross-reactions with non-H5N1 influenza viruses or other

143 f 0.2 ng/ml for C. difficile toxin B with no cross-reactions with other enterotoxins, nontoxigenic C.

144 Cross-reactions with other molecules in the medium are a

145 parvum DNA in human stool, and there are no cross-reactions with other parasites commonly found ther

146 nt IgM and syphilitic sera in the absence of cross-reactions with rabbit antisera to avirulent trepon

147 by serologic methods test their reagents for cross-reactions with selected S. porcinus cultures or an